In post 73, Maestro wrote:As for "getting out of responsibility", I entirely disagree. I'm still perfectly able to have my own opinions and lobby (for lack of a better word) RC's vote, both in this thread and in the PT. I'm not just going to tune out. Say shit like that once it happens, not as a preemptive exercise or because you feel like getting paranoid. That's what others are doing to you about your pledge of allegiance.
In post 84, RadiantCowbells wrote:Still think Clumsy is scum.
Strongly suspect that Broseidon is scum as well.
In post 79, Maestro wrote:A- I heavily implied my pledge was for funsies in my opening postin the PT
In post 88, Aristophanes wrote:He knows damn well you can't quote PTs. I have never seen a game where you can. I dislike the posturing here.
In post 106, Nahdia wrote:and I specifically asked you for reasons in the game thread ^_~
In post 100, Spiffeh wrote:In post 73, Maestro wrote:As for "getting out of responsibility", I entirely disagree. I'm still perfectly able to have my own opinions and lobby (for lack of a better word) RC's vote, both in this thread and in the PT. I'm not just going to tune out. Say shit like that once it happens, not as a preemptive exercise or because you feel like getting paranoid. That's what others are doing to you about your pledge of allegiance.
This is really aggressive for no reason?
In post 107, Maestro wrote:you're arguing over semantics and being a little shit
In post 82, Clumsy wrote:
In post 52, Gammagooey wrote:
BROseidon wrote:
Why do you dislike RC's post and like kuribo's? I'm inclined to like them both (both making a good point), and they both have PRs that are ~probably~ town PRs.
If there's a lengthy conversation/argument about 'but possibly prs tho' on page 3 of the game instead of just ignoring it and talking about who's scummy for the things they're doing (yes i know basically nothings happened yet but it's the principle of the thing) you'll make me the saddest person. please don't make me the saddest person.
That didn't actually answer the question. I'm wondering the same here, and you dodged it by talking about the second half.
In post 52, Gammagooey wrote:I don't like 37 because the idea that scum decided to attack Nahdia as risk-minimization on their part to avoid getting OMGUS'd (which seems to be what you're implying but correct me if i'm wrong) being more likely than the players voting her thinking 'lol, rvs' regardless of their alignment has an odor reminiscent of left out meat.
BROseidon wrote:
Why do you dislike RC's post and like kuribo's? I'm inclined to like them both (both making a good point), and they both have PRs that are ~probably~ town PRs.
If there's a lengthy conversation/argument about 'but possibly prs tho' on page 3 of the game instead of just ignoring it and talking about who's scummy for the things they're doing (yes i know basically nothings happened yet but it's the principle of the thing) you'll make me the saddest person. please don't make me the saddest person.
In post 119, BROseidon wrote:Spiffeh's play here wrt you is bothering me given that I'm townreading you for doing some similar stuff that I did at the start of disney.
In post 121, Spiffeh wrote:In post 119, BROseidon wrote:Spiffeh's play here wrt you is bothering me given that I'm townreading you for doing some similar stuff that I did at the start of disney.
How does that translate to my play bothering you?
Those two things have no relation
