Page 6 of 175

Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2017 8:42 pm
by alban
Can see that.

Bring more logic with the sass. Quote relevant posts where apparently I 'dodged the Titus issue', coz I don't recollect doing any such thing.

Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2017 10:17 pm
by Infinity 324
It's because it was a major issue you didn't address

Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2017 11:14 pm
by alban
And all the 16 other players addressed whatever the issue was?

Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2017 11:17 pm
by Infinity 324
In post 32, KuroiXHF wrote:VOTE: Titus

I didn't know that you were in this game.
In post 34, PrettyPrincess wrote:Oh god don't start with the VCA fight

let's save that til at least D3
In post 47, Infinity 324 wrote:
In post 31, Titus wrote:
In post 24, Infinity 324 wrote:You like your VCA don't you

Does CWing mean anything to you this early?

Image

I need flips. I can theorize with wagons but please don't try to "help" with my VCA with your votes. Just vote. Trying to help or get me to VCA on page 1 is creepy as fuck and your push on Pine reeks of desperation.
If you don't like VCA page 1, why did you vote me?

Your reaction here seems overblown.

VOTE: titus
In post 48, Aj The Epic wrote:
In post 47, Infinity 324 wrote:Your reaction here seems overblown.
Image

I'm hoping you're not being serious here.
Most other people who posted at the time addressed it

Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2017 11:17 pm
by Infinity 324
In post 50, Pine-A-Tonics wrote:
In post 49, Titus wrote:I voted you for your desperation posting regarding Pine and your overly friendly nature, which you immediately 180ed on. You still seem to be flailing about, which is odd for page 2 and me barely posting.
Pretty much every assertion here seems entirely premature.

Aww, Titus, we're not going to be friends this game, are we?

VOTE: Titus
#srsvote
In post 62, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:Titus, I think you're letting your aggroance be your worse enemy again.
And more

Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2017 11:20 pm
by Infinity 324
In post 78, Drunken Piper wrote:
In post 58, Titus wrote:
@Pine, I believe all of it, and I am well out of RVS. I have caught scum before post 20 in another game. I tunnelled too hard and town let it go.
such a brag, such a boast
what game dear sir, so we can toast?
In post 81, SirCakez wrote:
In post 36, Pine-A-Tonics wrote:
In post 30, SirCakez wrote:Dead off the bat, not a good start for a large theme...
So you're Leia, then?

#Too soon

Pine
Indeed too soon

VOTE: titus
A commune with spirits lead me to this vote
In post 89, Desperado wrote:
In post 86, SirCakez wrote:Well these spirits, they told me that Titus was trying too hard too early and that she was scum trying to build early towncred. I'm just following what they said.
I never understand stuff like this. If trying too hard is evidently scummy, why would Titus think that it's going to build towncred?
And more

Actually, pretty much everyone who posted addressed the issue of titus or something related to that issue.

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 12:32 am
by alban
Reading it.

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 1:10 am
by alban
This is a non-issue. I am taking it up coz two of you think I am scummy for not talking about it.

1. I am scummy because I dodged the topic. Well, so did Aero, BB, and Kling. Do you find them scummy too?

2. Assuming it was directed at me coz I was around and didn't comment. BB and Kling have posted after that. Why are they not being questioned?

So, focus on everyone.

3. How is my silence AI? Why should scum!me refrain from talking about Titus? If Titus is town, scum!me would focus on her when everyone is talking about her. If Titus is scum, scum!me will not like to be among the few who haven't talked about her. If anything, my silence during the cacophony over a non-issue is indicative of me being a town. Not a very strong AI, but definitely a mild one.

Cakez, if you are trying the same shit as 1706, of riling me up and targeting me, I will kick your ass.

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 1:13 am
by alban
One more thing. Why I didn't comment? The only reason is that I didn't have anything substantial to contribute to the conversation.

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 1:14 am
by Lil Uzi Vert
You sound like you're overreacting to being called scummy about the issue. If you didn't care to comment on it, you should've just said why and moved on.

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 1:15 am
by alban
My vote isn't RV anymore.

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 1:16 am
by alban
In post 134, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:You sound like you're overreacting to being called scummy about the issue. If you didn't care to comment on it, you should've just said why and moved on.
I know. I have that that kinda temperament. I should develop a thicker skin.

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 1:59 am
by SirCakez
Alban it was on page two. BB and Kling didn't post until a good while later so they might have just skimmed over. But there were only two pages when you posted so you definitely deliberately ignored it.
And I agree with LUV you're overreacting. I don't remember 1706.

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 2:51 am
by alban
You are correct in assuming that I ignored it. You are wrong in assuming that it was deliberate.

PS. It will be nice if people don't speak for each other this early. Since it's early for either Infinity or Lil to know about Cakez's alignment, I wish you guys would have first heard him out before reaching out. Who knows, maybe he would have said something that would have given you a clue or two about him as well.

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 3:00 am
by Infinity 324
That's fair

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 6:33 am
by Titus
In post 126, Infinity 324 wrote:It's because it was a major issue you didn't address
Not everyone who disagrees with you is a major issue.

In fact, I find it pretty telling that people are suggesting I am "trying too hard" for highlighting your awkward push on Pine. Yet, no one comments on you trying to steer RVS?

When you eventually saw my points, you immediately jumped back to Pine. It sounds like you are trying to control the thread through volume and dictate no one talk about you.

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 6:36 am
by Infinity 324
I'm not trying to control shit, don't know where you got that. It was a major issue because it was a strong reaction early on that could be used to judge alignment. But I think it's not really AI for you, so I unvoted.

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 6:37 am
by Infinity 324
People can still talk about me, but that doesn't mean I have to address every point when I don't believe anything good will come out of it.

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 6:59 am
by Drunken Piper
In post 134, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:You sound like you're overreacting to being called scummy about the issue. If you didn't care to comment on it, you should've just said why and moved on.
I see this post, up in this joint,
and it leads me to ask, what is the point?

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 7:26 am
by Heartless
alban, which alignment do you prefer to play?

I'm on the same wavelength with Antihero regarding the vote.

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 7:30 am
by Infinity 324
In post 144, Heartless wrote:I'm on the same wavelength with Antihero regarding the vote.
Just saying, this shit is going to get confusing if you don't sign your posts.

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 7:39 am
by Titus
In post 142, Infinity 324 wrote:People can still talk about me, but that doesn't mean I have to address every point when I don't believe anything good will come out of it.
The selective push does tell things to me. Namely, that whatever your alignment is, you're likely doing something scum want. The hyper, extreme defense of your awkward push on Pine says as much. Then people pretend you were not trying. Major bullshit. Even if you argue senantics on awkward, you were trying to have Pine lynched.

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 7:39 am
by Titus
In post 144, Heartless wrote:alban, which alignment do you prefer to play?

I'm on the same wavelength with Antihero regarding the vote.
Which votes?

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 8:04 am
by Desperado
Vote: Infinity 324 for Rogue Leader

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 8:06 am
by Firebringer
Indigo has received a prod.
ThinkBig has received a prod.