N's Notably Narcissistic Nonsensical Namesake (game over)

[Mitillos]

@BB: So, wait. You're a naive cop, who got a guilty result, is in a neighbourhood and knows that someone specific is a paranoid cop?
Why do I feel that all this makes absolutely no sense and you're just trying to obfuscate matters?
Is the paranoid cop your neighbour? Did they also get told that they were not sane?

Every role we've seen so far was made up of two N-words and had two components to its description. You are claiming three components (Cop, Naive, Neighbour). I'm not sure I believe you.

[DeasVail]

/shrug

My role has one component.

[Metal Unites Mutley]

VOTE: bbmolla

be cause you vote me



town: diabolic railtracer deasvail bbmolla radiantcowbells(cause molla said so)

probtown: mitillos peace


everyone else is null or scum

yep

[N]

Prodding ooba and Nani

[ooba]

Hey N - I was just about to post...

@BBMolla: Why did you claim when you did?

@Radiant: You need to full claim.

[PeaceBringer]

IF u re networker this means there are town with a qt, unless u re a scum networker.so town with a qt should be able to confirm u ?

I would think so and that is what kept me from just saying lynch me on day one... it did seem like BBMolla is connected with someone and have him as town.

[PeaceBringer]

@BB: So, wait. You're a naive cop, who got a guilty result, is in a neighbourhood and knows that someone specific is a paranoid cop?
Why do I feel that all this makes absolutely no sense and you're just trying to obfuscate matters?
Is the paranoid cop your neighbour? Did they also get told that they were not sane?

Every role we've seen so far was made up of two N-words and had two components to its description. You are claiming three components (Cop, Naive, Neighbour). I'm not sure I believe you.

BIG RED X-

My role is one N word... Networker...

[Mitillos]

@Deas and Peace: One component is fine. Two is what we've seen so far. Three seems like a stretch. Which was my point.

Plus, we haven't actually seen your roles yet. I was talking about the flips.

[Nani]

hi, will catch up shortly

[Rail Tracer]

One component is fine. Two is what we've seen so far. Three seems like a stretch.

speaking of stretching, your argument here is a stretch.

[Dante]

I got a guilty on Peacebringer last night >:(

that is a lie or you are paranoid...
might as well claim then- my role is Networker. It is negative ultility. There may be logic in my dying, as anyone who has a QT has full access during the day as long as alive. I die they lose it.

Can anyone confirm they have daytalk?

[Dante]

To my role PM!

And Mtillos, I was told I was a Naive Cop, I also know the identity of a Paranoid one.

It says my result will always be innocent.

But I have a guilty on RadiantCowbells.

@mod: If a framer framed someone, and a naive cop investigated that player, what would happen?

So, I'm guessing then RC is the not the paranoid cop. The why didn't RC vote Peace?

[Mitillos]

@RT: You don't find it strange that we'd have a naive cop neighbour, who knows both his sanity status and the identity of a paranoid cop?

[Rail Tracer]

no, not really.

well, not any more strange than a compulsive framer or a "normaliser"

[Diabolik]

usually para/naive dont' know what they re

[Rail Tracer]

the only thing i find strange about the claim is the guilty from a supposedly naive cop.

[Rail Tracer]

i suppose bb could be scum who lied about being a naive cop because he didn't know what naive meant. he clearly didn't know what naive meant when he claimed.

[Diabolik]

i don't think bb is so noob to slip like that?

[Rail Tracer]

well he's either noob enough to both not read his role and not know what a naive cop is, orrrrrrrrrrrr he's noob enough to fake-claim that as scum.

in either case, the only thing we can know for sure is that he's a noob.

[Dante]

@RT: You don't find it strange that we'd have a naive cop neighbour, who knows both his sanity status and the identity of a paranoid cop?

What I find strange:

BB claims naive Cop who knows the name of the paranoid Cop.
BB claims a guilty read on Radiant Cowbells.
Can we assume then that Radiant Cowbells is NOT the paranoid Cop? Why else would BB investigate who he knows is the paranoid Cop?

If we stick to that logic, then Radiant Cop is not the paranoid Cop, then he must be the sane Cop but Radiant Cowbells did not vote Peace.

So maybe Radiant Cop is the paranoid Cop and can confirm BB as well.

I'm confused.

[ooba]

@BBMolla: Why did you claim when you did?

I'm not willing to setup speculate yet. If we take everything at claimed value, I have a problem with the timing of the claim:
-> BB investigates RC in N1
--> He gets a guilty result . (He's stated in thread that he believes RC should be "fairly confirmed town" in the absence of a framer)

-> D2 starts. RC claims a guilty on Peacebringer.

Now put yourself in BB's place right now. Some one you believe is "fairly confirmed town" just claimed a guilty result. Why wouldn't I just lynch the target? Why would I claim at that point?
- It confuses everyone
- It narrows down the possible townies with "useful" power roles list for scum to target at night

Unvote. Vote: BBMolla

[DeasVail]

RC has been around but hasn't posted, even though there is obviously stuff he can and should clarify.

RC is in no way town because of BBmolla's claim. The guilty is either BBmolla's mistake, or the influence of some other role.

The thing is though, I'm pretty sure BBmolla's played on EM a fair bit (I could be wrong though) and I think anyone from there would be quite familiar with the different kinds of cop, but again, I don't know.

Ooba, you're missing the fact that RC's guilty doesn't look serious. 'Why would he claim?' is a fair enough question though, and I'd be keen to see his rationale.

[PeregrineV]

To my role PM!

And Mtillos, I was told I was a Naive Cop, I also know the identity of a Paranoid one.

It says my result will always be innocent.

But I have a guilty on RadiantCowbells.

@mod: If a framer framed someone, and a naive cop investigated that player, what would happen?

I was thinking maybe if you were redirected, but no, because you couldn't get a guilty on your redirected target either.

Which means it is RadiantCowbells who interferes with results that are gotten on him. Maybe whoever targets him gets a result that is the opposite of what they would normally get.
But, that sounds beyond useless as a role of any sort.

The other is that you were messed with, so that your results come back false. This would suck were you a normal cop. Being a naive cop with set results means that it's obvious you were messed with.

Anyone have any other theories?

[PeregrineV]

I am in a neighborhood with one or more people. Assuming this is what is being referred to.

Did you join last night, or start the game this way?

[PeregrineV]

@Peace

- Please answer this.

IF u re networker this means there are town with a qt, unless u re a scum networker.so town with a qt should be able to confirm u ?