In post 89, hayatoBL wrote:notsci made two townreads. One on you and one on Android.
There was a talk between you and HiShroo about ‘giving reads’. HiShroo was against. You was for. And for that notsci read you as town.
Android preferred an interesting game. Also, notsci read him as town.
So, his town reads were based on opinion on how to play the game and preference. How is that alignment-indicative?
Would you have a different opinion on how to play the game, if you had the opposite alignment you’re having right now? Or perhaps the likelihood of getting town-role increase if you have a certain opinion about the game?
The same with preference.
Preference and opinion wouldn't necessarily change, but you can bet your hide that expressions of them would. The mafia do not want the town to get active and organized; an inactive and/or disorganized town is the best ticket to a mafia victory. Mafia typically haven't got a reason to be so active in encouraging people to get reads out and pressing people for reads. Likewise with Android, especially given how widespread the belief that "lynch all liars" is a perfectly acceptable strategy, point-blank saying "I like it when town lie because it makes the game more interesting and nerfs the good town players" is suicidal if he is mafia.
Neither of those are 100% ironclad proofs that either me or Android are town, but they certainly provide enough justification to read us as town, so I definitely don't see where you conclude they're fake.
It felt at that time, as if he’s pulling town-reads out of a hat.
I wouldn't be suprised, if it came from a Newbie, but from an IC?
Tl;dr
It felt fake.
And you didn’t feel that way?
No, and your explanation certainly hasn't done anything to change that. You can't just call someone's town reads fake like it's a fact and then turn around and go "I just felt that way, what, you didn't?"
In post 90, hayatoBL wrote:But some of those are just excessive, not needed. For instance:
In post 68, Eden wrote:lol, wtf @ Volition
If Volition is mafia that's a pretty bold opening move. Volition, you care to share any of your reasons for why you think either of jaye or Android122 are mafia?
That question was unnecessary. Jaye has already asked that question. Why would you ask the same one again?
Why the hell wouldn't I? I wanted to know the answer. I don't give a shit what other people have done. You'd have a point if most of my questions to people were just echoing what others have said, but that's almost impossible by definition (since I have the most words and most posts) and definitely isn't true regardless (most of my questions posed have been original content).
Your preliminary reads (on page 1, I think). There are a lot of words, but less content. That list reads basically you’re saying hayato and DDR slightly scum and all other nulls. It felt like you just want to post a lot of words to look like you’re scum-hunting.
There's plenty of content, everything in that list either stated my read on a player or explained it by commenting on what the player had said up to that point. And sure, I guess a scum player could try scumhunting really hard really early to look town, but there was absolutely no pressure on me to look like I was scumhunting, so your assigned motive doesn't fit.
Also, you asked certain players reads on specific players. A question in almost every post. One example: You asked my reads on HiShroo and TCold. I answered it with : “No reads” or something like that. And there was no continuation to that discussion. It’s like you had done what you wanted, which is to post the question and that’s it.
Again, if I were doing this for the significant majority of my questions, this point would stick, but the fact that we're even having this back-and-forth at all should be proof positive that this isn't what's happening. If I'm just trying to ask my questions and skate by on that, I have no motive to press you for the reasons why you think I'm suspicious.
This is how I felt: It felt like you are scum who was given a To-Do-List.
1. Make a long list of reads – check.
2. Urge people to contribute – check
3. Question somebody something – check
Tl;dr
Eden is hungry for town-cred.
A to-do list from whom, Santa Claus? A scum partner that isn't even guaranteed to be sufficiently qualified to give me a to-do list and expect me to follow orders? And do you really think, based off my play so far, that if I were given a to-do list I'd pay the slightest heed to it?
If I am wrong and you’re town, I hope you won’t be discouraged and continue scum-hunting, however you see fit.
Good news! I wasn't going to change anything I was doing or be discouraged regardless of what you said.
TL;DR: Your arguments aren't wrong (there's too little confirmed data to say that absolutely), but your assignments of motives for my behavior don't match up with the current incentive structure of the game at all and make them significantly likely to be misguided. [and to be clear this is my best attempt to speak from a 'neutral' POV, leaving out my own knowledge that I'm town]