[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 5363325 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null Newbie 1437 - Chocolate Fondue Mafia (Over) - Mafiascum.net
Post
Post #38 (isolation #4) » Wed Oct 09, 2013 6:33 am
Postby jmo16mla »
Hmph.
In the newbie queue, you DID say /out and that was the last time I saw anything of you until the game started. I figured it was a mistake by singer.
Why would I be scared of a long time player? I play with the best and consider myself to be one of the better players on site. As town. So, playing with you isn't frightening. Your point is almost contradicted because I posted to fart bane that "he eats sleeps shits and cries just like you do" where he is referring to you. That I me classifying you as a player, not an all time great.
Typically, newbie games an just about every other game starts off with RVS until something is spotted and a serious vote is cast. He clearly was asking how the game was started, so I explained how a typical game is started. What scum motivation is behind me explaining how games typically start?
Post
Post #48 (isolation #6) » Wed Oct 09, 2013 10:23 am
Postby jmo16mla »
In post 43, Fart Bane wrote:Truthfully I didn't take this as an attempt to belittle you. I feel he was just trying to make me more relaxed playing with more experienced players.
This.
Not trying to belittle anyone. Just calling you human. Its rather easy to spot scum coming out of RVS due to them not knowing exactly what to do and leaving them twiddling their thumbs. though.
Bane, try to keep the multi posts down. One concise post recognizing all of your points gets across far better than 4 or even 5 in a row.
Bane, do you think flay's attack on me was one coming from scum?
Post
Post #142 (isolation #14) » Tue Oct 15, 2013 2:07 pm
Postby jmo16mla »
In post 140, Number_0ne wrote:Well, let's see what I've missed. Jmo seems to have not provided much information, and my initial town read on him has changed, as I'm finding him to be a bit scummy.
Mr. Flay is looking pretty town to me now, given his recent posts.
I'm neutral on the-duck and zakk at the moment. Can't really tell what side they're on.
My feelings towards notscience being scum have diminished, given his responses to Fart Bane, although not entirely.
Fart Bane also is seeming a bit scummy over his reasoning on notscience. Still, I don't see enough at the moment to justify a vote.
TAM could be a playstyle thing, like what The-Duck said. Unfortunately, I cannot address any of his suspicions against me when I don't know what they are. Still, he looks town to me.
Endernys...I don't even know.
For now, I'll
Vote: Jmo
mostly out of my instinct. I'm finding his play to be evasive, by not providing at least a bit of insight or giving reasons.
Among the survivors, he is the most suspicious to me, for a lack of posting and for his strange vote on notscience. On a slightly unrelated not, I also agree that unless both Flay's vote was accidental.
This is far too easy.
VOTE: number_0ne
lack of posting? you've got 13 hes got 31... not seeing it.
Post
Post #215 (isolation #27) » Wed Oct 23, 2013 8:56 am
Postby jmo16mla »
In post 211, The-Duck wrote:Jmo, I don't think your "FLAY " says anything about your alignment.
Regarding the expected rise in activity of a player under pressure for lack of activity, do you believe that townies don't get more active when they get pressured for inactivity? And if so, why only bring it up at (what you thought was) L-1 or earlier, because the pressure was building on him for quite some time..
I don't know what my case would look like if TAM flipped scum, I'm not even sure there would have been a case.
HM?
Both parties should react to pressure. In my mind, scum would attempt to catch up and be more productive faster than a townie.
Post
Post #217 (isolation #28) » Wed Oct 23, 2013 9:24 am
Postby jmo16mla »
In post 210, Mr. Flay wrote:He's trying to build a confTown block to avoid voting each other and to vote together, in the hopes of driving lynches toward scum.
In post 211, The-Duck wrote:Jmo, I don't think your "FLAY " says anything about your alignment.
Regarding the expected rise in activity of a player under pressure for lack of activity, do you believe that townies don't get more active when they get pressured for inactivity? And if so, why only bring it up at (what you thought was) L-1 or earlier, because the pressure was building on him for quite some time..
I don't know what my case would look like if TAM flipped scum, I'm not even sure there would have been a case.
HM?
Both parties should react to pressure. In my mind, scum would attempt to catch up and be more productive faster than a townie.
I don't have enough experience to know what scum would do, but it seems unlikely that there is a notable difference in response time, but discussing this is not getting us closer to finding scum imho.
You asked me if my case would look different if TAM had flipped scum, I don't know for sure what I would think of your actions in that light.. but I'd say that pushing for a lynch without reason is far less scummy if the lynched person is scum. at that moment it would have been very easy to defend your mate/deflect the pressure to the counterwagon. So, had TAM flipped scum, I don't think you would, but he didn't, and I'd like to know why you thought it relevant?
Post
Post #230 (isolation #31) » Thu Oct 24, 2013 8:14 am
Postby jmo16mla »
In post 227, Fart Bane wrote:Lets pretend she is a jailer. She jailed _____ and someone died meaning that person isn't scum. (Truthfully I don't know if one scum is jailed the other can kill someone still.
Lets pretend she is a cop. She... copped (?) ______ and she saw that she saw the person was a scum or townie. She would want him on her town block or she would try to lynch him once the town block was formed.
And so on I think you get what I'm trying to say...
Please, stop speculating on power roles or what not. That's horribly anti town and you're potentially giving away clues as to who has a PR and who doesnt. Essentially, you're potentially screwing town in the ass.
Post
Post #303 (isolation #37) » Mon Oct 28, 2013 3:59 am
Postby jmo16mla »
In post 283, Mindgamer wrote:Last two pages are rather dull. The Notscience/Bane exchange doesn't tell me much about their alignments. Only thing I'm curious about is Bane's apparent amnesia concerning votetags. He started the game using
[b/]
, then voted correctly three times in a row, but is now back to having the
[b/]
problems. I'm not sure if this is clumsiness or just an act.
Same for me really. The-Duck is an odd one: He's asking good questions and his cases are logical, yet I don't feel much of a presence from him in this game. It's like you could cut him away and this game wouldn't be much different.
In post 272, Mr. Flay wrote:Purely for lurking? Your last post of substance targeted FB.
That was more of a VI stance. As I called him anti town. I don't think I mentioned him being scummy.
I just don't have a good feeling about either. One of the two is scum. I find it unlikely that both would be lurking at the same time.
Vote one of us, then. Your play has been exceptionally weak today. Yesterday you were voting and applying good pressure, today you're not doing anything.
In post 284, Mindgamer wrote:This is going te be a double post, but I actually want to continue a bit: This game feels dull because nothing is happening. We have used up half of our time and there have been no meaningful wagons. We have two L-2 wagons, but neither is close to a lynch. This is not going to give us any hints towards scum.
I think we should really start to consider a lynch before we get into 'deadline lynch' terriotry. Who do you guys want to lynch?
For me, even though I do not consider myself part of any bloc, the people on Notscience's theoretical bloc are actually the people I do not want to lynch today. That leaves Number_0ne, Fart Bane and The-Duck. At this point I feel like lynching Number_0ne because there's an actual case on him, but I wouldn't be opposed to voting Bane or Duck if there are good arguments against them ('scumslip' and 'he's not in the townbloc' aren't good arguments).
I would like to hear everyone's scumspects now. This means concretely that I want to see:
The-Duck: Who do you want to lynch besides Jmo (that wagon is not going anywhere atm)? What do you think of the Number_0ne and Fart Bane wagons? Would you support either?
Jmo: Who do you want to lynch? If you say Duck or me, make a case. If you don't, explain which other wagon you think has scum (N1, Bane or Notscience) and vote accordingly.
I'm out of time, but you catch my drift.
the first post is absolutely useless.
The second continues the uselessness, then asks for peoples suspects. He is also leaving his vote open. Oh I would vote him, but he has a case on him so i would also be inclined to vote him. If something were to happen, i would vote him though.
In post 1355, Wisdom wrote:ns is my strongest townread. This is without a doubt his towngame - he tunnels, he gets aggressive and loud, he insists when he thinks he has found scum even if everyone else does not agree. He is not able to emulate these things at this level as scum yet, in fact the only time he did so was in a game that he had forgotten he's scum.
This quote is from October 14th. I don't usually do a lot of meta, but ns is hard for me to read because he's so chaotic. This obsession with townbloc is driviing a lot of my suspicion, because in a game this small it CAN be a scummy move, especially when the player proposing it isn't conftown themselves.
And yes, Wisdom is scum in that game, but he says the same thing postgame. notsci's play there is very different, full of cases and arguments and chasing down reads (often wrong, but that's the game). Here he's laying back and going "welp, gotta townhunt instead!". I really don't like it.
Intent to hammer notsci.
Claim in your next post. We have 3d16h left.
Spoiler: for later
jmo16mla's 303 vote on Mindgamer is... interesting, though. If we're wrong about notsci, I want to look at that, as they've both been townreads for me most of the game.
Do you NOT see how anti town this game has been? We have had one major wagon a day. Seems rather easy to just sit back, hop onto a wagon, and then not do anything for the rest of the day.
Post
Post #358 (isolation #48) » Fri Nov 01, 2013 2:42 am
Postby jmo16mla »
Tbh, if you just ended a two and a half year relationship, and you're not happy about it ending, you wouldn't have the greatest motivation either now would you? Don't mean to bring RL into the game but shit.
Well, if we're all doing this, then I'll post my reads as well.
If notscience flips town, then I'd say FB is most likely scum. If not, then I'm unsure on him.
Other than that, I was more suspicious of jmo compared to everyone else, but it's reducing because this tactic might be effective. On the other hand, it could just give mafia more information to decide their NK. Still, this current tactic feels fairly town.
Post
Post #398 (isolation #60) » Mon Nov 04, 2013 5:40 pm
Postby jmo16mla »
Okay. so. this is what we call LYLO. or lynch or lose. Notice, it takes 3 to lynch. If a townie votes another townie, both scum can vote that townie at once and immediately end the game. so PLEASE. DO NOT VOTE. flay, that means you.
This day is truly about discussion without voting. It is truly detrimental to town if you do not discuss as much as possible.
I will be reading over the game more. But tonight, i sleep.
AGAIN, DO NOT VOTE. unless of course youve got a guilty or the tracker found someone.