In post 261, Parama wrote:Well you can sort of change avatars easily so
This. See: Pink Kitty Tank
In post 407, singersigner wrote:It's a fairly meh title for me. Survivor is a game that almost requires some sort of backstabbing in some sort of capacity. Is there something in particular that stands out about his situation in particular other than he's new?
In post 411, xRECKONERx wrote:I'm not sure backstabbing people in a Survivor MishMash game is enough to warrant a title since like every person ever has done that. I dunno.
In post 404, animorpherv1 wrote:No chance to watch the video yet, but it's funny because Nicholas is pretty friendly. I approve.
In post 429, zoraster wrote:fun to give someone with 0 posts a title!
In post 390, TheButtonmen wrote:I will be declining any and all noms of a title for me as I think titling myself would be a conflict of interest.
In post 446, xRECKONERx wrote:In post 388, Chevre wrote:Nominate Umbrage forDolorous
because he seems to cause most people on this site pain
and there's a totes funny pun included.
Because this was a bad suggestion and also Umbrage hasn't done anything title worthy
In post 449, xRECKONERx wrote:Worth 1 Umbrage doesn't work because it's a brand new thread in F62 that hardly anyone has posted in or even heard of
In post 476, Oversoul wrote:In post 474, Ythan wrote:Speeding through a title means fewer eyes to pick out flaws.
In post 479, Ythan wrote:In post 478, animorpherv1 wrote:In post 476, Oversoul wrote:In post 474, Ythan wrote:Speeding through a title means fewer eyes to pick out flaws.
It also means more chance to be picked apart to death.
This doesn't make sense ani.
In post 481, Ythan wrote:So the problem is obviously that we weren't rushing them through fast enough.
In post 483, Oversoul wrote:In post 482, animorpherv1 wrote:In post 481, Ythan wrote:So the problem is obviously that we weren't rushing them through fast enough.
All I was doing was saying that more time =/= better title, like you suggested.
How does that make less time = better titles valid?
In post 495, Ythan wrote:In post 482, animorpherv1 wrote:In post 481, Ythan wrote:So the problem is obviously that we weren't rushing them through fast enough.
All I was doing was saying that more time =/= better title, like you suggested.
Pretty certain I was suggesting that less time == bad titles.
In post 494, SleepyKrew wrote:Goddammit kdowns, you already have a title.
In post 653, TheButtonmen wrote:The issue is it's only said in real life, there isn't a pattern of that being said on the forum.
In post 697, RichardGHP wrote:The evidence for the Pie title just really isn't that strong (nor is the title itself) IMO.
In post 675, Rhinox wrote:Yeah I mean I'm about as far away from the real life event that inspired it, and I still associate the saying with Pie.
In post 702, TheButtonmen wrote:Outside of the TF thread the phrase except when he does has been said in relation to Pie exactly twice, it might be extremely popular in the scumhouse in NC but until it carries over to the forum it's not really falling under my jurisdiction.
In post 704, redFF wrote:In post 676, redFF wrote:The only reason you associate the saying with Pie is because of the amount of times he's been nominated for a title relating to it.
In post 707, TheButtonmen wrote:In post 703, animorpherv1 wrote:I don't understand why it has to be said on the forums?
There is no community accessibility or buy in for titles which are based on things which don't involve Mafiascum. It would be like me just giving titles to the people I know in scumchat based off our own inside jokes.
In post 709, TheButtonmen wrote:I would.
In post 0, TheButtonmen wrote:What's a Good Title?
A title should subtly or not-so-subtly reference an amusing incident, playstyle or characteristicthat the entire community can understand.
In post 712, zoraster wrote:also, goddammit came from a mafiascum game.
In post 717, RichardGHP wrote:Only becauseyou people won't stop nominating itit was nominated twice.
In post 390, TheButtonmen wrote:I will be declining any and all noms of a title for me as I think titling myself would be a conflict of interest.
In post 972, SleepyKrew wrote:I like it but RedCoyote did Family Feud not Chevre (unless I'm wrong)
In post 1328, RachMarie wrote:April Fools Joke?? no clue what you are on about there?
In post 1338, izakthegoomba wrote:In post 1331, animorpherv1 wrote:In post 1328, RachMarie wrote:April Fools Joke?? no clue what you are on about there?
chamber "quit" and he gave UN admin for the day. Hence, United Nations and etc.
'cept he didn't really give him admin. Just put him in a usergroups named "administrators" which actually did nothing but change his name.
In post 1391, Mr. Flay wrote:In post 1376, crywolf20084 wrote:i'm here to Nth Adrnin as long as its put into red.
Not gonna happen, due to possible confusion. Only SaberKitty has a colored title I believe, and no one is going to confuse hers for a Skittle.
I'll talk to chamber about Adrnin.
In post 1507, RichardGHP wrote:In post 1506, Ankamius wrote:nth, but only with the emoticon. The title doesn't have the right feel without it.
In post 1532, Maestro wrote:why the fuck are giving a title to a guy for spamming FWAN and being a derp?
Well yes, but I could give you a tirle for being British.In post 1540, izakthegoomba wrote:I thought titles weren't meant to be rewards? >_>
Since I apparently missed this, you're not the only British Scummer on the site. You just happen to be one of the first I think of when I think 'British Scummers', because you post the most often.In post 1543, izakthegoomba wrote:You could if you thought my Britishness was worthy of a title. Your point?In post 1542, animorpherv1 wrote:Well yes, but I could give you a tirle for being British.In post 1540, izakthegoomba wrote:I thought titles weren't meant to be rewards? >_>
Neither - that title is applicable in so many ways to so many different people that I don't think it's worth it. Many people post in FWAN, he's just the first person most think about, because of the amount of pictures that makes people want to title him.In post 1547, DeathRowKitty wrote:@Ani
Are you against the title on the grounds that this particular feature of Tazaro is negative or on the grounds that this title isn't fitting/funny/memorable/etc?
Cayke?In post 1558, Mr. Flay wrote:Or the lady who rides horses
In post 1564, DeasVail wrote:And let's face it. No one is as ridiculously photogenic as Tazaro.
It's not even a good joke. And it's not even unique. I can back up like a half-step from it and make post 1550 again.In post 1568, DeasVail wrote:And that's why I'd consider the title unique to him.