In post 12159, Reasonably Rational wrote:
Mastin, what content are you looking for here from me?
The terms haven't changed.
Not knowing who the scum are shouldn't be a fucking problem for you.
You should have had a plan for every outcome today--you being lynched.
Someone else being lynched.
grapes being lynched.
You should have laid out the consequences of each path, and what the follow-through actions on each path would be.
What each path would mean.
And then from the follow-through, forming the optimal mylo/lylo situation.
I've been asking you to do this since daystart.
Literally nothing more than just. fucking. this.
And you've consistently dodged it.
It didn't require reads, though reads would help contribute I am sure.
All it required is some sort of hierarchy, an order to things, off of the possible outcomes today. With the only thing reads contributing to being commentary on which plan you think is best.
In short: I was looking for a, "If we lynch us, this is what should happen; Fuzzy, this is what should happen; grapes, this is what should happen." Then, explaining each in detail, going into tomorrow, and even lylo. And after explaining each plan, giving the summation, "Given these options, I currently prefer *this plan*, over *these other plans*, because *reasons*."
Something I've seen from you hundreds of times.
Yet you've consistently dodged this even though my request for this was abundantly clear.