@biancospino will this section of my role PM flip as Redacted?
Informed — You know that the following sentences are true about the setup:
Your "nights 1—101 activated Informed" ability will give you a piece of information about the following players: KayJayQueue, Gypyx, Hu Tao.
Your "nights 1—102 activated Informed" ability will give you a piece of information about the following players: Gypyx, Umlaut, experience, DrNickRiviera.
Your "nights 1—103 activated Informed" ability will give you a piece of information about the following players: Enchant, JacksonVirgo
In post 29, ketchup777 wrote:
@biancospino will this section of my role PM flip as Redacted?
Informed — You know that the following sentences are true about the setup:
Your "nights 1—101 activated Informed" ability will give you a piece of information about the following players: KayJayQueue, Gypyx, Hu Tao.
Your "nights 1—102 activated Informed" ability will give you a piece of information about the following players: Gypyx, Umlaut, experience, DrNickRiviera.
Your "nights 1—103 activated Informed" ability will give you a piece of information about the following players: Enchant, JacksonVirgo
Yes.
Informeds' information are always redacted upon flip.
In post 108, ketchup777 wrote:
VOTE: DrNick eh I changed my mind jambit or no jambit lurky slot so far maybe perchance a bit scummy
You really are pushing this Jackson thing aren't you? Are we a bit eager to get ahead of it before a clarification first? If what he claimed is true, I can understand why you would do this hear though.
Also, weekends are never great for me, and generally this time of the day is when I would be more active
im just bored my guy
Well I am here, let's spice things up then
if kjq, gypyx and hu tao were lying on a train tracks but you could pull the lever killing enchant and jackson but saving the others would you pull the lever
crumb of the groups of info
probs enough crumbs now
trolley problem too fun anyways (:
In post 19, ketchup777 wrote:
These groupings for info are unironically really good.
Group A I feel like Gypyx and KJQ should hopefully spew town if they are, but could be used for Hu Tao if I’m struggling on her late game (oh it’s the all female group)
Group B is all of the people I haven’t played with before+Gypyx, potentially the info is about Gypyx but if not then this helps me get info on someone I don’t have experience with.
Group C I struggle reading both Enchant and Jackson so this is great.
Depending on how the day goes order of priority probably C103—>B102—>A101 (I think C103 is the most likely to actually be useful info and not just something scuffed about Gypyx)
jackson seems town but he could also be informed scum and trolling so i think C103 is still the play for now
In post 61, JacksonVirgo wrote:
I’m town informed there’s a wolf between nick and ketchup
Imagine my rvs actually was on scum lol I guess that makes your vote make more sense though.
This post…
I think Kay is undertoning that she never succesfully RVSs scum. But the phrasing of this on a reread seems off.
What’s the difference tonally between 'Imagine my rvs vote was actually on scum' and 'Imagine my rvs vote actually was on scum’? I think to me 'was actually' would sound more natural, as in like, "wow, imagine I actually got the scum right in RVS for once!" whereas ‘actually was' sounds like "imagine an alternate world where my rvs vote was on scum". sounds to me as if Kay is scum and Nick is not her partner
In post 144, JacksonVirgo wrote:
The ketchup/nick thing isn’t absolute but I wanted to test something to see how accurate my assumptions were. I’ll elaborate further EoD, I do believe there’s a wolf between them.
The SK IC thing is as I said, there’s also mech info I have. I’m a super dumpy informed townie.
Why do you get the fun roles
this post doesn’t seem like Kay is superduperfun informed role, unless she’s bluffing.
In post 180, KayJayQueue wrote:
This is probably a dumb question but my role is my role, right? Like there’s no way that I’m actually something else I’m not aware of? There’s no mechanic that makes me think I’m good if I’m actually not, right?
dumb telling or similar perhaps. I remember looking briefly at Kay’s scum game in the past and she had a lot of this, though that was her first game on the site
hmmm probably tonally NAI though might come back here later. implication that she knows she might have done something?
In post 164, KayJayQueue wrote:
Okay I’m obviously way out of my depth here. If we can’t find a wolf and need to lim someone useless, both role-wise and knowledge of the game wise, I feel like dead weight. I really want to be helpful but I feel like everyone is speaking in code and it’s all flying completely over my head.
though with no wifom this would come from town, I somewhat feel like this is coming from wolf.
In post 191, ketchup777 wrote:
Kay, what’s your track record like with successfully voting scum day 1?
Ummm let me do some research lol
Interesting. Why was the reaction not more akin to 'Ummm I think it’s been decent. Let me check"? If Kay in town mindset, would she not remember her recent town stuff and be all too happy to share? But if Kay in scum mindset, might need to fact check
In post 191, ketchup777 wrote:
Kay, what’s your track record like with successfully voting scum day 1?
In 3 micros, I voted scum successfully twice on Day 1. In a mini, I voted incorrectly. There was a themed micro where we couldn’t talk in the game thread so I don’t count that - but I voted wrong there too lol
And any other games are either incomplete or unfinished.
.
In post 194, KayJayQueue wrote:
Is that helpful information here though because I feel like I have no idea what’s happening lol
9 minute or so gap before posting this. Is she starting to doubt herself in Macbeth fashion? why am i probing her for this? is she scared?
In post 191, ketchup777 wrote:
Kay, what’s your track record like with successfully voting scum day 1?
In 3 micros, I voted scum successfully twice on Day 1. In a mini, I voted incorrectly. There was a themed micro where we couldn’t talk in the game thread so I don’t count that - but I voted wrong there too lol
And any other games are either incomplete or unfinished.
When you say voted do you mean over the whole day in total or where your final vote landed? And did you auto discount your scum game from this list or include it?
You said successfully so I counted end of day 1 vote only and no I didn’t include my scum game.
'You said'- she was following the criteria I laid out and not free thinking
In post 61, JacksonVirgo wrote:
I’m town informed there’s a wolf between nick and ketchup
Imagine my rvs actually was on scum lol I guess that makes your vote make more sense though.
This post…
I think Kay is undertoning that she never succesfully RVSs scum. But the phrasing of this on a reread seems off.
What’s the difference tonally between 'Imagine my rvs vote was actually on scum' and 'Imagine my rvs vote actually was on scum’? I think to me 'was actually' would sound more natural, as in like, "wow, imagine I actually got the scum right in RVS for once!" whereas ‘actually was' sounds like "imagine an alternate world where my rvs vote was on scum". sounds to me as if Kay is scum and Nick is not her partner
With her decent d1 reads now exposed, this post reads worse than ever
villageread: me, Jackson, Experience
villagelean: Enchant
null: Umlaut, DrNick, Hu Tao (probs hu Taown tho hardly any activity so far)
wolflean+: Gypyx
likely wolf: KJQ
likely pairings:
KJQ/Umlaut
KJQ/Hu Tao
KJQ/Gypyx
KJA/Enchant
Umlaut/Enchant (Enchant dipping right as Umlaut gets back online…)
Gypyx/Hu Tao (the silent but deadly pair)
Nick/Gypyx, maybe
We are already alarmingly close to a mass claim, maybe I should make up some jokey crap informed info to fakeclaim incase my role is actually useful so I don’t die n1
I have to disappear for a bit, hopefully noone snipes 101