In post 298, Sakura Hana wrote: In post 293, Marquis wrote: In post 25, Sakura Hana wrote:And you gotta get used to the fact that each and every one of your posts is going to be analysed, even your random votes and reasons.
This was in response to something PHENOM said. She's being helpful, sure, but I'm getting the impression that she's not (at that time) actually seeing any scumreads on him despite this. A town player imo would be more suspicious of a player if they felt the need to say "be careful about what you say" Not a strong case of scum, but it strikes me as off.
I can see how that could be seen as couching, interesting point.
"Interesting point"? I'm glad you apparently agree that you can be seen as scum in that way.
In post 293, Marquis wrote:
In post 44, Sakura Hana wrote: In post 42, Your Troubles Will Cease wrote: In post 40, Sakura Hana wrote:
Any reason you are asking me a question, yet you are voting someone else? At this point I'm not in danger of getting lynched, what gives?
VOTE: arelian
Questioning someone is not the same as scumreading them.
VOTE: Sakura Hana
Serious vote.
I am aware of that, but the whole point of pressuring someone during RVS is so they answer your questions, and i assume his vote is still RVS, considering he moved it to someone only after i said it was bad that there wasn't anyone with more than 1 vote.
P-Edit: that's another good point right there Phenom.
Why would you tell someone that your vote is for pressure unless they're inactive? If you really suspected them wouldn't you just vote them and tell them why it's scummy? And your vote on arelian here isn't even a pressure vote, it's a vote because you suspected arelian for questioning people while voting you?...
Why is it ok to tell someone my vote is for pressure to begin with? obviously I was going after something else here, I did suspect arelian because he questions someone else and votes me for no apparent reason.
And from looking at your posts, you say you suspected arelian at this point, sure. But when you say you suspected arelian, and voted arelian, but just 4 posts of yours later:
In post 52, Sakura Hana wrote:Not being a scumread =/= being a townread, it's early in the game and everyone's pretty much null so that's why i'm asking questions.
So now you don't suspect or scumread arelian, and it's a null read for you now. Okay, fair enough.
(By the way, the post of yours before that says "Time to start getting into business". Was your vote on arelian earlier not serious at all?)
Then at some point you form a townread on arelian. Why? I know you apparently formed a townread because you go ahead and post this:
Either you're flipflopping hard, or you're the one contradicting yourself here. Why do I think you're not being real about this? Because arelian's an
easy
townread; they've clearly been providing the most original reads on players and actual game-related content. Because of this, at first you claimed to have suspected them, then townread them, then your townread dropped.
In post 203, Sakura Hana wrote:Eh I just realized I misread something on arelian's reads because he used Can Lynch (as in the people they want dead) for Want to lynch, and Willing to Lynch for Can Lynch so I read that thing backwards,
so i take back my drop on arelian's town read
.
But of course, this is a rather convenient explanation. Of course now I can't prove anything about it, but how you've been going all over the place with this read and trying to cover it up is pretty fishy.
In post 293, Marquis wrote:
Last line is much too passive in comparison to how she's jumping on cases/points that other players have made, and appears to be buddying PHENOM, even. Also it's after this point that YTWC gets pretty close to a lynch despite how Troubles' comment in response to Sakura is very town.
I point out good points where i see them, don't see how that's buddying?
Maybe you'd like to explain why it's a good point or something instead of just saying so? Post something about it that actually belongs to you. It's not exactly buddying, no. But what it is, is easily agreeing with a town player's post as well as giving yourself an easy opinion to follow up to.
In post 293, Marquis wrote:
In post 49, Sakura Hana wrote:For pressure yes, until i get a scumread i can leave my vote on until said scumread poofs.
Again, overexplaining the point of her vote/actions as relating to pressure, when she could have much more easily responded with a simple statement about how she found them scummy. I find that as scum I constantly need to justify my votes to the point where it becomes too much- and Sakura's atm seem like too much.
And again, when you make a pressure vote on someone, if you announce to the world that it's for pressure it's not helping anyone- only needlessly reminding people that you're not committing to the vote. :/
Yet you said earlier that it's ok to announce it's a pressure vote when people are lurking?
Contradiction
Oh, so you actually
are
reading the details of my post against you. Good to know. I had already mentioned the inactivity clause, so I didn't need to mention it here. It's not a contradiction because it was covered earlier.
Want to respond to the part about overexplaining your votes?
In post 293, Marquis wrote:
This post sounds like an act. It's normally considered town to not want to hammer someone, and of course Sakura knows this.
YTWC wasn't in any danger of getting hammered
unless one of the voters managed to finally convince another player/an inactive to hop on to the vote. I can very easily see her, as scum, wanting to get easy towncred for being the first one to unvote- even after she and Tomie had supposedly strong scumreads on YTWC.
An intent to hammer is not a danger of getting hammered?
Contradiction
Sure, I forgot about Metal Sonic's dumb comment right before that, that's a contradiction, congratulations. Doesn't mean your post wasn't opportunistic when it came to that. For this post and the next few ones, as you and MS go back and forth, you appear to slowly and deliberately develop a scumread and reasoning for it on Metal Sonic.
Question: Wouldn't it just make more sense as town to immediately suspect and scumread someone who wants to hammer a player only a few days in?
Answer: Yeah. It would.
That's painting me as scummy not figuring out my alignment.
Explain. I said it's too by-the-book, comparing it to taking lines from a wiki page about how to look town with stereotypical town characteristics. I don't understand how you're trying to respond to this.
In post 293, Marquis wrote:
In post 189, Sakura Hana wrote:I agree that forcing scum to take a stand is a good way to get information, which is why I also like to encourage people to vote during RVS instead of laying low and not placing votes.
This was the whole post. It's really just empty words without much content. As a whole, it sounds artificial, particularly because Sakura felt the need to add such phrases as "I agree that" and "which is why I also like to", when simply giving a blunter and less elaborate statement would have sounded actually more townlike and genuine.
I don't see your point?, I've always and always will encourage people to take stances
Read pls. It's not what you said but how you said it. I'm sorry if you don't think it's something you can adequately respond to, but when you feel the need to make a post all about this, isn't there anything else you'd like to say besides trying to sound townlike?
In post 293, Marquis wrote:
In post 281, Sakura Hana wrote:Ah I see where you're coming from now, that's indeed odd as well, what do you think about what I posted earlier?
"Ah I see where you're coming from", "that's indeed odd as well", then asks a question about a previous post to seemingly generate discussion instead of committing to anything herself. I know I just pretty much quoted the whole post, but all of it... I didn't like it at all.
Well then tell me which dictionary should I use my words from then since apparently every word in the dictionary is scummy to you, again, not trying to figure out my alignment but assigning me one
Don't be so offended, and don't put words in my mouth. Not every word is scummy, but when you feel the need to add useless fluff to so many of the things you say, I find that scummy.
In post 293, Marquis wrote:
I've used this phrase before: scum diplomacy. That's when scum makes itself look polite and insightful in order to seem town, when really a lot of it is unnecessary fluff added on.
She's posting a lot and specifically calling out the inactives, sure, but does she really need to be?
Right now, Sakura looks like she's trying to do it all, and it all looks fake.
Why wouldn't i do it? is a better question, i rather give scum less places to hide.
Because it's so easy to call out inactives and use that to look good for it. For a while now you've been calling out Rach in a lot of your posts, because its easy to do so. You're trying too hard to boost yourself up in comparison to a sick/inactive player.
In post 293, Marquis wrote:
Whereas rhyx's analysis of me and MS sounds and looks genuinely town, Sakura is like the person who has to add on to every comment a "hmmm" and "oh I see" and "that's interesting"; in the case of me and MS, she's taking that one detail from rhyx after a quick "I don't know what you mean" and then in the next post, trying too hard to derive a scumread from it. Again. It's too contrived.
This is my biggest scumread.
VOTE: Sakura Hana If you're not seeing what I see here, look at her ISO for yourself. It's really
too
much.
Your whole case contradicts itself, Try again!
Maybe you'd like to reply to this part? For example, instead of saying my
whole case
contradicts itself, explain why a lot of the things you say sound fake or, as ryhx said correctly before and that I agree with and have actually expanded on myself (unlike etc. etc. above), why have you been often so eager to agree with people, in particular with obvtown arelian's reads?
I'm leaving for work now, but let's try again later~