I'm town!
@notscience: Why did you call Smoker scum without voting him?
Wrong. VT declared Smoker town in one of her first few posts, so it's natural that she would call Feel It town.In post 283, Ms Marangal wrote:VT also struggled with reads all game, however she is able to pick up that Feel it is being Obv town from the moment he replaced in? no
Aside: I really hate how this site's meta is all about announcing conclusions without reasoning. It's classic proof of verbosity, and it stifles me from asking people to explain reads. I know you're doing it for reactions, but it's... well, it annoys me.In post 219, Wisdom wrote:Smoker, notscience, RachMarie and VT are ridiculously town.
Prophylaxis and CityElectric also lean that way.
Not sure about thenewearth.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Mara
In post 316, Prophylaxis wrote: @Feel It: Same for you as well. I would like to hear reasoning for your reads.
If you're being honest now, what were you being before then?
In post 387, notscience wrote:Rach full reads scale plox
Like, this interaction made me laugh.
I found ASP to be quite scummy. His posts had the familiar "ting" of newbscum, a posting style I emulated in one of my scum games.In post 493, VT wrote:Okay so I did some thinking during the night about who is scum from town to scum:
Feel It
Proph
Mara
Wisdom
notscience
Banakai
VOTE: Banakai
This looks like a promising lynch. CityElectric and Banakai have not done much for town and don't have a lot of content in their posts and stuff
Feel It, Proph, and Mara all have very genuine ideas like I've said before
Wisdom has interesting points on notscience, I'll have to look at those
BTW, Everyone who townreads Wisdom btw, can you explain why? I just don't see it.
I'll explain it later - I have a secondary reason to ask the question that I'd prefer to keep hidden right now.In post 494, VT wrote:Btw why would you ask this question? What were you expecting - yes? O_OProphylaxis wrote:VT, are you scum?
I'm afraid of hammering Wisdom because then the game would immediately go to Night, costing us precious reread time.
Thanks for the unvote.
Minor correction before I go to sleep.
If you agree, why aren't you voting?In post 833, notscience wrote:I agree.