[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 6427810 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null Newbie 1560 -- Game Over - Mafiascum.net
This slot is scum. Not due to Depi's actions, but those of his predecessor.
At first, I thought paul's nervousness at being targeted during RVS was just newb behavior, but when he replaced our the second I stopped suspecting him as scum, it occurred to me that he was dodging a ban for a strategic replace out.
You don't find replacing to be a null tell?
Also, were are the other pro-players? New scum can learn from elleheathen's impressive lurking.
Post
Post #122 (isolation #10) » Sat Dec 06, 2014 5:10 am
Postby TheFireRises »
In post 121, Howl wrote:I wasn't sure if I should bring it up, but paul has rejoined the queue so he didn't replace due to something with activity. I don't know if that can or should be used as part of a case but it's a thing and doesn't feel right to me.
That's pretty shifty, but using outside-the-game-info doesn't feel right to me.
Post
Post #126 (isolation #11) » Sat Dec 06, 2014 8:09 am
Postby TheFireRises »
In post 125, Derangement wrote:There's two scum in the game: Regardless of who you think the first one is, help us find both of them, please.
That's a tall order, especially when a good chunk of the playerlist hasn't posted anything beyond an introduction. I'm suspicious of you and depi, but I don't think it can be both of you. It's clear to me that there is scum hiding at the moment. (Of course, we're only on the first few pages here.)
Post
Post #139 (isolation #14) » Sat Dec 06, 2014 9:04 am
Postby TheFireRises »
In post 135, Hopkirk wrote:@125
Paulwise: You think he's a big newbie so why would newbie's not act that way?
Wondering if the townreads on all the non newbies is intentional or scuking up. Not enough info to get a read on me but slight town instead of null/neutral is odd.
Firerises wise: Could you clarify this a little, do you mean look for the scumteam or multiple scummy players.
I see plenty of back-and-forth between the two of you, but there's no substance in it.
What might have been a legitimate accusation of Elle being inactive has spun off into talk about... fluff?
A quick wiki search finds nothing about the term, which leads me to think the two of you are trying to seem active, without actually contributing anything.
Am I wrong here?
Elle's lack of activity (and shallow posts to cover it) IS the fluff.
Look at her ISO. There's nothing there. I am not misrepping when I say that, you can see for yourself.
Post
Post #167 (isolation #18) » Sat Dec 06, 2014 11:24 am
Postby TheFireRises »
In post 160, elleheathen wrote:IMO, if you're going to make an accusation, at least have some substance behind it as opposed to just trying to make someone look scummy because they haven't been on in awhile.
A misrep, you clearly just made up the last part of the sentence.
I see plenty of back-and-forth between the two of you, but there's no substance in it.
What might have been a legitimate accusation of Elle being inactive has spun off into talk about... fluff?
A quick wiki search finds nothing about the term, which leads me to think the two of you are trying to seem active, without actually contributing anything.
Am I wrong here?
Elle's lack of activity (and shallow posts to cover it) IS the fluff.
Look at her ISO. There's nothing there. I am not misrepping when I say that, you can see for yourself.
I think you need to read Hopkirk's explanation of fluff.
And I don't have a lot of posts, it's not hard to break down. Here:
#5 - Irrelevant, confirmation post
#15 - RVS vote
#90 - In reference to House fake-town reading my vote because of my avatar. It makes me uneasy.
#127 - Def not fluff.
#128 - Def fluff with context. I like read walls.
#133 - Def not fluff. Serious vote.
#134 - Giving a read based on the context on my #128 fluff.
So. 7 posts before you accused me off fluff. And 1 out of those that was actual fluff - though, I'll concede that #90 could have been seen as such, too. So 2.
Dangerously close to another misrep, friend.
I called you out after 90, before 127. You would then agree that prior to my vote, you had not made a serious post. The rest is you defending yourself and giving out snarky/obvious comments.
Post
Post #193 (isolation #19) » Sat Dec 06, 2014 1:54 pm
Postby TheFireRises »
deathfisaro, you cast suspicion everywhere but you haven't voted at all since replacing. It looks like you just don't want to commit to something and draw attention. See you Monday.
Post
Post #196 (isolation #20) » Sat Dec 06, 2014 2:10 pm
Postby TheFireRises »
In post 194, Derangement wrote:All right. Since we're one Deathfisaro short for a couple of days, I'll make it easier for town to avoid dumb mistakes, and turn my attention elsewhere... for now.
I spy with my little eye something beginning with "unhelpful". UNVOTE: VOTE: TheFireRises
In post 194, Derangement wrote:All right. Since we're one Deathfisaro short for a couple of days, I'll make it easier for town to avoid dumb mistakes, and turn my attention elsewhere... for now.
I spy with my little eye something beginning with "unhelpful". UNVOTE: VOTE: TheFireRises
Good idea, now that fisaro can't unvote me.
Unhelpful with what, exactly?
Can you point out what you
have
been helpful with?
If you were town, wouldn't you be making the most of your day phase?
But I am trying to. Do have an actual argument to make?
Post
Post #200 (isolation #22) » Sat Dec 06, 2014 2:53 pm
Postby TheFireRises »
I feel like I've been pretty transparent with my scum reads. I don't like Elle and Dee, and I don't like deathfisaro either, particularly after his last post.
I noticed you were defending Elle a bit. Have you played with her before?
In post 200, TheFireRises wrote:I feel like I've been pretty transparent with my scum reads. I don't like Elle and Dee, and I don't like deathfisaro either, particularly after his last post.
I noticed you were defending Elle a bit. Have you played with her before?
Compare your analysis on your reads with the analysis other players make of theirs, ragardless of whether they're for the same people or not.
Do you see any differences?
Now look at your ISO. Do you think you are doing enough to improve the quality of the reads everyone has?
Yes? People might not agree with my reads, but I've worked hard in putting them out there. I feel like you're just trying to find a reason to bust me, without doing any work whatsoever.
Post
Post #396 (isolation #29) » Sat Dec 13, 2014 5:12 pm
Postby TheFireRises »
Friendly reminder that ludakic has made a whopping 3 posts, the last of which was a week ago. I'm not saying he's scummy, but I'm just saying he might be a figment of our imaginations.
I don't have time to pay ping pong posting with you. I work 14 hours a day and check in when I can.
If you want to lynch me, do it at the end of the day, and use the rest of this time to scum hunt so I can do so as well through interactions.
Bickering with me isn't helping me confirm my read on Hopkirk at all, so you go ahead and rush to lynch me if it suits your fancy.
Either way, I can't play the game.
I'm getting a little tired of this. You want us to sheep you, but you're too cool to explain anything. I don't think you're Mick Jagger, I think you're just talking out of your ass.
Post
Post #423 (isolation #31) » Sun Dec 14, 2014 9:57 am
Postby TheFireRises »
I got you two confused, sorry.
What exactly are you trying to do then, House? You say you're too busy to explain, but you've posted more here than most people have, and you're playing more games than most people are.
Post
Post #514 (isolation #34) » Mon Dec 15, 2014 3:36 pm
Postby TheFireRises »
In post 500, House wrote:If you read my post games like you claim you did, you would know I outed all the members of my scum team in my first reads list in NY 177, for example.
And I bussed the shit out of both of them.
In post 495, House wrote:If I was scum, I'd have bussed the shit out of her for town cred.
You seem really proud of this. The argument implies that you would never change your scum meta.
Do I town read him? No - look at the guys posts. But I'm not scum reading him either.
I think it's because I really think both scum are on that D1 wagon - and that both scum have been active throughout today - and he's not either.
I can't be reading this right. If you thought the wagon was scummy, then why did you hammer?
Post
Post #520 (isolation #36) » Mon Dec 15, 2014 3:58 pm
Postby TheFireRises »
In post 479, Derangement wrote:We lynch TFR. If he flips town, House and Elle are mafia. Now in LyLo, we vote one after the other and town still wins.
If TFR flips mafia, that clears both elle and house. In the next two days, we can then easily find who the last scum is and offer them a nice neck rope for Christmas.
I hate when people set up lynch queues like this.
Say you lynch me, but I'm wrong about my reads. You lynch either House or Elle, and scum wins. Don't make this sound like its a heads or tails scenario.
In post 500, House wrote:If you read my post games like you claim you did, you would know I outed all the members of my scum team in my first reads list in NY 177, for example.
And I bussed the shit out of both of them.
In post 495, House wrote:If I was scum, I'd have bussed the shit out of her for town cred.
You seem really proud of this. The argument implies that you would never change your scum meta.
I know how I play. I'm simple to read if people take a minute and actually look outside of their preconceived notions.
Short version is: If I'm looking scummy, I'm probably town. If I'm paying a town game, chances are I'm scum.
I don't understand. You would lose every game as scum If you had the same tells every time.
Post
Post #606 (isolation #41) » Thu Dec 18, 2014 7:29 am
Postby TheFireRises »
In post 600, Micc wrote:Sorry guys. Got home from school yesterday and ended up being pretty busy.
I still think Elleheathen is scum, and I dont understand any of the convoluted plans Ive seen to lynch elsewhere today. She has enough expeirence on this site to know that hammer was terible, yet she pretends to think that it was ok play. Thats straight up policy lynch material.
Case study: The same thing happened in Newbie 1548. I tried to make excuses for why Molla might have hammered without a claim, but when it comes down to it that action is policy lynch material. Molla flipped scum.
So...after lunch im going to go back and read the stuff I missed, respond to it, vote Elle, and refuse to move it until she's lynched.
You haven't voted since replacing in. Why are you so hesitant? Especially since you've been scumreading elle from the beginning.
Post
Post #713 (isolation #49) » Sat Dec 27, 2014 1:46 pm
Postby TheFireRises »
Thanks for the advice, Micc. I was very suspicious of the guy you replaced, but it turned null the moment you came in and I sort of forgot about you, which I'm guessing was exactly what you wanted!
By the way, Nobody Special, not to pry, but at the end of page 1 the thread was locked for like an entire day and then the IC was replaced. What was up with that?