The Role PM only says night kills will not affect you if you were targeted while hiding.
Liking Mathdino for now as I wouldn't have thought of the tracker and hider strategy.
I think I'm 100% sure that tracker should be chosen (and everyone should).
1. The hider can be killed if he tried to confirm the vigilante
2. The vigilante, if not experienced, will do more harm than good
3. If the detective was chosen, he can falsely accuse the vigilante as scum.
Second, if it's not clear that a tracker was surely picked, a scum that was
targeted by detective can just claim he's a vigilante and now the real tracker
should probably counter claim.
The reason why everyone should say that a tracker must be chosen is because
of #3. Mafia outed by detective can just say he's vig and say on day 1 he did
not ignore the possibility of choosing vig unlike some people
(assuming the tracker did not claim yet).
The only reason vig should be chosen if he's unfortunately about to be lynched
so that he can use his night action one last time.
In post 24, Mathdino wrote:Not liking this opportunism on a discussion of theory. I think Piratecat's stance is pretty clearly laid out.
I think he's not necessarily being opportunistic. I think his vote has merit.
Scum hunting never stops. And besides, at least the random voting stage is over.
Because as much as much as possible I vote someone who I feel is suspicious, I'll probably vote Piratecat.
I'll unvote when he clearly states that tracker should always be chosen and vig should only
be chosen if the PR was unfortunately about to be lynched OR unless someone could come
up with a compelling reason why vig should be used.
VOTE: Piratecat