Open 624 Fire and Ice - Fire Mafia Wins

Firebringer · Post Post #625 (ISO) » Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:09 am

I just woke up, and I am having one of those mornings.
Where I just want to destroy the world.

I can't afford a death machine, so I guess ill just play mafia.

Why is everyone scum reading Supereme Overlord?

ISO · Post Post #626 (ISO) » Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:14 am

His reasoning feels weak and forced, his voting patterns are opportunistic (especially the Shadow vote), his whole "has/hasn't mentioned" thing pings me wrong, and his case on ika for hammering after he himself put Shadow at L-1 is hypocritical.

Firebringer · Post Post #627 (ISO) » Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:15 am

In post 626, Something_Smart wrote:His reasoning feels weak and forced, his voting patterns are opportunistic (especially the Shadow vote), his whole "has/hasn't mentioned" thing pings me wrong, and his case on ika for hammering after he himself put Shadow at L-1 is hypocritical.

Hammering and putting a person at L-1 are two different things...
How is that hypocritical?

ISO · Post Post #628 (ISO) » Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:20 am

He said it himself that he wanted Shadow hammered...
While he's voting ika for hammering...

Firebringer · Post Post #629 (ISO) » Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:31 am

Okay that sounds a bit silly.

Supreme Overlord · Post Post #630 (ISO) » Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:36 am

In post 602, Viva La Gloria wrote:SO is an obvious scumfuck and the Cobalting kill proves it so bye.

Rude. Also; what?

In post 617, Viva La Gloria wrote:Like even if you look at his last post he gets bogged into a sort of IIOA; he's discussing the meta of how reads form instead of actually having them. Which is really scummy.

I don't know if you noticed, but I was responding to a question in that post. Not really sure how to do that without explaining my philosophy ...

In post 628, Something_Smart wrote:He said it himself that he wanted Shadow hammered...
While he's voting ika for hammering...

Are you wilfully ignoring the context I've explained twice now?

L-1? Let's have a look at the votes on my wagon:

In post 550, Viva La Gloria wrote:VOTE: Supreme Overlord

This should have been yesterday's lynch.

In post 572, SilverWolf wrote:Much better thanks.

<3

Also.................

VOTE: Supreme Overlord

In post 581, Something_Smart wrote:575 was bad. Didn't expect a hammer? From ika? You put Shadow at L-1 anyway (which was also bad)!
And why are you so concerned with who has or hasn't mentioned whom? Feels like manufacturing reasons.
The whole Shadow wagon was bad. Viva's and SO's votes were the worst. I get the feeling that Viva and Shinobi are opposing scum, and SO could be partners with either. Plus this wagon is more likely to go somewhere than Shinobi's.
VOTE: Supreme Overlord

In post 599, SnarkySnowman wrote:Ah right. VOTE: Supreme Overlord for L-2

In post 621, Aristophanes wrote:I know we have 10 days and I want to give Fire time to catch up, but I totally agree with this lynch on a reread.

All of their questions seem to be at the game rather than in the game. Which is weird I know, my explanations suck.

Aaand I got called in to work while typing. Basically, they feel off and unengaged and are probably scum.

VOTE: SO

This is L-1

Lots of convincing cases there. I've responded to Something Smart, and I don't know there's much I

can

respond to about the others.
I won't claim until intent to hammer; I've gone three hours without ika hammering and I don't think he was going to anyway.

Shinobi · Post Post #631 (ISO) » Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:01 am

In post 628, Something_Smart wrote:He said it himself that he wanted Shadow hammered...
While he's voting ika for hammering...

I need to double check this.

SilverWolf · Post Post #632 (ISO) » Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:10 am

ika-if you hammer for no reason I will be pissed

Firebringer · Post Post #633 (ISO) » Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:11 am

In post 632, SilverWolf wrote:ika-if you hammer for no reason I will be pissed

Its like you are daring him too.

SilverWolf · Post Post #634 (ISO) » Tue Feb 09, 2016 11:42 am

In post 633, Firebringer wrote:
In post 632, SilverWolf wrote:ika-if you hammer for no reason I will be pissed

Its like you are daring him too.

Not really? Like, what said should do the opposite of that unless he's scum. If he wants to declare intent that's fine. I also think SO should just go ahead and claim at this point.

Firebringer · Post Post #635 (ISO) » Tue Feb 09, 2016 2:39 pm

In post 634, SilverWolf wrote:Not really? Like, what said should do the opposite of that unless he's scum. If he wants to declare intent that's fine. I also think SO should just go ahead and claim at this point.

But Ika always hammers. Like 99.999999% of the time.
Can you point to a game he doesn't hammer someone at L-1.
This is regardless of alignment too btw. You know its a Null tell.

You have to assume L-2 is L-1 with Ika in game.

ika · Post Post #636 (ISO) » Tue Feb 09, 2016 3:22 pm

In post 632, SilverWolf wrote:ika-if you hammer for no reason I will be pissed

im not hammering.

i jsut got home as well

so give me 10 to read up

ika · Post Post #637 (ISO) » Tue Feb 09, 2016 3:35 pm

In post 605, Masquerade wrote:

ika: Which posts from Silver in this game remind you most of that other game?

its not even her post per say its how shes interacting with me

In post 613, Firebringer wrote:Silverwolf is pinging me!
In places I don't like to be pinged.

hi fire, im goign to ignore the fact right now that you amde that comment to my GF and hope you didt mean anythign by that

In post 616, Viva La Gloria wrote:
In post 613, Firebringer wrote:Silverwolf is pinging me!
In places I don't like to be pinged.

I don't think Ika will be too happy about this...

fire is a trolll and form my homesite, i know he prob didnt knwo about me/silver so im giving him a by FTM.

In post 632, SilverWolf wrote:ika-if you hammer for no reason I will be pissed

i do have to ask then, why dont you unvote?

In post 633, Firebringer wrote:
In post 632, SilverWolf wrote:ika-if you hammer for no reason I will be pissed

Its like you are daring him too.

no. shes not, i have to much love and repsect for her to go aginst her. There would be only one case where i would go against her and that would be that i am scum

Firebringer · Post Post #638 (ISO) » Tue Feb 09, 2016 3:38 pm

In post 637, ika wrote:fire is a trolll and form my homesite, i know he prob didnt knwo about me/silver so im giving him a by FTM.

Rude.

Firebringer · Post Post #639 (ISO) » Tue Feb 09, 2016 3:39 pm

In post 637, ika wrote:hi fire, im goign to ignore the fact right now that you amde that comment to my GF and hope you didt mean anythign by that

She is my GF now!

ika · Post Post #640 (ISO) » Tue Feb 09, 2016 3:43 pm

In post 639, Firebringer wrote:
In post 637, ika wrote:hi fire, im goign to ignore the fact right now that you amde that comment to my GF and hope you didt mean anythign by that

She is my GF now!

dont evens start wth em i will rage at you in skype post game if you even make a joke like that

she is mine and you are not even getting close to her

ika · Post Post #641 (ISO) » Tue Feb 09, 2016 3:44 pm

llike what im sayingis really tame to what i want to say....

i need to go get some food now ill bbl

Firebringer · Post Post #642 (ISO) » Tue Feb 09, 2016 3:44 pm

I am here to chew bubblegum and lynch scum.
And I am all out of scum.

So give me some bubblegum.

But on the real Ika, its a joke.

ika · Post Post #643 (ISO) » Tue Feb 09, 2016 3:47 pm

In post 642, Firebringer wrote:But on the real Ika, its a joke.

I know..... like i knew you were trollign and joking but..... it... jsut triggers me... joking or not

ika · Post Post #644 (ISO) » Tue Feb 09, 2016 3:48 pm

real talk though

whats your read on her and why?

ika · Post Post #645 (ISO) » Tue Feb 09, 2016 3:48 pm

talk to me about reads. it will hepl me

Firebringer · Post Post #646 (ISO) » Tue Feb 09, 2016 3:49 pm

In post 644, ika wrote:real talk though

whats your read on her and why?

She seems to be trying too hard. Seems scummish.
Kind of reminds you two as anxiety attack when you were scum.

ika · Post Post #647 (ISO) » Tue Feb 09, 2016 3:53 pm

In post 646, Firebringer wrote:
In post 644, ika wrote:real talk though

whats your read on her and why?

She seems to be trying too hard. Seems scummish.
Kind of reminds you two as anxiety attack when you were scum.

vote her then?

Firebringer · Post Post #648 (ISO) » Tue Feb 09, 2016 4:03 pm

In post 647, ika wrote:vote her then?

Is that how you play mafia?

ika · Post Post #649 (ISO) » Tue Feb 09, 2016 4:04 pm

Fire do you think silver is only tryhard as scum?

Pedit: dunno is it?