Open 661: Pick Your Poison [Game Over]

[SnarkySnowman]

VOTE: Snarky/Snarky's replace in

savage

[Cheesy]

PP, are you a cop?

After you get your answer, could you tell me why you were so specific? I'm having trouble assessing your possible motivation. It seemed very out of the blue.

[Cheesy]

Mr. Snowman, as which alignment are you more likely to replace out?

[ThinkBig]

TB...seriously?

Yes. Seriously. His question presumed the existence of a cop in this game and seems to be rolefishing.

If there is a cop, please do not claim.

[PenguinPower]

There's this great movie called Equilibrium...

[Gamma Emerald]

LOL
I get it

[aronagrundy]

VOTE: vedith

because dog

[Cheesy]

TB...seriously?

If there is a cop, please do not claim.

It seems pretty obvious at this point, doesn't it?

[LicketyQuickety]

TB...seriously?

If there is a cop, please do not claim.

It seems pretty obvious at this point, doesn't it?

I still don't like it. It was directed at a single person to answer.

[aronagrundy]

so?

[SnarkySnowman]

It's a 1-shot Cop, right? It would make sense to claim the result after you use it, because then you'd be just a VT like the majority of players. Claiming before is a losing strategy.

[LicketyQuickety]

It's a 1-shot Cop, right? It would make sense to claim the result after you use it, because then you'd be just a VT like the majority of players. Claiming before is a losing strategy.

yeah, but you can still answer no. That's what I am seeing. Not that they would actually say yes, but that they would say no.

[Cheesy]

I don't imagine anybody would out themselves to potential scum just cause he's asking nicely. Maybe these two have a history together that I don't know of.

[Gamma Emerald]

I don't imagine anybody would out themselves to potential scum just cause he's asking nicely. Maybe these two have a history together that I don't know of.

They do.

[Cheesy]

It's a 1-shot Cop, right? It would make sense to claim the result after you use it, because then you'd be just a VT like the majority of players. Claiming before is a losing strategy.

yeah, but you can still answer no. That's what I am seeing. Not that they would actually say yes, but that they would say no.

If you know the answer won't be "yes", what do you gain from somebody answering "no"?

[PenguinPower]

I'm not going to spoil it before TB gets back in here, but...yeah...this got carried a bit out of hand.

[LicketyQuickety]

It's a 1-shot Cop, right? It would make sense to claim the result after you use it, because then you'd be just a VT like the majority of players. Claiming before is a losing strategy.

yeah, but you can still answer no. That's what I am seeing. Not that they would actually say yes, but that they would say no.

If you know the answer won't be "yes", what do you gain from somebody answering "no"?

You know they are not cop.

[Cheesy]

Seems pretty naive

[aronagrundy]

Town can lie though?

[LicketyQuickety]

VOTE: cheesy

[ThinkBig]

LOL
I get it

PP is talking about this game that I just completed with PP and Vedith.

[ThinkBig]

Town can lie though?

Yes they can lie. While I generally lynch all liars, there are instances in which it is good for the townie to lie.

[Cheesy]

VOTE: cheesy

So was your last post some kind of test?

[LicketyQuickety]

VOTE: cheesy

So was your last post some kind of test?

You are acting in a hypocritical way. You vote/question Vedith, but when someone else does it you think they are naive.

[Cheesy]

No, I thought it's naive to accept somebody's not of X role just cause he denied to be. Like if you asked me if I was mafia and I said no, would you believe me?