You too?
:O
VOTE: Jmo
TAM's questions
1- EST
2- Less until I get my new laptop
3- A lot
4- Liars is no (BP claiming doc and vice versa), lurking is no (however it goes on a case by case basis for these
5- Meh
Because these are things EVERYONE has an opinion on and the contrasting opinions start conversation.In post 45, Fart Bane wrote:Also just curious why in most questioners do they ask if you believe in lynching all liars or lurkers?
In post 48, jmo16mla wrote:Bane, do you think flay's attack on me was one coming from scum?
1) I didn't say it was my opinion, but I do not ONCE remember you asking that in either of the games we have played (where you were town in both).In post 81, Mr. Flay wrote:I don't think you understand what I mean by 'vote cases' I mean a reason to vote. Any reason, even a small one, is good Day One. But sitting back and going "hurr I'm waiting for something to happen" is not good for the game. Random voting is not good for the game past the first couple of posts (and not really good there, but it does minimal harm). Jerry's (who was scum in 1397) pressure voting close to deadline was a reason to vote him. Minimalist and uncooperative posting by Xiao Long was a reason to vote him. A case doesn't have to be a wallpost, especially in the early game.
So why are you pushing a wagon onto me for basically saying to do what I'm doing? Also "here where the votes are on him" is a big misrep when you're onto the second vote on me. Some people are questioning what I was doing with the wagon on jmo16mla, but only Number One had voted until you did. And for somebody who wants me to back up my 'vote cases' dictum, you haven't done much to build yours.
Let's dance. VOTE: notscience
Wrong. I'm saying you're using policies that didn't seem remotely important to you in our other games. Where you were town.In post 111, Mr. Flay wrote:I'm pretty sure I don't have any tells that blatant... I'm a case-based player, not gut-based, like I said. That works for me as scum or town.
... I'm still waiting for that case, I hope. Basically all you've said so far is "he asked for cases or suspects from people who aren't stating their suspects or cases yet!" If you've got more, now is the time to bring it.
My laptop was delivered to my moms house today while she was in the shower >.>In post 155, Mr. Flay wrote:notsci is that fixed yet??
In post 198, Fart Bane wrote:In response to Mindgamers section on the great and powerful Fart Bane
Flay, we really need that Sarcasm font.In post 212, Mindgamer wrote:When you said this you had Flay, Duck and Fart Bane on your wagon. Yet Duck and Bane aren't included in your block. So all in all you have a townread on 5 out of 7 players (5 out of 6 not including yourself). I fail to see how additional townhunting is going to help you when you've already formed townreads on every player but one.
Also, I remember you saying you were going to give this game the attention it deserved when you got your laptop. So far I've only seen a few 'might be newbtown/newbscum' comments, that hardly qualifies as the attention you should put into this game after your lackluster performance yesterday.
I don't care if they deny it or not, PoE works wonders. The fact that people ARE denying it, showing that skepticism speaks volumes to their alignment.In post 224, Mindgamer wrote:Repeating what you already said doesn't refute my argument. I wouldn't call this townbloc particularly effective either, seeing as no one has accepted your offer. Do you have any scumreads at all so far?
And this is why he doesn't get access to the townblocIn post 230, jmo16mla wrote:Please, stop speculating on power roles or what not. That's horribly anti town and you're potentially giving away clues as to who has a PR and who doesnt. Essentially, you're potentially screwing town in the ass.In post 227, Fart Bane wrote:Lets pretend she is a jailer. She jailed _____ and someone died meaning that person isn't scum. (Truthfully I don't know if one scum is jailed the other can kill someone still.
Lets pretend she is a cop. She... copped (?) ______ and she saw that she saw the person was a scum or townie. She would want him on her town block or she would try to lynch him once the town block was formed.
And so on I think you get what I'm trying to say...
If it's any consolation, N1 is bussing his buddy for usIn post 237, Mr. Flay wrote:That seems a little reductive, notsci. I don't recall you having an aversion to null reads. Why did you vote him now and not earlier?
I'm gonna be brief today because costume building for Saturday. Oi. Anyway, I don't like the townbloc idea for reasons earlier mentioned. N1's latest posts (219 in particular) have helped reduce my scumread somewhat. I still don't like that my top two scumreads are the voting wagon on Fart Bane the Hapless, so I'm not removing it yet. It really smells like a push for an easy lynch to get us to LyLo.
He's not in the townbloc, thus he must be scumIn post 239, Mr. Flay wrote:OIC. Case?
Because my role PM says I'm townIn post 240, Mr. Flay wrote:Why isn't it you bussing your buddy instead?
So, I'm bussing my scumbuddy by trying to convince people not to vote you over him?In post 243, Number_0ne wrote:And you say I'm bussing? Me, when you are trying to convince people who are suspicious of me to vote for someone else entirely? If anything, I'd say that notscience is bussing his scumbuddy.
I'm not requesting I'm demandingIn post 246, Mr. Flay wrote:This is a request. It's not a declaration. Why are we all Town, anyway?In post 206, notscience wrote:jmo and flay do you want in the townbloc
He's scum tooIn post 249, Mr. Flay wrote:In fact you've NEVER mentioned The-Duck.
In post 253, Fart Bane wrote:You act like you 100% know who the scum and town are. Which you don't. Risking it all for your reads doesn't make much sense. We are already down 2. Like number 1 said another town death would suck. Why do you press you point? I just don't get it. I really want to vote you but I feel what your doing is just unthought through not scummy.
He's saying this which implies I'm town, yet saying things like he think's I'm scum.In post 253, Fart Bane wrote:You act like you 100% know who the scum and town are.
UmIn post 265, Mr. Flay wrote:Yeah, basically notsci's entire case on this page is crap. Unfortunately I'm not sure it's a tell for him.
notsci: Link me your best completed game as Town? You don't have to have won, but I want to see GOOD arguments from you.
In post 288, The-Duck wrote:He promised us to give the game the attention it deserves, but comes out of Night 1 saying that scumhunting isn't working this game, despite not trying it. Unless his scumhunting is twiddling thumbs untill a scum falls in his lap.
Discredits ahoy
After that, he proposes to form a townbloc, because finding town works better then finding sum. This is most definetly true, for scum. It's way easier to call someone town than it is to call someone scum, based on the simple fact that only one of those things requires lying.
There are several players who base their whole playstyle around finding who is town and then using PoE. It's just as viable.
The reasons he chooses to put people in his townbloc are at the very best unthoughtful. Jmo and flay both get in because of the quickhammer and the response to that. If both are scum, Jmo's response is also quite a logical thing to do, so the conclusion that they are both town is too premature.
Someone's butthurt they aren't in the townbloc
His last bit, about people not having to follow cases also seems scum motivated to me. To me it reads like he wants to drop some case on someone, and then not push it so nothing happens with it and he can continue to pretend like he's trying to find scum.
I literally have 0 idea what foxhole you pulled this out of
In post 291, Number_0ne wrote:Notscience, you seem more focused on making your townbloc than getting an accurate lynch. You don't seem to care about who the mafia are, and your reasoning to accuse someone or defend your ideas is "they're not in the townbloc, so their argument is invalid".
It's true. Why? Accurate lynches in a pool of 3. Hey, that's funny! With 2 scum and one town in that pool, we lynch all 3 and auto-win.
In post 284, Mindgamer wrote:
I would like to hear everyone's scumspects now.
For my suspect list, my suspects are Fart Bane and Notscience.
There's several problems with this post.In post 304, Number_0ne wrote:I changed my mind because of how they're reacting to each other. I can no longer understand what notscience is doing, and I read over their arguments again, which made me believe that they're not bussing.
As for making the situation more volatile, it's because I was worried about this causing the townbloc to be formed. I firmly believe that there is at least 1 mafia in there, most likely notscience. Even if he is town, I'm not willing to risk the game on the credibility of his townbloc.
In post 306, Number_0ne wrote:I'm only slightly suspicious of jmo, but I'm highly suspicious of you right now.In post 305, notscience wrote:There's several problems with this post.In post 304, Number_0ne wrote:I changed my mind because of how they're reacting to each other. I can no longer understand what notscience is doing, and I read over their arguments again, which made me believe that they're not bussing.
As for making the situation more volatile, it's because I was worried about this causing the townbloc to be formed. I firmly believe that there is at least 1 mafia in there, most likely notscience. Even if he is town, I'm not willing to risk the game on the credibility of his townbloc.
Lets go over them, shall we.
1) The only person in my suggested townbloc that he has EXPRESSED misgivings about is jmo. And even then, they seem to have subsided.
The self preservation is real
I'm firmly confident that you are scum. I don't need to discredit you. And supposing you weren't, in what way would the flip be ignored? I am trying to dissolve your townbloc because I believe you to be scum.In post 305, notscience wrote: 2) He's trying to dissolve it. Like, he's trying to offhandedly discredit me so that when I flip town you all will ignore this. Now, why would this happen? Because I have both him and his scumbud out of my townbloc.
And here's what you're saying. If I'm town my flip won't be ignored, but you're trying to dissolve my townbloc before you see my flip because once you do you will have to result to hardcore discredits. For someone so firmly sure I'm scum you haven't laid out legitimate reasons, no?
Do you mean my read on The-Duck, which happened back on Day 1? Or my so-called 'null' read on Fart Bane?In post 305, notscience wrote: Lets look at his most recently announced reads on those who ARENT in my townbloc- Hm, that's funny. It seems they were both null. Now, why would he be worrying about my townbloc's credibility once I flip town if he doesn't have townreads on the two others not in my townbloc?
brb quoting
This is the last time you mention a read on The-duck, and Fart Bane is your scumread. You keep saying you think scum is in it but it's probably not me. How Jmo is supsicious too. Now, what's weird is that rather than come out and say why I'm wrong, you're just trying to say "nah don't trust him guys." Why would town need to do that? What happens when I'm confirmed town? He goes after Jmo.In post 140, Number_0ne wrote:Well, let's see what I've missed. Jmo seems to have not provided much information, and my initial town read on him has changed, as I'm finding him to be a bit scummy.
Mr. Flay is looking pretty town to me now, given his recent posts.
I'm neutral on the-duck and zakk at the moment. Can't really tell what side they're on.
My feelings towards notscience being scum have diminished, given his responses to Fart Bane, although not entirely.
Fart Bane also is seeming a bit scummy over his reasoning on notscience. Still, I don't see enough at the moment to justify a vote.
TAM could be a playstyle thing, like what The-Duck said. Unfortunately, I cannot address any of his suspicions against me when I don't know what they are. Still, he looks town to me.
Endernys...I don't even know.
For now, I'llVote: Jmomostly out of my instinct. I'm finding his play to be evasive, by not providing at least a bit of insight or giving reasons.
lol'd.In post 321, Mr. Flay wrote:Agreed, lack of activity is murdering this town. I'm guilty of it too.
That said, notsci has posted several times on the site today. Claim delay in progress!
Especially given this game, the claim delay means nothing.In post 323, jmo16mla wrote:I've delayed my claim intentionally and have gotten out of a lynch as town. That's not a scum tell,In post 321, Mr. Flay wrote:Agreed, lack of activity is murdering this town. I'm guilty of it too.
That said, notsci has posted several times on the site today. Claim delay in progress!
I disagree. Scum usually have PRs figured out in pre-game. Most games I've been in, that's been the case. The only reason I'm delaying is so I get time to make a formal caseIn post 331, Mr. Flay wrote:Why would town delay their claim in this game?In post 330, The-Duck wrote:Flay, Why would scum delay his claim in this game?
Scum are really the only ones who EVER need to delay, usually because they have to figure out what is safe to claim. Town should not be lying or dissembling about their claim, especially if they are a PR.
Good to know now, not much use anymore.In post 334, Mr. Flay wrote:And that still doesn't answer why you would delay theclaim, as Town. If you'd just asked "don't hammer until I make my case" I believe we would have obliged you.
I lied before, I have to have this quote to show you how stupid this wagon on me is. If this doesn't SCREAM inside information to any of you then lmfao.In post 266, Fart Bane wrote:Ah. Just for the record
vote not science [/b ]
I have a strange feeling from not science not exactly scum just more of not thinking anything through.
because that's what I'm going to flip, lmfao.In post 346, Mr. Flay wrote:Why? Why not wait for the flip?
He is trying to DISSOLVE the basis of my reads. By DISSOLVING IT you therefore make it impossible to look at after my flip.In post 355, The-Duck wrote:Notscience, How is it weird that Number wants to give more weight to your reads if you flip town? I'd say it's only logical.. When you are confirmed as a townie, your reads are not tainted by your alignment, and therefore more trustworthy than the reads of someone you think might be scum.