In post 108, Hiraki wrote:Most games have at
least
a two week deadline for Day 1.
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=83&t=23424 (10 Days for a MICRO game of 7 People)
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=55&t=21855 (2 Weeks for 16 Players)
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=52&t=21383 (2 Weeks for 14 People)
Calling 12 Days for 9 People somewhat of a gift is absolutely absurd.
In addition, the last game even shows that Page 4 is going as slow as this game. Sure--the other two are different but the other two are drastically different then normal games.
Also, just because it's in the rules doesn't make it a good rule. You basically made it so that an extension was a gift to an already suffering deadline.
Finally, you must've seen that rule literally in one or two games because I've NEVER been in a game where time was taken away. That's absurd and extremely scum-oriented.
Scum could be lurking just so that rule could go into effect.
I'm going to have to agree with this.
@Mod: Request a deadline extension to at least 2 weeks, it is too short as is.
>Open Games
>review
wat
In post 111, Hiraki wrote:No. This is an Open Game. Nothing is reviewed setup/game-wise.
Also, just to fact check, the little "leme take away time if I feel that everyone isn't posting enough" isn't in your rules. It's a little note that's added in the first post. I'd like a final declaration on your motives toward this and other opinions on this, thanks.
Yeah this.
In post 113, uctriton00 wrote:Hello.
Unseencamo so are you saying Lincoln outright scum slipped by saying lurk?
Pretty clearly not what he was saying; he was calling Lincolm scum for supposed "active lurking".
In post 114, uctriton00 wrote:Crap I didn't see extra pages, that question directed at post at bottom of page 1.
Need to catch up on this then more tomorrow.
oh ok
In post 115, unseencamo wrote:@ #122
Good response.
@ Hiraki
I believe it is more scum to just pursue one person in a dogmatic way. Being open and weighing out options is a good town oriented strategy. I disagree w/ #104.
@ uctriton
Nice of you to join us.
1) There was no #122 (future edit: unless you had the foresight to know about ArcAngel's post, which was IMO sucktacular), so what are you talking about here?
2) Why would scum want to dogmatically pursue one player instead of keep their options spread out? Other opinions should be weighed, but sometimes if you're confident someone is scum you don't really need to take heed of every other person's opinion.
In post 116, Disturbed_One wrote: In post 96, Disturbed_One wrote:Hey MonkeyMan, you're still voting Lincolm. Does that you mean you still find Lincolm suspicious? If so, what exactly about Lincolm is it that you still find suspicious?
Why did you ignore my question?
Also, I completely agree with Hiraki. Just saying.
I'll just nod my assent to this post.
Um yeah. More scumhunting, please and thank you.
In post 118, unseencamo wrote:@ HD 101
No, of course not. When I have some time I will create my complete read list.
I eagerly wait. (future edit: posted already)
In post 119, unseencamo wrote:My reads as of now.
HD
He has targeted me since my skirmish with Lincolm, however he does not lack all reasoning. That being said it looks like HD is going to be that one guy that I don't like very much. Sorry. There is always one in each game, but they always turn out to be town in my short experience. I'll refer to it as DB town. And with regard to the claim of optimism in his vote, I really don't see it, all I see is less than sufficient reasoning. Off of the small amount of posts I have to draw from, instinct tells me town. Town that I don't like.
DB town
MonkeyMan576
MM has barely posted anything, and his posts are never that helpful. I need to see more from this guy. What is your opinion about HD?
Unknown
Uct
Obviously nothing to say, unknown.
Unknown
Lincolm
Reasoning can be found in previous posts.
Rather cluless town
Hiraki
I disagree with this guys push on me and his view of fencesitting. Do you want me to dogmatically vote and potentially lynch a town? Your claim that just because Lincolm is a new player he is definately prone to strange behavior is erroneous, he has been here longer than me. That being said, he does indeed actually lack the meta, but sometimes new players have experience elsewhere so you can't just always blame suspicious behavior on being a noob.
Unknown (Slightly Scummy)
Tazaro
This guy hasn't posted too much either, he did however almost buddy up with HD pretty quickly.
Unknown (Possible Slightly Scum
Damn it I have to go.... Will finish later
Okay let's look at this post:
What does DB stand for?
I go off whatever reasons I currently think might be scumtells. Does that mean they might end up being weak? Maybe. Does it make them fundamentally untrue? No.
I agree on Monkey.
I wouldn't say Lincolm is clueless, but I find him likely town.
I disagree with your Hiraki read in its entirety. A good townie believes in his reads and doesn't sit on the fence saying "Well maybe he's this, but maybe he's this, or
maybe
he's this..." Therefore, I think he's completely correct to be pushing you for it.
Tazaro I agree with though.
This is town flavored posting. Keep it up. However, if you have no strong scum reads, why are you not poking and prodding your weaker scum reads?
In post 120, Hiraki wrote:unseencamo wrote:but sometimes new players have experience elsewhere so you can't just always blame suspicious behavior on being a noob.
This doesn't matter because mafiascum meta=/=randomforumsite meta
Besides, that's a probability. It's not like there's a decent chance of it.
This.
I agree with this post; Tazaro backing off when called out is a pretty big scumtell.
Scumhunt moar, thanks.