Open 421-Pamplona II: Electric Bullgaloo! Game over

BK201 · Mon Aug 13, 2012 6:44 pm

Not to mention they actually have to protect the right person to begin with.

BK201 · Mon Aug 13, 2012 7:02 pm

In post 1861, RachMarie wrote:

BK you have been tunneling a lot. Do you have any specific town reads you feel fairly confident about? And who would you pursue if I come up VT like I claimed? I think you are going after an easy lynch and a bit of confirmation bias since you have been in games with me where I was scum. Same with Gunny too he almost always assumes I am scum in every game. Obviously I am not scum in all my games that is statistically impossible.

Town reads: Trevor(Drm), Near, RBD. Bitmap is either SK or town. You're scum.

In post 1861, RachMarie wrote:Pedit

How can you be so sure they have all of those left BK? Do you think the one who said he protected McStab was lying? or do you think there is an SK and the SK was a strongman SK? Since we have 3 Doc claims that seems much more likely if they are all Docs for true, and they all 3 pick different people to protect, then our odds of them stopping the NK or NKs if there is an SK are pretty good I think.

Strongman or 1-shot bus-drive was used Night 1 whether or not Bitmap really did protect McStab.
tl:dr - Scum would have used one of those to for sure get rid of the Role Cop. He was basically a Cop and even one result could confirm town PR or find scum PR hiding in VT pool.

Night 2 I see no reason not to use whatever remained from 1-shot and strongman since their target was the confirmed town JK. Again, even if Bitmap is not a doc, he is SK and scum would have no way to know that. So I'm assuming Roleblock or one of the other two is still available.

Any other thoughts on the game, Rach?

BK201 · Mon Aug 13, 2012 7:04 pm

In post 1864, Rainbowdash wrote:Okay I would put RM over BK as last scum from that post. Really dont think BK can be anything but SK at this point and if he is I would rather give him the win as SK than mafia the win /pandering to SK.

If I was the SK I would have just killed from the VT pool which would have probably gotten Bit lynched. Just saying.

BK201 · Mon Aug 13, 2012 7:11 pm

Seriously Rach posted and Psyche posted. Kondi is scum.

BK201 · Mon Aug 13, 2012 7:17 pm

In post 1869, Psyche wrote:
In post 1868, Bitmap wrote:
In post 1854, Psyche wrote:Okay. Elaboration?

Well, you're scum. It's kind of simple. Also the reason why no one else would get quick hammered is because Rach has been inactive and she's scum.

Everything BK201 said is correct in my eyes.

I'm not scum.

Now I need you to elaborate on both why Umbrage's play was scummy and why my play is scummy.

DLG and yourself have been on my backburner probably all game, I have not thought your slot was town even once, the only thing your slot has going is it didn't make the NK on night 1. A large part is PoE though.

BK201 · Mon Aug 13, 2012 7:21 pm

In post 1873, Psyche wrote:Rach's attitude toward kondi in her last post (no attitude?!!!) and her wording ("And who would you pursue if I come up VT like I claimed?") suggests that she is scum who doesn't want to lynch kondi.

Kondi's a safe scumlynch either way.

vote kondi

And Rach tomorrow. I'm still thinking about the implications of that post for a third scumbud...

@BK: Are you Bitmap?

UNVOTE:

Just curious, do you generally have your profile set to not hidden when viewing?

BK201 · Mon Aug 13, 2012 7:24 pm

VOTE: Kondi

BK201 · Mon Aug 13, 2012 7:26 pm

UNVOTE:

BK201 · Mon Aug 13, 2012 7:26 pm

I don't like seeing both Psyche and Rach pop up on the viewing this forum list.

Kondi is still scum but, Rach what do you think about Kondi and Psyche?

BK201 · Mon Aug 13, 2012 7:27 pm

Not ending this early, Rach will actually answer us since she's on.

BK201 · Tue Aug 14, 2012 8:10 am

VOTE: Kondi

Rach goes next, but you're not getting town-cred for bussing.

BK201 · Tue Aug 14, 2012 8:10 am

And you're much better than she is, so there's that.

BK201 · Tue Aug 14, 2012 3:32 pm

Nope.

BK201 · Tue Aug 14, 2012 7:59 pm

In post 1861, RachMarie wrote:

BK you have been tunneling a lot. Do you have any specific town reads you feel fairly confident about?
And who would you pursue if I come up VT like I claimed?
I think you are going after an easy lynch and a bit of confirmation bias since you have been in games with me where I was scum. Same with Gunny too he almost always assumes I am scum in every game. Obviously I am not scum in all my games that is statistically impossible.

Bold is my emphasis. It is also coming from someone who knows they aren't a VT.

BK201 · Tue Aug 14, 2012 8:03 pm

Btw Rach, I've only been in one game with you where you were scum. (Open 397).

So the plural on that doesn't give me much confidence the rest of it is genuine.

BK201 · Thu Aug 23, 2012 6:49 am

In post 1740, BK201 wrote:
In post 1738, Near wrote: Also, if there is SK among VT do you think that the SK was intentionally not shooting? SK in PR may withhold his shot, but SK in VT would not. Also, if SK shot, JF would not be SK's primary target... He would have tried to target one of the scums from the VT pool.
This. There was all that talk about if there is a SK, then there is at least 1 fake claimer in the docs. If the SK was from the VT pool he would have just killed.

Drm/Near are town. Bit is the SK if we have one, but could still be a doc at this point.

Rach is most definitely scum. Kondi is probably scum.

RBD I really hope is town but his defense of rach is troubling. Either way Rach goes first. Psyche might be third scum, really needs to post his reads.

VOTE: Rach

Almost nailed the set-up here. Then I decided to throwaway my rach vote to tunnel kondi

BK201 · Fri Aug 24, 2012 8:49 pm

GG

I had a lil bit of a bad vibe from Rainbow ever since Day 2, however she just seemed so smart I thought she was town.

Bit, I think you lucked out some, but congratulations either way.

Lol at myself being overkilled by scum and SK.