HI.
Anyone want to give the too long didn't feel like reading tonight of what I've missed?
HI.
You must be joking.In post 1081, SpyreX wrote:claim plz we're at that point
Your going to make me read tonight to see if this is true, aren't you?In post 1083, SpyreX wrote:not even a little that's what is happening right now.
In post 1085, SpyreX wrote:look at the last 2 pages. thats it. You dont have to read a lot
You know I'll want a favor back.
Why?In post 103, petroleumjelly wrote:No. But I am clearly not interested in either the Bulbazak wagon or the kraska77 wagon.In post 102, hiplop wrote:anything else to say
Stands out on bulb wagon and I still don't like kraska or SKmod wrote:Bulbazak (6): Katsuki, Sleepykrew, Kraska77, Camn, Deathrowkitty, Hiplop
Kraska77 (3): Implosion, Equinox, Bulbazak
Implosion (1): Lalaladucks
Hiplop (1): Beeboy
killthestory (1): Petroleumjelly
not voting (3): Uptoolate, Snarkysnowman, Killthestory
Ive entered backwards land!In post 157, kraska77 wrote:UNVOTE:
@kats my vote was just a normal rvs-y pressure vote. Bulba's page 1 and 2 posting is the kind of offbeat/jumpy/posturey that I tend to townread, but I expect more experienced players to come off as more collected though so I didn't know what to make of his posting. His recent posts make me feel more comfortable townreading him, I don't see scum openly panicking about being voted this early in the game, especially when most of the votes don't seem serious
And i have no scumreads yet
And im still cool as a cucumber
yup.In post 665, hiplop wrote:so has UTL
do you think lurkers = scum?
does my being inactive crosssite change anything to you y/n
I couldn't say it better myself.My problem with this entire line of reasoning, and frankly all of your posting about the matter, is that you're so intent on just taking things at face value, when it's obvious that you are a deep thinker. This should be something that's occurred to you, yet you are putting in the minimum amount of effort required to progress
Yeah hahahaIn post 1041, SnarkySnowman wrote:Ugh fine.
I'm a homicide detective. Which is like a watcher, but I only see who orders kill actions. I saw Katsuki ordered the errant kill.
I want DGB next.
I think she did it because snarky was tracked to the dead player and snarky said he was waiting for kats.In post 1104, SpyreX wrote:Farside I'm really confused at your train of thought at the end.
You think utl claimed at that point to protect kats?
Implosion looks town.In post 1108, SpyreX wrote:Well utl claimed what the role did and it's a twofer considering were changing leader i have a hard time buying that as scum.
I'm way way more scum on snowmans because it's a nonsense role.
Implosion looks town in that mess, yes? Maybe this can be poe
Hell no.In post 1109, SpyreX wrote:Like all i want today is a new leader and a dead snow most everything else is negotiatable
Reread what equinox said the role does.In post 292, Equinox wrote:Before we start the leadership vote, I have something to say.
The leader has the power to execute any player in the game, effective at the end of the Day. There is a condition that mykonian coded in flavor. Having thought about this, it's better if I outline it so that an actual leadership choice can be made. That condition is that executing the wrong person can lead to disfavor among a group that I can safely assume are town. Up until yesterday morning, I had assumed that it meant that I would potentially die along with my target if I had happened to target town, but that does not make sense balance-wise. It makes far more sense that I take the hit if I execute incorrectly but confirm town.
What this means is:
(1) Vote for the player whose alignment is under question. If my guess about this is correct, scum cannot risk using the execution vote.
(2) Force the leader to announce the execution and carry it out. Lynch the following day if the leader does not comply.
Alternatively, we could vote for the player whose reads are the most likely to be accurate and force them to execute but without necessarily directing their decision. However, this method will lose skillful town players, and that's not a good idea.
If it is not already obvious, I chose to abstain.
This was her reason for picking EPIn post 1064, Katsuki wrote:If we got more execution targets, I'd all be for leader-go-round!
I'm a VT.
I suppose it'd be easier not to be cheeky and admit that I sheeped Coggy on taking out EP since we were on even numbers anyways.
I still need to read this bloody game, was preoccupied with modding duties and RL.
Katsuki leader using it the way she did is Hella more scummy then snarky.In post 1116, SpyreX wrote:And no I'm not rewarding that sheesh.
Ill get to it.In post 1119, SnarkySnowman wrote:dont really understand what makes pj scum tbh
Electric dgb for leader, she is the one.In post 1120, DrippingGoofball wrote:Exactly and I am very leery of lurkers that seem to avoid putting a leader vote to remove Katsuki from the position.In post 1117, farside22 wrote:Katsuki leader using it the way she did is Hella more scummy then snarky.In post 1116, SpyreX wrote:And no I'm not rewarding that sheesh.
My top picks for death (assuming the position still works as Katsuki described, which is by no means certain since he's scum) would be among PJ, UTL & SS assuming that we lynch Katsuki today.
HI pj.pj scum wrote:1.) farside22,
I changed from voting Bulbazak to voting for hiplop on Day Two because Katsuki was a vote from being elected Leader with a claimed guilty result on Bulbazak. Continuing to vote for Bulbazak would essentially be a waste of my vote. How does that it make "zero sense"?
We should probably vote spy if they keep stalling.In post 1136, DrippingGoofball wrote:farside PJ wants to keep Katsuki as leader
Fair enough.In post 1143, SpyreX wrote:With my politician? Maybe i haven't thought of that cause silly
Leader is untargetable.
If kats is scum i wouldn't kill snow maybe
No one was executed day 1, it wasn't know till day 2 that a player could execute 2 players per kats claim.In post 1149, SpyreX wrote:? That role could be 100% made up with the same end result. Which Mt opinion is it is
Okay this I get.In post 1150, Cogito Ergo Sum wrote:If Snarky's a Mafia Soldier, he would've known EP had been executed and Katsuki'd be the obvious culprit (certainly, I assumed it was Katsuki). Given the amount of Town Soldiers, a second Mafia Soldier wouldn't surprise me. That also explains why he didn't question Katsuki on the EP execution.
Thanks for that.
She didn't say that.In post 1164, Cogito Ergo Sum wrote:I was assuming Katsuki was given the option of executing EP because the slot didn't kill anyone while leader and that that would also be the consequence for disobeying.
In post 1161, UpTooLate wrote:What did I do that you do as scum? That's not my post, so I'm assuming it's separate from your comment.In post 1101, farside22 wrote:Alright let's see how far I get this time.
I'm betting utl is scum.
She did something I do when I'm scum.
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 4#p8241194
Seriously???
I'm going to need more than that. What is your issue with this post?
I REALLY hated the post from implostion as well. Actually I wasn't a fan of any of his D1 posting I don't think.In post 1101, farside22 wrote: http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 5#p8243825
Wtf is this shit implosion?
Hey farside. Serious question. In your game, other than Yume, how many strong pushes did I make? How much did I do other than get Yume lynched? Like really? Nothing.In post 1103, farside22 wrote:Here's outing things is pretty Nai and frankly her full game is actively lurking, weak pushes and fence sitting post.
Also I'm betting no one used the execute day 1 but I remember when it was claimed it was hinted with one execute, not 2.
Utl, pj and spy I will get to all your comment one at a time, some may have to wait till Tuesday.In post 1166, SpyreX wrote:I think you're over thinking what I'm saying.In post 1153, farside22 wrote:No one was executed day 1, it wasn't know till day 2 that a player could execute 2 players per kats claim.In post 1149, SpyreX wrote:? That role could be 100% made up with the same end result. Which Mt opinion is it is
Are you saying that it was clear that the leader could execute 2 players?
Scum snowman visits ep as a role. Gets tracked. After jazzhands says his role is magic i tell you who ordered the kill if i visit him on the night they are killed.
As scum, you can 100% say kats did it regardless of kats alignment. Because who else 'orders' a kill.
There's no doubt that claim will come up 'legit' because it's worthless.
Okay so the only thing I'm going to ask is this to snarky.In post 1041, SnarkySnowman wrote:Ugh fine.
I'm a homicide detective. Which is like a watcher, but I only see who orders kill actions. I saw Katsuki ordered the errant kill.
I want DGB next.
In post 1185, SpyreX wrote:Yesssssss. The power courses through my veins.
So the dealio is a target and, optionally, the previous leader. By end of day.
This was all she said she got, equinox said the same thing.In post 1008, Katsuki wrote:I vehemently oppose DGB being leader; she is such obvious scum.In post 1001, SpyreX wrote:I mean if snow flips scum leader or scum triplemurderface then sure i get it.
There's a puzzle piece I'm still missing and i cant wrap around what it is.
Dgb i know i know but i get the bulb hate so much. But that's why you're probably getting stuck leader today cause i have a hunch tm
Now if MYSTERY LEADER MECHANICS make you uncomfortable I don't mind passing leadership off to you just so you can confirm that I don't actually get any knowledge from Myko as to how the executions work, just simply that I get to execute.
It may actually be a solid choice today to ensure you can't be touched for the remainder of the game but I'll tie this to the condition that we powerlynch DGB today.
Someone's omgus is showingIn post 1193, UpTooLate wrote:I think PJ is town. More town than farside and ces.
Depends how many scum are in the game.In post 1195, SpyreX wrote:Yea I'm just not confident at the moment.
Actually were at 9 alive? In theory if we lynched and doubleshot town... is that game?
That sucks.In post 1198, SpyreX wrote:That's the thing. It's not an option. Executes are locked during the day.
Maybe it's more sense to lynch kat and let a body hot the floor. Unless someone has something that really gets my goose
Considering this was all pj said:
In post 103, petroleumjelly wrote:No. But I am clearly not interested in either the Bulbazak wagon or the kraska77 wagon.In post 102, hiplop wrote:anything else to say
That's it.
1 and 3)between calling bulba weird a few post in between you didn't question him till he attacked you.In post 1206, UpTooLate wrote:No, I didn't. I didn't have any questions for him at the time. Or anybody else other than kats about his read on him. Go look at page 7 in most of my games and tell me how many questions I'm asking people. At that point in the game I'm usually just observing and trying to get a feel for people.In post 1204, farside22 wrote: http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 7#p8239517
Vague posting about bulba as scum. Says the player is weird but doesn't ask any questions to sort him.
This was right at the time I was fighting with Yume in your game about her getting away with doing jack shit and then getting pissed for being called on it. Too many people pull that and get away with it, and when I came over here and read he was fucking around after I had been yelling at Yume for the same type of shit I wasn't about to play his game. I'm over that shit. And then when he did finally produce something, it was utterly terrible and I left my vote there.In post 1204, farside22 wrote: http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 6#p8240716
This is the post I said reminds me of what I do as scum. Attack a player that is being weird.
This was after kts just telling players to find him a strategy. It's not scummy from the start it's weird, it's nonsensical, it was scummy because it was her scum buddy and being there to bus is ++
I wasn't really getting defensive there. I thought it was absurd that he was trying to paint it like I had no reason to change my opinion on him when there was plenty of content to go on. This is where he really started pinging me, as I was never buddying him but that seemed to the main point he had against me (a theme that followed through pretty much everything that he said about me).In post 1204, farside22 wrote: http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 4#p8242164
This was my ewwww post. Bulbazak noted how utl went from buddying to calling him weird. She gets defensive at being called out and suddenly there's the questions.
Usually it's when I see someone post about a player calling them weird and once confronted they ask a bunch of question to look town.
The biggest issue is no where did Bulbazak say he was worried about the leader being voted quickly.
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 8#p8237408
He was clearly referring to the wagon on himself.
I'm not sure I understand what you mean wrt to the bold, can you explain that more please?
??In post 1204, farside22 wrote: http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 9#p8259389
the amount of fence sitting comes down to I didn't like Bulbazak post.
In that situation, I couldn't see motivation for him to lie about his vote being stolen as scum. Or as town. Lying about it would be stupid because it's easily provable in thread. And this was obviously before he got leader and killed 2 townies, so your point is not valid.In post 1204, farside22 wrote: http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 1#p8260901
This is especially hysterical that utl says she sees no scum motivation for lying.
No seriously, gets leader role, shots 2 town, no scum motivation.
I'm literally pushing on bulbaIn post 1204, farside22 wrote: http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 5#p8264105
I like this post only because Bulbazak is pointing out the distancing and how bad utl is being with her reads and I'm adding, lack of push. She just constantly defends herself.in this post. I'm questioning him on what he was saying about PJ and telling him why I think he's wrong? Like I don't get what you're going for here.
I didn't switch a vote there at all. I said I would be happy voting for either of them because they weren't doing jack shit. I'm pretty sure there was a reason, but still no vote.In post 1204, farside22 wrote: http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 9#p8278049
Switch vote, no reason, never mentioned once.
Why not? I don't have the best track record of reading hiplop, and I wondered where her read on him was coming from.In post 1204, farside22 wrote: http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 1#p8312541
I always wonder why ask a question about a player you've never said boo about.
Buzzzz words.In post 1204, farside22 wrote: http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 3#p8312613
Lots of fence sitting.
Lots.
I mean, he was doing anything, and his stance on duck was bad. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯In post 1204, farside22 wrote: http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 8#p8320938
Weak reason to join wagon.
In post 1204, farside22 wrote: http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 0#p8323630
Bahama hahaha.
Sorry that's so bad considering that reason was weak.
Spy didn't want leader at first.In post 1204, farside22 wrote: http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 9#p8364229
Kissing leaders ass. Also if true why did utl vote dgb leader first.
Confbiased much? You don't have a flip on any of us and yet you're sitting here trying to draw associatives.In post 1204, farside22 wrote: Add to kats awkward vote on utl for no reason and pj saying how town utl is for asking questions and agreeing with her reads?
Let me yawn at how bad that is.
This entire thing was you essentially just going through my ISO and taking a bunch of shit out of context to paint it in a scummy light.
I have to go pick up my son and do the mom thing now, but really Farside. This "case" was complete and utter shit.
You also never answered my question from 1161.
In post 827, UpTooLate wrote:Happy Birthday EP!!!! <3
For your birthday, I will sit next to you on the hiplop wagon.
VOTE: hiplop
His role is apparently NAI, and his comment about ducky without actually voting for her didn't sit right with me.
Reference with quote to the hippy vote from utl and the votes at the time.In post 825, mykonian wrote:I do not believe that factions can ever be of use. It is certain that when the enemy comes upon you in divided cities you are quickly lost, because the weakest party will always assist the outside forces and the other will not be able to resist.
votecount
hiplop (4): Cogito Ergo Sum, Implosion, DrippingGoofball, Errantparabola
Drippinggoofball (2): Lalaladucks, Petroleumjelly,
Uptoolate (2): Katsuki, Bulbazak
Nahdia (1): Hiplop
Cogito Ergo Sum (1): Snarkysnowman
not voting (3): Deathrowkitty, Pitoli, Uptoolate
With 13 alive it takes 7 to lynch.
5 days remaining