In post 1372, Feysal wrote:Not for bussing his partner, for defending him. That disclaimer looks like he was preemptively excusing himself defending a partner. He never voted Konowa either, only talked about it.
This isn't even objectively correct.
In post 1373, Untrod Tripod wrote:Yeah, I think those look pretty bad after the Konowa flip. I do think that him asking to be "convinced" is a reasonable scumtell, especially combined with the buddying and generally trying-to-stay-out-of-the-way stuff
I'm on board with your read on him, sure
...What?
I don't even understand what you're trying to say here.
If we look at Fink's early ISO. It's hyper aggressive. As if he's looking for a fight rather than looking for scum. Three votes on three different people and a throw away post about being out of RVS.
His ISO is empty of content and his scumreads have remained static, other than the appearance of a Konowa read out of nowhere. He has no interaction with Konowa that I can find.
The defense of ika also eels out of place.
He's all about promoting D1 activity, yet he lurks to the point of replacement himself.
His last post was 10 days ago. We can look at look at his replacement, whenever that happens.
@Antihero - Fink is being replaced, right?
Klingoncelt: "The whole scumteam slipped on page 1. It's the new meta. Sheep me because my reads are so accurate that whoever I name gets mod-converted to scum."
Yep, he siteflaked, I just checked his profile. Gone since October 1.
Klingoncelt: "The whole scumteam slipped on page 1. It's the new meta. Sheep me because my reads are so accurate that whoever I name gets mod-converted to scum."
Spiffeh, you need to build a case against me that's stronger than OMGUS. Except you can't. 'Cause I'm Town. And you're Scum.
Klingoncelt: "The whole scumteam slipped on page 1. It's the new meta. Sheep me because my reads are so accurate that whoever I name gets mod-converted to scum."
Is it not? I'll grant you that the part about preemptively excusing yourself is my interpretation, but the facts are that you repeatedly talked about voting Konowa but never did, and defended him while saying you would not bother.
I'll have to look at Fink later, I'm pressed for time now. My read on him is based on his late day one play, and I have to admit I can't remember him doing anything a good scum player would not be able to fake.
In post 1394, hiplop wrote:i have too many town reads not enough scum reads
Same, tbh...
“Why was I chosen?'
'Such questions cannot be answered,' said Gandalf. 'You may be sure that it was not for any merit that others do not possess. But you have been chosen, and you must therefore use such strength and heart and wits as you have.”
I had another look at Fink, and it pretty much served only to remind me why I read him as town in the first place.
I guess three votes on the first page is unusual, but I don't see why he should be scum for it. People often stir up trouble in RVS to get reactions and to get the game going. The only part of it I disagreed with was about randomizing your vote, which I don't think is indicative of anything.
I would not say his reads have remained completely static, he does acknowledge CB looking better and later focuses on Diamond more. He does not comment on Konowa much, but he does note his vote in his first post as scummy and later says he is cool with his lynch. He spends the end of the day poking and prodding and asking questions, but not really pushing anyone. I also think that his vote on Diamond was very likely from town, since it would be incredibly reckless for scum to try to push an alternate wagon with their partner at L-1 and the day nearly over.
His disappearance today is not good, but not necessarily indicative of alignment. His activity was fine before today, and he flaked from the entire site, not just this game.