Open 431 - Sword Swallowing - Game Over
-
-
TheShadow Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 181
- Joined: June 16, 2012
-
-
TheShadow Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 181
- Joined: June 16, 2012
In post 17, Scigatt wrote:
Is there any other reason for that vote?TheShadow wrote:So this has started..
VOTE: Om
Yes, I do want fries with that.
Of course not. It's RVS.-
-
TheShadow Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 181
- Joined: June 16, 2012
-
-
TheShadow Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 181
- Joined: June 16, 2012
And here comes a modkill..
If he is scum, that's a violation of General Rule 2.
Mod in General Rule 2 wrote:Play to win. Players want to win legitimately, don't ruin their enjoyment by playing against your wincon.
If not, then it brings in General Rule 10, re: rule 2.
Mod in General Rule 10 wrote:Pretending to break a rule will be treated the same as breaking the rule.-
-
TheShadow Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 181
- Joined: June 16, 2012
-
-
TheShadow
-
-
TheShadow Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 181
- Joined: June 16, 2012
Sure, now that I have the physical capability to do so for the first time all day.
In post 84, Siveure DtTrikyp wrote:VOTE: TheShadow
Quicklynching is BAD. Very bad. Especially when we have barely got out of random voting stage. Especially when there's a votecount right above your post...
If you're so against a quickhammer, then why did you put him at L-1 in the first place? And then with the first post of day 2 attempt to start a wagon based on the hammer vote? This strikes me as scum setting up a townie hammer that could then be pushed as a "quickhammers are scummy" wagon the next day.
VOTE: Siv
In post 88, Om of the Nom wrote:Also, in case anyone asks. I was getting the impression that Shadow was egging us on because he entertained the notion of a policy lynch without giving an opinion on my alignment individually. It looked like he wanted to support Thomas and indirectly attack me without getting in our way.
The whole thing regarding your "joke" claim I admit was not handled well by me. You're lucky we have a newbie mod. Most games, claiming scum with someone even as a joke would be an instant modkill.
@Mod: Can you PLEASE not hide the flips behind spoiler text? The device I'm using to read the thread 99% of the time has no means of text selection, meaning I can't read what it says. I did not know until a few minutes ago that Thomas flipped town and was the nightkill.-
-
TheShadow Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 181
- Joined: June 16, 2012
Alright, answering questions:
Re: the quickhammer. It is my style to drop a hammer like that on someone I feel is scummy even before a claim. If they're null to me I'll declare intent and allow for claim first.
Reads:
Siv is my #1 scumread, for reasons including those I mentioned in my last post where I voted him.
Partner I think is Split, or maybe Scigatt.
Om and Amrun scream town to me, based partly on experience of previous games I've played with you.-
-
TheShadow Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 181
- Joined: June 16, 2012
In post 114, Amrun wrote:TheShadow, what other games have we played?
A couple Larges.. game of the year, and one other I cant mention cause its still ongoing-
-
TheShadow Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 181
- Joined: June 16, 2012
-
-
TheShadow Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 181
- Joined: June 16, 2012
Upon review, I'm even more convinced that split is scum. His ENTIRE ISO:
RVS
fluff post announcing v/la
In post 98, splitfarvle wrote:In post 94, TheShadow wrote:
If you're so against a quickhammer, then why did you put him at L-1 in the first place? And then with the first post of day 2 attempt to start a wagon based on the hammer vote? This strikes me as scum setting up a townie hammer that could then be pushed as a "quickhammers are scummy" wagon the next day.
VOTE: Siv
This seems like a stretch.
In post 94, TheShadow wrote:
@Mod: Can you PLEASE not hide the flips behind spoiler text? The device I'm using to read the thread 99% of the time has no means of text selection, meaning I can't read what it says. I did not know until a few minutes ago that Thomas flipped town and was the nightkill.
But this seems like a towntell.
Amrun and Om seem town, leaving Siv and Scigatt by POE.
VOTE: Siv
L-1
Comments one one of my posts, and puts Siv (who has flipped town) at L-1
In post 132, splitfarvle wrote:In post 99, Om of the Nom wrote:Spitfarvle's last post was really bad, considering he attacked TheShadow only to call him town in his next sentence. Which to me seems like pointless content.
Just calling it how I see it.
In post 103, Scigatt wrote:No it doesn't. It seems like an attempt to push a null tell as a town tell. This is enough to decide between TheShadow and Siveure DtTrikyp for now.
How does it seem like a null tell? It Shadow was scum, he'd know who the nk was. Also is this really the best case you have for voting Shadow over Siv? What is your read on Siv?
More filler, nothing really useful.
I don't have a real suspect for his partner yet, but I'm 99% sure split is scum.
VOTE: splitfarvle-
-
TheShadow Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 181
- Joined: June 16, 2012
-
-
TheShadow Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 181
- Joined: June 16, 2012
-
-
TheShadow Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 181
- Joined: June 16, 2012
-
-
TheShadow Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 181
- Joined: June 16, 2012
In post 195, funkybike1 wrote:Well, would you care to give us these reasons?
The main one is the fact that the game's still going. If split/you were town, scum would have hammered by now. There was 36 hours between my initial vote and the unvote when you replaced in. Plenty of time for one to vote and another to hammer.
If you are town, then scum deserve to lose because I handed them a textbook LyLo auto-win and they didn't use it.-
-
TheShadow Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 181
- Joined: June 16, 2012
-
-
TheShadow Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 181
- Joined: June 16, 2012
-
-
TheShadow Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 181
- Joined: June 16, 2012
-
-
TheShadow Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 181
- Joined: June 16, 2012
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.
-