[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 7391343 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null Blitz 6: Normal! [Game Over] - Mafiascum.net
Post
Post #187 (isolation #3) » Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:28 am
Postby LoHa »
In post 181, TheLhix wrote:Pip: He is most likely not to be null, as I have said, he is either as scummy as scum can openly be. Or, he is a hindering town like has been pointed out. If i had to vote now and instantly, it would be the easiest choice.
How is he hindering town if he is town but not scum?
In post 180, Aquanim wrote:What are the things you find unconvincing about the arguments I've made so far?
Defensiveness despite claiming to be chill is null because self-preservation is null. Is there another basis for your conclusion?
There was the observation that he seems more interested in saying things are scummy than trying to generate more information (the latter being the most important thing for a townie in the early stages of the game IMO).
What about Nosferatu?
Also, why are you voting Titus?
As opposed to Nosferatu she hasn't done anything. I can see Nosferatu's push as newbie town's attempts at getting out of RVS.
In post 179, LoHa wrote:I've read the thread and can't recall a single alignment indicative argument, so we're still in-between RVS and what comes next.
Pip's interactions don't seem forced or otherwise scummy to me and anyone exaggerating the alignment indication of the selfvote looks fishy.
If theLhix is scum his talkative style will reveal a scumslip sooner or later. Same for gung-ho farside.
VOTE: Titus
Soren, why did you get lynched on day1 3x?
This is pretty lazy and weird.
First you say you don't recall anything alignment indicative about the arguments.
Then you defend pip (which means you do see something alignment indicative) about him.
Why the vote on Titus?
Nope. I said nobody vocalized any alignment indicative arguments, which is not contradictory to Soren saying pip's self-vote was scummy being fishy.
Post
Post #236 (isolation #11) » Mon Nov 16, 2015 10:05 am
Postby LoHa »
In post 234, Titus wrote:Loha votes me for reasons that aren't clear. The only thing I said was I needed a counter to itep to get things going. That indicates not much is alignment indicative.
Loha sheeps that thought process, but votes me. If he thinks my thought process is scummy, why would he follow it? If he doesn't, then why is he voting me?
can't recall a single alignment indicative argument
, so we're still in-between RVS and what comes next.
Pip's interactions don't seem forced or otherwise scummy to me and anyone exaggerating the alignment indication of the selfvote looks fishy.
If theLhix is scum his talkative style will reveal a scumslip sooner or later. Same for gung-ho farside.
VOTE: Titus
Soren, why did you get lynched on day1 3x?
This is pretty lazy and weird.
First you say you don't recall anything alignment indicative about the arguments.
Then you defend pip (which means you do see something alignment indicative) about him.
Why the vote on Titus?
Nope. I said
nobody vocalized any alignment indicative arguments
, which is not contradictory to Soren saying pip's self-vote was scummy being fishy.
You add the qualifier 'vocalized' here. I don't understand how those sentences (bolded) are different. I'm saying that whole sentence seems unnecessary as it looks like you are simply attempting to say farside is wrong and coming up with a justification that makes no sense. From my perspective you simply added the word vocalized and pretended it changed the meaning of sentence? Would you mind explaining it differently. As I don't see what you're talking about.
Post
Post #414 (isolation #15) » Tue Nov 17, 2015 12:28 am
Postby LoHa »
In post 360, Titus wrote:Yeah you do. You're trying to provoke me into perceived anti-town behavior and avoiding discussing substance. You're trying to avoid discussing your bus vote on Laho. Loha. Whatever.
Post
Post #436 (isolation #16) » Tue Nov 17, 2015 4:11 am
Postby LoHa »
Meanwhile I'll take home the fact that aquaman doesn't know why Titus' vote is on me either and that I'm in his lynch pool because my play is thin. Does my postcount or the substance bother you? I've made two alignment indicative arguments for titusscum, the produce of my thin play. You call me scummy because my play is thin, I'd expect a townie with such a fat play as yours to come up with better arguments to base a lynch on, or at least sheep the ones that make sense.
Post
Post #510 (isolation #31) » Tue Nov 17, 2015 1:44 pm
Postby LoHa »
I'm not scum though.
I just wanted to provide an alignment indicative reaction test before I bite the dust. I would've left a pretty shitty mislynch wagon behind otherwise. Not even a counter just plain reasonless crapvotes.
Interpret it as you see fit, I'm off to bed. Titus you suck or are scum.
Post
Post #1056 (isolation #32) » Wed Nov 25, 2015 3:14 am
Postby LoHa »
In post 1050, Aquanim wrote:Also... this is why having admitted you're scum you should just hammer yourself:
In post 889, Aquanim wrote:...
Especially given LoHa's request for advice when he claimed scum that indicates to me that
there was nobody particularly experienced on his scumteam for him to seek that advice from
.
...
This was information I should never have beeen given.
This was a wreck for scum communication-wise but I wasn't playing against my wincon when I said I was scum asking for advice. I knew I called Nos newbtown so if I died then an early combo for town was likely. Therefore I tried to exploit the fact that the case on me was shaky at best, by claiming scum asking how he got caught as a reaction test to seem useful trying to salvage something from a supposed mislynch. Maybe I would've gotten away with it too if it weren't for your role.
