Open 431 - Sword Swallowing - Game Over

Amrun · Post Post #5 (isolation #0) » Wed Jul 25, 2012 5:33 pm

Vote: Sieure DtTrikyp

For having a super hard to remember name.

Amrun · Post Post #15 (isolation #1) » Thu Jul 26, 2012 2:36 pm

DOWN WITH POTATOES!

Amrun · Post Post #85 (isolation #2) » Mon Jul 30, 2012 4:31 pm

what the FUCK happened

I came home from work to a LYNCH

Amrun · Post Post #86 (isolation #3) » Mon Jul 30, 2012 4:41 pm

In post 17, Scigatt wrote:
TheShadow wrote:So this has started..

VOTE: Om

Yes, I do want fries with that.
Is there any other reason for that vote?

This useless questioning that Scigatt is doing first strikes me as scummy because I see NO use to his obvious questions. However, people often see no use to MY scumhunting questions, so...

In post 25, Thomas wrote:When? Right now you are interrogating me and before... I dunno. "It's complicated" came from facebook. So should I ask you "any scumhunting justification for this question?" Right now you're just asking weird questions. Do you play like this in all games?

This line of questioning was exactly what I was thinking, but I was reading this knowing you guys lynched Thomas for no reason and going "uuuuuuuuuugh."

In post 27, Siveure DtTrikyp wrote:Progressing the RVS.

Who's the best player in this group? Let's lynch that person...

On second thoughts, no, bad idea. We want a choice for scums between confirmed innocents and townie players.

This is a good post, but it's undercut by the "progressing the rvs" line. Idk, just strikes me as off.

In post 72, TheShadow wrote:That's a policy lynch anyways. It will provide the truth.

My vote is no longer rvs based.

This is a TERRIBLE post. It's just... so bad. As somoene else asked earlier, do you think Om is scum? Why, then, did you hammer his biggest suspect with no discussion and waste Day 1 entirely?

In post 78, Siveure DtTrikyp wrote:Policy lynch is okay, in my opinion. Sure, they won't die, but they'll definitely be innocent and we're essentially painting a bullseye on them for the scum.

Vote: Thomas
.
Overreaction to an obvious joke claim seems scummy.

But Siv here does the same thing. He's clearly super fine with Thomas dying, here.

In post 84, Siveure DtTrikyp wrote:VOTE: TheShadow

Quicklynching is BAD. Very bad. Especially when we have barely got out of random voting stage. Especially when there's a votecount right above your post...

Which makes this post super hypocritical.

VOTE: Siv

I believe one of him/The Shadow are scum, leaning strongly towards siv.

Amrun · Post Post #89 (isolation #4) » Mon Jul 30, 2012 6:59 pm

No, I don't think both of them are scum - but one of them probably is.

I felt like you were town, but that question you just asked me rubbed me the wrong way.

Amrun · Post Post #92 (isolation #5) » Mon Jul 30, 2012 7:04 pm

Scum are usually most concerned with how they are being viewed by town, particularly town they feel are the stronger ones in the player list (which you have called me).

Amrun · Post Post #100 (isolation #6) » Tue Jul 31, 2012 7:10 pm

No, don't hammer yet. Too soon. I would like to see everyone's scumteam speculations. My best guess is Siv and Scigatt, but there are other possible partners. I just feel like the rest are slightly less likely buddies to siv than scigatt.

Amrun · Post Post #102 (isolation #7) » Tue Jul 31, 2012 7:39 pm

Next most likely buddy to Siv.

Amrun · Post Post #106 (isolation #8) » Wed Aug 01, 2012 6:17 am

So you're fine with a policy lynch boy days 1 and 2?

Amrun · Post Post #108 (isolation #9) » Wed Aug 01, 2012 8:57 am

In post 104, Siveure DtTrikyp wrote:Either way, too dumb to live.

This suggests otherwise.

Amrun · Post Post #110 (isolation #10) » Wed Aug 01, 2012 9:18 am

That was like 2 posts ago

....

OKAY can we get our team speculations up so siv can die? Thanks.

Amrun · Post Post #114 (isolation #11) » Wed Aug 01, 2012 6:48 pm

TheShadow, what other games have we played?