[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 5459610 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null Shadow's terminally happy Newbie 1451 game over,mod exploded - Mafiascum.net
lets get a wagon her so she can have PLENTY of time to claim
This.
VOTE: Huntress
In post 4, pirate mollie wrote:also mod makes me feel like I wandered into an episode of my little ponies. like how can I possibly troll that
Never watched it.
~
Hi there new players, I'm one of the three SE's this game. If you have any questions you can ask the IC(Goodmorning) or any of us to help you!
Also hi to all the people I know!
~
HEY GOODMORNING WHAT'S UP?
~
@Emerald:
That game was a bit of an intense game as most of the players had experience with each other besides the newbies.
(I modded and followed a bit of it before RL got too busy)
No matter how high the stakes, sooner or later you're just gonna have to go with your gut.
And maybe, just maybe, that'll take you right where you were supposed to be.
Post
Post #14 (isolation #1) » Fri Nov 15, 2013 3:43 pm
Postby Malakittens »
So since this is the perfect oppurnity to ask and I don't remember if I have before, but Huntress was MS or ypp your first experience of mafia?
(Ofc I can just go look at dates, but I'm lazy)
No matter how high the stakes, sooner or later you're just gonna have to go with your gut.
And maybe, just maybe, that'll take you right where you were supposed to be.
Post
Post #19 (isolation #2) » Sat Nov 16, 2013 2:40 am
Postby Malakittens »
VOTE: Huntress
~because well I can!
No matter how high the stakes, sooner or later you're just gonna have to go with your gut.
And maybe, just maybe, that'll take you right where you were supposed to be.
Post
Post #30 (isolation #3) » Sat Nov 16, 2013 12:15 pm
Postby Malakittens »
Because I can read Mollie without wagoning her.
No matter how high the stakes, sooner or later you're just gonna have to go with your gut.
And maybe, just maybe, that'll take you right where you were supposed to be.
Post
Post #34 (isolation #4) » Sat Nov 16, 2013 2:55 pm
Postby Malakittens »
Um. We don't actually know if he confirmed a role. He could have just did /confirm and didn't put alignment information.
I really just don't like your last post, however.
Also that's kinda a false interpretation of Mollie's meta. However once she starts posting I should be able to decently figure out her alignment. There's only been one game she threw me off recently but it's only because I have encountered scum her only twice
No matter how high the stakes, sooner or later you're just gonna have to go with your gut.
And maybe, just maybe, that'll take you right where you were supposed to be.
Post
Post #39 (isolation #5) » Sat Nov 16, 2013 3:23 pm
Postby Malakittens »
When you try to multiquote. Hit the quotes you want then hit preview. You hit submit which posted the multiquote instead of giving you the option to type.
You're not misinterpreting this, but I might have read yours wrong. You looked to me like you were indirectly role fishing. As I said they probably confirmed , but never stated their alignment. Just when I hear role I thought maybe you were role faising that's all.
No matter how high the stakes, sooner or later you're just gonna have to go with your gut.
And maybe, just maybe, that'll take you right where you were supposed to be.
In post 33, emeraldemon wrote:Maybe a vote will convince our lurker to come out of hiding.
VOTE: Rothwell
It did!
In post 37, emeraldemon wrote:All I meant is that Rothwell seems to be around, which makes me wonder if he's following the thread but not posting for some reason.
I don't really have much to input, and I don't fancy random lynching as everyone seems to have done so have just observed.
You mean random voting? We are currently in RVS stage which brings up discussion and possible information in the long run. The faster we are out of it the better.
No matter how high the stakes, sooner or later you're just gonna have to go with your gut.
And maybe, just maybe, that'll take you right where you were supposed to be.
Post
Post #51 (isolation #7) » Sun Nov 17, 2013 3:25 pm
Postby Malakittens »
Soooo.
I know this is really early, but I think Huntress is town. Like I think I'm really, really sure.
No matter how high the stakes, sooner or later you're just gonna have to go with your gut.
And maybe, just maybe, that'll take you right where you were supposed to be.
Post
Post #53 (isolation #8) » Sun Nov 17, 2013 3:29 pm
Postby Malakittens »
I need more posts from gm to be able to correctly read her.
No matter how high the stakes, sooner or later you're just gonna have to go with your gut.
And maybe, just maybe, that'll take you right where you were supposed to be.
Mollie. I directly 'caught' scum Goodmorning in two of her most recent games. However I didn't replace into one, but I replaced into another, but failed to get her lynched before I was NK'd.
When I say I need more time, I need more time.
Want to back off and let me have it?
No matter how high the stakes, sooner or later you're just gonna have to go with your gut.
And maybe, just maybe, that'll take you right where you were supposed to be.
Post
Post #57 (isolation #10) » Sun Nov 17, 2013 4:02 pm
Postby Malakittens »
The answer is no, but I mean there has to be a reason why you're asking it. I'm just not ready to dance with you yet.
I'm caught up. I have never been not caught up.
No matter how high the stakes, sooner or later you're just gonna have to go with your gut.
And maybe, just maybe, that'll take you right where you were supposed to be.
Post
Post #59 (isolation #11) » Sun Nov 17, 2013 4:15 pm
Postby Malakittens »
Why is she scum?
No matter how high the stakes, sooner or later you're just gonna have to go with your gut.
And maybe, just maybe, that'll take you right where you were supposed to be.
Post
Post #61 (isolation #12) » Sun Nov 17, 2013 4:22 pm
Postby Malakittens »
Yeah, I'm not seeing what you are seeing.
No matter how high the stakes, sooner or later you're just gonna have to go with your gut.
And maybe, just maybe, that'll take you right where you were supposed to be.
Post
Post #63 (isolation #13) » Sun Nov 17, 2013 4:32 pm
Postby Malakittens »
Why aren't you voting her then?
No matter how high the stakes, sooner or later you're just gonna have to go with your gut.
And maybe, just maybe, that'll take you right where you were supposed to be.
cos the newbs need lurve and I believe I said this already?
Random voting when you think you have a scum read isn't that good.
Probably better to put a vote on someone you believe is scum rather than just vote because you don't want people to be left out.
No matter how high the stakes, sooner or later you're just gonna have to go with your gut.
And maybe, just maybe, that'll take you right where you were supposed to be.
Post
Post #67 (isolation #15) » Sun Nov 17, 2013 6:52 pm
Postby Malakittens »
I forgot about my vote on her.
UNVOTE: Huntress
Ill come back on Mollie.
No matter how high the stakes, sooner or later you're just gonna have to go with your gut.
And maybe, just maybe, that'll take you right where you were supposed to be.
cos the newbs need lurve and I believe I said this already?
Random voting when you think you have a scum read isn't that good.
it is in a 9 player game when you are potential partner hunting. don't even pretend like you do not know that this is what I am doing since I do it in nearly every 9 player game I play in
Probably better to put a vote on someone you believe is scum rather than just vote because you don't want people to be left out.
okay are you posturing for effect cos of the newbies or are you posting this post as legit wrt me. I can't tell
dead serious question
I hunt potential partners after I get a flip. I only do it before hand if I'm really, really sure. I'm not pretending that I don't know what you're doing, but the fact is saying me if I'm scum partners with x isn't going to accomplish anything and you know that.
I'm being legit. I rather not have newbies think they can just lazy vote someone else when they are thinking someone else is a scum read.
No matter how high the stakes, sooner or later you're just gonna have to go with your gut.
And maybe, just maybe, that'll take you right where you were supposed to be.
Post
Post #71 (isolation #17) » Sun Nov 17, 2013 8:52 pm
Postby Malakittens »
Who's ever going to admit truthfully to yes I'm his scum partner.
I do which is why I haven't voted you.
Our newbies need to appear though. One has already admitted to lurking; which can be taken two ways. He's mafia and scared to post or he's town and is lost. It's like why haven't I jumped on him because I'm waiting to see what happens.
No matter how high the stakes, sooner or later you're just gonna have to go with your gut.
And maybe, just maybe, that'll take you right where you were supposed to be.
@ emerald and NP: What do you think about the wagon on mollie?
I skimmed mollie's meta a bit, and it seems like it's normal for her to go for long periods of time without activity, so I don't think she looks suspicious. I don't really think she needs any more votes on her right now. Of course, I'm a newbie, so if there's any particular reason for that wagon existing I'd like to hear about it.
gm is a top notch player she is setting up early game play so she doesn't have to
she looks nervous, tentative and drops off. <----scum
I don't see her doing any of those things. So far she's voted for TierShift on a hunch, and she's given Rothwell some advice on how to get started. Seems neutral to me.
In post 51, Malakittens wrote:Soooo.
I know this is really early, but I think Huntress is town. Like I think I'm really, really sure.
Duly noted. But shouldn't you take your vote off of her, then?
I was ready to let that vote go anyway, and Malakittens seems pretty trustworthy so far. UNVOTE: Huntress
And I've got a better vote anyway. That would be... VOTE: pirate mollie
Not OMGUS, I just don't like the way she's locked onto goodmorning after only three unextraordinary posts. It is a bit weird for her to not even vote for goodmorning, too... That's a bit of a mystery to me. Maybe she wanted to see my reaction, which would be town, or maybe she wanted to look more town by toning down her attack on GM a bit and pretending to be trying to gauge my reaction, which would be scum. I can't tell, but she seems more scum to me because of her arguments against goodmorning.
How much of her meta did you actually read or look up?
No matter how high the stakes, sooner or later you're just gonna have to go with your gut.
And maybe, just maybe, that'll take you right where you were supposed to be.
Post
Post #75 (isolation #19) » Sun Nov 17, 2013 9:16 pm
Postby Malakittens »
On the scale of I wish we can be confirmed masons.
Last edited by Shadowmod on Mon Nov 18, 2013 6:22 am, edited 1 time in total.
No matter how high the stakes, sooner or later you're just gonna have to go with your gut.
And maybe, just maybe, that'll take you right where you were supposed to be.
No matter how high the stakes, sooner or later you're just gonna have to go with your gut.
And maybe, just maybe, that'll take you right where you were supposed to be.
Post
Post #96 (isolation #21) » Mon Nov 18, 2013 12:36 pm
Postby Malakittens »
Huntress and I have a history together that goes further than this site. It's more I'm ultra familiar with her play on both sites. So my read is based on gut and also strong meta on her.
No matter how high the stakes, sooner or later you're just gonna have to go with your gut.
And maybe, just maybe, that'll take you right where you were supposed to be.
In post 51, Malakittens wrote:Soooo.
I know this is really early, but I think Huntress is town. Like I think I'm really, really sure.
Yeah, it is a bit early. I know what you're getting at, but I also know that you know that I know, so I would have expected you to be a bit more wary.
Everyone is going to think we are about to speak a different language here.
I'm aware, but I'm partly wary, but also testing you at the same time. If you were scum you have to make sure to dodge everything I'm looking for, but if you're town your posts will look legit genuine and not like you're trying to dodge what I'm looking for.
I'm going to address other people now since this quote was on a different page to the others.
No matter how high the stakes, sooner or later you're just gonna have to go with your gut.
And maybe, just maybe, that'll take you right where you were supposed to be.
In post 90, TierShift wrote:Rothwell has been on today, he is lurking badly.
I'm not going to post in bed whilst on my old iPod. Would take ages.
In post 71, Malakittens wrote:One has already admitted to lurking; which can be taken two ways. He's mafia and scared to post or he's town and is lost.
The 2nd option is better.
In post 88, TierShift wrote:Rothwell, could you just tell us what you think of the game so far? Who looks the most townish and who the most scummy?
Stale and I have no idea. My apologies but I've put little effort into this and haven't looked at any past games to see how the discussion works. Once again I have nothing to input so haven't bothered to post.
In post 89, goodmorning wrote:Pressure votes have been known to work with varying levels of effectiveness depending on the player.
They'll work on me, for now.
See the thing is unless you don't post I won't be able to tell the difference between them. However even if you are lost a little effort will go a long way because I will be able to interact with you and see if I can figure stuff out. Keeping quiet isn't going to help anyone, but going to end up worse for yourself.
Just try asking little questions and things or look for odd things in behavior or sentences that don't add up and contraction other posts prior.
In post 96, Malakittens wrote:Huntress and I have a history together that goes further than this site. It's more I'm ultra familiar with her play on both sites. So my read is based on gut and also strong meta on her.
Does this mean I should just take your word for it? There isn't anything in your read that I would understand?
I mean I can't really explain it even if I were to link the other games and things. My thoughts usually make very little sense to those who arent me. Huntress does know most tells of what I'm looking for.
Like for instance one of her old tells I had on her was her behavior in voting patterns on certain alignments which she has now improved.
In post 99, emeraldemon wrote:If it's a gut read that you can't explain, I can respect that, but I'd rather have something I can see for myself.
Once and if I get something more concrete and I can explain, I'll point it out.
No matter how high the stakes, sooner or later you're just gonna have to go with your gut.
And maybe, just maybe, that'll take you right where you were supposed to be.
i don't see any reason to vote for Tier there is not "point" in any previous post
Since you guys are new I take her post as something completely different. I will agree that there was no point to GM's vote and if I'm not mistaken Huntress didn't geniuly believe there was one either. I felt her post as minor as it was it brought up enough discussion to throw us out of RVS stage. Which is a very good thing.
No matter how high the stakes, sooner or later you're just gonna have to go with your gut.
And maybe, just maybe, that'll take you right where you were supposed to be.
In post 66, Neater Plastic wrote:I don't see her doing any of those things. So far she's voted for TierShift on a hunch, and she's given Rothwell some advice on how to get started. Seems neutral to me.
while I am trying to give her space since she is an IC and fairly new, I think that it is her very neutral approach that is troubling. she seems to be trying to blend in.
Not OMGUS, I just don't like the way she's locked onto goodmorning after only three unextraordinary posts. It is a bit weird for her to not even vote for goodmorning, too... That's a bit of a mystery to me. Maybe she wanted to see my reaction, which would be town, or maybe she wanted to look more town by toning down her attack on GM a bit and pretending to be trying to gauge my reaction, which would be scum. I can't tell, but she seems more scum to me because of her arguments against goodmorning.
I am not "locked down" onto anything. plz don't misrep me like that. my reads are generally pretty fluid as I gather more info.
and I think you are over thinking my motivations and what is funny is that I do this too! I often think scum are more diabolical then they actually
are
and it bites me in the ass every single time.
so your case so far:
1. I think gm is scum
2. you have a different read
so why am I scummy again?
The way you talked to Malakittens about it made you seem very, very convinced that GM is scum. Since she seemed neutral to me, this breach seemed rather suspicious.
"Breach"? I meant "rift." A rift in viewpoints. Seriously, how do I edit these?
You can't edit. Wouldn't be fair to the rest of us.
Okay castle is on, back later.
No matter how high the stakes, sooner or later you're just gonna have to go with your gut.
And maybe, just maybe, that'll take you right where you were supposed to be.
Post
Post #119 (isolation #26) » Tue Nov 19, 2013 8:39 am
Postby Malakittens »
Well now accusing me of guiding/coaching is one thing, but he seemed to be having a little bit of trouble with posts such as it double posting and what not so I decided to help him out. I think that's really the big major thing that I see that I'm 'guiding' him. I can see your point as he basically has said my name in all of his posts, but there's a point for all of it.
I know you're trying to early connect me with NP, but it's too soon, at least imo.
No matter how high the stakes, sooner or later you're just gonna have to go with your gut.
And maybe, just maybe, that'll take you right where you were supposed to be.
Is there a reason that the majority of your posts are directed only towards Empking and DrDolittle? You might have been asking others for their reads, but the majority of your posts are focusing only on the two above mentioned posters.
@DrDolittle:
I did not like your L-2 vote on Xegarus in Post 38. You're barely scum hunting up to that point and you didn't find anyone scummy. I'm not sure why you were putting someone to L-1 so fast just when the games started. You have been sitting here defending Empking.
So who do you currently find scummy?
@Madi:
I can understand the not voting due to being a hydra, but why are you trying to tell someone to look at your posts in two different slots. You are a hydra you have no right to tell someone not to read your posts how they are. It's your responsibility to interact with your partner and if you guys disagree currently without discussing it gives you guys an out if you make a mistake.
I do not like the tone of #140. You find him scummy, but what was the need to add the extra un-needed tone along with the fact part of the post sounds like you are getting into a slight overlap on wanting to policy lynch him.
Why did you call out Does Bo Know for a very similar agrument that DrDolittle made towards Xegarus. Do you agree with what Does Bo Know has said?
@Does Bo Know:
Blue Yoshi has had one post and he doesn't look like he's committed to the game. I'm not sure how you can label that fence-sitting. It's more of a lack of commitment.
@Empking:
Is there any reason why you left your vote on Xegarus this whole time? Your idle vote right there is suspect and I don't like it at all. You might be interacting with people, but your reads seems to be staying the same and I don't like it.
I would like to see Blue Yoshi's replacement have thoughts on the game before this day is ended. The deadline is in 6 days which means we still have time.
I'm going to UNVOTE: DrDolittle and VOTE: Empking.
I think his idle vote on Xegarus is suspicious, but I also think he's fence-sitting and being very passive. He's currently my biggest suspect.
I don't see it as alignment indicative if you ask me GM.
Btw depending on if I can get this phone fixed at the mall today I might be V/LA for a few days. I just cracked my screen enough where it's hard to see what I'm typing.
No matter how high the stakes, sooner or later you're just gonna have to go with your gut.
And maybe, just maybe, that'll take you right where you were supposed to be.
What are you referring to, you got us all on the edge of our seats! The fact that the other quotes were said by scum and that they asked questions to players doesn't seem too strong a connection? Basically just what mala said in response.
I am referring to the type of question and the depth thereof.
You're grasping. It's also making my whiskers tingle. It makes me possibly think Mollie's right and you could be scum afterall.
No matter how high the stakes, sooner or later you're just gonna have to go with your gut.
And maybe, just maybe, that'll take you right where you were supposed to be.
Post
Post #133 (isolation #29) » Tue Nov 19, 2013 2:24 pm
Postby Malakittens »
Man the first spoiled tab reminds me of the case you decided to build on me in Donner Party on ER. Just the title, but not the context.
/conflicted.
No matter how high the stakes, sooner or later you're just gonna have to go with your gut.
And maybe, just maybe, that'll take you right where you were supposed to be.
I think it might be necessary for me to point out that I'm actually not familiar with Huntress.
mollie and I have I think three or four shared games, Mala and I have probably about the same, plus we've modded for each other.
My question here, and it's more rhetorical than anything else: Does Mala have with Huntress what I have with Zai, Safety, even ppp? like Cabd has with TIP? like I have with Guy? or is it more like what kuribo has with DGB? in between? Does it even exist?
And I know that's a lot of namedropping but basically what I'm trying to say is I don't know whether it's playstyle synergy, really good meta, a fairly strong tell, or just lots of experience with each other, or something in between.
I'm willing to believe it exists, because it does happen and it destroys your credibility if you claim it wrongly one too many times.
I think we have more than four shares games. I'm not exactly sure of the count. Plus I modded you numerous times so I also add that due to watching how you play each game.
No matter how high the stakes, sooner or later you're just gonna have to go with your gut.
And maybe, just maybe, that'll take you right where you were supposed to be.
Post
Post #153 (isolation #31) » Wed Nov 20, 2013 7:22 am
Postby Malakittens »
However ill add with my experience. I read huntress wrong here once, used to REALLY suck at reading her on the homesite, but slowly got better over time after learning how she plays. Not that I can really ever get credit for catching her as scum because I was never in those games, but yeah. (Early one I was)
No matter how high the stakes, sooner or later you're just gonna have to go with your gut.
And maybe, just maybe, that'll take you right where you were supposed to be.
Post
Post #161 (isolation #32) » Thu Nov 21, 2013 4:54 pm
Postby Malakittens »
Just the post by GM. It reminded me a bit of the case she made on me in Donner. I think if she were to try and get an example of a town player trying to do it that would work, but I feel like she's tryin to mold a case with all alignments on scum to see who bites on it.
I sorta explained it in a previous post:
No matter how high the stakes, sooner or later you're just gonna have to go with your gut.
And maybe, just maybe, that'll take you right where you were supposed to be.
Is there anything in GM's more recent posts that has made you more suspicious of her, or is this mostly still based on the early read?
And why don't you like mala?
I didn't like her telling me how to play for starters. and when I pushed on it her reaction was pretty terrible.
I never told you how to play. I just play differenty than you in terms of trying to find a partner unless I'm SURE the person in going after is scum then ill look before the flip and give my two cent out.
My reaction was fine.
No matter how high the stakes, sooner or later you're just gonna have to go with your gut.
And maybe, just maybe, that'll take you right where you were supposed to be.
Post
Post #170 (isolation #34) » Fri Nov 22, 2013 3:25 pm
Postby Malakittens »
Yeah, but you're talking about an hour or two hours worth of work and doing it on my phone.
Ask me a spefic question on any player and ill answer it, but no sorry I won't go down ISO to ISO on each player.
No matter how high the stakes, sooner or later you're just gonna have to go with your gut.
And maybe, just maybe, that'll take you right where you were supposed to be.
Post
Post #172 (isolation #35) » Fri Nov 22, 2013 3:31 pm
Postby Malakittens »
In post 171, goodmorning wrote:I'm still working on it all, it's taking me slightly longer than expected.
You going to stall it out like in DP. (<3)
No matter how high the stakes, sooner or later you're just gonna have to go with your gut.
And maybe, just maybe, that'll take you right where you were supposed to be.
Post
Post #178 (isolation #36) » Sat Nov 23, 2013 7:20 am
Postby Malakittens »
Can we have a prod on D_Cobbz?
Also ill get to the comments after work most likely.
No matter how high the stakes, sooner or later you're just gonna have to go with your gut.
And maybe, just maybe, that'll take you right where you were supposed to be.
Post
Post #181 (isolation #37) » Sat Nov 23, 2013 3:08 pm
Postby Malakittens »
Needs I be more spefic
No matter how high the stakes, sooner or later you're just gonna have to go with your gut.
And maybe, just maybe, that'll take you right where you were supposed to be.
The thing about her difference between her scum and town games is her activity and the way her reads feel. In clue she attempted to try and play a similar way to her town game that threw me off. I was so blinded that when she replaced out I was avoiding calling her slot scum.
Here I'm not sure because she's not as active as I thought she would be, but I'm not really feeling a scum her either. If I had to pick I would say this is her town game. Based on how she reacted to me.
No matter how high the stakes, sooner or later you're just gonna have to go with your gut.
And maybe, just maybe, that'll take you right where you were supposed to be.
Post
Post #196 (isolation #39) » Sun Nov 24, 2013 2:18 pm
Postby Malakittens »
In post 192, TierShift wrote:Okay mala, so mollie has a strong scum game (those games were really good), I'll keep an eye on her...
What really is the intent of post 190, if i may ask?
Also can someone explain how to link to single posts?
I was asked for a read on Mollie by another player. Why wasn't that what you wanted out of me anyways? Reads on players.
To post a certain post number do [ post=# ] title [ /post ] without the spaces. That will link to a certain post from this game.
Another game you would do [ url=link ] title [ /url ] without spaces.
No matter how high the stakes, sooner or later you're just gonna have to go with your gut.
And maybe, just maybe, that'll take you right where you were supposed to be.
Post
Post #207 (isolation #40) » Tue Nov 26, 2013 7:01 am
Postby Malakittens »
The odds are we can have two newbies as scum. I'm not sure how you are getting IC/SE combo. We could also have Se/Se combo for scum. Every single one is pausible. Nati when you get the chance explain, thanks!
@preedit:
.... Yet you were sorta town reading me? If I'm town/huntress is town and you are looking at a Se/IC combo that means scum would be you and GM.
No matter how high the stakes, sooner or later you're just gonna have to go with your gut.
And maybe, just maybe, that'll take you right where you were supposed to be.
Post
Post #209 (isolation #41) » Tue Nov 26, 2013 7:12 am
Postby Malakittens »
In post 208, pirate mollie wrote:I am back to thinking you are scum. tbh I don't remember why I thought that I will to do a reread.
Okay.
I mean I only had the chance to post one thing before that read changed by you.
No matter how high the stakes, sooner or later you're just gonna have to go with your gut.
And maybe, just maybe, that'll take you right where you were supposed to be.
cos those scum games sucked, I replaced out of 1 and was lynched in another cos I told a lie and forgot about it like 20 minutes after I told it.
Lol i only read like halfway through both of them.
Then what was mala's point with all that meta crap?
Did NP receive a prod and is cobbz getting replaced?
That I'm not the best at telling her scum game from her town game. However I'm great at figurin out when she's town right away. She rarely rolls scum and if she does its a game I'm not really present in.
No matter how high the stakes, sooner or later you're just gonna have to go with your gut.
And maybe, just maybe, that'll take you right where you were supposed to be.
Post
Post #214 (isolation #43) » Tue Nov 26, 2013 8:21 am
Postby Malakittens »
Well the site going down isn't helping matters much.
I really hate it when people say my posts are content less. Actually fluffy isn't a scum tell and almost every single one of my posts are revelant to this game.
Actually he did say 'scum are double Se/IC' which reads to me as what it states. I don't even see how this would be remotely considered a scum slip. I'm not even being defensive either. I have modded a few newbies games in the past and the chances of newbies being scum together are just as likely as Se/IC or Se/Se combo. Yet he's hard pinging at me rather than GM or any other SE. Secondly he didn't self vote first either. (Meta due to that).
Mollie is a she and not a guy and she was town reading me.
No matter how high the stakes, sooner or later you're just gonna have to go with your gut.
And maybe, just maybe, that'll take you right where you were supposed to be.
Post
Post #222 (isolation #44) » Tue Nov 26, 2013 6:40 pm
Postby Malakittens »
Since I'm working during the holiday and I'm in that type of job where's its busy all the time during a holiday I'm going to be La/VA til Sat (sun at the latest).
I might post before then depends on how busy I am.
Just for a warning when I disappear for a while.
No matter how high the stakes, sooner or later you're just gonna have to go with your gut.
And maybe, just maybe, that'll take you right where you were supposed to be.
Post
Post #227 (isolation #45) » Wed Nov 27, 2013 8:27 am
Postby Malakittens »
Actually that's not true.
I already commented in regards to Nati. It's going to see very OMGUS-like, but I'm not liking his entrance into the game for reasons I stated in a previous posts. Leaning scum on him and GM.
I'm liking tiershift for town however. He's applying pressure and I'm not seeing him as scum for it.
Neat, Roth are null. And I'm really still unsure what to thinking of emerald. I really do have trouble reading newbies until like Day 2 or later.
No matter how high the stakes, sooner or later you're just gonna have to go with your gut.
And maybe, just maybe, that'll take you right where you were supposed to be.
Post
Post #231 (isolation #46) » Wed Nov 27, 2013 3:55 pm
Postby Malakittens »
I thought I read somewhere that he does it after RVS. I just looked up a recent game of ours where he replaced in and he didn't do it. However I'm still not liking his elimination of all the newbies so fast. He's also trying to connect me with you without a flip first. Like if I flipped town then you would be questionable to him. (Assuming there, but still). However if I flipped scum it makes you town.
Only thing that nudged me wrong the other day was tier's posts about loving how another player matches his own reads. (However its just a playstyle difference for me and it hints him as buddying up to Nati).
No matter how high the stakes, sooner or later you're just gonna have to go with your gut.
And maybe, just maybe, that'll take you right where you were supposed to be.
Post
Post #234 (isolation #47) » Thu Nov 28, 2013 3:06 am
Postby Malakittens »
In post 233, Natirasha wrote:Nah Huntress is town either way. The way you two have interacted is almost exactly like how SSK and I post to each other. It indicates to me that you're scum, but it also indicates to me regardless of your alignment that Huntress is town.
I'm able to read her by interactions and there's a reason I wanted her to engage me and its due to our last two recent games together (this site and our homesite). Just because you and SSK play similar doesnt mean her and I do. Have to say I dislike when someone puts their meta on someone else.
No matter how high the stakes, sooner or later you're just gonna have to go with your gut.
And maybe, just maybe, that'll take you right where you were supposed to be.
Post
Post #241 (isolation #48) » Thu Nov 28, 2013 9:10 am
Postby Malakittens »
Probably reason she's expressing suspicion is because last time I was (scum) I town read her very early on and then decided to ingore/buddy her. I noticed a pattern when she's also scum on this so I was seeing her reaction. As I stated before its a town reaction and not something I'd expect out of scum-Huntress.
No matter how high the stakes, sooner or later you're just gonna have to go with your gut.
And maybe, just maybe, that'll take you right where you were supposed to be.
Post
Post #242 (isolation #49) » Thu Nov 28, 2013 9:30 am
Postby Malakittens »
In post 240, Yiley wrote:Ok for right now I would like tom VOTE: goodmorning
I kinda don't like this only because you haven't caught up. We don't have your thoughts, reads or anything that could help us determine your alignment. Yet swing on a vote.
Are you suspicious of GM or is it due to DL approaching?
No matter how high the stakes, sooner or later you're just gonna have to go with your gut.
And maybe, just maybe, that'll take you right where you were supposed to be.
In post 241, Malakittens wrote:Probably reason she's expressing suspicion is because last time I was (scum) I town read her very early on and then decided to ingore/buddy her. I noticed a pattern when she's also scum on this so I was seeing her reaction. As I stated before its a town reaction and not something I'd expect out of scum-Huntress.
Nope. I'm using it to actually get a certain read out of her. She kinda ingores the crap out of me when she's scum, but works a bit with me when she's town. If you see how many times that game town-me had to engage her in order to get a type of read. You can also see how waffley I was in my read on her after certain posts.
No case in point there.
If you at all glanced at the thread I linked its my town game vs her scum game. Our other second completed game here we were confirmed masons together so we didn't engage each other in thread.
No matter how high the stakes, sooner or later you're just gonna have to go with your gut.
And maybe, just maybe, that'll take you right where you were supposed to be.
Post
Post #245 (isolation #51) » Thu Nov 28, 2013 10:18 am
Postby Malakittens »
In post 239, TierShift wrote:I think the time is now to really vote. It's gonna be pretty hard to gather 5 votes...
ED, nati is probably not receiving a lynch majority, could you please vote someone you think can actually receive 5 votes? I'm gonna use a lame appeal to authority argument here, but all the experienced players are on mala or gm except for themselves. I think it's gonna be between them two either way. Even if you think both are town, better a mislynch than no lynch.
Also welcome yiley, hope you catch up soon.
Also I'm the only one here, but I wouldn't self vote even if I was at L-1 approaching a deadline in less than 2 mins. If I'm town I won't self vote at all even if its for information. I just won't.
If I know something's a mislynch I try my hardest to fight and not accept it.
That's however just me and how I approach my lynch at a deadline. I would still be hesitant to vote someone I think is town though.
No matter how high the stakes, sooner or later you're just gonna have to go with your gut.
And maybe, just maybe, that'll take you right where you were supposed to be.
Post
Post #248 (isolation #52) » Thu Nov 28, 2013 4:43 pm
Postby Malakittens »
In post 247, emeraldemon wrote:Malakittens you still haven't put a vote down, how would you feel about a gm lynch? I will try to get something in tonight, but if not I will definitely be around tomorrow.
I'm not against it, but due to her V/LA and our deadline we might not be able to get a claim from her before lynching her. That's my only worry.
No matter how high the stakes, sooner or later you're just gonna have to go with your gut.
And maybe, just maybe, that'll take you right where you were supposed to be.
In post 247, emeraldemon wrote:Malakittens you still haven't put a vote down, how would you feel about a gm lynch? I will try to get something in tonight, but if not I will definitely be around tomorrow.
I'm not against it, but due to her V/LA and our deadline we might not be able to get a claim from her before lynching her. That's my only worry.
are you townreading her or scumreading her
and if you don't think that she is a good lynch who is your second choice and why are you not pushing on them
Because I didn't want to vote her when she's v/LA because that would have put her to L-1 and possibly someone would have hammered without a claim. (Ironically happened anyways)
No matter how high the stakes, sooner or later you're just gonna have to go with your gut.
And maybe, just maybe, that'll take you right where you were supposed to be.
Post
Post #280 (isolation #54) » Mon Dec 02, 2013 5:23 pm
Postby Malakittens »
There's probably no reason why mafia would no kill. The only time I have ever seen them do it was when they either forgot to send in a kill or they did it to setup a town member after they knew the setup. I'm pretty sure the latter wouldn't have happened so I'm thinking either the kill was blocked or it was doc protected, but no use trying to fish at this point.
@Roth:
277 is bad. You basically appealed to emotions saying "I fully accept a lynch".
I'm kinda sitting here waffling on my Mollie read tbf. Don't really know what to think there.
Nati my gut is still pinging against you and that's never a good feeling or a good sign. I also don't really like Yiley either, but Roth's hammer was horrible. I didn't really like how quickly that wagon moved to L-1 and I don't particularly care for the hammer without intent to hammer for a claim.
However I'm not going to vote Roth because I'm pretty sure everyone wants his head on a lynch and I don't want anymore hammers and I sure as hell don't want a quick D2.
No matter how high the stakes, sooner or later you're just gonna have to go with your gut.
And maybe, just maybe, that'll take you right where you were supposed to be.
Post
Post #291 (isolation #55) » Tue Dec 03, 2013 7:42 am
Postby Malakittens »
Can we
not
fish for anyone to claim.
No matter how high the stakes, sooner or later you're just gonna have to go with your gut.
And maybe, just maybe, that'll take you right where you were supposed to be.
Post
Post #312 (isolation #56) » Wed Dec 04, 2013 4:46 pm
Postby Malakittens »
VOTE: Mollie
No matter how high the stakes, sooner or later you're just gonna have to go with your gut.
And maybe, just maybe, that'll take you right where you were supposed to be.
I think I know why you are doing this and you are wrong to jump to that conclusion.
I am pretty sure nasty rash is scum.
What am I doing?
Why?
No matter how high the stakes, sooner or later you're just gonna have to go with your gut.
And maybe, just maybe, that'll take you right where you were supposed to be.
Post
Post #337 (isolation #58) » Fri Dec 06, 2013 6:35 am
Postby Malakittens »
Okay all of these 1 vote wagons are ridiculous,
When I'm home I need to reread for some gut feels with an open mind.
No matter how high the stakes, sooner or later you're just gonna have to go with your gut.
And maybe, just maybe, that'll take you right where you were supposed to be.
Post
Post #358 (isolation #59) » Sat Dec 07, 2013 9:36 am
Postby Malakittens »
Hold off til Mollie answers first. (To Emerald)
^ ThenI'll answer your question.
No matter how high the stakes, sooner or later you're just gonna have to go with your gut.
And maybe, just maybe, that'll take you right where you were supposed to be.
