Read your first newbie game

This forum is for discussion related to the game.
User avatar
kirroha
kirroha
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
kirroha
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1516
Joined: February 21, 2009
Location: London, United Kingdom

Post Post #75 (ISO) » Wed Feb 10, 2016 4:54 am

Post by kirroha »

In post 74, Dwlee99 wrote:
In post 73, kirroha wrote:
kirroha wrote:Vote:Seraphim

Because he claimed he wasn't the Mafia, and according to this logic:

Seraphim = Not Scum -------- 1
Scum = Not Seraphim -------- 2

Not Seraphim = Scum -------- 3

Seraphim + Not Seraphim = Scum + Not Scum
(Not+1)Seraphim = (Not+1)Scum


Seraphim = Scum

Simple. :D


cries

What even


i don't know
with a chainsaw.
User avatar
Dwlee99
Dwlee99
They/them
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Dwlee99
They/them
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 25777
Joined: July 3, 2015
Pronoun: They/them
Location: Northeast USA

Post Post #76 (ISO) » Wed Feb 10, 2016 5:02 am

Post by Dwlee99 »

In post 75, kirroha wrote:
In post 74, Dwlee99 wrote:
In post 73, kirroha wrote:
kirroha wrote:Vote:Seraphim

Because he claimed he wasn't the Mafia, and according to this logic:

Seraphim = Not Scum -------- 1
Scum = Not Seraphim -------- 2

Not Seraphim = Scum -------- 3

Seraphim + Not Seraphim = Scum + Not Scum
(Not+1)Seraphim = (Not+1)Scum


Seraphim = Scum

Simple. :D


cries

What even


i don't know

a=b
a^2=ab
a^2-b^2=ab-b^2
(a+b)(a-b)=b(a-b)
a+b=b
a=b so
b+b=b
2b=b
2=1

#DivideByZero
User avatar
kirroha
kirroha
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
kirroha
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1516
Joined: February 21, 2009
Location: London, United Kingdom

Post Post #77 (ISO) » Wed Feb 10, 2016 5:12 am

Post by kirroha »

Holy mother of puddings
with a chainsaw.
User avatar
kuribo
kuribo
he/him
Fire and Brimstone
User avatar
User avatar
kuribo
he/him
Fire and Brimstone
Fire and Brimstone
Posts: 15467
Joined: August 21, 2007
Pronoun: he/him
Location: the beach, probably
Contact:

Post Post #78 (ISO) » Thu Feb 18, 2016 4:52 am

Post by kuribo »

Town won my first newbie game in eight pages and I died N1.

http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?t=6083

There is a distressing lack of murder and theatrics to my posts though. Ecch, I get a literal cringe reading some of this timid shit.

kuribo wrote:HackerHuck, you and I may disagree about whether you're trying to avoid suspicion, and that's fine. But I do disagree.

You've made a clear case against Rogueben, sure, but a little too clear in my mind. We could chit-chat all day for dozens of reasons that Rogueben appears scummy, but to me, you appear scummy too.

What are you looking for from me? For me to comment on your previous post? I already told you that it looks like you're trying to string up Rogueben to protect yourself.

I haven't been Rogueben's biggest supporter this Day, but I would have never advocated putting him at L-1 until we were more certain than speculation that he was scum. You, on the other hand, saw L-1 as a tool to gather more information, knowing full well the risk that he would be lynched back on Page 3. This gambit could have had disastrous outcome for the town, and in my mind, it shows me more about you than your words do. I feel that the reason you were confident enough to take that risk, is because you knew he was a townie, and you knew that at L-1 your scum buddy could come along and lynch. Either one of the votes was removed in time to save him, or your buddy had already voted and you were just waiting to convince a townie to finish the job.

THAT, HackerHuck, is why I feel so strongly towards you being scum, I don't have to outline each and every one of your posts for my opinion, I have stated my opinion twice now, and your actions have reinforced them to me. You've voted people up to L-1, you've lurked, you've bandwagoned, and you've responded with a high level of defensiveness to smallish accusations. Each one of these alone means little, but put them together, and they seem to reveal a more sinister intent.


it's like reading the posts of a complete stranger. Ah, 2007, the olden days, I was still a fresh-faced 20-something married to the love of his life, back before my marriage became insuffurable / hit the rocks
Join me on my quest to play every NES game! Some of them are awful.

Kuribo's read is foolproof: one night he was high on NyQuil, and he's ancestors reveiled Aureal's alignment to him. - Dessew
User avatar
BROseidon
BROseidon
Expert Marxman
User avatar
User avatar
BROseidon
Expert Marxman
Expert Marxman
Posts: 8242
Joined: April 18, 2013

Post Post #79 (ISO) » Thu Feb 18, 2016 5:23 am

Post by BROseidon »

My first game was basically a super robotic version of my self that town dunked super hard >.>
User avatar
yessiree
yessiree
he
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
yessiree
he
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4386
Joined: June 6, 2013
Pronoun: he

Post Post #80 (ISO) » Thu Feb 25, 2016 2:04 pm

Post by yessiree »

In post 73, kirroha wrote:
kirroha wrote:Vote:Seraphim

Because he claimed he wasn't the Mafia, and according to this logic:

Seraphim = Not Scum -------- 1
Scum = Not Seraphim -------- 2

Not Seraphim = Scum -------- 3

Seraphim + Not Seraphim = Scum + Not Scum
(Not+1)Seraphim = (Not+1)Scum


Seraphim = Scum

Simple. :D


cries


psshhhhh, amatuers

yessiree wrote:
Behold the power of mathematics!!

5 newbs, 3 SEs, and 1 IC; 7 towns, and 2 mafias.

Based on theory of probability distribution, the 2 mafia members could have a distribution as follows:

2 in newb
2 in SE
1 in newb, 1 in SE
1 in newb, 1 in IC
1 in SE, 1 in IC

If we were to calculate the probability of each instance, it will look like this

Code: Select all

2 in newb                 27.78%
2 in SE                   8.33%
1 in newb, 1 in SE        41.67%
1 in newb, 1 in IC        13.89%
1 in SE, 1 in IC          8.33%


Sample calculation

1 in newb, 1 in SE

Code: Select all

P = (1 C 5) * (1 C 3) / (2 C 9) = 15 / 36 = 41.67%


However, this tells us information about 2 people. Since we can only vote on one person at a time, we need to narrow it down. We do this by combining the results of our previous calculations, and calculating the probability of at least 1 person from the user groups is the mafia.

At least 1 person from the newbs is mafia
combining the results, this is a 83.34% chance
At least 1 person from the SE is mafia
58.33% chance
IC is the mafia
22.22% chance

If you're thinking random voting one of the newbs is the most logical choice, you'd be wrong. Here is why:

There are 5 newbs, by randomly choosing one, your chance of being correct is 83.34% / 5 = 16.67%.
Similarly, there are 3 SEs, by randomly choosing one, there is a 19.44% of being correct.
However, since there is only 1 IC, your chance of being correct stands at 22.22%.
User avatar
Marquis
Marquis
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Marquis
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 11342
Joined: June 23, 2013
Location: EST (–5)

Post Post #81 (ISO) » Thu Feb 25, 2016 5:07 pm

Post by Marquis »

Spoiler: in my early games i tended to put a lot of effort into awkwardly scumreading town which made me inclined to just stop trying for most of my first six months
Subject: Newbie 1395 Game Over

Marquis wrote:Ok then!~

In post 298, Sakura Hana wrote:
In post 293, Marquis wrote:
In post 25, Sakura Hana wrote:And you gotta get used to the fact that each and every one of your posts is going to be analysed, even your random votes and reasons.


This was in response to something PHENOM said. She's being helpful, sure, but I'm getting the impression that she's not (at that time) actually seeing any scumreads on him despite this. A town player imo would be more suspicious of a player if they felt the need to say "be careful about what you say" Not a strong case of scum, but it strikes me as off.

I can see how that could be seen as couching, interesting point.
"Interesting point"? I'm glad you apparently agree that you can be seen as scum in that way.


In post 293, Marquis wrote:
In post 44, Sakura Hana wrote:
In post 42, Your Troubles Will Cease wrote:
In post 40, Sakura Hana wrote:
Any reason you are asking me a question, yet you are voting someone else? At this point I'm not in danger of getting lynched, what gives?
VOTE: arelian


Questioning someone is not the same as scumreading them.

VOTE: Sakura Hana

Serious vote.


I am aware of that, but the whole point of pressuring someone during RVS is so they answer your questions, and i assume his vote is still RVS, considering he moved it to someone only after i said it was bad that there wasn't anyone with more than 1 vote.

P-Edit: that's another good point right there Phenom.


Why would you tell someone that your vote is for pressure unless they're inactive? If you really suspected them wouldn't you just vote them and tell them why it's scummy? And your vote on arelian here isn't even a pressure vote, it's a vote because you suspected arelian for questioning people while voting you?...


Why is it ok to tell someone my vote is for pressure to begin with? obviously I was going after something else here, I did suspect arelian because he questions someone else and votes me for no apparent reason.

And from looking at your posts, you say you suspected arelian at this point, sure. But when you say you suspected arelian, and voted arelian, but just 4 posts of yours later:


In post 52, Sakura Hana wrote:
In post 50, maverick_alpha wrote:Sakura, does that mean that you got a townread out of arelian and PHENOM? Why?
Not being a scumread =/= being a townread, it's early in the game and everyone's pretty much null so that's why i'm asking questions.


So now you don't suspect or scumread arelian, and it's a null read for you now. Okay, fair enough.

(By the way, the post of yours before that says "Time to start getting into business". Was your vote on arelian earlier not serious at all?)

Then at some point you form a townread on arelian. Why? I know you apparently formed a townread because you go ahead and post this:


In post 196, Sakura Hana wrote:My town read on arelian just took a drop


Either you're flipflopping hard, or you're the one contradicting yourself here. Why do I think you're not being real about this? Because arelian's an
easy
townread; they've clearly been providing the most original reads on players and actual game-related content. Because of this, at first you claimed to have suspected them, then townread them, then your townread dropped.


In post 203, Sakura Hana wrote:Eh I just realized I misread something on arelian's reads because he used Can Lynch (as in the people they want dead) for Want to lynch, and Willing to Lynch for Can Lynch so I read that thing backwards,
so i take back my drop on arelian's town read
.


But of course, this is a rather convenient explanation. Of course now I can't prove anything about it, but how you've been going all over the place with this read and trying to cover it up is pretty fishy.


In post 293, Marquis wrote:
Last line is much too passive in comparison to how she's jumping on cases/points that other players have made, and appears to be buddying PHENOM, even. Also it's after this point that YTWC gets pretty close to a lynch despite how Troubles' comment in response to Sakura is very town.


I point out good points where i see them, don't see how that's buddying?
Maybe you'd like to explain why it's a good point or something instead of just saying so? Post something about it that actually belongs to you. It's not exactly buddying, no. But what it is, is easily agreeing with a town player's post as well as giving yourself an easy opinion to follow up to.


In post 293, Marquis wrote:
In post 49, Sakura Hana wrote:For pressure yes, until i get a scumread i can leave my vote on until said scumread poofs.


Again, overexplaining the point of her vote/actions as relating to pressure, when she could have much more easily responded with a simple statement about how she found them scummy. I find that as scum I constantly need to justify my votes to the point where it becomes too much- and Sakura's atm seem like too much.

And again, when you make a pressure vote on someone, if you announce to the world that it's for pressure it's not helping anyone- only needlessly reminding people that you're not committing to the vote. :/


Yet you said earlier that it's ok to announce it's a pressure vote when people are lurking?
Contradiction


Oh, so you actually
are
reading the details of my post against you. Good to know. I had already mentioned the inactivity clause, so I didn't need to mention it here. It's not a contradiction because it was covered earlier.

Want to respond to the part about overexplaining your votes?


In post 293, Marquis wrote:
In post 117, Sakura Hana wrote:UNVOTE:
I don't think a Hammer this early will benefit town at all.


This post sounds like an act. It's normally considered town to not want to hammer someone, and of course Sakura knows this.
YTWC wasn't in any danger of getting hammered
unless one of the voters managed to finally convince another player/an inactive to hop on to the vote. I can very easily see her, as scum, wanting to get easy towncred for being the first one to unvote- even after she and Tomie had supposedly strong scumreads on YTWC.


An intent to hammer is not a danger of getting hammered?
Contradiction


Sure, I forgot about Metal Sonic's dumb comment right before that, that's a contradiction, congratulations. Doesn't mean your post wasn't opportunistic when it came to that. For this post and the next few ones, as you and MS go back and forth, you appear to slowly and deliberately develop a scumread and reasoning for it on Metal Sonic.

Question: Wouldn't it just make more sense as town to immediately suspect and scumread someone who wants to hammer a player only a few days in?
Answer: Yeah. It would.


In post 293, Marquis wrote:
In post 119, Sakura Hana wrote:Do you have any reason for rushing the end of day?


Again, sounds like a contrived by-the-book version of town.


That's painting me as scummy not figuring out my alignment.

Explain. I said it's too by-the-book, comparing it to taking lines from a wiki page about how to look town with stereotypical town characteristics. I don't understand how you're trying to respond to this.


In post 293, Marquis wrote:
In post 189, Sakura Hana wrote:I agree that forcing scum to take a stand is a good way to get information, which is why I also like to encourage people to vote during RVS instead of laying low and not placing votes.


This was the whole post. It's really just empty words without much content. As a whole, it sounds artificial, particularly because Sakura felt the need to add such phrases as "I agree that" and "which is why I also like to", when simply giving a blunter and less elaborate statement would have sounded actually more townlike and genuine.


I don't see your point?, I've always and always will encourage people to take stances

Read pls. It's not what you said but how you said it. I'm sorry if you don't think it's something you can adequately respond to, but when you feel the need to make a post all about this, isn't there anything else you'd like to say besides trying to sound townlike?


In post 293, Marquis wrote:
In post 281, Sakura Hana wrote:Ah I see where you're coming from now, that's indeed odd as well, what do you think about what I posted earlier?


"Ah I see where you're coming from", "that's indeed odd as well", then asks a question about a previous post to seemingly generate discussion instead of committing to anything herself. I know I just pretty much quoted the whole post, but all of it... I didn't like it at all.


Well then tell me which dictionary should I use my words from then since apparently every word in the dictionary is scummy to you, again, not trying to figure out my alignment but assigning me one

Don't be so offended, and don't put words in my mouth. Not every word is scummy, but when you feel the need to add useless fluff to so many of the things you say, I find that scummy.


In post 293, Marquis wrote:
I've used this phrase before: scum diplomacy. That's when scum makes itself look polite and insightful in order to seem town, when really a lot of it is unnecessary fluff added on.
She's posting a lot and specifically calling out the inactives, sure, but does she really need to be?
Right now, Sakura looks like she's trying to do it all, and it all looks fake.


Why wouldn't i do it? is a better question, i rather give scum less places to hide.

Because it's so easy to call out inactives and use that to look good for it. For a while now you've been calling out Rach in a lot of your posts, because its easy to do so. You're trying too hard to boost yourself up in comparison to a sick/inactive player.


In post 293, Marquis wrote:
Whereas rhyx's analysis of me and MS sounds and looks genuinely town, Sakura is like the person who has to add on to every comment a "hmmm" and "oh I see" and "that's interesting"; in the case of me and MS, she's taking that one detail from rhyx after a quick "I don't know what you mean" and then in the next post, trying too hard to derive a scumread from it. Again. It's too contrived.

This is my biggest scumread. VOTE: Sakura Hana If you're not seeing what I see here, look at her ISO for yourself. It's really
too
much.


Your whole case contradicts itself, Try again!

Maybe you'd like to reply to this part? For example, instead of saying my
whole case
contradicts itself, explain why a lot of the things you say sound fake or, as ryhx said correctly before and that I agree with and have actually expanded on myself (unlike etc. etc. above), why have you been often so eager to agree with people, in particular with obvtown arelian's reads?

I'm leaving for work now, but let's try again later~


P-edit: good for you that you have suspicions and a vote on Rach; I'm sure we'd all love to actually hear them after hearing that for quite a while! I'm not sure why nobody except for Rach should be too interested in your reasoning for voting her. Don't take too long to come up with one now, dear!~
link in bio
User avatar
Marquis
Marquis
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Marquis
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 11342
Joined: June 23, 2013
Location: EST (–5)

Post Post #82 (ISO) » Thu Feb 25, 2016 5:08 pm

Post by Marquis »

would love to see some past-self-analysis from kaney tho
link in bio
User avatar
Cheetory6
Cheetory6
MS Painter
User avatar
User avatar
Cheetory6
MS Painter
MS Painter
Posts: 7403
Joined: September 21, 2014

Post Post #83 (ISO) » Thu Feb 25, 2016 5:28 pm

Post by Cheetory6 »

I was very adamant about scumreading people until they defended themselves, at which point they became slightly less likely to be scum to me.
I also wanted to a lynch a claimed cop and everyone call me stupid.
And then the claimed cop ended up being scum who could make people death millers.
Was a dumb game.
Don't play offsite mafia kids.
User avatar
T S O
T S O
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
T S O
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 16301
Joined: February 11, 2013

Post Post #84 (ISO) » Sat Feb 27, 2016 11:39 am

Post by T S O »

I rolled Cop and attempted to play a gambit where I cleared someone who I hadn't investigated. I didn't remember to update my reads accordingly and the scum IC Johhog who I was hardpushing as scum managed to get me lynched despite no counterclaim. I still can't bring myself to re-read the game.
"i have the sickest grossest feeling that even if it's my lynch today, my townflip still won't lead to a tso lynch, and then he'll find some bullshit way to reason either shooting or lynching gm tomorrow because if there's anyone who can strongarm a mislynch despite his reads or cases being proved wrong time and again it's tso"
-Marquis
User avatar
goodmorning
goodmorning
Any
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
goodmorning
Any
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 10204
Joined: October 15, 2012
Pronoun: Any
Location: THE SWAMPS OF MOSQUITOEY HELL (aka Orlando, FL)

Post Post #85 (ISO) » Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:06 am

Post by goodmorning »

I was a little uptight in my writing which made it look initially a little stilted. Fortunately that hid my Cop crumb really well.

In the meantime, I shall mention in passing that information is pretty much the only thing Town can use to better determine who to lynch. In my opinion, it is slightly anti-Town of all of us to just passively continue as we are. Yes, I realize that all information helps Mafia, but it helps Town, too. And the Mafia role comes with built-in information: Who is the Mafia? Who is not? Who is pretending in either direction?

is just a tiny example of the pretentiousness I was channeling.

I do believe my snark filter fell off.

I love me so much.
EFFORT IS NOT INDICATIVE OF ALIGNMENT
LA during normal working and sleeping hours EST

Get to know a very pleasant AM.
User avatar
Faraday
Faraday
...should I be here?
User avatar
User avatar
Faraday
...should I be here?
...should I be here?
Posts: 12126
Joined: March 29, 2009
Location: Ireland

Post Post #86 (ISO) » Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:34 am

Post by Faraday »

Pretty easy scum win for me.
are you thinking of me when you're with somebody else?
User avatar
Bicephalous Bob
Bicephalous Bob
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Bicephalous Bob
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3828
Joined: June 4, 2013
Location: I don't know why you're linking me to pictures of babies on Facebook

Post Post #87 (ISO) » Sun Feb 28, 2016 11:45 am

Post by Bicephalous Bob »

In post 80, yessiree wrote:snip

that's still my favourite game on this site

Bicephalous Bob wrote:This is my version of what happened:

1. Someone on the forum says I should totally check out mafiascum. I do.
2. I receive my role PM which says I'm town. However, it doesn't clearly state that being murdered doesn't change whether I win or not. I still think that my goal is to survive, because that's the only way I played it.
3. Yessirree says that he is trying to survive.
4. Bacde says that's silly.
5. I say I also thought we were trying to survive because the role PM doesn't clearly state we aren't
6. DoctorPepper says no way you'd think that IF YOU READ YOUR ROLE PM
7. I say I did read it is something wrong with me
8. Bacde says wait arent yessirree and bob saying the same thing
9. DoctorPepper says no THE END

This is what I assume DoctorPepper thinks what happened:

1. I read my role PM it says I'm superscum
2. I don't read the first post and I'm unable to figure out that the good guys are supposed to kill the bad guys because I suffer from severe mental retardation
3. Yessirree says that he is trying to survive
4. I say what are town what are they even doing in this game can you hold hand while I go pee pee
5. DoctorPepper says ha you would know what town are if you were town because town is explained to town in the town PM town town town
6. I start crying I lick my feet and eat my hair
User avatar
Davsto
Davsto
He/Him
Farce of Habit
User avatar
User avatar
Davsto
He/Him
Farce of Habit
Farce of Habit
Posts: 5279
Joined: June 29, 2015
Pronoun: He/Him

Post Post #88 (ISO) » Sun Feb 28, 2016 11:48 am

Post by Davsto »

In post 85, goodmorning wrote:I was a little uptight in my writing which made it look initially a little stilted. Fortunately that hid my Cop crumb really well.

In the meantime, I shall mention in passing that information is pretty much the only thing Town can use to better determine who to lynch. In my opinion, it is slightly anti-Town of all of us to just passively continue as we are. Yes, I realize that all information helps Mafia, but it helps Town, too. And the Mafia role comes with built-in information: Who is the Mafia? Who is not? Who is pretending in either direction?

is just a tiny example of the pretentiousness I was channeling.

I do believe my snark filter fell off.

I love me so much.

You were in my first newbie game which I barely remember

How times pass
User avatar
goodmorning
goodmorning
Any
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
goodmorning
Any
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 10204
Joined: October 15, 2012
Pronoun: Any
Location: THE SWAMPS OF MOSQUITOEY HELL (aka Orlando, FL)

Post Post #89 (ISO) » Sun Feb 28, 2016 12:47 pm

Post by goodmorning »

Pass they do.
EFFORT IS NOT INDICATIVE OF ALIGNMENT
LA during normal working and sleeping hours EST

Get to know a very pleasant AM.
User avatar
T S O
T S O
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
T S O
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 16301
Joined: February 11, 2013

Post Post #90 (ISO) » Sun Feb 28, 2016 12:56 pm

Post by T S O »

The worst bit was how pretentious I was. I made these snotty wall theory posts and thought I was the best player ever for posting them.
"i have the sickest grossest feeling that even if it's my lynch today, my townflip still won't lead to a tso lynch, and then he'll find some bullshit way to reason either shooting or lynching gm tomorrow because if there's anyone who can strongarm a mislynch despite his reads or cases being proved wrong time and again it's tso"
-Marquis
User avatar
Davsto
Davsto
He/Him
Farce of Habit
User avatar
User avatar
Davsto
He/Him
Farce of Habit
Farce of Habit
Posts: 5279
Joined: June 29, 2015
Pronoun: He/Him

Post Post #91 (ISO) » Sun Feb 28, 2016 4:08 pm

Post by Davsto »

I was scum and spent every day flailing.

...

Okay, some things don't change.
User avatar
Papa Zito
Papa Zito
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Papa Zito
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 9792
Joined: April 5, 2009
Location: Tejas
Contact:

Post Post #92 (ISO) » Mon Feb 29, 2016 3:20 pm

Post by Papa Zito »

I forgot Reck was in my first game.

I couldn't choose one post, they were all p bad
Kappa
Just Monika
Age is a very high price to pay for maturity.
User avatar
Jackal711
Jackal711
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Jackal711
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2390
Joined: September 23, 2011

Post Post #93 (ISO) » Thu Mar 03, 2016 2:41 am

Post by Jackal711 »

Hard to pick just one.. they were all bad.

The worst of the bunch is probably the awkward as heck counter-bus in my first post of relevance...

In [url=http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=50&t=19053]Newbie 1160[/url], [url=http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=3474458#p3474458]Post 117[/url], Jackal711 wrote:Hmm I really can't get a read on anyone yet, as has been pointed out there hasn't been much activity.

VOTE: vadinci
Reasoning: Voted for me (vilfa) during replacement search


Though my later unvote was probably worse.
User avatar
ZZZX
ZZZX
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
ZZZX
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 10778
Joined: July 7, 2013

Post Post #94 (ISO) » Thu Mar 03, 2016 2:43 am

Post by ZZZX »

First mafia game... Spend half a page building a case up...

On a dead person.
Implosion: I see ZZZX was
redacted
. For shame, people. For shame.
The Bulge: ZZZX is ZZZX
Get to know a ZZZX: http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=61&t=58733
Post Reply

Return to “Mafia Discussion”