Open 662: Fire and Ice (Game Over)

Alisae · Post Post #1925 (ISO) » Thu Jan 19, 2017 10:17 am

Isn't Realeo already on it?

Akarin · Post Post #1926 (ISO) » Thu Jan 19, 2017 10:19 am

In post 1925, Alisae wrote:Isn't Realeo already on it?

Oh, you're right. I missed that somehow. I guess because he was townreading N_M before.

So that's L-1.

Alisae · Post Post #1927 (ISO) » Thu Jan 19, 2017 10:20 am

It's cuz they're scumbutts hehe

Not_Mafia · Post Post #1928 (ISO) » Thu Jan 19, 2017 10:25 am

Intent to hammer

Alisae · Post Post #1929 (ISO) » Thu Jan 19, 2017 10:25 am

^scum post^

light_ganski · Post Post #1930 (ISO) » Thu Jan 19, 2017 10:44 am

Mod has now had a couple off drinksn

Official Vote Count 4.3

Not_Mafia (3)

- Realeo, Alisae, Akarin

Realeo (1)

- Not_Mafia

Akarin (1)

- havingfitz

Not Voting (2)

- Kmd4390, Aristophanes

With 7 players alive, it takes 4 votes to lynch

You have (expired on 2017-01-29 09:49:43) until deadline.

Aristophanes · Post Post #1931 (ISO) » Thu Jan 19, 2017 12:21 pm

In post 1921, Akarin wrote:If we lynch Not_mafia, do you think Aristophanes will sort one of them out for us overnight?

I don't know if it's because you're scum that you're pushing this narrative, but I'm beginning to think so.

Alisae · Post Post #1932 (ISO) » Thu Jan 19, 2017 12:22 pm

If it's Akarin/Realeo then I diserve to git rekt

Kmd4390 · Post Post #1933 (ISO) » Thu Jan 19, 2017 1:32 pm

<- won't be hammering. still think not mafia is town. Anyone got a case saying otherwise or is it just "lol not saying much so scum"?

Alisae · Post Post #1934 (ISO) » Thu Jan 19, 2017 1:33 pm

VCA pointed me to Not_Mefia and Realeo being buddies.
So the same reason for Realeo except without the appeasement part.

Kmd4390 · Post Post #1935 (ISO) » Thu Jan 19, 2017 1:47 pm

I hope this isn't what you are calling VCA:

In post 1808, Alisae wrote:skimmed the mod's ISO.
Wouldn't be surprised if both you and Not_Mafia were scum.

Because if it is, there isn't nearly enough analysis there to sway me.

Alisae · Post Post #1936 (ISO) » Thu Jan 19, 2017 2:00 pm

Nah it's micro level VCA taken from the very first vote count. There was a huge wagon on Realeo that Not Mafia was on and Realeo was voting Not Mafia.

Kmd4390 · Post Post #1937 (ISO) » Thu Jan 19, 2017 2:51 pm

And that makes them partners? With no context? Like what if one was a really bad OMGUS vote or something?

Alisae · Post Post #1938 (ISO) » Thu Jan 19, 2017 2:56 pm

Ye. I wouldn't be surprised if Realeo was trying to bus. Also this is an RVS wagon, so bad OMGUS or OMGUS in general is still OMGUS. Some people OMGUS in RVS for some reason. It's still held accountable, no?

Kmd4390 · Post Post #1939 (ISO) » Thu Jan 19, 2017 4:01 pm

So any RVS OMGUS vote means the two players involved are scum together? I never knew mafia was so easy.

Alisae · Post Post #1940 (ISO) » Thu Jan 19, 2017 4:02 pm

Now you're implying that I said that's 100% the case.

Realeo · Post Post #1941 (ISO) » Thu Jan 19, 2017 4:14 pm

In post 1931, Aristophanes wrote:
In post 1921, Akarin wrote:If we lynch Not_mafia, do you think Aristophanes will sort one of them out for us overnight?
I don't know if it's because you're scum that you're pushing this narrative, but I'm beginning to think so.

Talk with me. What do you think?

Realeo · Post Post #1942 (ISO) » Thu Jan 19, 2017 4:15 pm

In post 1940, Alisae wrote:Now you're implying that I said that's 100% the case.

If it's not 100%, there is a second thing that makes it 100%.

Realeo · Post Post #1943 (ISO) » Thu Jan 19, 2017 4:16 pm

*cough* N_M KMD *cough*

Realeo · Post Post #1944 (ISO) » Thu Jan 19, 2017 4:19 pm

In post 1913, Akarin wrote:The way the wagon falls apart doesn't read like scum trying to save their buddy

Thank you! I was trying to said that.

Kmd4390 · Post Post #1945 (ISO) » Thu Jan 19, 2017 5:21 pm

In post 1940, Alisae wrote:Now you're implying that I said that's 100% the case.

Well if you aren't considering context, you must mean 100% of the time.

Of course I don't think you actually believe that. I'm just trying to follow why it stood out to you and it's not adding up.

Aristophanes · Post Post #1946 (ISO) » Thu Jan 19, 2017 7:36 pm

Light
Going camping this weekend, gonna be full V/LA until Monday

everyone else, I'll see if I can do this while at work. I'm sure it will get quiet at some point.
I'm really, really sorry I haven't contributed enough. It's unfair, but I'll make the wait worth it in the end!

Realeo · Post Post #1947 (ISO) » Thu Jan 19, 2017 9:31 pm

@Akarin

So fitz is Ice Mafia or Fire Mafia? Because at one point, you asked about whether Aristo will sort that out and at one point, you said fitz is distancing from BK.

Realeo · Post Post #1948 (ISO) » Thu Jan 19, 2017 9:34 pm

In post 1933, Kmd4390 wrote:<- won't be hammering. still think not mafia is town. Anyone got a case saying otherwise or is it just "lol not saying much so scum"?

My case that NM is not serious is not enough?

Realeo · Post Post #1949 (ISO) » Thu Jan 19, 2017 9:55 pm

In post 1898, Kmd4390 wrote:By this logic, I should be voting you or havingfitz. My first suspect list was you/nn/culted/lo if I'm not mistaken. I added in one of rory/josh after nn's flip, BK's rory case, and josh's obsession over the idea that rory was the NK. You need a reread if you think otherwise.

No. You misread my case. The keyword here is consistency.

You said that you scumread rory since D2 right? I find it hard to believe that you scumread rory

for 3 consecutive days

but make no serious attempt to make rory a wagon contender.