[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 6845477 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null Newbie 1605 (Game Over) - Mafiascum.net
Post
Post #22 (isolation #3) » Mon May 11, 2015 2:47 pm
Postby heyboxgaminig »
In post 20, Drixx wrote:@Hexboxgaminig - You do realize that there is a full stop at the period right? I said that no role was worthless. I then pointed out that even "no role" has upsides. Noted that you tried to attack the IC by intentionally misinterpreting something he said. Scum tend to target the IC as a general rule. You just went to the top of the suspect list.
OOOOOOOOOOH defensive, i like that! as you would say "noted"
Also if you thought i was being serious this early in the game and with the amount of "smileys" i used then forgive me for forgetting that you are the IC
Post
Post #26 (isolation #4) » Mon May 11, 2015 3:11 pm
Postby heyboxgaminig »
hmmmmmmmmmmm yes!
vote for me! [line]i wanna be president![/line]
Frankly I was just messing around fishing for reactions, and i got some bites.
Fakespear- Saying what is already self evident
OkaPoka- defending me then saying vote for me? LOL
Frankly i am trying a new playstyle and so far its not working out for me
Whatever im calling that jeanne is one shot bullet proof, because in her last game her first posts told her power role and i guess that is what she is trying to do, pretty easy to track if you ask me XD
Feel free to check all of my last games for some more info on my playstyle, i have one scum game and one town game... well i guess i have two town games now
Post
Post #41 (isolation #7) » Mon May 11, 2015 6:02 pm
Postby heyboxgaminig »
In post 38, patzer wrote:Hi all. I'm a SE, which means I'm supposed to know how this whole malarkey works.
And I sort of do.
And heybox is behaving oddly. Whether that means
they
are scum is a different matter, but I'll go for the semi-random vote.
VOTE: heyboxgaminig
Crap, you found out about my split personality! Semi-seruis vote is not enough info. how am i acting weirdly? let town know why to vote me and let scum know how to use me as a scapegoat
In post 31, heyboxgaminig wrote:Thats not fair, i don't think anybody is shitty here. The day is young.
Lets have a good game guys, also i would love to hear about peoples current experience?? Like, other games on other sites? success in other games?
Especially with you OP (thats what im calling you from now on.) Your being very passive aggressive =)
I've played a couple of games online on another forum, quite different vibe to here - they don't have a rvs so they tend to have the same discussion on what to do each D1, pressure a TPR until they claim and then lynch a vanilla townie that's how it feels anyway!
LOVELY SCUM READ HERE, I want to vote you so bad for this post,
I'm doing it!
VOTE: Trainedmonkey
For two reasons
Why the f@^! would you want to make a TPR claim day one, that's an instant death night one and one step closer to scum winning
and why in gods name would you want to lynch a VT?!?! why would you not want to lynch scum?
Post
Post #81 (isolation #16) » Tue May 12, 2015 11:55 am
Postby heyboxgaminig »
The reason I know the game is because my friend Shadoxx was in it and I was watching his game and saw all of the fluff posted that i was not worried about!
Post
Post #121 (isolation #25) » Thu May 14, 2015 2:20 pm
Postby heyboxgaminig »
Looking through all of OP'S games he does seem to have this trollish attitude throughout.... and he does seem to pick up on day 2 as he has stated, although this is not helping us as a town now i can understand his trollish posts untill night 2
In post 121, heyboxgaminig wrote:Looking through all of OP'S games he does seem to have this trollish attitude throughout.... and he does seem to pick up on day 2 as he has stated, although this is not helping us as a town now i can understand his trollish posts untill night 2
Null read.
thats a lot of effort for a game of mafia
Im in math. Im bored.
Sue me.
Plus your troll attitude led me to thinking you were scum cos you weren't helping very much.
In post 139, OkaPoka wrote:UNVOTE: jeanne11
scratch that i remembered somethin
VOTE: stoz
I'm glad you're not voting Jeanne, although not that impressed with your new vote.
VOTE: OkaPoka and I think others should vote for him because he is jumping all over the place changing his mind and trying to manipulate people like crazy.
in other words...
vote okapoka becuz he is voting me
In post 147, patzer wrote:However, I get a vague vibe that Trainedmonkey might be scum trying to start a wagon on OkaPoka.
You've almost convinced me patzer. Anyone else want to contribute a convince me a bit more?
Interesting that patzer votes for me despite the fact you were the one calling for others to join the wagon and then you claim to be "almost convinced" by someone saying they have vague suspicions based on the very thing you did...
In post 158, Trainedmonkey wrote:
The comment about remembering something when there was nothing to remember about stoz. If they'd said it was to remove the vote from Jeanne and/or for lack of contribution (I.e. Same reason for the Jeanne vote) I would probably not have voted. Vote just just still there while I was deciding who to move it to.
Actually, the "just remembered something" could well be talking about the unvote on Jeanne. There's no reason to assume it was refering to the vote on stoz.
In post 139, OkaPoka wrote:UNVOTE: jeanne11
scratch that i remembered somethin
VOTE: stoz
I call shenanigans. You've remembered nothing. Nothing has changed regarding stoz since your post 131 when you didn't bother to vote stoz so I don't believe you.
VOTE: OkaPoka
There was a massive difference between Oka's post 131 and 138. Between then, I had pointed out Jeanne and stoz's inactivity, then the mod prodded those two players. I voted Jeanne based on inactivity, and OkaPoka decided to emulate this, before switching their vote to the other inactive player- stoz.
The difference is, Oka's vote for stoz was presumably a vote based on inactivity, despite the fact they didn't explicity state this. The circumstances were quite different in post 131.
Yes, they could have stated the actual reason for their votes and avoided this.
With all due respect, you seem to be far too critical of OkaPoka's behavior. OkaPoka usually behaves like a troll on day 1, and the presence of such behavior shouldn't be considered very suspicious. Besides, it's not likely that a mafioso would vote for a player in such a manner without any explanation at all; usually some explanation is given by mafia, who tend to be more cautious and afraid of misinterpretation. (though I admit OkaPoka may be an exception to this rule!)
You mentioned that you have played in some mafia games on other forums. Would you be able to provide a link to these, so we can analyse your playstyle if wanted?
Looks like your trying to defend a scum buddy here, and i like how you back yourself up saying "OP may be an exception" so if we lynch him then he is scum you can just fall back onto that
In post 159, heyboxgaminig wrote:saw 2 votes, wanted to create pressure to force and answer out of OP
It Worked... Kinda.. not really... so my vote stays
Brb idk gtg will post later but have work!
if it doesn't really work then why is the vote there?
Because look how much it has done now =) your contributing and we have a mild scum read on patzer now =) thats pretty good since the game was starting to drift off!
Do you think it could be a white knight situation??
Drixx wrote:2.) Whether they are using proper reasoning. I expect town players to look at the evidence and let it guide them to a theory. Scum already know who is on their team, so they by necessity have to use reasoning that begins with a {false} theory that a townie is scum, and then they have to go and manipulate things said person did or said in order to make a narrative that is convincing.
It isn't quite this simple for two reasons. Firstly, this is a newbie game, and thus some town players might not be good at strategy, and thus not implement this evidence-based theory system. Secondly, and more importantly, scum do not appear to use reasoning that begins with a false theory! They would find a false theory, and construct a narrative leading to it. But then they would try to portray the theory in the same way that they believe a townie would. Due to this, it's difficult to find the subtle differences between theory-based evidence and evidence-based theory, when they're presented in the same way.
The general gist of what you're saying is true - thank you for that - but I think it paints the differences between scum and town behavior as being bigger than they are.
As for #1, activity level, how would you apply that to a player like Trainedmonkey? He has told us that he's played elsewhere, but doesn't want to provide a link to the games played elsewhere.
Had just written this, when I realized I was using loaded language negatively portraying Trainedmonkey, in order to ask what appears to be a neutral question. That is bad. I'm just leaving this here as an important reminder to avoid this sort of a fallacy, as it ties in with Drixx has been saying about correct logic.
In post 184, patzer wrote:I announce that, if it gets within 2 hours of the deadline and we still haven't lynched anyone, I intend to vote for the player who has the most votes at that point, regardless of my opinion of the guilt of this player.
Does that include yourself? Are players even allowed to vote for themselves?
Yes and yes.
Self hammering is scummy.
No reason to self hammer yourself if you know your town. thats a minus 2 per night apart from a minus 1 which goes towards a scum win condition.
In post 210, OkaPoka wrote:
do you agree completely with drixx's list? If not then explain what is wrong with the drixx list.
I am really confused. Drixx shared a classification system he has used previously and I attempted to classify everyone using that system.
Is your question directed at me? And are you asking if I agree with Drixx's classification system? Because I haven't seen him publish an actual list of players yet, just the categories themselves.
FWIW, I think Drixx's classification system is good, but I'm the only one to have published a list for this game using that system so far. Patzer agreed with my list and Drixx said it was "fairly decent", but I would be happy to take more comments on it.
If you claim I'm a one, and drixx says scum are rarely found here. So you think im an epic scum player since you are voting me???!!!!
Post
Post #217 (isolation #36) » Sun May 24, 2015 12:43 am
Postby heyboxgaminig »
In post 215, Drixx wrote:OkaPoka is only a one because there hasn't been a lot to talk about yet, and he posts frequently and has addressed every topic thus far.
Was it not you that said not to answer on the behalf of another player??
Why in the case did u answer a question not directed at you??
Just gonna point out incase, now I'm directing it at you!
In post 215, Drixx wrote:OkaPoka is only a one because there hasn't been a lot to talk about yet, and he posts frequently and has addressed every topic thus far.
Was it not you that said not to answer on the behalf of another player??
Why in the case did u answer a question not directed at you??
Just gonna point out incase, now I'm directing it at you!
There was no question. You made a statement. You didn't ask a question. I gave my opinion on response to your statement.
There was no question but i thought it was obvious that i was looking for a response
Just because there was no question mark does not mean that i was not expecting an explanation from them.
In post 249, Trainedmonkey wrote:Been a 3 day weekend here. Not round much on weekends. See another vote on me. When I flip town will that still help you formulate your opinions?
But you are here now, and that's how you choose to respond? Not even an argument against the points brought up about you, just 'when I flip Town'. Not a very compelling argument, or something that would make me want to switch my vote.
Post
Post #312 (isolation #40) » Thu May 28, 2015 3:02 pm
Postby heyboxgaminig »
OK here is how I see it,
Lynching Drixx is bad because he is IC, to be frank, i dont care if he is scum just yet because the posts he has made (although 70% are "will make a post soon" kind of filler) are good. somewhat. If the deadline was not so close i would go and side with IAI. If i was a cop he is the one i would inspect.
Lynching IAI, this is not going to happen. I like the push he has made against drixx, adore it in fact! scum would not do this! probably my only real town read at this position of time. except for maybe...
Monkey is town. No self hammer makes me think that scum are waiting patiently for the deadline lynch and maybe are just trying to confirm to everybody to stay on this wagon... and who might be doing that you ask?
well..... patzer.
Sorry for this
Unvote
VOTE: Patzer
I know we are close to a no lynch but as i said before i would rather have that. + the night kill will be all I need to make a push on day 2, as to me, night kill info is much better then lynch info!
Post
Post #337 (isolation #45) » Fri May 29, 2015 2:18 pm
Postby heyboxgaminig »
LOL
Dont worry stoz, you wont be the night kill, and if you are I'm VERY worried :')
I dont see bailish as scum, just inactive.
also its annoying me that people wont vote for me. like gosh!
also it worries me about how much of IAI posts are about forming wagons.... and his pre-decided idea that we should already form a lynch pool.. comes off a tad scummy.
ALSO IF ONE MORE PERSON DECIDES WHO WE SHOULD VOTE, OFF INACTIVITY, THEN I WILL LYNCH MYSELF XD
I dont agree with a trained monkey lynch but it seems as if i have no say in the matter :/
Post
Post #340 (isolation #46) » Fri May 29, 2015 5:00 pm
Postby heyboxgaminig »
LOL woops yea, ummmm 3 hours from now then, XD
My reads? only scum would ask me that right before night 1 starts. We Know who the night kill will be. It wont be me. If it is. eh.
Cant hurt to say that i see, patzer to be the current most scummy. although its dwindling as she explained why we should vote for monkey. drixx is pretty scummy. He will be night killed tho.
IAI is town. no doubt.
Oka, your town in my books ATM but im expecting big things from you day 2
Post
Post #381 (isolation #50) » Fri Jun 05, 2015 7:48 pm
Postby heyboxgaminig »
Hey guys! I pmed the mod but i guess he did not get it :/ i said i was gonna be absent for a couple of days due to camp..
Anyway i see i have 2 votes now. Interesting.
I will dispute OP's case soon enough, would love to have a shower and msg the GF beforehand though and im not worried about myself getting lynched.
IAI not being killed makes me suspect drixx less but drix not being killed makes me suspect him more. maybe that's just me though.
my thoughts on patzer as a night kill are as follows,
weird.
yea thats about it XD she was pushing hard on monkey who was a VT so it does not make much sense to kill her... heck i would have expected scum to kill me. that really would have confused the town.
will post more but need the beforementioned shower and rest.
Post
Post #386 (isolation #51) » Sun Jun 07, 2015 6:09 pm
Postby heyboxgaminig »
Sorry about this responces lateness, i did write up a draft but then my computer blue screened and i was too lazy to write it up again.
Either you give me a chance to write up the longer version again or you except this short responce
I am not scum. you said i have only been hopping wagons cos there are more people on it. yet all of my votes have good reasons or are there to create pressure. please check my iso.
You say me getting anoyyed at monkey for PR telling yet blabber on about Jeanes, although i did talk about jeanes and i regret that but getting anoyyed at monkey does not meen anything other then im not scum?
I think it is a silly case but if you need more evidense i can attempt to rewrite up the whole thing :/
In post 385, Drixx wrote:We need to get some activity going here. I will do my best to see to it in the morning.
If you refuse to put down votes, would you at least please rank the other 6 players from towniest to scummiest, or vice versa, I really don't care.
Interesting that the neither of the two vote getters have casted a vote yet today. I would like to hear Stoz's and heybox's top 2 scum reads ASAP.
The NK has srsly got me questioning my reads. Not sure if I'm off on some of my town reads from end of D1 (Oka, Heybox) or my scum reads (Baelish, Drixx) or both. I'm leaning both, and am happy that the two vote getters currently were on the Monkey wagon. I do like that one of my town reads is voting the other (oka on heybox), makes me realize I'm probably not wrong about both of them.
At this point, I will likely vote one of heybox and stoz, but want to see their scum reads in their next post first. Only thing that would detract me from that is if Drixx continues to fail to produce any votes OR reads, if so I will push for a policy lynch of him. I understand differences in playstyle, but I have never in my 30+ games seen anything this extreme. Reads please!
My towniest to scummiest.
% relates to how much of me thinks there town.
TOWN
Me 100% confirmed
OkaPoka 75%
IAI was 65% but due to saying he will only vote for either of the wagons drops him to a 60% confirmed, Something feels off about it.
gravity 60% for starting a stoz waggon and being productive
stoz 55% nothing super townie about him, nothing scummy either, but by day two if sombody has not done at least one thing scummy then there probs not scum. bad way to look at it hence only a slight town read
drixx is at 50% cos somthing feels off but im not too sure...
ravenclaw 45% due to too much coasting and doing not much.
Post
Post #408 (isolation #59) » Tue Jun 09, 2015 11:33 pm
Postby heyboxgaminig »
In post 404, Drixx wrote:Heybox can only be soft claiming one thing, or else Heybox's slot would have gone after IAI's slot already. If Heybox doesn't die tonight, it's scum.
HOOOOOOOOLD UP.
How do you know i could only be claiming on thing?!?!