N's Notably Narcissistic Nonsensical Namesake (game over)

[Shadowy Poison]

I got a guilty on Peacebringer last night >:(

that is a lie or you are paranoid...
might as well claim then- my role is Networker. It is negative ultility. There may be logic in my dying, as anyone who has a QT has full access during the day as long as alive. I die they lose it.

Can anyone confirm they have daytalk?

Look at Dante trying to look like he's doing something. Molla had just claimed his neighborhood 12 posts before.

i suppose bb could be scum who lied about being a naive cop because he didn't know what naive meant. he clearly didn't know what naive meant when he claimed.

i don't think bb is so noob to slip like that?

well he's either noob enough to both not read his role and not know what a naive cop is, orrrrrrrrrrrr he's noob enough to fake-claim that as scum.

in either case, the only thing we can know for sure is that he's a noob.

Was this muffin or xegarus?

@BBMolla: Why did you claim when you did?

I'm not willing to setup speculate yet. If we take everything at claimed value, I have a problem with the timing of the claim:
-> BB investigates RC in N1
--> He gets a guilty result . (He's stated in thread that he believes RC should be "fairly confirmed town" in the absence of a framer)

-> D2 starts. RC claims a guilty on Peacebringer.

Now put yourself in BB's place right now. Some one you believe is "fairly confirmed town" just claimed a guilty result. Why wouldn't I just lynch the target? Why would I claim at that point?
- It confuses everyone
- It narrows down the possible townies with "useful" power roles list for scum to target at night

Unvote. Vote: BBMolla

Ooba you seem to be confused. Molla is towntowntown. Wanna help kill the bad guys now?

The thing is though, I'm pretty sure BBmolla's played on EM a fair bit (I could be wrong though) and I think anyone from there would be quite familiar with the different kinds of cop, but again, I don't know.

Yeah, I have, I'm honestly not sure if even on EM cop sanity goes above framer though.

I'm not stupid guys, I just forgot I was naive and assumed I was paranoid because of the guilty result. That's where you're getting the lapse in logic.

Oh

Well this is awkward

...

It was a mod error

>_>

i suppose bb could be scum who lied about being a naive cop because he didn't know what naive meant. he clearly didn't know what naive meant when he claimed.

I know what a naive cop is

I had a guilty so I tried to think of possibilities. Which, assuming it was wasn't a mod error as I did, would be:

-Framer frame going above sanity.
-Targetable Psychotrooper
-Secret Normaliser

The first option seemed most likely.

Like I said: Molla is town and you can take that to the bank.

Can we all get back to hunting scum now? Peep the vote if you need a place to start.

- Des

[Shadowy Poison]

I know what a naive cop is

then why the fuck did you think getting a guilty on RC made RC near confirmed town?

that to me suggests you thought naive meant insane. and the fact you didn't ask the mod about how the fuck you could get a guilty suggests you had no idea what naive means.

He explained why he thought RC was town in the post you quoted.

- Des

[Rail Tracer]

I thought I was a paranoid cop due to my guilty result. Then one of my neigbbors mentioned they had a guilty in the hood. And then I rechecked, realized I was naive, and realized something wasn't right.

you claimed naive in the same post you claimed the guilty. so this obviously isn't true.

[Shadowy Poison]

(hint: Militillos would be an excellent person to vote)

and speaking of him, Dia, what do you think of Militillos so far? why did you drop him from your initial list of suspicious people?

[Shadowy Poison]

Tracer, pleasepleaseplease stop going after molla. He's pretty freaking town and it would be awesome if you looked at the other people who are pushing him

[Rail Tracer]

He explained why he thought RC was town in the post you quoted.

No.

This is what happened.

Spoiler:

I'm a naive cop with a guilty on RadiantCowbell, so she should be fairly confirmed town unless anyone claims to have framed her.

I'm a naive cop with a guilty on RadiantCowbell, so she should be fairly confirmed town unless anyone claims to have framed her.

^wut

I guess there could be a Sanity Switcher that gives me an alternate result or some bullshit.

To my role PM!

And Mtillos, I was told I was a Naive Cop, I also know the identity of a Paranoid one.

It says my result will always be innocent.

But I have a guilty on RadiantCowbells.

@mod: If a framer framed someone, and a naive cop investigated that player, what would happen?

[/quote]
he claimed naive in a way that suggests he thought he was insane, then he claims he thought he was paranoid to begin with (WHICH WOULD MEAN HE SHOULDN'T THINK RC IS NEAR CONFIRMED TOWN) but he also claimed naive in the same post he claimed.... and he didn't start thinking there was a problem with his claim until after people reacted to it.

[Shadowy Poison]

I thought I was a paranoid cop due to my guilty result. Then one of my neigbbors mentioned they had a guilty in the hood. And then I rechecked, realized I was naive, and realized something wasn't right.

you claimed naive in the same post you claimed the guilty. so this obviously isn't true.

It's pretty obvious that all of this happened before he claimed. Notice how there wasn't even a hint of confusion in molla's claim post?

- Des

[Rail Tracer]

fucked up tags but whatever.

also i'm not voting bb yet.

[Shadowy Poison]

Yeah but you're slinging mud and making it easier for scum to push him so you need to stop it.

- Des

[Rail Tracer]

also he still hasn't answered

why

he claimed. usually fucking cops don't claim just because they have a result on someone they think suggests they're innocent unless that person is being wagoned hard.

and no, i'm not slinging mud, i'm pointing out the massive inconsistencies with what he's claimed so far.

[BBmolla]

I know what a naive cop is

then why the fuck did you think getting a guilty on RC made RC near confirmed town?

that to me suggests you thought naive meant insane. and the fact you didn't ask the mod about how the fuck you could get a guilty suggests you had no idea what naive means.

For fucks sake, I feel like a broken record

Because obviously if I'm a naive cop getting a guilty

something is fucking afoot.

The most obvious answer, assuming other roles trump sanity, is that he was framed.

Nobody claimed a frame, so he would be almost certainly town framed by scum.

[BBmolla]

I thought I was a paranoid cop due to my guilty result. Then one of my neigbbors mentioned they had a guilty in the hood. And then I rechecked, realized I was naive, and realized something wasn't right.

you claimed naive in the same post you claimed the guilty. so this obviously isn't true.

Jesus christ you're dense

TIMELINE FOR PEOPLE WHO DON'T READ

START OF DAY 2:

"OH HEY LOOK I GOT A GUILTY, I GUESS THAT MAKES SENSE CAUSE I'M A PARANOID COP(I KNOW I WAS NAIVE OR PARANOID AND CAUSE I GOT A GUILTY I MUST HAVE BEEN PARANOID)"

PERSON POSTS IN NEIGHBORHOOD ABOUT GETTING A GUILTY

[BBmolla]

I thought I was a paranoid cop due to my guilty result. Then one of my neigbbors mentioned they had a guilty in the hood. And then I rechecked, realized I was naive, and realized something wasn't right.

you claimed naive in the same post you claimed the guilty. so this obviously isn't true.

Jesus christ you're dense

TIMELINE FOR PEOPLE WHO DON'T READ

START OF DAY 2:

"OH HEY LOOK I GOT A GUILTY, I GUESS THAT MAKES SENSE CAUSE I'M A PARANOID COP(I KNOW I WAS NAIVE OR PARANOID AND CAUSE I GOT A GUILTY I MUST HAVE BEEN PARANOID)"

PERSON POSTS IN NEIGHBORHOOD ABOUT GETTING A GUILTY

"OH WOW THEY'RE PARANOID COP WELL SHIT WHAT AM I OH I'M NAIVE WOAH WHAT THE FUCK IM NAIVE WITH A GUILTY I SHOULD PROBABLY CLAIM THAT."

*insert your shitty quote wall*

[BBmolla]

Please tell me this isn't muffin talking, I don't think I've ever experience muffin being remotely this dense.

[ooba]

The timeline makes a lot of sense and this is town posting "If it helps at all, this isn't a gambit. It'd be really fucking stupid if it was.".

@BB: Is RC the paranoid cop in your QT? That would explain the "guilty" and her lack of vote as well.

Unovte. Vote: mnemonicdevice

[N]

nankeen

noun

a firm, durable, yellow or buff fabric, formerly made from a natural-colored Chinese cotton.

Vote Count 2.03

Luna Lovegood

( 0 )

Dante

( 0 )

DeasVail

( 0 )

Shadowy Poison

( 1 ) mnemonicdevice

Rail Tracer

( 0 )

PeaceBringer

( 0 )

mnemonicdevice

( 3 ) Dante , Rail Tracer ooba

ooba

( 0 )

PeregrineV

( 1 ) PeaceBringer

Nani

( 0 )

Metal Unites Mutley

( 1 ) BBmolla

Mitillos

( 1 ) Luna Lovegood

RadiantCowbells

( 1 ) DeasVail

Diabolik

( 1 ) Shadowy Poison

BBmolla

( 2 ) Metal Unites Mutley

Not voting:

PeregrineV , Nani , Mitillos , RadiantCowbells , Diabolik

With 15 alive, it takes 9 to lynch.

Deadline is in

(expired on 2013-10-06 04:47:07)

Prodding mnemonicdevice

[Diabolik]

[align=][/align]

(hint: Militillos would be an excellent person to vote)

and speaking of him, Dia, what do you think of Militillos so far? why did you drop him from your initial list of suspicious people?

yeah he is flying too low.. for sure 1/2 scum ae lurking.

also he still hasn't answered

why

he claimed. usually fucking cops don't claim just because they have a result on someone they think suggests they're innocent unless that person is being wagoned hard.

and no, i'm not slinging mud, i'm pointing out the massive inconsistencies with what he's claimed so far.

I know what a naive cop is

then why the fuck did you think getting a guilty on RC made RC near confirmed town?

that to me suggests you thought naive meant insane. and the fact you didn't ask the mod about how the fuck you could get a guilty suggests you had no idea what naive means.

For fucks sake, I feel like a broken record

Because obviously if I'm a naive cop getting a guilty

something is fucking afoot.

The most obvious answer, assuming other roles trump sanity, is that he was framed.

Nobody claimed a frame, so he would be almost certainly town framed by scum.

Please tell me this isn't muffin talking, I don't think I've ever experience muffin being remotely this dense.

But the question is,why would you check some one on the "cop team" if u had day talk( or night talk) you supposed to know.
2) you said u have this QT with 1 or more .. what u mean 1 or more... u don't even know how many people?
the weird thing u claim this after the networker claim and the other cop clim.. so some way the other cop claim should be able to confirm you? and why would you know about his insanity but don't know who is him? wha ti is the reason to check her in first place? u speak of this Qt how if is full of people.. "they said to me i checked one of the cops"...but u say its with 1 or more people.. the first thing to know should be who is there so u don't check them and u don't suspect them?i mean.. this is all weird..

[Mitillos]

I think I'm OK with BB and RC being town, if RC will confirm the whole varying sanity cop and QT thing, assuming she *is* the paranoid one. Not sure I want BB or anyone to make a claim about the number of people in their QT, though. That's not good information to give to scum, I think.

Not sure what to make of Pere, with his unconfirmed status...

I'm still thinking mnemonic-scum.

[ooba]

Not sure I want BB or anyone to make a claim about the number of people in their QT, though. That's not good information to give to scum, I think.

I actually think the reverse i.e. that it's information worth knowing. If there are more than BB and RC in the neighbourhood - say 3 or 4, I'd wager for sure that there's one scum in it.

If it's just the two of them, then it can go either way - if it's 1 scum, 1 town - the scum would be RC since she claimed first in thread and BB's motivations have town reasoning.

[RadiantCowbells]

No, my role is actually Annie.

At night I get to drop Tibbers on someone.

Tibbers is in a QT with me.

[BBmolla]

But the question is,why would you check some one on the "cop team" if u had day talk( or night talk) you supposed to know.
2) you said u have this QT with 1 or more .. what u mean 1 or more... u don't even know how many people?
the weird thing u claim this after the networker claim and the other cop clim.. so some way the other cop claim should be able to confirm you? and why would you know about his insanity but don't know who is him? wha ti is the reason to check her in first place? u speak of this Qt how if is full of people.. "they said to me i checked one of the cops"...but u say its with 1 or more people.. the first thing to know should be who is there so u don't check them and u don't suspect them?i mean.. this is all weird..

Because I thought it'd be fun to check someone in my neighborhood, assuming my ability is useless anyway.

I

know how many people are in the neighborhood, you ever consider I may not want to tell Mafia everything? Especially when who is in my neighborhood isn't particularly relevent atm? If you can explain why, then sure I'll tell you.

Why would I not suspect people in a neighborhood with me? Neighbors =/= masons.

[BBmolla]

Not sure I want BB or anyone to make a claim about the number of people in their QT, though. That's not good information to give to scum, I think.

I actually think the reverse i.e. that it's information worth knowing. If there are more than BB and RC in the neighbourhood - say 3 or 4, I'd wager for sure that there's one scum in it.

If it's just the two of them, then it can go either way - if it's 1 scum, 1 town - the scum would be RC since she claimed first in thread and BB's motivations have town reasoning.

Fine, there's two in the neighborhood, a paranoid and naive. We are informed of each other's roles, not each other's alignments.

[Rail Tracer]

"OH WOW THEY'RE PARANOID COP WELL SHIT WHAT AM I OH I'M NAIVE WOAH WHAT THE FUCK IM NAIVE WITH A GUILTY I SHOULD PROBABLY CLAIM THAT."

*insert your shitty quote wall*

first, i don't see why you wouldn't verify with the mod how you could have got a guilty before claiming. instead you claim it in thread first and then ask the mod later... derp derp derp

second, i don't see why you ruled out possibilities other than a "framer". it could have had something to do with RC's role, it could have had something to do with neromollie's role, it could have been any number of fucking things - instead, you automatically assumed some interaction with your role and a scum framer making RC near confirmed town. fucking lol.

[Metal Unites Mutley]

I got a guilty on Peacebringer last night >:(

that is a lie or you are paranoid...
might as well claim then- my role is Networker. It is negative ultility. There may be logic in my dying, as anyone who has a QT has full access during the day as long as alive. I die they lose it.

Can anyone confirm they have daytalk?

Look at Dante trying to look like he's doing something. Molla had just claimed his neighborhood 12 posts before.

i suppose bb could be scum who lied about being a naive cop because he didn't know what naive meant. he clearly didn't know what naive meant when he claimed.

i don't think bb is so noob to slip like that?

well he's either noob enough to both not read his role and not know what a naive cop is, orrrrrrrrrrrr he's noob enough to fake-claim that as scum.

in either case, the only thing we can know for sure is that he's a noob.

Was this muffin or xegarus?

yeah lol i totally hope that wasnt muffin speaking


he just called a 2011 join date a "noob"

[Rail Tracer]

protip: don't take everything i say seriously. (even though bb is actually a noob)