havingfitz wrote:ZeroFang wrote:In addition to that, he has generally weak reasoning for his votes, and
finishes with a "don't ask me for more reasons",
Which reasons of mine do you feel are "generally weak?" Do you agree with farsides suspicions towards me? If so...can you remind me which of her reasons you agree with?
I said generally weak specifically because I'd have to list several points I feel are weak, and that takes time. But I'll give you a couple examples for your benefit.
Your 109 (ISO #2). You reference "aformentioned reasons", of which there are two.
}|{opa's statement that DRK is a GF and subsequent vote on someone with 2 posts who, other than the fact they have only made two posts, has done nothing suspicious.
-}|{opa pushing DRK as a good cop lynch. Why keep mentioning a cop?
1) I searched for what you were referencing, and I
found Opa's post about how three people had made only two posts, and one of them (startransmission) was not contributing harder than the others. This was a valid, albiet (IMO) weak reason for Jora to vote.
2) Referencing that same post by Jora, you say he's pushing for a DRK lynch, except he voted star at the end.
So your "case" on him was very weak.
Your 145 (ISO #10). You reference your two weak reasons in post 109.
In the second section of
this post you claim to have explained your reason for voting Opa. However, you simply refer back to the posts farside called you out on in the first place, that is, the one listing a couple weak reasons (and nothing else) and the one referencing those weak reasons. You beg us to look back at your posts when there's nothing to look back on. There's no foundation for your case.
To answer your second question, yes I did agree with her suspicions, but for different reasons. Reading it over again and again, I've changed my mind. I believe that exchange with farside was town v town (with confusion on your end).