Open 330: Masons and Mafia (Game Over, Scum Win)

Crazy · Post Post #8 (isolation #0) » Wed Aug 24, 2011 2:33 am

/confirm

Crazy · Post Post #15 (isolation #1) » Wed Aug 24, 2011 8:19 am

So, your plan is to do nothing and wait for scum to kill themselves...? Okay.

*waits*
3 years later...
*still waiting*

I guess I should have brought Yahtzee or something.

@glowball - Do you think scum would really get antsy enough for this to work?

Crazy · Post Post #18 (isolation #2) » Wed Aug 24, 2011 8:58 am

glowball wrote:Crazy- Do you have anything to say about Dram's inquiry?

Like what? Weren't you and dram saying the same thing?

Crazy · Post Post #87 (isolation #3) » Wed Aug 24, 2011 12:58 pm

VOTE: glowball

For role-fishing.

Twice

.

Once with "Hey, Crazy, why are you questioning me but not dramonic?"
And more obviously, with "Hey, Fate, why are you saying that you're not a mason?"

On another note, he also completely abandoned his line of thinking (of the "waiting game" stuff) based only on my one post (#15). That suggests he was hardly sincere to begin with.

Crazy · Post Post #156 (isolation #4) » Wed Aug 24, 2011 2:35 pm

dramonic wrote:There's a deadline for lynch before we hit a happily ever after and scum is not necessary patient. Add to that the Screaming Death Clowns are already juggling mason claims and bullets will fly.
I'm not feeling rushed.

I did not realize that. How do you know that?

@glowball

- Did you know this?

Crazy · Post Post #161 (isolation #5) » Wed Aug 24, 2011 2:45 pm

@SpyreX

- How is the "waiting game" valid? Did you know about dramonic's rule?

Crazy · Post Post #163 (isolation #6) » Wed Aug 24, 2011 2:48 pm

Oh, and of course,

@Mod

- Please confirm whether or not dramonic is correct in whether no lynch by deadline will result in a "happily ever after."

If the answer's "no," then a dram lynch is bogus. He's not confirmed town, but he's not scum because of this. If the answer is "yes," then I'll go with a dram lynch.

Crazy · Post Post #166 (isolation #7) » Wed Aug 24, 2011 2:52 pm

Glowball, what were you hoping to accomplish with your question to Fate in Post #59? I said it was rolefishing because I can't imagine how that could possibly be scum-hunting. Prove me wrong.

RECK wrote:I've PMed the mod to ask him, I'll let you all know what I hear back.

I'd like to hear it directly from the mod in thread.

Crazy · Post Post #177 (isolation #8) » Wed Aug 24, 2011 3:02 pm

@SpyreX - Actually, I didn't even notice the deadline at first. But seriously, what would be forcing the scum to shoot?

@dram - You didn't say a "few cycles." You said there was a HEA if we hit deadline without a lynch.

Crazy · Post Post #182 (isolation #9) » Wed Aug 24, 2011 3:09 pm

dram wrote:There is no night and there are no power-roles, what's the difference between day 1 and day 2 if no shots or lynches happen?
None?
Yeah, thought so.

According to you, a "happily ever after" ending.

Are you telling me that you didn't say in Post #150 that

there would be a HEA ending if we didn't lynch by deadline?

I can't see any other way to interpret that post.

Crazy · Post Post #184 (isolation #10) » Wed Aug 24, 2011 3:34 pm

I took it literally. But I think I believe you now.

*MIND CLEAR*

@SpyreX - If you thought my first post was so horrendous, what is your opinion of glowball being swayed by it?

glowball wrote:Okay so instead of answering my question, you call it role fishing- I call it scum hunting. You blatantly ignored another player and I want to know why especially now that you are taking things that I say out of context. I told Fate and anyone else not to claim mason or say that they aren't mason that should be reserved because claiming anything is only helpful to scum in this set up IMO.

My point was that hunting for associations in a game with 4 masons is a bad idea.

About Fate, his post was obviously a joke and/or WIFOM, and your response read like "Oh, okay, so you're really not a mason, right?"

Crazy · Post Post #186 (isolation #11) » Wed Aug 24, 2011 3:43 pm

Oh, indeed it was Gandalf, my bad. That doesn't make a difference, though.

Yeah, I did skim a little through the RAGECAPS.

Crazy · Post Post #190 (isolation #12) » Wed Aug 24, 2011 4:07 pm

Why is that a town-tell?

Crazy · Post Post #215 (isolation #13) » Thu Aug 25, 2011 4:31 am

I did not realize I was joining the cult of RAGECAPS when I joined this game.

Katsuki, why are voting me? SpyreX and Fate have provided different reasons for why I am scum, and I want to know which one you are sheeping.

Crazy · Post Post #217 (isolation #14) » Thu Aug 25, 2011 4:52 am

Is there a reason that you're acting like a moron on purpose?

Serious question.

Crazy · Post Post #313 (isolation #15) » Thu Aug 25, 2011 10:23 am

Katsuki, is there one good reason for why you are treating this game as a joke?

Are you acting like an idiot so that you end up totally off of everyone's radar?

Crazy · Post Post #336 (isolation #16) » Thu Aug 25, 2011 3:51 pm

SpyreX wrote:Annnd crazy steps up to the plate with But moooommmmmmm why am I scum.

So you don't have a problem with the way Katsuki is posting? Should he be allowed to wagon with no reasoning and refuse to answer questions because he's playing some stupid game?

I don't get your tunneling on me, either, since I don't think your reasons for suspecting me to begin with were all that spectacular.

You didn't like my first post because I shot down the idea of the "waiting game." Except:

-You agreed that you didn't want to play the "waiting game."
-You have not explained why the scum have any incentive to shoot anybody if we just do nothing. I mean, the deadline doesn't

force

them to shoot, right?
-You have not explained how my post has any scum motivation. You just basically said, "I disagree with Crazy, therefore he is scum."

I have a conflicting read on you right now because apart from this, you read town because you defended dram after his "scumslip." Dramonic is my only definite town read at this moment... he was prob-town for even suggesting the idea of not lynching (trying to break the setup = town).

Then Glowball kind of piggy-backed that, but then changed his mind after my one post, which still seems fishy. Though I admit my accusations of "fishing" were probably just me imagining things that weren't there. The way he questioned Gandalf about his not-mason claim was still VERY BAD, but even if glowball was scum, it was probably only out of negligence and not intentional fishing.

Crazy · Post Post #357 (isolation #17) » Fri Aug 26, 2011 2:58 am

UNVOTE:
VOTE: Katsuki

Tell me why you are voting me, and I'll tell you why I'm voting you. Deal? I asked you first and you responded with your "TEEHEE" crap. For real, this ti,me,m okay?

Crazy · Post Post #369 (isolation #18) » Fri Aug 26, 2011 8:19 am

Blah, I was town.

Oh, well.

Crazy · Post Post #383 (isolation #19) » Fri Aug 26, 2011 8:31 am

I am a mason.

My mason buddies and I have decided that the scum is among Fate/SpyreX/Soicopath/RECK/Elli.

Crazy · Post Post #699 (isolation #20) » Sun Aug 28, 2011 5:03 am

Crazy game.

I really like this setup. This was my second time playing it. The first time was a town win in 3-person LYLO.

I don't know a whole lot about balance, but I think scum did play much better than town did in this game (myself included, of course.)

I don't understand the purpose of limiting the scum's kills. I could see this setup go without daytalk, too. (With the scum just being notified whenever somebody shoots.)