Lack of tonal perception from Franky.In post 8, Franky wrote:Why would you try to force an interpretation on an RVS vote?In post 7, thenewearth wrote:Nacho probably remembers me and is voting because he doesnt want any hindrance to his mafia plans.
Also as far as i know its "pre-game" and votes dont count.
But just in case its counted
VOTE: nacho
VOTE: thenewearth
Do you think making quick judgements is alignment indicative?In post 12, Franky wrote:Dirty Harry is quick to make judgements.
Do you think my "quick" judgements were "malicious"/"out of nowhere"?In post 15, Franky wrote:If it's malicious and/or out of nowhere, then yeah, It's scum indicative.In post 14, Dirty Harry wrote:Do you think making quick judgements is alignment indicative?In post 12, Franky wrote:Dirty Harry is quick to make judgements.
Pro-active intro.In post 22, e_is_cool wrote:Hello.
Because no one has done RQS (is there one of those on this forum?) I will do that now.
1) Are you mafia or town?
2) Any experience?
3) Which side will win?
My answers:
1) SK
2) Around 3 games of mafia (on another forum)
3) Tie. Vig and Mafia will shoot each other last night. (This game will be secretly BM and Vig will show up out of nowhere.)
And just to bandwagon because no votes count, VOTE: thenewearth.
Days are 14 days long so I don't think it will be a problem.In post 26, e_is_cool wrote:Oops I just noticed that I will beV/LA from 6/30-7/3. Hopefully I only get a prod or two and it doesn't affect the game too much. (I might still have internet access though.)Are you trying to figure out if you should vote for your mafia partner? Because that type of question is best answered after votecounts, not before. (No point in telling everyone all the scumtells if no one has done any of them.)In post 24, Dirty Harry wrote:Nachomamma8.
Do you think there is a correlation between newb-scum voting for their scum partners?
Do you think there is a correlation between experienced scum not voting for their newb-scum partners?
80%?In post 29, thenewearth wrote:It looks town really but most of it that I encounter are from scum. 80% of it. Its a really easy LAMIST play.
I liked the motivation of e_is_cool initiating RQS as a new player.In post 31, Nachomamma8 wrote:This seems like a generally positive response to the RQS; why didn't you answer e's questions if you thought what he was doing was a good thing?
Thanks.In post 31, Nachomamma8 wrote:Yes to both of these; although I think how willing a player is to vote their scumpartner depends very very heavily on their disposition as opposed to their experience, I have thoughts on both of these.
I think that newb-scum tend to defend their scum partners too hard or they tend to vote them too early. This is based on mistakes in two different directions; I think that they defend their scumpartners too hard because they're afraid to lose them, and I think they vote them too early if they think they look scummier than they do. An average new scum player is probably less likely to vote their scumpartner than most.
I think that experienced scum rarely vote for their newb-scum partners; as scum IC, I try to give my scumpartner every opportunity to post and be townread and survive, and if possible, I'll be the one to be the sacrificial sheep and set them up for endgame, and I think that extends to most people who IC or SE seriously. That being said, if I my scumpartner is lurking or looks really scummy or we've talked about distancing in scum chat, then I'm more likely to place a distancing vote/bus.
Strong OMGUS vibe evident here.In post 44, thenewearth wrote:Also about the L-1
2 people are sheeping
Why is that? Oh right because "RQS is town you're scum because you dont agree with e"
Double lul. I swear one of them is scum along with e
In post 46, Dirty Harry wrote:Strong OMGUS vibe evident here.In post 44, thenewearth wrote:Also about the L-1
2 people are sheeping
Why is that? Oh right because "RQS is town you're scum because you dont agree with e"
Double lul. I swear one of them is scum along with e
Game solved on page 2?
Do you believe the mafia team have piled onto your wagon in pre-game to force L-1?
Do you think the sheeping is scum-indicative based on where we are?
Frustrated townie or scum trying to avoid pressure by removing themselves from focus?In post 77, thenewearth wrote:I'm not in the mindset today
I also forgot to set my V/LA
Fuck it
@mod: V/LA 2 daysI need to cool my head off
Uneasy with this snap-shot of everyone - some observations were more info/activity-led than alignment indicative-led.In post 70, Faalcon wrote:Okay, time for thoughts on everyone :
Blizzard :We know he is there, but not much more.
e_is_cool :He stayed pretty consistent when accused, so good point for him I guess. We also know he's played some games elsewhere, so he might be experienced. I see it in his debate with Harry on page 2, for instance. I don't have much else to say, and he's not there at the moment.
Harry :A pretty active guy. But being active isn't always being rational/helpful, and a lot of his posts are there for the count (all his posts on page 1, for instance). To be honest, his writing one-liners after posts (like "X is active) quite annoys me. He sometimes asks good questions though.
Faalcon :He's town. He's also me.
Franky :Like Harry, he asks a lot of questions, not all of them relevant. All around I get a "wait and see" vibe from him.
Storma : I'm waiting for him to say something.
Parabola :He's been with us for little time. He gave us some advice on nacho, and is taking part in the earth lynch.. Plus he cannot count.
Earth :The more I read his posts, the scummier he looks to me. He votes e_is_cool because of that RQS thing, which is okay. But he completely misreads that RQS, and gets all butthurt when voted. Then he votes e again despite having no motives (plus if he was doing a RVS, he'd do it on someone else I think).
Nacho :He is both helping us understand the game/debate and confusing us on himself. Looks like someone trying to be unclear on whether he's town or scum by giving us insight on his playing. Looks pretty neutral to me for now, and quite informative.
'Scum being caught for the wrong reason'?In post 71, Errantparabola wrote:ooh. i don't really like this responseIn post 57, e_is_cool wrote:The only argument you have against me is me bringing up RQS, and that's because of my meta, not because of my alignment. You also say that RQS looks town, but I'm scum because I'm doing it? That's kinda WIFOM-y.
someone take a guess at why
I was not being neutral.In post 82, e_is_cool wrote:You are being very neutral, trying talking about the game and saying how one person could be scum, but that same person could also be town. Overreacting itself isn't scum. (There's something on the wiki about this I think.)