- MY OBVSCUM PARTNER!!! MUWWAHAHAHAH!!
@Om: I don't like the idea of outting the lover pairs. I've done some reading leading into this setup (examples given on the wiki); massclaims were a common practice and they all ended in maf victories.
In post 8, Om of the Nom wrote:Because if we're going to lynch someone, we need to know who else we're lynching with them. This is basically the main reason behind it.
In post 106, citysnake wrote:Looks like Venmar is trying to give control to Om. Possible scumteam?
In post 106, citysnake wrote:townslip seem genuine.
In post 106, citysnake wrote:I remembered wrongly- I just ISOd the game we had and he's just as relaxed at the start of the game. We had an argument about whether another players reaction to a claim was scummy on D2 and I wanted Tech lynched from then so I'm probably comparing him to his stubbornness at that point in the game. Neutral
In post 105, Venmar wrote:@Techno - I find that really harsh to say about PMysterious. Your reasoning can literally be pinned on anyone in the game who made their first post. I can't really see why you expected someone's FIRST post to be as detailed and contributive as you were hoping it to be. Seems more like a easy target to nitpick from the crowd, no offense Techno, just not seeing what you got going for PM.
In post 181, Om of the Nom wrote:Lol.
Both parts of a lover pair are scum.
Everyone else is town.
Except one null read.
Yep, great town play right there.
In post 180, PMysterious wrote:I honestly think Om is 100% scum. Om has really thrown me off my town groove because of his suspicious acts.
In post 200, Bitmap wrote:PMyst town game:
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=51&t=22693
I thought since the game just finished, it could be of some use.
In post 222, Bitmap wrote:Secondly, that's a whole load of WIFOM. If your attack wasn't so tunneled, you would of realized Techno had also been focusing on PMyst lately. This purely due to getting information out of PMyst as he had said very little the past week.
You're just tunneling me to get rid of me early.
In post 232, Venmar wrote:- I think this more of sounds like you don't want me to die and avoid lynching PMysterious just for that fact. Just because i am a townread doesn't mean PMsyterious cannot be a scum read. My alignment is not linked to PMysterious's.
In post 236, Om of the Nom wrote:If this were a Night game with no claimed power roles on D1, I'd easily shoot Techno over Bitmap anyday.
Techno, are you able to look me in the eye and seriously say that if we lynch city and Bitmap, we won't get at least one scumflip?
Are you scum? Plz don't say yes, I won't believe you unless you say no.
In post 272, Venmar wrote:Omg, Fluff. Only scum abuse fluff.
In post 280, Venmar wrote:Sarcasm goes a long way padawan. No but seriously, I don't like fluff all the time.
Bitmap, that question is like asking a Serial Killer if he blew up an entire building of 500 people and expect him to be all like: "HURR DURR YESSSSS I KILLED THEEEEEEM".
In post 152, TeChNoWC wrote:@PMyst:
pressure flake? Prod dodging? Reads please. Get involved please.
Who is scum? Why is Om scum? Have you played with Om before? Have you read up on his meta? (Some has already been provided, eg his link on the lover game).
What are your thoughts on City, specifically? Is Ven scum with Om? What do you think about the townslip?
In post 352, Venmar wrote:Sooo, Techno do you think he is scum or no?
In post 374, Venmar wrote:In post 365, TeChNoWC wrote:
Everybody give a list of all the possible scumteams you think are viable, even if not heavily likely.
Then give a list of scumteams you think are very unlikely.
- Not answering this until a flip, my gut feels off about this post for some reason.
In post 381, Venmar wrote:I think it's about time that TAM's lover claims.
In post 393, Om of the Nom wrote:Techno, if you think we're both town, why don't you try getting everyone off our wagons?
I can't even remember my reasons for most of my early game reads, and I'm not prepared to go through the game again just to re-figure it out.
If we're scum, then just lynch us, if we're town, then get off our wagons. Everyone needs to stop pussyfooting around our lynch and pick a side.
Although frankly I want to be lynched really badly right now because it will damage Junpei's confidence >:D
In post 393, Om of the Nom wrote:Techno, if you think we're both town, why don't you try getting everyone off our wagons?
In post 403, Venmar wrote:You think you and City are both town/town? You want to self-hammer?
Dude, dafuq? If you do that and both turn up town i am not playing with you again.
In post 411, Om of the Nom wrote:Yes, everyone should claim lovers Junpei.
I want to know who else is going to die when you get lynched. Bonus points if it's Bitmap or TAM who are also scumreads of mine.
In post 437, Junpei wrote:No... your ISO doesn't suggest this and the actions of every other player in the game don't suggest this either.
In post 443, Junpei wrote:In post 226, Venmar wrote:Honestly, this looks like a Town vs Town argument. OmNom probably has a scum partner that is partners with PM. I say we either lynch me and PM or Omnom and City.I am also going to assume Bitmap is lovers with Junpei, and Techno with TAM, simple because i see no arguments between the those pairs.
Vote: PMysterious
This is different than the sub conscious matter-of-fact truth factor that Om of the Nom held.
TeChNoWC did you really think Om of the Nom would answer no after spending a page and a half talking about how the answer is yes? You point 2 is pretty important here.
In post 459, Bitmap wrote:@Techno: If someone uses AtE when at L-1, what would you do?