Open 595: Elemental Mafia (Town Wins!)
-
-
Flubbernugget Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11751
- Joined: June 26, 2014
-
-
Flubbernugget Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11751
- Joined: June 26, 2014
-
-
Flubbernugget Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11751
- Joined: June 26, 2014
-
-
Flubbernugget Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11751
- Joined: June 26, 2014
-
-
Flubbernugget Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11751
- Joined: June 26, 2014
-
-
Flubbernugget Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11751
- Joined: June 26, 2014
In post 90, Ricastle wrote:
What vote on page 1 do you think was being used to scumhunt?In post 80, Flubbernugget wrote:@senator without discussing theory too much this site takes voting as a very strong protrayal of one's intentions. The fact that conman didn't even ask the mod if his vote counted suggests his vote was not being used to scumhunt
Fuck if I know. I just know con's wasn't being used-
-
Flubbernugget Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11751
- Joined: June 26, 2014
In post 77, choof wrote:In post 64, Plotinus wrote:I'm still mainly in RVS at the moment, but I changed my vote because he said:
In post 50, choof wrote:In post 41, Jeanne11 wrote:Hello, my homies. This player asks which one of you is mafia?
you and I are scum partners, thought we already established in the quicktopic
I realise he's probably joking but I don't have anything else to go on at this stage so saying he has a scumpartner is a good enough reason to vote him as any. Also it would be totally ironic if he was telling the truth.
there are a few ways I think I could paraphrase this but I'll just ask something instead
what is the purpose of prefacing a post that contains reasoning for a vote with "I'm still mainly in RVS"
by definition, backing up your vote with reasoning puts you solidly out of RVS
so this post is either forced or disingenuous
would be willing to sheep this-
-
Flubbernugget Survivor
-
-
Flubbernugget Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11751
- Joined: June 26, 2014
In post 97, Ricastle wrote:
I...jesus christ. Have you even thought about this at all?In post 93, Flubbernugget wrote:Fuck if I know. I just know con's wasn't being used
Here's the votes. I challenge you to argue any one of them is intended to scumhunt.
Spoiler:
I just said I don't have a case for or against those being scumhunting votes. I can argue though that con's was not indicitive of a desire to scumhunt.
Last post I'm making on the subject-
-
Flubbernugget Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11751
- Joined: June 26, 2014
In post 101, farside22 wrote:flubber is now a scum read. I don't recall him trying hard to find a purpose to keep is vote on a player (yes meta)
Still think bela is scum. non reaction and newb = scum in my book
Senator's questions remind me of the one's I asked in my first newbies so he can be town for now
Other than that nope-
-
Flubbernugget Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11751
- Joined: June 26, 2014
In post 100, ConManMick wrote:OK, you want a read? I think, flubber, you're being a tad over pedantic about me not correcting a formatting error. That's a feeble line of investigation, feels like your whole line is an OMGUS vote. My vote will stay put for now.
Gimme one more scum read and ill move my vote over to plot-
-
Flubbernugget Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11751
- Joined: June 26, 2014
In post 101, farside22 wrote:flubber is now a scum read. I don't recall him trying hard to find a purpose to keep is vote on a player (yes meta)
Still think bela is scum. non reaction and newb = scum in my book
can you explain how bella's iso is fake but con's isn't?-
-
Flubbernugget Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11751
- Joined: June 26, 2014
In post 122, choof wrote:In post 103, Flubbernugget wrote:
I just said I don't have a case for or against those being scumhunting votes.
here, let me help: the votes that were quoted were all rvs votes
having said that
I can argue though that con's was not indicitive of a desire to scumhunt.
I'm quite certain that none of the votes made on page were not "indicative of a desire to scumhunt"
Last post I'm making on the subject
and why is that?
So here we go again random votes shouldn't actually be random etc etc. Every fucking game I swear. That's why I want to drop the subject. It's semantics, theory, and nothing useful.
Look at con's iso. There's half a read in it and nothing of substance that would incite a reaction. But this is okay because I'm wrong about his vote? Like I've brought up twice in one way or another that there's more to my scumread than the vote but that doesn't seem to matter because idk-
-
Flubbernugget Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11751
- Joined: June 26, 2014
-
-
Flubbernugget Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11751
- Joined: June 26, 2014
-
-
Flubbernugget Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11751
- Joined: June 26, 2014
In post 175, Ricastle wrote:Oh right, Flubber. Can you point me to where Con is looking fake?
Yeah I'm just going to swap brains with farside and magically understand what the fuck she's saying for you-
-
Flubbernugget Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11751
- Joined: June 26, 2014
-
-
Flubbernugget Survivor
-
-
Flubbernugget Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11751
- Joined: June 26, 2014
Senator wrote:I'm not sure what's going on with Lane. His posts seem needlessly distraught.
Flubber, you still haven't answered my questions. Why was it scummy for Conmannick to not try to correct his botched vote; and why is it worse than actively avoiding RVS like others did?
In post 80, Flubbernugget wrote:@senator without discussing theory too much this site takes voting as a very strong protrayal of one's intentions. The fact that conman didn't even ask the mod if his vote counted suggests his vote was not being used to scumhunt
Avoiding rvs is usually a personal schdule/opinion thing.
I've stated before that I am more concerned with con's defensive iso as a whole than his vote. Why is his vote still relevant?-
-
Flubbernugget Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11751
- Joined: June 26, 2014
-
-
Flubbernugget
-
-
Flubbernugget Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11751
- Joined: June 26, 2014
-
-
Flubbernugget Survivor
-
-
Flubbernugget Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11751
- Joined: June 26, 2014
In post 253, farside22 wrote:I I'm paranoid about Flubber being active because I don't recall him as an active player so he's more just on my to be watched list.
No that's not how meta works at fucking all-
-
Flubbernugget Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11751
- Joined: June 26, 2014
In post 257, farside22 wrote:Flubbernugget wrote:In post 253, farside22 wrote:I I'm paranoid about Flubber being active because I don't recall him as an active player so he's more just on my to be watched list.
No that's not how meta works at fucking all
Did i call you scum for it?
no
Did I say town for it?
No
just someone I would keep an eye on.
IE: uncertain
So what exactly was [p]101[/p]?-
-
Flubbernugget
-
-
Flubbernugget Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11751
- Joined: June 26, 2014
In post 283, FA_Q2 wrote:In post 237, Flubbernugget wrote:What exactly would have made the wagon town motivated to you?
?
I asked what YOUR town motivation was.
There's 4 scum and I have 2.5 independent scum reads so sheeping someone else's scum case makes sense. Also congrats on confusing agreeing with another player for being opportunistic.
Now it sounds like you're making stuff up as to what would make the wagon scummy so an answer to my question would still be nice.-
-
Flubbernugget Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11751
- Joined: June 26, 2014
-
-
Flubbernugget Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11751
- Joined: June 26, 2014
In post 321, RationalMadman wrote:Tbh, I suggest a policy lynch of a lurker d1. Town that doesn't contribute should be gotten rid of and if they happen to be maf it's a bonus.
You do realize that if we did this your slot would be dead before you could replace into it?-
-
Flubbernugget Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11751
- Joined: June 26, 2014
-
-
Flubbernugget Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11751
- Joined: June 26, 2014
-
-
Flubbernugget Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11751
- Joined: June 26, 2014
In post 355, Bellaphant wrote:Bert alt? Can you explain a bit more for those not in the know?
Check his posting style. You can also look up Antihero: Redemption. I think it's theme mini 1619-
-
Flubbernugget Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11751
- Joined: June 26, 2014
-
-
Flubbernugget Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11751
- Joined: June 26, 2014
-
-
Flubbernugget Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11751
- Joined: June 26, 2014
In post 372, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:353 - Can you expand on this read Flubber. I can see it but want to know why you're scum reading her.
Her scumread on me is bullshit and she can't keep coherent as is. I can see farside looking for an easy mislynch out of me-
-
Flubbernugget Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11751
- Joined: June 26, 2014
farside22 wrote:In post 437, Flubbernugget wrote:In post 372, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:353 - Can you expand on this read Flubber. I can see it but want to know why you're scum reading her.
Her scumread on me is bullshit and she can't keep coherent as is. I can see farside looking for an easy mislynch out of me
That's why I'm pushing a lynch and cLalling you scum right now.
Wait no I'm not doing that at all.
Okay but that's not refuting your read is bullshit but keep trying to be condescending to discredit me-
-
Flubbernugget Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11751
- Joined: June 26, 2014
-
-
Flubbernugget Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11751
- Joined: June 26, 2014
-
-
Flubbernugget Survivor
-
-
Flubbernugget
-
-
Flubbernugget Survivor
-
-
Flubbernugget Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11751
- Joined: June 26, 2014
-
-
Flubbernugget Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11751
- Joined: June 26, 2014
-
-
Flubbernugget Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11751
- Joined: June 26, 2014
In post 581, Flubbernugget wrote:I don't even understand why we are waiting for claims in this setup. Also cc'ing a doc right now is impossible/dumb unless I'm missing something
I am missing something: there's more than just the docs in this setup-
-
Flubbernugget Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11751
- Joined: June 26, 2014
In post 583, TheReverend wrote:In post 581, Flubbernugget wrote:I don't even understand why we are waiting for claims in this setup. Also cc'ing a doc right now is impossible/dumb unless I'm missing something
I'd have been more inclined to believe him if he claimed vanilla.
Why do people seem shocked that a scummy player made a scummy claim anyway-
-
Flubbernugget Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11751
- Joined: June 26, 2014
Senator wrote:Seriously? Its all one liners, misremembered games, and how youll read tonight. How could you, an experienced player, possibly argue that number of posts equals amount of content? They dont equal at all. Can you start ptoducing something now?
Senator there's so much bullshit in this post I can smell it over the internet-
-
Flubbernugget Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11751
- Joined: June 26, 2014
-
-
Flubbernugget Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11751
- Joined: June 26, 2014
@senator Well you have a "contradiction" on the reverend which is just a cross between his personal opinions and the optimal way of working with the town, so congrats on scumreading him for not being an asshole?
Even if you don't see a solid town case on him, is your scum case so insanely strong on him that he's not worth the benefit of the doubt to see what he brings to the table tomorrow? From a replacement standpoint, your push on him is encouraging suboptimal play from his perspective as is.-
-
Flubbernugget Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11751
- Joined: June 26, 2014
-
-
Flubbernugget Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11751
- Joined: June 26, 2014
-
-
Flubbernugget Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11751
- Joined: June 26, 2014
In post 690, TheReverend wrote:In post 689, Flubbernugget wrote:my posting won't feel like buddying if you don't deliver tomorrow
How do you know I haven't delivered today?
672 by your own admission-
-
Flubbernugget
-
-
Flubbernugget Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11751
- Joined: June 26, 2014
-
-
Flubbernugget Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11751
- Joined: June 26, 2014
-
-
Flubbernugget Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11751
- Joined: June 26, 2014
In post 718, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:I haven't read anything in the past 4/5 pages and I don't give a fuck.
Discuss.
Just read 713 and 716-
-
Flubbernugget Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11751
- Joined: June 26, 2014
In post 702, TheReverend wrote:In post 701, ConManMick wrote:would it be worthwhile hanging onto papi and having him investigated?
By who? The tracker? That would be really convenient for the scum if they knew who was getting tracked.
He barely even gave you a peepee smack and it somehow managed to obliterate your ego...-
-
Flubbernugget Survivor
-
-
Flubbernugget Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11751
- Joined: June 26, 2014
In post 726, lane0168 wrote:Why can't flub be baiting him because con thinks flub is scum and papi is town? My brain apparently isn't working right. I mean why can't that be why con thinks flub is baiting him?
This would make sense if con had a history of speaking definatively or in absolutes-
-
Flubbernugget Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11751
- Joined: June 26, 2014
In post 730, Flubbernugget wrote:In post 726, lane0168 wrote:Why can't flub be baiting him because con thinks flub is scum and papi is town? My brain apparently isn't working right. I mean why can't that be why con thinks flub is baiting him?
This would make sense if con had a history of speaking definatively or in absolutes
FAQ What exactly didn't I answer?-
-
Flubbernugget Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11751
- Joined: June 26, 2014
-
-
-
-