Open 580: Tit For Tat - Game Over!

[BlueBloodedToffee]

V O T E C O U N T

2 . 0 3

[/b]

(2)

Netherspite -

Bulbazak, Xayzeck

(L-3)

(2)

T S O -

acryon, davesaz

(L-3)

(1)

davesaz -

T S O

(L-4)

(4)

Not Voting — Netherspite, Shinobi, Aquanim, Malakittens

With 9 alive, it takes 5 votes to lynch

[/font]

Deadline is in

(expired on 2014-12-31 23:20:00)

[/b]

[Malakittens]

Correct. If we are wrong the VIG will shoot the conf scum.

I mean the plan isn't super foolproof other than scum has to decide who out of the three PRs to kill.

[Netherspite]

If the scum counterclaims a PR we're in fact in a better position than if scum claims VT.
Because there will be less options on where to find scum.

@davesaz

Mind listing the reasons you scumread me?
Also, is possible gambit with hopping between the wagons the only reason for you to scumread TSO?

[acryon]

@Mod: If the role cop investigates the mafia back-up JK, what is the result?

[acryon]

In terms of a mass-claim, I've run through a bunch of scenarios and they are all just too risky to consider at this point. No reason to not just play it safe.

Also V/LA until Monday as usual.

[Malakittens]

Acryon are you planning to be VLa this wholeeee game...?

[acryon]

Acryon are you planning to be VLa this wholeeee game...?

Not at all! That big chunk was very out of the ordinary since I had a baby, and I'm always V/LA on weekends.

[Malakittens]

Oh congrats! And okay

[T S O]

Speaking of which, TSO, I have some questions for you.

...

as shit as your play today

.

Why did you think my day 1 play was bad?

Try me.

You going to keep running away from calling me scum, yeah?

You'll keep until tomorrow. Unless the vigilante shoots you, that is.

This needs death.

Why did you think this post and my play in general was worth lynching?

Didn't see them - will answer later.

the one problem I have with TSO is that I felt he wasn't sorting out Bulba like he did in the past. Revolution mafia he was so aggressive that Bulba was scum from one post here yet he danced around it.

Because Bulba scumposted there and I knew it and I was right. Here, he hasn't done that yet - plus I don't have half the fucking game sorted yet due to school being on.

@Mod: If the role cop investigates the mafia back-up JK, what is the result?

Why would it be irregular?

[davesaz]

@Mod: If the role cop investigates the mafia back-up JK, what is the result?

Why would it be irregular?

I see two possible interpretations.

1. "Back up is a role" would investigate as that role
2. "Back up is the potential to convert to a role" might investigate as vanilla until the backup is activated.

It's a perfectly good question but it wasn't bolded as requested by the mod.

@Mod: If the role cop investigates the mafia back-up JK, what is the result?

[Netherspite]

@davesaz

Please stop ignoring questions.

[Shinobi]

I've been putting this game on my backburner, but I'll try to get to it tonight.

[davesaz]

Regarding Nether, I agreed with 841 at the time of 845 and had an unstated weak scum at that time.

I was weak scum on TSO after the interaction starting at 689, and saw another weird interaction from him elsewhere. Obviously the VCA to solidify the read came after flips.

[T S O]

What about that post made you think scum?

[davesaz]

Making up a reason to vote me, of course. Did you notice anyone agreeing with that characterization of my play?

[T S O]

lol

[T S O]

I just find it hilarious that -you- are accusing -me- of making up bullshit reasons for a vote. Seriously, it's a joke.

[Netherspite]

@davesaz

So your main arguments are my playstyle that is pretty similar regardless of alignment + VCA.
Well well.

Regarding TSO, what was scummy in 689?

[davesaz]

Just answered in 1064.

[Netherspite]

He was suspecting you ages before this post.
What's wrong with this specific one?

[davesaz]

Umm, I used very specific words, did you have trouble understanding them? Or are you

trying

to do exactly the same thing I scum read TSO for doing?

[T S O]

Dave, here's a hint: when I'm scum and say obviously wrong things, I don't continue telling other people they're right. Hope it improves your game.

[Netherspite]

@davesaz

How on earth can #689 be a reason to vote someone?
I would understand (partially) if you would mention his previous posts where he was pressuring you.
But this specific post has nothing to do with making up a reason to vote someone...

[Aquanim]

@davesaz

How on earth can #689 be a reason to vote someone?
I would understand (partially) if you would mention his previous posts where he was pressuring you.
But this specific post has nothing to do with making up a reason to vote someone...

Oh look I'm just going to answer this one...
Dave said "the interaction starting at #689", in which TSO says some stuff about Dave's posting which he completely fails to substantiate and then runs off without voting for Dave.

[Aquanim]

I just find it hilarious that -you- are accusing -me- of making up bullshit reasons for a vote. Seriously, it's a joke.

Mock him all you like, TSO, it won't make what he said any less true.