In post 332, TierShift wrote:In post 328, zMuffinMan wrote:more or less (though i imagine you will be told that is an oversimplification or a strawman)
Sure, but it must be possible to actually isolate the argument out of all those lengthy paragraphs, mustn't it?
If it's incomplete, I'd like someone to add the essential part I'm missing.
Hydras are considered non-normal because they are a significant enough mechanical/behavioral deviation from a single player to warrant this new categorization.
^ is basically the argument in a nutshell. Yes, it is arbitrary. There isn't really a way to have a non-arbitrary definition of "Normal" unless we go with the EVERYTHING IS NORMAL or NOTHING IS NORMAL approach, which is simply moronic
And no, it won't please everyone. No definition or inclusion/exclusion list will.
Edit: SKew b& 4 ALLCAPZ.