In post 333, Sickofit1138 wrote: In post 324, lucca261 wrote: In post 283, SensFan wrote:
lucca and huntress have been the two that have stood out to me as particularly scummy in the early parts of today. Huntress in particular seems super eager to put all of a D1 lynch on one person, and has been around the block way too much to seriously think that 'one time someone did this thing and was Scum' is at all relevant.
TheBrie is super raw, which is making it hard for me to read her. For now I think I'm willing to put her in the Town pile until a bit later, but plan on looking back at her stances on people when we get more flips. I think she's the least likely to have been able to look natural as Scum looking back in hindsight on stuff like a Scum wagon.
Loopdan and I seem to naturally be on the same page on most/all issues, which makes me inclined he's looking at the game sincerely.
I don't feel like I have a good grasp on Fred/Selynee/Rask right now, though I should go back. I feel like I remember finding Fred suspicious on D1 and I'm not sure why.
Don't like this post. You have zero substance reads, save for Loopdan.
So you have four null reads, Loopdan as town, me as scum without explaining it and Huntress as scum because she put the hammer exclusively on you? You explain the total of two reads. All the other ones are unexplained.
This "readslist" feels like you are trying too hard to make your options open. If you need to ever vote one of your four null votes, by this, you can just say "Hey, I re-read then and they're scum".
Btw this is scum distancing from their partner when I called them out.
What. You didn't call "us" out. You specifically that you see nothing that made us a likely scum-pair, and that you see nothing that made us an unlikely scum-pair.
This post is so bad that makes me think that you're Town that thinks they cracked the game and is now confbiased.
In post 334, Sickofit1138 wrote: In post 276, TheBrie wrote:
What's been so hard about this game? I'm finding it getting a bit harder now that every one seems to be cross-voting. but before it didn't seem bad.
lucca261 wrote:knew it was coming.
finally somebody votes me. was starting to get lonely.
That sounds like you're trying to laugh your vote off. As if it's not a big deal. Not that it is very big yet.
In post 275, lucca261 wrote:
I never said that Huntress was scum. I said that I was thinking that maybe the only scum vote on that wagon was Huntress.
I think I know what you means, but that sounds rather contradictory.
Loopdan, likely town
Selynee, likely town, but not as strongly as before
Fred, null. He hasn't said enough for me to read him, but my gut says not scum
Rask, sounds town, but I'm not sure.
Sensfan, Null. leaning slightly town
Huntress, slightly scummy and I don't see any reason to shift my vote.
Lucca, leaning slightly scummy
Reread this and tell me that this is coming from someone's first game and they are scum.
I see nothing "unfakeable" on this post. Yes, the readslist is unconclusive. But I also have seen a lot of newbie scum that were "Confirmed NewbTown".
Can you explain to me why do you think Brie is clear? It your words.
In post 335, Sickofit1138 wrote: In post 327, lucca261 wrote:VOTE: Sickofit
Confortable with voting him with this entrance. It's the scummiest thing that happened all game.
This is a terrible OMGUS.
That's not an OMGUS. If I would do an OMGUS vote, I would probably vote someone who has voted for me, right? If I'm scum and I vote for you, it's likely that you vote for me.
You had a bad entrance to the game, sheeped the most popular opinions and is inconsistent as fuck. The rest of your posts are theory related. You have done nothing to make me think you're town, except for the whole "So scummy to be scum" post above.
nah. you're just scum.