In post 7, Cub Daigoro wrote:VOTE: Nobody Special
I know you only as a god, untouchable by mere mortals. Let's see how you play.
Man, you are going to be SO DISAPPOINTED.
In post 7, Cub Daigoro wrote:VOTE: Nobody Special
I know you only as a god, untouchable by mere mortals. Let's see how you play.
In post 64, Cub Daigoro wrote:In post 59, implosion wrote:In post 48, Cub Daigoro wrote:Someone's likely to hit scum in RVS. Why not me?
Why not you indeed. Whether or not NS is scum is irrelevant here
...Wut? What could possibly be more relevant?
In post 66, Belisarius wrote:Don't use racial slurs, NS.
In post 71, Cub Daigoro wrote:In post 65, Nobody Special wrote:I just read your iso and failed to come up with any kind of reason to vote me.
Would you [like] to provide some reasoning now?
Out of your seven posts, one has content. It consisted of an OMGUS vote that you described as RVS well past RVS (IMO). You've done literally nothing else. I see no reason to move my vote.
In post 171, pieceofpecanpie wrote:we live in an instantaneous age, of internet and magnets and shit.
In post 167, Cub Daigoro wrote:In post 164, ac1983fan wrote:If NS plays anything like he used to, then well, I don't think anyone can read him.
I'm getting this same message from a lot of people.
So what's the plan, then, folks who are saying this? Lay off him until...? Sounds like just the kind of player to pressure early so we don't get screwed in LYLO.
In post 182, Apozzle wrote:In post 171, pieceofpecanpie wrote:...And I watched him scoot around on the site elsewhere at will for those 6 hours as well.
Also, just want to point out that that comes off askind of creepy.
In post 192, goodmorning wrote:
And let me break this down, since people are going to be like" but why do you think they're scummy??"
25 is scummy because NS has been around long enough to know that people sometimes do really random stuff D1. This should not confuse him, and I feel like he's playing the "I don't know anything" card early on with it.
37 is scummy because it is completely unhelpful to Town and because he caved to pressure rather than make a fuss.
65 is a little bit scummy just in the way he reacts to Cub; that vote had been on him since the first page and he chose not to address it til then?
Active lurking is rather scummy for obvious reasons.
In post 65, Nobody Special wrote:In post 64, Cub Daigoro wrote:In post 59, implosion wrote:In post 48, Cub Daigoro wrote:Someone's likely to hit scum in RVS. Why not me?
Why not you indeed. Whether or not NS is scum is irrelevant here
...Wut? What could possibly be more relevant?
I just read your iso and failed to come up with any kind of reason to vote me.
Would you [l]ike to provide some reasoning now?
In post 216, Cub Daigoro wrote:In post 205, Nobody Special wrote:I don't usually get much of substance done during Day One. I get better on Day Two, after a couple flips.
Here's how it usually happens: Someone miraculously outshines me in the scummy behavior department on Day One, and I get much more active and substantial from Day Two forward.
You seem very self-aware of your meta. Have you ever thought about, I don't know, not being scummy on Day One? Is it intentional?
In post 216, Cub Daigoro wrote:In post 205, Nobody Special wrote:I'm not going to address my post 140 at this time.
When can we expect you to address it?
In post 364, Apozzle wrote: obviously
In post 519, Edosurist wrote: but I'll have time this weekend and next week to contribute more.
In post 547, Zaicon wrote:I have a scum-finding record of about 1-7 (that is, out of the last 3-4 games, I've correctly found 1 scum).
In post 570, Belisarius wrote:
Although really, I was expecting to be thefirstto defend HD's action here, not theonlyone.
In post 573, ac1983fan wrote:
Overreact how? I merely explained why HD's method of catching up is unhelpful.
In post 779, implosion wrote:So people are unvoting based on a roleblocker claim because...