Newbie 617 (Over!)
-
-
Brandi Awwwrtist
-
-
Brandi Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Posts: 2426
- Joined: May 4, 2008
-
-
Brandi Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Posts: 2426
- Joined: May 4, 2008
-
-
Brandi Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Posts: 2426
- Joined: May 4, 2008
-
-
Brandi Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Posts: 2426
- Joined: May 4, 2008
-
-
Brandi Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Posts: 2426
- Joined: May 4, 2008
-
-
Brandi Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Posts: 2426
- Joined: May 4, 2008
Bah! This inactivity makes me sad.
Maybe you should look at the mafia wiki to get a better general knowledge on how to hunt scum? I think there are some pretty helpful articles out there... Though I can't really point to anything specific at the moment. My brain is all fuzzy right now, I just woke up, heh. I'm just gonna go back to sleep...Mike Zim wrote:Well i still cant see anyone suspicious. Damn it
How do you detect who is who?-
-
Brandi Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Posts: 2426
- Joined: May 4, 2008
How interesting.
Opportunism? Where did you get that from? It seems like you are just blatantly attempting to misrepresent my intentions despite the fact that I have previously stated that the reasonings for my vote were entirely facetious. It also seems that you are more so voting for the way I present myself as a person rather than anything that I have actually said or done. I don't really appreciate the ad Hominem, and because of such I find you to be a bit scummy.Armlx wrote: I can also support a Brandi vote, but more for her opportunism in voting Mike Zim.
Unvote: Mike Zim
Armlx, IGMEOY.
Clammy's vote strikes me as a bit odd as well, but not as much suspicious as that of Armlx's.
The vote that you randomly placed on me for coming from a screwed up cop game has just as much basis as you voting for me for inquiring who and how many IC's we have. You already proclaimed that being inquisitive about such is a "null tell" which basically means 'not a tell'. Why place more emphasis on one ill reasoning than another?clammy wrote:...and much'a'mora for seeking after the IC's in post 17, null tell, but so is knowing who they are.-
-
Brandi Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Posts: 2426
- Joined: May 4, 2008
-
-
Brandi Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Posts: 2426
- Joined: May 4, 2008
-
-
Brandi Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Posts: 2426
- Joined: May 4, 2008
-
-
Brandi Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Posts: 2426
- Joined: May 4, 2008
EBWOP: And I mean obviously because, in the beginning:
angelmouse wrote:@ Brandi...was that a serious first vote in the game rather than a random one?Brandi wrote:Obviously I was being facetious AngelMouse. ^_^
She got that it was random, why was it so hard for you to figure out?Angelmouse wrote:I was just checking! Tone of voice is sadly lost here.-
-
Brandi Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Posts: 2426
- Joined: May 4, 2008
-
-
Brandi Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Posts: 2426
- Joined: May 4, 2008
It wasn't an attempt at logic, I was just being silly. ;P Like the people who start off random voting for others because their usernames sound sinister, or because their avatar 'screams' scum. Such things like that. Its not a good or realistic reason, but its not intended to be aarmlx wrote:Random votes don't usually have attempts at logic behind them.seriousreason.-
-
Brandi Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Posts: 2426
- Joined: May 4, 2008
Well to answer to your specualations here:Bazza-Scumfinder wrote:Thanks brandi
wow things are becoming stagnant, we really need more posts!
after that little confrontation between brandi and Armix i wouldn't be surprised if one of them were mafia....of course it could be an attempt at distancing.
I'm more inclined to believe that Brandi is scum, although her rebutals seem unflawed, my last argument against her still feels valid. I would have liked an answer as to why you were pretty flippant in the beginning Brandi, you obvously read my post, didn't you feel the need to comment on my suspicion??
Is this usually your style in the beginning....what do you think about Armix and his comments about you???
I apologize for not addressing you earlier, that was rude of me. I'd have to say that the only reason I stated that my mind was 'fuzzy' was because it was 8 am and I didn't feel like looking around the wiki to direct Mike to something helpful. (I also don't know my way around the wiki too well like some of the other players here do) I was pretty much making a comment that wasn't really directed at the actual game at hand.Bazza Scumfinder wrote:She seems a little flippant....and saying things like "my minds fuzzy" is often what i view as being over cautious
I'm not completely aware of what you mean by 'flippant'. I take it that you mean it somewhat a long the lines of eccentric or enthusiastic. I admit that I am enthusiastic, but I wouldn't see that as something negative, or scummy. This is my firstofficialgame, because my previous game was never actually arealgame. It was very skewed due to a huge mod error.
I'm not aware of my 'usual' style, because I haven't had much experience at all to label any certain mannerisms 'usual'. I just know that the way I see the beginning of the game as is fun and friendly.
I'm not really 100% on my stance on Armlyx as of yet. (Or anyone else for that matter!) I was a bit suspicious of him when he was set on keeping his vote on me for my random vote, and when I confronted him about it he said he was unaware that my vote was random. So IMO, it feels like it was a misunderstanding. Then again, he could just be deceiving me. However, I don't believe this game has enough content yet to get a very good read on anyone. I do know that that can change at any time.
As for you, Bazza, well, you haven't done anything but speculate on a few players. I can't really find much scumminess in that, you're just throwing your opinions out there and asking valid questions, which seems pretty pro-town to me.
I do agree with you that we need more posts, I don't believe the games activity levels are TOO low though. Everyone has posted at least once I believe.
Hooray I made a long post!! Or maybe not hooray, I know some people hate looking at walls of text. I can be pretty verbose at times... ^^-
-
Brandi Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Posts: 2426
- Joined: May 4, 2008
-
-
Brandi
-
-
Brandi Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Posts: 2426
- Joined: May 4, 2008
Ok so, I did a quick re-read of everything posted up until now, and I still haven't gathered any major suspicions yet. I'm also a bit weary to read too deeply into everyone else's posts when 2 people haven't done any serious posting at all.
I do want to address the armlx-Mike-Zim thing.
Armlx, I know what you're insinuating, and I have to say that while I think that you MAY be correct in your assumption, I don't think you should have put even that thought out there. Because by insinuating such you are doing the very thing that you don't want to do:
It wasn't until that post that I realized what you meant. I'd like to point out that also, just because you have a hunch about someone, doesn't necessarily mean you are correct. Not everyone is going to want to follow your hunches either, and you are in no way confirmed town as of yet. For now I have a strong feeling that you are town, but I'm still leaving my mind open to the possibility that you could be scum.Armlx wrote: There are, and most of them have to do with giving out information that wouldhelp the scumdirect their kills correctly.
Also, I'd like to point out I agree with the way Caf is thinking here:
I believe it is too early to be giving anyone in this game special attention, As I mentioned before there are 2 people who haven't posted any major content and the town currently has 0 solid, confirmed, information.Caf19 wrote:I fail to see the reason for defending Mike that armlx is hinting at so I'm just gonna have to treat him like everybody else.
At first I thought that Mike was just being overly enthusiastic. (not a tell) Now I think he is enthusiastic but a bit overly submissive and cautious at the same time. He doesn't want to say or do the wrong thing. However, I think he is doing it in the sense that he just doesn't want to hurt the town. In some cases being overly cautious would be scummy, but in this case, it seems leaning towards town. Not that I condone being overly cautious, I would prefer if Mike would try to think for himself rather than just follow along with what everyone else is suggesting.Bazza-Scumfinder wrote:I'd like for Mike and Brandi to give their opinions on each other please.
One more thing:
Q-man has posted more than Angelmouse, but Q-mans posts are of much less value than Angelmouses thus far, which isn't saying much.Darox wrote: I would like to hear more from Angelmouse and Qman.
Q-man confirms, says he he'll post more when hes functional, tells Darox that he did make a post, states that no one else has posted much content, then says he'll be making a post 'tomorrow.' (which is now today) Hopefully we will see something from him soon, I'd like to hear him actually give us some opinions to work with.
AngelMouse has made 3 posts outside of confirming, and her last post was 3 days ago. She gives input twice, and once she was basically repeating something that I had already said to mike.
^Essentially the same thing I said to Mike here in post subject #46:Angel Mouse, Post subject #49 wrote:@mike - I don't think we are at a point at all that we can be making concrete desions on who is who. If you are completely new to the site, may i sugesst reading the wiki and possibly some other newbie games to get a flavour of what happens.
This makes me wonder if shes just saying it for the sake of being redundant or rather she just didn't bother reading what I said at all.Brandi wrote:Maybe you should look at the mafia wiki to get a better general knowledge on how to hunt scum? I think there are some pretty helpful articles out there...
Anyway, I can't say that I am suspicious of neither Qman nor Angelmouse, but their lack of input isn't doing much good for the town. Perhaps Q-man will be giving us content today, but I'm completely unsure with Angelmouse. If she doesn't say anything by tomorrow perhaps we should ask for a prod.-
-
Brandi
-
-
Brandi Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Posts: 2426
- Joined: May 4, 2008
-
-
Brandi Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Posts: 2426
- Joined: May 4, 2008
Armlx wrote:Brandi- She said she got it, yet she still voted him for it in her first post....
That makes absolutely no sense armlx. Thats the most backwards crap logic I've ever seen in my life. I'm scummy because I realized somethingnowthat I didn't before? Something that didn't even come to mind untilafteryou noted it in a much later post? It's called progression of events. REGARDLESS, my vote for Mike was R A N D O M. GENERALLY on page one there is this thing that takes place called 'random voting' in which the players vote for another player with out any serious logic or basis behind their vote. For more information, check the Mafia wiki here: Random Vote
Anyway, I only stated I understood your point, and that you MIGHT be correct. Ineversaid Iacceptedyour point. To completely accept your assumption on Mike would be MAJOR WIFOM.
Also, I disagree with your stance on Bazza. He has come off as slightly scummy to me in other ways, but definitely not in the way you proclaimed. He was just posting his assumptions, like everyone else. Nothing he has done or said has been remotely harmful thus far and I definitely see no indication of where he was insinuating that any sort of wagon should be formed, either.
You are gradually moving into my scumdar armlx with each post you make. I figured that you perhaps had a genuine interest in helping the town when you pointed out your certainty on Mike-Zim. However, you seem to be a bittoofocused on him muchtooearly. I don't find it very pro-town of you to only give your input when its relevant to you or your own personal agenda. I think that someone who is genuinely pro-town would try to give at least the slightest opinion on multiple aspects of the general conversation.
Inexperienced != confirmed town.armlx wrote:Mike Zim, however, is not an experienced player, and his statement is very easy to read.
His inexperienced methods of play could just as much be newb scum as it could be newb town.
I'm inexperienced as well yet you didn't have any problem jumping on me at the beginning.
Armlx, I think you have a very, very bad case ofConfirmation Bias.
QFT.Bazza wrote:IfMikeArmlx genuinely did believe that he felt Mike was a power-role there was no need to mention it so early in the game when there was little pressure on Mike.
Most scummy: Armlx, for reasons stated above. Which I believe is still not enough to warrant a vote. Definitely a HOS though.
Second most: Bazza, for his seemingly over defensiveness towards mike. Not necessarily a tell. FOS for this.
Neutral (In no particular order): Mike-Zim; Q-man; Angelmouse; Cammy
Least scummy would have to be Caf. Hes given a lot of unbiased opinions and seems to have a genuine interest in helping the town. Second least scummy would be Darox, for the same reasons as Caf only just a little less apparent.
BTW, I would like Cammy to give his input on some things, he hasn't been posting much as of lately, I almost completely forgot about him.)-
-
Brandi Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Posts: 2426
- Joined: May 4, 2008
I specifically stated I found him scummy fordifferentreasons.
Brandi wrote:...I disagree with your stance on Bazza. He has come off asslightly scummy to me in other ways...
He is number 2, but only because everyone else seems just neutral or simply very pro-town.Brandi wrote:Bazza, for his seeminglyover defensiveness towards mike.-
-
Brandi Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Posts: 2426
- Joined: May 4, 2008
Never mind about what I said about Clammy, I guess I didn't realize his last post was yesterday. It just feels like he doesn't have much of a presence here... Though some input would be nice whenever he gets back. And Q-man still hasn't posted yet today even though he said he would. I'm sure he has important things to do though. I would have made a post yesterday if I hadn't been so pre-occupied the whole day.-
-
Brandi Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Posts: 2426
- Joined: May 4, 2008
-
-
Brandi Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Posts: 2426
- Joined: May 4, 2008
-
-
Brandi Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Posts: 2426
- Joined: May 4, 2008
-
-
Brandi Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Posts: 2426
- Joined: May 4, 2008
So you are saying that asking for explanations for motives from other players is anti-town? EXCUSE ME? Obviously if someone states something and then refuses to give a reason for it, people are going to ask questions. There is NO way around it and it should be EXPECTED. You DO realize that this is aAngelmouse wrote:Now i got very early on at what armlx was hinting at and i think the matter should have been left alone from there.
Those that forced armlx's hand, so to speak, are those that i feel are much more suspicious at the moment than either of these two.newbiegame right? YOU may have the experience necessary to easily detect reasonings without them being given, but a lot of us do not. I'm sorry if I'm coming off as a bit harsh in tone, but I'm completely appalled at the audacity of those statements.
"It may haveAngelmouse wrote:I didn't like the first post. It may have been random, yes, but i found the reasoning too strong for this.been randomhad no reasoning, but the reasoning was too strong"
Lets take a look at the random vote 1 VS random vote 2.
clammy wrote:vote: Brandi was reading you were recently a cop*, obvscum**Brandi wrote:Vote: mike-zim for laughing maniacally about the role he recieved*. (Only scum would do such a thing!)***= random/silly/non-serious reasoning
**= sarcastically claiming it to be an obvious scum tell.
Also, just for kicks lets throw in the third comment.
In conclusion, its obvious. Bringing it up is just beating a dead, invalid point. But anyway, there are more important things to point out, such as this:Darox wrote: Vote: Bazza cause Bazza is Australian slang.*
I also think Mike is acting rather sinister. You know they must be evil if they have a mad scientist laugh!
Obvious misrepresentation. Please point out where I attempted to throw suspicion on the inactive players for their inactivity. I, just like many others, just pointed out that the game was in need of more participation from yourself and Q-man.Angelmouse wrote:I'm not too found of throwing suspicion on players that haven't properly made their mark on the game.
I did point out a minor,POSSIBLEsuspicion in regards to you, but it had NOTHING to do with yourinactivity.It had everything to do with your previous statements.
Anyway, I'm glad you came and gave your input on something. I'm a bit surprised Q-man hasn't posted yet, when he already stated that he would have made a post by the first.
I'm going to end this post for now, but I do want to address other things that have been said by other people. I'll do that in another post when I have time.-
-
Brandi Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Posts: 2426
- Joined: May 4, 2008
Same here, Darox. =/Darox wrote:
I really, really don't like that appeal.Bazza-Scumfinder wrote: I swear i am townie, voting for me is a mistake.
Very bad move Bazza. You claim to be an experienced player, yet you use the obvious logical fallacy of an appeal to emotion. If you want others to regard you as a townie, statements such as this are a major way to screw things up for you. Even if you are pro-town, it will be hard to take you seriously after something like this. Bazza, I'd like for you to explain your appeal to emotion, and why you thought it was necessary.
@Mike-Zim.
You don't have to technically be aggressive to not be submissive. I agree that this is very exciting, but I'd think that it would be more exciting to try and join in on the action than to just sit on the side lines and cheer. Also, not everyone has someone actively protecting them on a hunch like what is happening for you, you shouldn't use such as a crutch to not put serious input. Not saying that you haven't been contributing, just putting that out there for future reference.
Moving on..
I find it odd that that in regards to what Darox said here:
Clammy says:Darox wrote:For now, I am fine with Mike and armlx both staying alive today, but if I don't hear what armlx has to say on the matter day 2 then I think we should lynch both of them, starting with armlx.
Reason being, theres two likely reasons why he is doing this, and one of them involves them both being scum.
But then says:Clammy wrote: Cannot believe this was missed!
If you say that what he said was majorly overlooked then why do you claim that he got the town to follow him? If we followed a long with anything he has said, it was most definitely not that.Clammy wrote:smooth work convincing the town to follow you..
Personally I take Darox's comment as pure speculation. But I do not see any reasoning as to why Darox would claim that Mike should be lynched solely because of the way Armlx has been regarding him. Sure he is being defensive of Mike, but I really believe Mike never needed a defense at the time he began defending him. Mike had done nothing to incriminate himself. It would be unfair to decide to lynch him solely based on the actions of another player towards him.
So you are saying we should be suspicious of you?Darox wrote:I'd be more worried if you weren't suspicious.
So...attacking a person who hasn't done anything suspicious is pro-town? Obviously you believe Clammy's suspicions against you to be invalid. Does this mean you support straw-manning and red herrings? I'm very confused by your logic.Darox wrote:If anything, your attack has made me believe you're protown
As for Caf, I agree with most of his recent post, except for here:
I don't think a lynch of Mike just to get something out of armlx is a very good idea, and, as I stated in regards to one of Darox's previous statements, kind of unfair.Caf19 wrote:Personally, notwithstanding the relative inactivity of Qman and angelmouse (who need to post more today so we can form a proper opinion of them), I'd be happy with a lynch of either mike or Bazza.
..
..
I feel that pushing for mike's lynch might be somewhat as a reaction to armlx's confirmation.
For now Caf, I still feel that you are pretty pro-town. As for Clammy, I don't feel comfortable with his reserved-nature, it makes me feel like he is trying to hide something, but I'll give him the benefit of the doubt for now. Darox's responses to Clammy's suspicions towards him have me a bit puzzled and I don't know if I should take it as scummy or not.
Thats about it for now, I guess. I may give the game another re-read just in case I missed something crucial.-
-
Brandi Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Posts: 2426
- Joined: May 4, 2008
OMG UR TOTALLY RIGHT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111one HOW DARE ANYONE QUESTION ANOTHER PERSONS REASONINGS FOR THEIR STATEMENTS?! BACKING UP OPINIONS? PSSHH, WHO NEEDS TO DO THAT!?armlx wrote:definitely agree that those who pressed me were bordering on role digging.
I HAVE AN IDEA! FROM NOW ON LETS JUST PLACE ALL OF OUR VOTES AND STATE OUR OPINIONS BUT GIVE NO REASONS FOR THEM! IF anyone questions us we'll just say they are role fishing! THAT will make for a good game!
Thanks for that Armlx, if it weren't for you I would have never realized that mafia was all about expecting people to read each others minds so that they wouldn't have to back up their opinions!
HOW SILLY OF ME TO GO THROUGH THIS ENTIRE GAME POSTING MY ANALYSIS! FOR SHAME. I WAS DOING IT THE HARD WAY.
PS: I'd also like to thank Angelmouse for teaching me that all random votes are bad. I had no idea that SERIOUS was a synonym for random!
Armlx and Angelmouse are the best IC's ever! I LEARNED A LOT FROM THEM.
VOTE: Everyone who random votes and isn't a mind reader
/sarcasm-
-
Brandi Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Posts: 2426
- Joined: May 4, 2008
Dictionary.com wrote:
ran·dom
____-adjective
1.proceeding, made, or occurring without definite aim, reason, or pattern:the random selection of numbers.
2.Statistics. of or characterizing a process of selection in which each item of a set has an equal probability of being chosen.
...
___—Idiom
6.at random, without definite aim, purpose, method, or adherence to a prior arrangement; in a haphazard way:Contestants were chosen at random from the studio audience.
Analyze this:armlx wrote:Random voting wouldn't be worth anything if it wasn't analyzable
[roll]1d9[/roll]-
-
Brandi
-
-
Brandi Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Posts: 2426
- Joined: May 4, 2008
-
-
Brandi Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Posts: 2426
- Joined: May 4, 2008
-
-
Brandi Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Posts: 2426
- Joined: May 4, 2008
-
-
Brandi Awwwrtist
-
-
Brandi Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Posts: 2426
- Joined: May 4, 2008
-
-
Brandi Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Posts: 2426
- Joined: May 4, 2008
-
-
Brandi Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Posts: 2426
- Joined: May 4, 2008
-
-
Brandi Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Posts: 2426
- Joined: May 4, 2008
I really can't argue with point one, that there is no harm in telling the truth. Because if you are town, it would in fact be a mistake to lynch you. With point 2, I don't think that whoever jumps on 'the quickest' always works...Bazza-scumfinder wrote:My plea was for two reasons, (1) there is no harm in telling the truth, and me saying it should not be underestimated (2) An experiment which has been useful in previous games...When someone is the victim of a bandwagon they purposely do a move that (although not incriminating) is questionable....the people who jump on that most aggresively and quickly are often scum.
I HAVE seen games where a person uses an appeal to emotion and genuinely was town, so I suppose that voting you solely for an appeal to emotion wouldn't be enough basis. I think Darox provided other reasons a long with his vote, but armlx did not.
Also, I see your reply to Caf, but I don't see any indication of why you think he is being scummy.
Said scenario is plausible, said certainty is slightly contradictory. You say that Armlx is scummy for his certainty of mikes role, but would it not be equally scummy to be certain of armlx's role? I could just as easily argue that you and armlx are scum buddies and that you are just bussing him for his bad play and crap logic. If armlx was lynched and appeared as scum you would look more town for pointing fingers at him. I'm not saying that this is the case, but its the same kind of thing with your argument on armlx. So, how certain are you? As certain of his being mafia as armlx is certain of mike being town?bazza-scumfinder wrote: I am certain Armix is mafia. His certainty on Mike is just FAR FAR too scummy, As Scum he would have killed Mike night One and hoped that we looked at him as a townie after Mike is revealed to be a townie. (Only someone with extra knowledge would be so certain)-
-
Brandi Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Posts: 2426
- Joined: May 4, 2008
Nothing much to say about your second post Bazza except for that you now have 3 votes on you, not just 2. Also I wasn't aware of any deadline, I meant to question caf where he got that 12 days left. I know the mod said if he wants to make a deadline he will, but I didn't see that there actually was one yet...-
-
Brandi Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Posts: 2426
- Joined: May 4, 2008
It is not contradictory, Mike's certainty was based on One post (which i discredited in my last post) My certainty is based on dozens of posts and actions by Mike.
Also, if i were mafia i would not dream of bussing my buddy on Day 1 of this set-up, that would leave 7 townies and 1 mafia.....it would be almost impossible to pull off the win. Armix's certainty came within the first page...i didn't suspect Armix til more recently when i thought out of his possible motives.
Mike? You mean Armlx? Anyway, noted. But I have seen a game where a guy bussed his buddy on D1 and won the entire game without garnering very little if any suspicion. But it wasn't F11, it was California...
Also, I suppose I really can't argue with your arguments towards Armlx, they seem pretty valid. I'd like to see Armlx try to refute your points first before I decide if he really needs a vote or not. I already stated that be was number 1 on my scum list and for now, he still is, but I also think its possible that he could just genuinely be a disillusional townie who is caught up in confirmation bias.
Your recent posts are making me lest suspicious of you, and you seem to be genuinely devoted to helping the town for now... but I'm not completely ruling you out as possible scum either.-
-
Brandi Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Posts: 2426
- Joined: May 4, 2008
-
-
Brandi Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Posts: 2426
- Joined: May 4, 2008
I guess I was a bit out of line with the over use of caps lock, and blatant sarcasm. But I was just trying to make a point that I guess no one got. (Seeing as how being civil and putting logic behind my opinions wasn't proving very effective since no one cared to respond at that point.) I just find it really annoying that everyone seems to think that its ok to keep information and opinions to themselves. (Or at least, no one else has addressed this point.) As far as everything I've read in the wiki, hiding information as well as proclaiming that you are hiding information DOES NOTHING GOOD for the town... and I think its just plain ridiculous that someone would say that questioning another person's reasonings for their opinions when it isn't very apparent is role fishing. EVEN IF THE REASON has to do with a role, its not like everyone is going to assume or know that it does in fact have something to do with a case such as that.Caf19 wrote:Based on Brandi's recent posts (134 being a prime example), I think she needs to calm down.
Thats like condemning someone for asking for answers on the basis that they should some how already know the answer even if the answer is just something that another person just randomly thought up in their head. "You shouldn't have asked me that question because the answer is something that will screw you and everyone else over big time! YOU MUST BE GUILTY OF SOMETHING!"
Theres just 0 logic in that. Not to MENTION said 'information' in this case is really just an opinion for now.
I do know what Armlx was getting at in his opinion towards Mike-zim, but if he didn't want anyone to know his reasonings, he should have never told every one that he didn't want to GIVE reasonings. Mike hadn't had any serious attention on him whatsoever at that point, it was pretty pointless and anti-productive towards his supposed goals as a townie to rigorously defend him so early on.
I know this. I was pointing out that not every random vote can be analyzed. Technically though, if someones dice pointed towards someone who already had 2 votes on them, then voting for them regardless of what the dice said could appear as scummy and could be questioned. Someone might ask why they didn't just roll again so they could vote for someone with less votes on them. Also the fact that someone is using a dice could also gather a bit of suspicion. It might make a person look as if they are just trying to keep from being questioned completely.caf19 wrote:Actually, a lot of people think dice voting is useless. As it's provably random, there's no way anyone could actually feel pressured by it, which decreases the worth of the random vote substantially.
Also I'm a bit confused as to why Mike is number 2 on your list. He may have not been posting today, but I don't think that means hes been lurking....
Isn't that exciting though? I feel pretty excited myself whenever I awaken to see this game has a bunch of new comments that I haven't read yet. Its like getting a handful of candy that you've never tasted before. =)caf19 wrote:but every time I sleep there are a million new posts when I wake up
Absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence.Armlx wrote:Oh, wow, I just got it.
Bazza = scum
Caf = partner.
Notice how he just slips in caf and is trying to find reasons why. Pre-emptive bus / distance much?-
-
Brandi Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Posts: 2426
- Joined: May 4, 2008
armlx wrote:
What?Brandi wrote: Absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence.Wikipedia: Argument from Ignorance-
-
Brandi Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Posts: 2426
- Joined: May 4, 2008
-
-
Brandi Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Posts: 2426
- Joined: May 4, 2008
The fact that bazza had no evidence on his suspicions towards Caf is not any reason to believe that there should be a suspicion on him.
No one had really said anything against Caf until now, and at the rate bazza has been throwing out suspicions I'd say that thats even less of a case.
But yes, Bazza's list does appear to be OMGUS.-
-
Brandi Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Posts: 2426
- Joined: May 4, 2008
Man, you two sure have been arguing, Ill have to look over all this, armlx and bazza are both seemingly very head strong... x.x
Also I would like Angel mouse to post too as she said shed post more thoughts the other day but didn't. Granted I know she 'has a life.'
I don't think that she hasn't been posting is a reason to pair her with bazza, but when she actually posts her opinions that might potentially change that...-
-
Brandi Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Posts: 2426
- Joined: May 4, 2008
-
-
Brandi Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Posts: 2426
- Joined: May 4, 2008
Dear God, what the heck. This kind of arguing was unneeded. Bazza, you should have just gone to bed instead of stubbornly stayed awake to argue. Once you got some nutrients and fluids and ENERGY maybe it would be easier for you to THINK OUT your posts before posting them.
Reading through this, this morning, this is how my mind was going:
andClammy wrote:shut up! shut up! shut up! shut up! shut up! shut up! shut up! shut up! shut up! shut up!
QFT.Clammy wrote:2. Lol at Baz nonetheless as he's clearly not thought about this.
Right now I'm not 100% if Bazza is desperate scum or desperate townie... But man its a bit disappointing to see all that arguing and not a word from Mike, AM, or Q-man....
One thing I find interesting though, is that if Bazza was really just desperate scum, considering his other crappy tactics, you'd think he'd do something crazy like false claim a power-role. But you never know, its not like that happens all of the time.. He did already claim townie anyway. *shrugs*
This is going to be annoying to analyze *huff*... I'm gonna make breakfast first...-
-
Brandi Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Posts: 2426
- Joined: May 4, 2008
How can you tell us that you're giving up and then tell us you hope we don't mislynch?
Is this really a post of yours to tell us you are giving up, or a post to try to get us to not lynch you?
You know you aren't even at L-1 yet...
And I was saying that scenario about claiming a power role would only be plausible if you were scum, which you might or might not be.
And why did you ask for a best newbie award if you said that you are really an experienced player?-
-
Brandi Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Posts: 2426
- Joined: May 4, 2008
-
-
Brandi Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Posts: 2426
- Joined: May 4, 2008
Q-man posted a lot yesterday, but, meh. He could have just done a read through and post all of his final thoughts into ONE post... I don't know why he had to cut it up into pieces like that. Angel Mouse, she barely touched on anything.... I don't like how they stay gone long enough not to get prodded but just enough to miss all of the action
Votecount:
Bazza [3] (Armlx, Darox, Qman)
Armlx [1] (Bazza)
Darox [1] (Clammy)
Not Voting [3] (Darox, Brandi, caf19, Angelmouse)
If anyone needs a prod, feel free to ask.-
-
Brandi Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Posts: 2426
- Joined: May 4, 2008
Its fine Q-man. Do whatever feels best for you, I don't want you to change around your posting style cause of MY preferences. XP I'm glad you are here though. And yah I guess 'we' may be posting machines =PQman wrote:@Brandi, you guys (Without me!!) are putting up over a page a day on average, as much as I wish I had the free time every day to keep up I don't rigfht now. I'm both sick, and am busy gettting my wedding details finalized. Busy I am.
While getting itchy that i have posted in the last 2 days while understandable, is also a little annoying for me, I'm not trying to not post but you people are post machines.
It also is part of why i multi post alot. that and alt tabbing with notepad is just aggravating. but if you wish me to do bigger posts, in a lesser number i can do that. my quick posts and the sheer number comes as i catch up in games.
Reading through.-
-
Brandi Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Posts: 2426
- Joined: May 4, 2008
@Bazza, there's no need to be a jerk. These games shouldn't be taken on a personal level. I know that you are frustrated, but using someones lack of experience as an insult doesn't make you look any better. This is after all, just a game. If everyone is wrong about it and you are town, well your death doesn't mean you lose. Just support the town like a townie should. Arguing and putting everyone down isn't going to make you more pro-town, it is just going to make everyone want to lynch you regardless... Because anti-town I think is almost as bad as scum, and arguments like this that are just the same thing over and over will just make us get... no where. Try to calm yourself a bit maybe... and I'm not trying to be mean, or attack you, but the more you post the more scummy you look to me, despite your appeals. Not to mention that your negative attitude just doesn't help. *sigh* This is supposed to be fun. =(-
-
Brandi Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Posts: 2426
- Joined: May 4, 2008
-
-
Brandi Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Posts: 2426
- Joined: May 4, 2008
Darox, in my opinion, he is either scum, or VI. Honestly I'm leaning towards the latter. I'm not trying to be mean with that statement, but I think he is so SURE of himself that he doesn't see how many mistakes he is making or how he is hindering the town. I support the bazza-lynch, but I'd still rather hear from Angel mouse before things move on. Even if it IS pretty obvious Bazza is getting the axe regardless of what she has to say. Unless of course, she says something that incriminates herself more than bazza has, which is highly doubtful.-
-
Brandi
-
-
Brandi Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Posts: 2426
- Joined: May 4, 2008
-
-
Brandi Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Posts: 2426
- Joined: May 4, 2008
-
-
Brandi Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Posts: 2426
- Joined: May 4, 2008
-
-
Brandi Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Posts: 2426
- Joined: May 4, 2008
-
-
Brandi Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Awwwrtist
- Posts: 2426
- Joined: May 4, 2008
-
-
-
-