Open 445: Fight or Flight - {Game Over!}

[absta101]

Mod: With 7 alive it takes 4 to lynch.

----

@Maxous

Poor reason to waggon vote.
VOTE: Maxous

[absta101]

VOTE: Matt

[absta101]

@Uct

Absta vote looks suspicious on an RVS.

Explain the scum motivation.
----

@Everyone

About Mence voting Mat and not Uct and Om:
- The Om waggon had no support.
- The Uct waggon had too much support.
- The Mat waggon was just right.
--
Does anyone here have experience with this setup?

[absta101]

Hi Salamence, how are you doing today?

I'm doing fine, are you feeling better?

You're looking more scummy by the post.

[absta101]

Quick reply:

I'm L-1

[absta101]

@Uct

- Post #34 is total bs because you can't elaborate on gut.
Have you played with Om before?
----

@Om of the mom

If you do that 'response-within-quote' shit again, I will replace out, again.
----

@Mala

It's okay UCT your vote on Absta didn't look good either.

I'm curious. Which is more scummy:
1. Putting someone on L-2 with shit reasoning.
2. Putting someone on L-1 with no reasoning (gut).

I'll elaborate on what I think after your answers.

[absta101]

OOOOOOh I get it. So when asked which is more scummy you pick both.
--
1 or 2?

[absta101]

Quick reply:

@Om

- Gut is just a "feeling", it doesn't come with reason.

Here absta just says Sala is getting scummier with each post he does, which is just a cheap way to feign suspicion on someone without a valid reason or a need for an explanation.

1. The reason was obvious and you already know what it is. Your sudden defence of Sala is scummy.
2. The explanation comes after he asks me why.
Your whole reaction to this is terrible. Keep going.

Instead he chooses to discredit my vote on him and tries to give a general impression that I had no reason to vote him therefore it's scummy.

It's not scummy to assume that "gut" doesn't come with reason. In fact you've already said that you follow your gut and then find evidence to support it which implies that your gut feeling has no explanation.
----

@Uct

- Answer my question first. Have you been in a game with Om before?

[absta101]

UNVOTE:

@Mod: Why is there no deadline?

----

@Om

Salamanca's post is scummy because it provides no content to support town. "Increasingly scummy" because the post before was "ZZZZZ" (no content as well).

- You're defending Salamanca by way of attacking me.
- Scum motivation for your defence is to either buddy Salamanca or protect him (depending on Salamanca's alignment).

I'll let you off for this last part because you fail to realise what gut actually is.

This is terrible and vote worthy.
VOTE: Om
----

@Mala

Why me Ommy? Guess I'm not doing my usual meta, eh? Which I totally am, but whatevers.

Being conscious that you're playing to your town meta is scummy. Only scum care to be (or appear to be) consistent.
If I wasn't voting Om right now i'd be voting you.
----

@Uct

- Will you ever answer my fucking question!?

[absta101]

@Quick reply:

I already know Om's meta. I wasn't bitching.

[absta101]

@Mala

If you know his town meta is mostly based on gut then why did you have a huge problem with his vote on you? Is it because he's right due to it?

Huge problem?
You know making shit up doesn't convince anyone that you're town, right?
----

@Everyone

- Naming scum teams without a scum flip is anti-town. You get into deep confirmation bias and it guides town in directions that make little sense.

[absta101]

Sorry school. I need to cut down on games.

@Mod: Replace me out please.