Open 255 - Double Cop - Game Over

[Zed]

Vote: Furcolow

because I like cheese

[Zed]

I really don't see how you can tell if its intentional or not, andrew.

[Zed]

I can read, too. All I got from it is standard RVS. Anyone else want to share?

[Zed]

Furcolow, you need to chill. andrew's reasoning doesn't seem to be taken seriously by any of the other players. 23 posts in and you're already flipping out. Just relax a little

[Zed]

How can you cc cop if there are two? For all we know, you're both the cop. So now you've both claimed cop, because there cannot be a cc until there is a third claim.

And you both claimed on page two. We barely made it to page two. Neither of you are in any real trouble. What are you thinking?

[Zed]

and andrew, you spelled dethroned wrong in your sig.

[Zed]

Unvote

Not taking any chances. I'll be back later with more

[Zed]

I'm really not sure what to do right here.

shotty, why'd you claim?

[Zed]

shotty, if you really are a cop then I feel it was bad play to claim now. You could have hid for another night or so to get a read on one of the claimed cops and told us for sure. But thats what I would have done, so...

Right now, I'm leaning torwards believing shotty. Furc and andrew I'm still debating on. Right now, the wording of their more recent posts seem to say that they aren't aware that there are multiple cops here, and this confuses me. I'm trying to pay that much attention to furc because it could have just been a grammar error, but andrew seemed to be in his own little world when he cc'ed.

The problem is that andrew was in no danger when he cc'ed. There was no reason for a second cop to claim, and it doesn't make sense why anyone should think they have to. I'm not sure if I should believe the one who had no reason, or the one that was at L-1.

And now shotty and furc are pushing for eachother, and thats really no help guys.

[Zed]

I'd really like to vote andrew (Happy Birthday!), but I want to hear from him first.

[Zed]

so look into me and don, but not scott?

I'm really not believing andrew right now. And how do you beleive that this is a one cop set-up? It was clearly labeled double cop. There is a clear difference between ccing and asking for a cc, and that doesn't look like you were looking for a cc.

Why are you so quick to believe don? and shotty?

[Zed]

Let me clarfiy my question quick.

To don and shotty- Why are you so quick to believe andrew?

[Zed]

But the title of the thread is double cop...

[Zed]

Just because we listen doesn't mean we believe you. I know I don't, so you can assume that there is someone else who doesn't either. I think that you cced, saw there was trouble and denied everything. But that's just me.

[Zed]

Hey, don, shotty? Want to answer my question? plsthanks.

[Zed]

Sorry shotty, wasn't sure who you were talking to there. And what's a VI? >.>

[Zed]

So I'm not seeing a case for lynching Far_Cry. I don't see anything out of the ordinary here, and there is nothing that jumps out at me from his posts.

I'm really hopping that either furc or shotty isn't a cop, and one of them was smart and didn't claim. This doesn't seem likely, so I'm hopping we get lucky today.

Right now I'd like to hear more from scott and andrew, especially andrew. Last game I played with andrew he was chaotic and all over the place, but that's all I've seen from him so maybe that was out of the ordinary, and this calmer andrewis the norm.

[Zed]

Maybe you should start

[Zed]

I think I post plenty furc, but thanks for the suggestion

[Zed]

okay. I'm not going to hammer. We still have time, and I'm not really sure I believe that andrew is scum. I think he is more guilty of bad town play then anything, but I'm still thinking about it.

[Zed]

I'll say it again, I'd really find it helpful if scott would talk some more, especially since he has a vote on him now.

I don't think HOMJ's case against him is any good, inactivity is not a good reason in my book. I don't think he is lurking since he doesn't post once his name comes up, so I guess he is busy. But either way, another look at HOMJ's case against scott iis sending off some bells in my head.

[Zed]

Well furc, I'd like to hear more from scott, but that isn't happening is it? I'm busy, I post when I can.

Oops, meant to post this one first.

[Zed]

wtf? I had two fucking windows open for this game. there was no pressure? and what defense? none. there was no defense in post. claimed cop or not, you're coming across as scummy. so stop.

[Zed]

@Mod- Can I request a prod on scott?

eh, I usually give players 48 hrs before prodding them.

[Zed]

I think its pretty close to 48 anyways.

maybe, shotty. I still think he's just a bad townie though.

[Zed]

HOMJ makes much more sense then furc. But andrew makes no sense at all. I say we pick someone who hasn't claimed cop to lynch for this day, and see how the night goes before we think about lynching the claimed cops.

I half think there is another cop out there hiding, because furc just screams scum.

[Zed]

Thinking about hammering andrew. We aren't moving forward at all, and not having any new information is just keeping us at this standstill.

[Zed]

Sorry I like to think things through completely before I do them? If hesitation = thinking, then yeah, I hesitated.

[Zed]

Also note that I haven't been suspicious of andrew.

[Zed]

I'm not defending you. I'm stating my opinion. I've seen you play a townperson badly before, and that's all I think you've been doing.

[Zed]

shotty, why me?

good game though, everyone, I know I was really unsure once scott claimed.

[Zed]

/pre in too.