Mafiascum.net

in fact

IDK how we'd be privvy to that. Normals for example start 13 with three scum I think. That's like 23%

In post 97, Aj The Epic wrote:Desperado if I told you there was a 35% chance on Infinity being scum, would you buy the odds?

Nah don't think so

This game is confirmed singleball with 17 players

4:13 is 30% scum
5:12 is 41% scum

5:12 would be really high, but it's one of those two distributions.

regardless, assuming a 4:13 distribution town-Desperado has a 4:12 chance of randomly picking scum which is real close to 35%.

FWIW your math is wrong. You take the percentage of the whole populace, not the assumed scum:town ratio. 4/17 is 23% scum ration, 5/17 is 29%. Not that it's completely relevant to anything, but that's how you'd measure it.

In post 83, Titus wrote:

In post 78, Drunken Piper wrote:

In post 58, Titus wrote:
@Pine, I believe all of it, and I am well out of RVS. I have caught scum before post 20 in another game. I tunnelled too hard and town let it go.

such a brag, such a boast
what game dear sir, so we can toast?

http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... s&start=25

It was before post 30. Made a typo but still...:/

so the boast checked out, or at least the little I read.
was just curious, if indeed the truth you had said.

In post 104, Aj The Epic wrote:FWIW your math is wrong. You take the percentage of the whole populace, not the assumed scum:town ratio. 4/17 is 23% scum ration, 5/17 is 29%. Not that it's completely relevant to anything, but that's how you'd measure it.

well not that it's relevant but I am apparently a paste eating stupidhead

Desperado would still be picking from a list of 16 players not 17 though

In post 22, PrettyPrincess wrote:

In post 7, Drunken Piper wrote:the game is afoot, with deadly stakes,
seems only fitting, to VOTE: sircakez

I like you

In post 99, PrettyPrincess wrote:

In post 94, SirCakez wrote:ur face is boring

a man after my own heart <3

In post 106, PrettyPrincess wrote:

In post 104, Aj The Epic wrote:FWIW your math is wrong. You take the percentage of the whole populace, not the assumed scum:town ratio. 4/17 is 23% scum ration, 5/17 is 29%. Not that it's completely relevant to anything, but that's how you'd measure it.

well not that it's relevant but I am apparently a paste eating stupidhead

A princess so pretty, jokes and has a silver tongue.
"Than thine, thou serpent, never adder stung"

VOTE: PrettyPrincess

In post 96, Desperado wrote:what's that, girl? jimmy's stuck in a well???

no, cakez's spirits were just brain-meltingly boring

aww someone's jealous

I assume it's 13 v 4 like Firebringer's last 17 player large theme.

In other news I reconnected with the spirits and they've tentatively told me that the Piper and Princess are town and that alban is scummy (i;e I reread the game to answer Heartless's question and noticed that alban was sort of dodging the Titus issue on page 2 which doesn't look good).

Well, 13 v 4 also had a number of quirks. First, it was a very low-power scumteam. We had a 1-shot strongman, plus a group power we could activate to get one of three 1-shots, though that also gave Town a 1-shot. Plus, one of our team was a Lover with Town, which is a negative utility role. So I don't know; I could buy a 14:3 from Firebringer in a power-heavy game, he likes his scumteams relatively weak.

In post 113, Pine wrote:Well, 13 v 4 also had a number of quirks. First, it was a very low-power scumteam. We had a 1-shot strongman, plus a group power we could activate to get one of three 1-shots, though that also gave Town a 1-shot. Plus, one of our team was a Lover with Town, which is a negative utility role. So I don't know; I could buy a 14:3 from Firebringer in a power-heavy game, he likes his scumteams relatively weak.

Ack! Hydra slip.

In post 112, SirCakez wrote:I assume it's 13 v 4 like Firebringer's last 17 player large theme.

In other news I reconnected with the spirits and they've tentatively told me that the Piper and Princess are town and that alban is scummy (i;e I reread the game to answer Heartless's question and noticed that alban was sort of dodging the Titus issue on page 2 which doesn't look good).

better

In post 113, Pine wrote:Well, 13 v 4 also had a number of quirks. First, it was a very low-power scumteam. We had a 1-shot strongman, plus a group power we could activate to get one of three 1-shots, though that also gave Town a 1-shot. Plus, one of our team was a Lover with Town, which is a negative utility role. So I don't know; I could buy a 14:3 from Firebringer in a power-heavy game, he likes his scumteams relatively weak.

what you're describing is not "weak," it's balanced

you just speak of it as "weak" because mods here put their scumteams on steroids so everyone thinks it's normal

In post 112, SirCakez wrote:I assume it's 13 v 4 like Firebringer's last 17 player large theme.

In other news I reconnected with the spirits and they've tentatively told me that the Piper and Princess are town and that alban is scummy (i;e I reread the game to answer Heartless's question and noticed that alban was sort of dodging the Titus issue on page 2 which doesn't look good).

Probably right.

the ratios or the reads?

In post 113, Pine wrote:Well, 13 v 4 also had a number of quirks. First, it was a very low-power scumteam. We had a 1-shot strongman, plus a group power we could activate to get one of three 1-shots, though that also gave Town a 1-shot. Plus, one of our team was a Lover with Town, which is a negative utility role. So I don't know; I could buy a 14:3 from Firebringer in a power-heavy game, he likes his scumteams relatively weak.

Yeah it could depend on power levels. Like in dragon age we only had 4 scum vs 16 town which was rough.
I think Fire generally tends to lean more scum then less though.

I'm glad I have your "approval" Heartless

In post 118, Heartless wrote:the ratios or the reads?

The ratio.

the saaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaass

we're on there twice, n00b

I am feeling very....sassy lately