Ethics of Scumplay

TierShift · Post Post #39 (isolation #0) » Fri Sep 09, 2016 9:29 am

Scum should be allowed to be toxic and apathy-inducing and it is town who bear the responsibility to punish this behaviour by roping the player in question.

TierShift · Post Post #41 (isolation #1) » Fri Sep 09, 2016 9:44 am

That does not take away that it is town's job to disencourage such behaviour.

I'm of the opinion that lynching toxic players furthers your wincon as town as it promotes town cohesion and diminishes town apathy

TierShift · Post Post #62 (isolation #2) » Fri Sep 23, 2016 3:49 am

Conf/obvtown players without charisma can use it to push their lynch choices through. Not really in the spirit of the game.

TierShift · Post Post #71 (isolation #3) » Fri Sep 23, 2016 10:15 am

In post 64, kuribo wrote:Sure but I can't imagine the town wouldn't hold people accountable for shitty 1v1s

Let's say newbie is IC. IC 1v1s someone. Town is always gonna vote the other option, regardless of if they're annoyed by the IC. Repeat every day. Profit.