Open 620: Duck Duck Goose Game Over, Mafia Victory
-
-
RadiantalyFarrar3 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 114
- Joined: December 25, 2015
-
-
RadiantalyFarrar3 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 114
- Joined: December 25, 2015
-
-
RadiantalyFarrar3 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 114
- Joined: December 25, 2015
-
-
RadiantalyFarrar3 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 114
- Joined: December 25, 2015
-
-
RadiantalyFarrar3 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 114
- Joined: December 25, 2015
-
-
RadiantalyFarrar3 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 114
- Joined: December 25, 2015
-
-
RadiantalyFarrar3 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 114
- Joined: December 25, 2015
-
-
RadiantalyFarrar3 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 114
- Joined: December 25, 2015
-
-
RadiantalyFarrar3 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 114
- Joined: December 25, 2015
-
-
RadiantalyFarrar3 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 114
- Joined: December 25, 2015
-
-
RadiantalyFarrar3 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 114
- Joined: December 25, 2015
-
-
RadiantalyFarrar3 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 114
- Joined: December 25, 2015
-
-
RadiantalyFarrar3 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 114
- Joined: December 25, 2015
-
-
RadiantalyFarrar3 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 114
- Joined: December 25, 2015
-
-
RadiantalyFarrar3 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 114
- Joined: December 25, 2015
-
-
RadiantalyFarrar3 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 114
- Joined: December 25, 2015
In post 40, Mathilda wrote:In post 20, RadiantalyFarrar3 wrote:Oh yeah I'm not gonna bother signing posts because I'll just forget at the scummiest moment
Can you explain what you meant by this? Please define what you mean by "scummiest moment". I just glossed over it because I did not understand it. And can everyone else who thinks that it is scummy explain why?
I meant I'm just gonna not sign from the start, because I will inevitably forget, and when I do someone will try to turn it against us. It's a bullshit thing that happens always with hydras so I figure I'll deal with it now instead of later in when it might be important.
There will be dissonance in this hydra. All of us are talkative, all of us will be around to answer for ourselves. Learn that now.Hydra of RadiantCowbells, JohnnyFarrar, and Taly.-
-
RadiantalyFarrar3 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 114
- Joined: December 25, 2015
That quickly, huh?
In post 24, Burning_Earth wrote:I hate hydras that don't sign btw.
I do. Happy to talk as long as literals don't faze people too much...
So...
You sheeped a vote with little reasoning behind it rather than your own assessment?
Don't understand the townvibes on you.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: concvex
In post 33, Burning_Earth wrote:In post 20, RadiantalyFarrar3 wrote:Oh yeah I'm not gonna bother signing posts because I'll just forget at the scummiest moment
This seemed self-conscious to me. Good enough for page one. I also don't like that you hand waved by saying "yeah that post was scummy but it's only my other, worse head"
We need some more posters in here btw.
Idk how it's self-conscious to admit to anything that'd appear scummy, whether it's serious or not.
Would you rather nobody to bring up the topic of signing? And not everyone in a hydra is the same in how they portray themselves, so your hydra banter seems very quick in judgment.
~Taly- Btw. This is this heads first post.Hydra of RadiantCowbells, JohnnyFarrar, and Taly.-
-
RadiantalyFarrar3 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 114
- Joined: December 25, 2015
-
-
RadiantalyFarrar3 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 114
- Joined: December 25, 2015
Pot calling the kettle black.
I make my own idea on not seeing how Conc is getting townvibes and vote there and here you vote and jump on the idea that my vote was bad when I gave my thought process on it.
You don't even state how this is OMGUS.
In post 43, Newbie wrote:conc and Mathilda are giving me townvibes so far. I need more people to post before I really get into it. I know that's hypocritical coming from the person with only 2 posts, but I don't have much to work with.
You even could have explained why you had townvibes then, but you sheep-voted out of what BE said - and saw that as a reason to see conc-townvibe?:
In post 49, Newbie wrote:In post 14, concvex wrote:People should sheep my vote, it's quite a good vote.
I can't see scum making a post like this. Even if it was just a joke, I'd expect a bit more self consciousness. I also understand how concvex could've found what BE pointed out about RF3 as scummy.
And scum can easily make posts like town. The principle about this is, to you - it isn't self-conscious to ask for sheeping, yet based on what BE said - 1 of my heads saying they wouldn't sign at the scummiest moment - you say this is reason enough to vote.
So - even jokingly - saying you're doing a scummy thing is self-conscious compared to just stating that someone should sheep?
I'm not going to talk about frivolous literal crap if that's the basis of the votes on me. But your logic seems a bit skewed.
I'm getting scumvibes from Newbie. Want to get to Conc though.
In post 52, concvex wrote:In post 45, RadiantalyFarrar3 wrote:You sheeped a vote with little reasoning behind it rather than your own assessment?
I thought it was a little worrying that your other head isn't doing something that could help the town (signing their posts) just because it could make them look scummy if they forget to do it. Even the other head agreed that post 20 looked scummy.
I have 2 other heads. Sure, I'll make it known to them that they should sign.
And are you serious? The 'other head agreed that our OTHER heads post was scummy?'
So this slots scum for calling the other head scummy? Wtf? Idek how you interpreted this as serious if not a lack of inhibition. But apparently this makes us self-conscious?
In post 52, concvex wrote:On a side note, if you all start signing your posts I won't scum read you for forgetting to sign every once in a while. That'd be stupid.
So now, we're scum because 2/3s of this hydra haven't signed so far?
You told us you won't scumread us? You're either baiting us, or the basis of your scumread and vote is shit. Idk how this is alignment-indicative, and you seem like you're bargaining for something which I don't like.
In post 52, concvex wrote:In post 48, Something Pip wrote:I didn't understand the townvibes on concvex either. The post he referred to was not pretty scummy, and pretty scummy for page 1 is not even pretty scummy. So why would he call it that?
"Pretty scummy (for page 1)" implied that I thought it was a pretty weak reason, but easily good enough to go off of for this point in the game.
In post 50, Sharky5x wrote:This is weak.
See above.
This literally doesn't tell us anything beyond what we already have seen.
This head is fine with the vote here, atm.
>>>
Feeling good with the Pip hydra atm. Similar with Sharky.
~TalyHydra of RadiantCowbells, JohnnyFarrar, and Taly.-
-
RadiantalyFarrar3 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 114
- Joined: December 25, 2015
-
-
RadiantalyFarrar3 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 114
- Joined: December 25, 2015
-
-
RadiantalyFarrar3 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 114
- Joined: December 25, 2015
In post 55, Something Pip wrote:Whoops almost hydraslipped there. Guarantee that I'm gonna do it sooner or later.
I'm feeling honest townie frustration from RF3. To the people with townvibes on concvex, why?
In post 51, Newbie wrote:I can't see it happening on the first page of the first day phase, a time when scum tend to be extra cautious.
wifom wifom wifom wifom wifom
In post 54, RadiantalyFarrar3 wrote:Guys I hate the word OMGUS so much. It's one of those buzzwords that new players latch onto for just a bit too long (see also: "misrep" and "buddying")
Agree with this. I think OMGUS has a scummy connotation that shouldn't necessarily be there. It is possible to vote someone right after they vote you and have a real reason.
Concvex, what do you think of Newbie?
-the smart head
fite me irlHydra of RadiantCowbells, JohnnyFarrar, and Taly.-
-
RadiantalyFarrar3 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 114
- Joined: December 25, 2015
Didn't I explain that a sentence later? Let me break it down for you.
>You state my vote is OMGUS without reasoning. You vote me based off that???
>My vote on conc was because I didn't understand the townvibes there and I wanted to push, I also didn't understand why he sheeped that vote without saying much beyond it. You seem to have some sort of issue with my push.
In post 56, Newbie wrote:In post 53, RadiantalyFarrar3 wrote:
I make my own idea on not seeing how Conc is getting townvibes and vote there and here you vote and jump on the idea that my vote was bad when I gave my thought process on it.
You don't even state how this is OMGUS.
I think it's OMGUS because you did too much with his reasoning for voting you and then voted him. It's obvious to me he saw BH's reasoning on you as scummy and decided to throw on a vote. Sorry if you don't like.
What are you talking about? My vote and reasoning on conc has nothing to do with the fact that he voted me.
It's that he sheeped over BE's thinking and I decided to push him for a better read.
And when is something too much? I'm going based off of what I see and think. You, however - seem to think that I'm basing this all around the fact that I "don't like" it? This doesn't make any sense...
How is my vote less valid than his?
You're also focusing to much on the idea that my vote is based only on concs thinking with BE - which is wrong. For reasons I've stated.
In post 56, Newbie wrote:In post 53, RadiantalyFarrar3 wrote:
In post 43, Newbie wrote:conc and Mathilda are giving me townvibes so far. I need more people to post before I really get into it. I know that's hypocritical coming from the person with only 2 posts, but I don't have much to work with.
You even could have explained why you had townvibes then, but you sheep-voted out of what BE said - and saw that as a reason to see conc-townvibe?:
Mathilda - Because of post #40. It looks like a person engaging genuinely, trying to figure things out.
conc - Already explained this.
These two reads aren't set in stone, and truthfully, I would like to see more from both.
Well this doesn't tell me anything I didn't know....
In post 56, Newbie wrote:In post 53, RadiantalyFarrar3 wrote:
In post 49, Newbie wrote:In post 14, concvex wrote:People should sheep my vote, it's quite a good vote.
I can't see scum making a post like this. Even if it was just a joke, I'd expect a bit more self consciousness. I also understand how concvex could've found what BE pointed out about RF3 as scummy.
And scum can easily make posts like town. The principle about this is, to you - it isn't self-conscious to ask for sheeping, yet based on what BE said - 1 of my heads saying they wouldn't sign at the scummiest moment - you say this is reason enough to vote.
So - even jokingly - saying you're doing a scummy thing is self-conscious compared to just stating that someone should sheep?
I'm not going to talk about frivolous literal crap if that's the basis of the votes on me. But your logic seems a bit skewed.
I'm not even sure how to respond.
.....
BE's reasoning on his vote against me - in part - is about how the posts in page 1 were self-conscious. Basically one of my heads saying openly that they'd forget to sign at the scummiest moment - Did people really take this seriously, btw? Or self-conscious?
Conc's vote is based around someone elses reasoning - and in part of me not understanding the townvibes on him - made me wonder around peoples thoughts on him.
Again, your response doesn't provide anything to go off of. I don't even know why you're voting me other than that you're creating some sort of dichotomy and then discrediting my thoughts revolved around a push.
In post 56, Newbie wrote:
Geez, I wonder why? Does it have anything to do with me voting you and not seeing conc, your top suspect, as scum?
If this isn't a misrep, this is looks like an attempt to discredit me.
I never mentioned that I got scumvibes from you because of you voting me. It's the fact that these posts so far are of you not entirely explaining yourself, while you say you understand someone else, but finding fault whenever I push against them.
You go as far as to say things like "Sorry if you don't like" or "Is it because I'm not doing what you want" to make it a point to go against what I'm doing. This is seriously unhelpful, and not town-motivated.
Please I'm not asking people to vote or think remotely the same as I do, but your posts do not make any sense in the perspective that as town - we should figure out the game and actively working to take in info. in achieving that.
~TalyHydra of RadiantCowbells, JohnnyFarrar, and Taly.-
-
RadiantalyFarrar3 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 114
- Joined: December 25, 2015
In post 77, Elsa and Anna wrote:If she was planning to wifom being a newb she'd be planning to do so as town or scum.
Im not sure if there's any value to the tell.
<--
Well, that proves this post was RC at any rate.Hydra of RadiantCowbells, JohnnyFarrar, and Taly.-
-
RadiantalyFarrar3 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 114
- Joined: December 25, 2015
In post 61, Something Pip wrote:In post 54, RadiantalyFarrar3 wrote:Guys I hate the word OMGUS so much. It's one of those buzzwords that new players latch onto for just a bit too long (see also: "misrep" and "buddying")
RadiantalyFarrar3 wrote:If this isn't a misrep, this is looks like an attempt to discredit me.
...
Eh... The original was a quote from the other head. I didn't definitively accuse Newbie of misrepping, I did state whether I was uncertain whether she was, or if she was trying to discredit me.
I'll stop with the dissonance.
>>>>
OK, I'm not going to go back and forth forever about why I'm pushing someone and talking to the people who jumped on my wagon. I feel like a damn record and so I'm just going to clarify and answer questions and that should be done with it.
Something Pip wrote:Why are you complaining about someone answering your question? This post was exactly what you were asking
Newbie wrote:Mathilda - Because of post #40. It looks like a person engaging genuinely, trying to figure things out.
conc - Already explained this.
These two reads aren't set in stone, and truthfully, I would like to see more from both
Not entirely. I was asking about conc specifically. She just said that she already explained it but I must have addressed it already?.
Newbie wrote:Whet? You specifically stated that he sheeped BE without his own assessment and didn't give any other reason.
Really? I also stated that I didn't understand the townvibes and I wanted to engage moreover by voting conc. >_>....
Newbie wrote:I voted you because it looked like you tried to add more to conc's vote than him simply agreeing with BE.
Seriously, what was I trying to add? I wanted to push conc off of him making vague statements and sheeping, and to clarify more on reads here. You say my vote was OMGUS when I had my reasons stated.
Newbie wrote:I wasn't trying to misrep you. I seriously wanted to know why I was giving off scummy vibes since you gave no reason.
>You stated my vote was OMGUS, and you saying things like "Sorry, if you don't like it" rings to me as if you're trying to discredit my reasoning for even going after conc. It doesn't matter over the fact the votes on me, I wanted to push him.
>I don't understand how the reasoning you gave on conc-town made him town.
I can see you coming from a town perspective too, but I'm not nearly sold on it.
In post 64, Burning_Earth wrote:Oh I didn't think that your second post that I quoted was self conscious, Taly. I thought that your first was, and your second was a bad hand wave.
I'm not sure on what posts you're talking about? My first 2 were those I signed in Page 2. 45 and 46
The "Damnit Taly, you're scumming up the slot" is a running joke in the hydra.... Because I 1v1 a lot. :/
In post 75, Mathilda wrote:
I'm getting the sense that Newbie might not actually in fact be ... a newbie.
Which then suggests someone actually quite experienced at this game because they appreciate the value of being under estimated.
Why is this important? Because I like how she is scum hunting. But if she is experienced then could be this be a scum tactic to play as close to town as possible? Well there's absolutely nothing to suggest that this is the case for the moment so I am going to put her on my town pile for now.
With a joindate of August 2013, I highly doubt Newbie is an actual Newbie...
>>>
Also, is this a game of 6 people or 12? Let's get posting, people!
@BE
>Thoughts on conc's 52
@Something Pip
>Not entirely sure of the purpose of 62?
Is E&A even in this game?
~TalyHydra of RadiantCowbells, JohnnyFarrar, and Taly.-
-
RadiantalyFarrar3 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 114
- Joined: December 25, 2015
-
-
RadiantalyFarrar3 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 114
- Joined: December 25, 2015
-
-
RadiantalyFarrar3 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 114
- Joined: December 25, 2015
-
-
RadiantalyFarrar3 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 114
- Joined: December 25, 2015
-
-
RadiantalyFarrar3 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 114
- Joined: December 25, 2015
In post 117, Elsa and Anna wrote:VOTE: Sharky
Not much in favour of calling things flips but this is scum pure and simple.
-RC
slips*Hydra of RadiantCowbells, JohnnyFarrar, and Taly.-
-
RadiantalyFarrar3 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 114
- Joined: December 25, 2015
In post 119, Something Pip wrote:In post 85, Lowell wrote:UNVOTE: newbie
VOTE: something pip
80 is the longest post to say nothing. Also ironically, it does what it purports to *facepalm*. Yes, 75 is pretty dumb, but Mathilda is the easy target here, and your obsession is overwrought. I get the vibe of scum happy to be able to jump in on a dumb comment and make hay with it. Way too much hay.
I don't think Sharky is scum because Lowell already claimed it. His only contribution to the thread is a chainsaw on basically what amounted to a FoS. I don't understand the vote on me being based on Mathilda being a easy mislynch bait when I'm not voting Mathilda.
This post makes no sense. Are you saying that you don't think Sharky is scum because Lowell already scumclaiemd?Hydra of RadiantCowbells, JohnnyFarrar, and Taly.-
-
RadiantalyFarrar3 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 114
- Joined: December 25, 2015
-
-
RadiantalyFarrar3 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 114
- Joined: December 25, 2015
Taly head, here.
I like these Newbie votes.
Explanation...?
In post 133, Something Pip wrote:Wee that was shit. Do you have an actual reason for voting me or are you just lazy scum?
-pip
Eww...
In post 119, Something Pip wrote:In post 85, Lowell wrote:UNVOTE: newbie
VOTE: something pip
80 is the longest post to say nothing. Also ironically, it does what it purports to *facepalm*. Yes, 75 is pretty dumb, but Mathilda is the easy target here, and your obsession is overwrought. I get the vibe of scum happy to be able to jump in on a dumb comment and make hay with it. Way too much hay.
I don't think Sharky is scum because Lowell already claimed it. His only contribution to the thread is a chainsaw on basically what amounted to a FoS. I don't understand the vote on me being based on Mathilda being a easy mislynch bait when I'm not voting Mathilda.
I'm having difficulty following you here. So you're saying that Sharky isn't scum, because Lowell is?
And where's this Lowell chainsaw post - if I'm reading correctly?
In post 121, Something Pip wrote:I have an independent town lean on Sharky before his "Why aren't you guys scumreading me" post. It went down to null for this head, but I'm not happy that Lowell got away with that awful post much more than I care about whatever RC thinks a scumslip is.
Are you referring to 85?
I'm not getting good vibes over that you're casting suspicion but you don't seem to be doing anything about it...
In post 85, Lowell wrote:UNVOTE: newbie
VOTE: something pip
80 is the longest post to say nothing. Also ironically, it does what it purports to *facepalm*. Yes, 75 is pretty dumb, but Mathilda is the easy target here, and your obsession is overwrought. I get the vibe of scum happy to be able to jump in on a dumb comment and make hay with it. Way too much hay.
I don't really understand the thought of Mathilda easy lynchbait?
Sharky5x wrote:Let the BE/Sharky scumteam begin.
So... You're just going to narrate what you're anticipating? Eh...
~TalyHydra of RadiantCowbells, JohnnyFarrar, and Taly.-
-
RadiantalyFarrar3 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 114
- Joined: December 25, 2015
In post 125, TheDominator37 wrote:In post 17, Lowell wrote:^^^ this guy is going to be fun.
The AtE is strong in you.
I don't think this means what you think it meansHydra of RadiantCowbells, JohnnyFarrar, and Taly.-
-
RadiantalyFarrar3 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 114
- Joined: December 25, 2015
Taly's been making everyone think we're all townie so I figured I'd come in and fuck up all that hard work.
In post 52, concvex wrote:In post 45, RadiantalyFarrar3 wrote:You sheeped a vote with little reasoning behind it rather than your own assessment?
I thought it was a little worrying that your other head isn't doing something that could help the town (signing their posts) just because it could make them look scummy if they forget to do it. Even the other head agreed that post 20 looked scummy.
OK fight me on this, how exactly does us signing help the town? If one of us does something scummy does it matter who said it? If we change our minds a lot does it matter what we blame it on? Bottom line we're all good enough that we don't need to blame hydra dissonance for any bad play we might commit so the signing bullshit is just a waste of my time and a waste of your energy. Unless you're scum, then good job distracting the town.
If pip is the same pip I remember it's weird that I'm agreeing with him so much.
In post 67, Newbie wrote:In post 65, Burning_Earth wrote:In post 49, Newbie wrote:In post 14, concvex wrote:People should sheep my vote, it's quite a good vote.
I can't see scum making a post like this. Even if it was just a joke, I'd expect a bit more self consciousness. I also understand how concvex could've found what BE pointed out about RF3 as scummy.
What the hell are you talking about? Everyone makes posts like this, all the time.
This is just one of those things that I'll have to agree to disagree.
Scum joking about avote wagonon thefirstpage? Nah. Can't see it.
I literally did this exact same thing, where's my defense brigade? Or is this bullshit?
Oh shit Frozen is here
Go on
I don't like the whole "Taly stop posting so much" thing when activity is this low. We need folk to get in here.
If I cared to hijack Bells' vote I'd throw it on Newbie, but Bells is smarter than me so I'll leave it for now.Hydra of RadiantCowbells, JohnnyFarrar, and Taly.-
-
RadiantalyFarrar3 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 114
- Joined: December 25, 2015
-
-
RadiantalyFarrar3 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 114
- Joined: December 25, 2015
-
-
RadiantalyFarrar3 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 114
- Joined: December 25, 2015
-
-
RadiantalyFarrar3 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 114
- Joined: December 25, 2015
In post 161, Burning_Earth wrote:In post 160, RadiantalyFarrar3 wrote:YOU'RE NOT DOM BURNIE
I felt that his response to my post was likely to be more interesting than his response to yours.
I like Burnie though.
Well here's the thing, he posts 'hi' and that says to me "I'm here to start a dialogue"
I post a simple question and you cut in being all hostile. Dialogue ruined. I'm already in a bad mood.
So this says to me either you're his partner and you don't want me digging into him OR you're trying to frame him and you don't want him to have a good reason for what he's doing. Your thought about him having some disease that renders him only able to answer one question at a time is sad and unconvincing.
Also I tend to hate abbreviated names so I turn them into things that are pronounceable.Hydra of RadiantCowbells, JohnnyFarrar, and Taly.-
-
RadiantalyFarrar3 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 114
- Joined: December 25, 2015
-
-
RadiantalyFarrar3 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 114
- Joined: December 25, 2015
-
-
RadiantalyFarrar3 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 114
- Joined: December 25, 2015
-
-
RadiantalyFarrar3 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 114
- Joined: December 25, 2015
-
-
RadiantalyFarrar3 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 114
- Joined: December 25, 2015
-
-
RadiantalyFarrar3 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 114
- Joined: December 25, 2015
-
-
RadiantalyFarrar3 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 114
- Joined: December 25, 2015
-
-
RadiantalyFarrar3 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 114
- Joined: December 25, 2015
-
-
RadiantalyFarrar3 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 114
- Joined: December 25, 2015
-
-
RadiantalyFarrar3 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 114
- Joined: December 25, 2015
-
-
RadiantalyFarrar3 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 114
- Joined: December 25, 2015
Taly head here. Haven't been so active the past few days but I'm regaining time and energy. So I'll be contributing more....
This town is pretty aggravating.....
In post 144, Something Pip wrote:I think Sharky is town because the last sentence of 116 ("Let the BE/Sharky scumteam begin") is not self-conscious enough to be scum. Nothing to do with Lowell.
Lowell's chainsaw that pip referred to is indeed 85, and I'm not voting him because I have stronger reads, I want concvex to say something, and the chainsaw could be unconscious (Lowell sees Mathilda as town and an easy target and automatically scumreads us for attacking her). I'm leaning toward voting Newbie, however.
-the smart head
Tbh "Let the BE/Sharky scumteam begin" seems like a half-assed way to let people know you've anticipated that happening to you. Which is either a distraction or just plain useless unless it was meant to gauge a reaction by a townsperson to stir conversation in the game.... And I haven't seen Sharky post much since then. Correct me if I'm wrong.
As for the 'Lowell chainsaw' I don't really understand that much either.
Are you insinuating both Lowell and Mathilda are scum together? Or do you think Lowell is scum by herself? I don't understand this. What's not valid about Lowell's townread on Mathilda?
In post 146, concvex wrote:Still here, I'm going to try to get back into the game later tonight.
That's yet to have happened....
Explanation would be lovely. But you could just flake like half the playerlist atm....
In post 168, Burning_Earth wrote:Dom is clearly just lurking scum IMO.
And what have you done to push him into actually engaging?
In post 179, Lowell wrote:UNVOTE: whoever
VOTE: conc
To add pressure. This looks like the kind of game where we just wagon everyone to get them to wake up. Wake me when it's my turn.
*yawns*
Try breeding apathy less in your next post, please.
While you're at it, I just want to entertain how I don't exactly understand these votes back onto the conc wagon, namely how quickly there are. Of course a flip gives information, but I'm pretty sure that conc being null and inactive af seems like a policy thing and the fact that people just jump on the notion that a quicklynch should be made there does not sound entirely town-sided.
In post 181, Something Pip wrote:^if concvex ever gets bussed this is 100% where it happens.
BE vs. RF3 seems TvT.
Dominator is obvscum.
Not_Mafia will probably need to be PL'd at some point.
-the smart head
This is why I'm not confident in my read in you.
You throw on a townread on something.
After you say something else is scum. (Lowell?)
Then you call out that Dom is 'obvscum', but do shit about it.
You then say that NM should just be policy lynched -wtf? But your votes still on conc, yet you just say that someone is bussing conc?
Seriously. Wtf are your reads. This is either hydra dissonance in picking up a lot of adversity with people, or I really don't like how it seems like you're lining up shit with your scumreads.
I mean... You could be giving your individual opinion but you know... Sheeping's cool too....
In post 194, Mathilda wrote:Sorry for needing to be prodded. I am watching this game. Wasn't sure what to post because there's so little content, but I suppose that's probably part of the reason why there is so little content. I'm going to re-read the entire thread again and be more active.
I've never played a game with a hydra before. The concept is new to me. I'm thinking through the mechanics of it. It's like an entire faction in one. If one member of the scum team of three slots was a hydra then there would be 6 scum players. That sounds somewhat mental.
So far the only person who I know for sure is town is Frozen Angel for #107. I hadn't read the possible set-ups.
Hydra's tend to be sided in the faction their in. But they play as an individual person - which means ideally - they all must be on the same page as each other in how they work - which is near impossible for a lot, that's why hydra's are either very strong or very weak in an area when it comes to playstyle.
If anything, you get several personalities and gamestyles to look at in 1.
If you have questions I'll be glad to answer.
Also, this is an Open Set-up - so there's only 3 scum and 9 town with the same roles
P-Edit
OK, you covered this
>Mathilda, what do you think about Lowell?
~TalyHydra of RadiantCowbells, JohnnyFarrar, and Taly.-
-
RadiantalyFarrar3 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 114
- Joined: December 25, 2015
-
-
RadiantalyFarrar3 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 114
- Joined: December 25, 2015
-
-
RadiantalyFarrar3 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 114
- Joined: December 25, 2015
-
-
RadiantalyFarrar3 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 114
- Joined: December 25, 2015
-
-
RadiantalyFarrar3 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 114
- Joined: December 25, 2015
In post 213, Mathilda wrote:VOTE: TheDominator
Fluff poster doing the minimum necessary to register a presence but does not explain any of his thoughts or votes. Anti-town at best.
Why is he voting for Something Pip in #132?
It could be that he's not paying much attention to the game, but some pressure might give us extra information that we need to determine whether this is the case or not.
In my experience pressure works best when you state it's pressure outright. Really lends gravity to the vote. Makes it seem serious.Hydra of RadiantCowbells, JohnnyFarrar, and Taly.-
-
RadiantalyFarrar3 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 114
- Joined: December 25, 2015
-
-
RadiantalyFarrar3 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 114
- Joined: December 25, 2015
-
-
RadiantalyFarrar3 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 114
- Joined: December 25, 2015
-
-
RadiantalyFarrar3 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 114
- Joined: December 25, 2015
-
-
RadiantalyFarrar3 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 114
- Joined: December 25, 2015
In post 202, Something Pip wrote:In post 196, RadiantalyFarrar3 wrote:This is why I'm not confident in my read in you.
You throw on a townread on something.
After you say something else is scum. (Lowell?)
Then you call out that Dom is 'obvscum', but do shit about it.
You then say that NM should just be policy lynched -wtf? But your votes still on conc, yet you just say that someone is bussing conc?
Seriously. Wtf are your reads. This is either hydra dissonance in picking up a lot of adversity with people, or I really don't like how it seems like you're lining up shit with your scumreads.
The only read we disagree on is Newbie. Our top two scumreads right now are conc for starting a point, then letting Newbie take all of the heat for him and dom for every post he has made this game. My experience with NM is that he will never do anything the entire game. I don't think there is any way of dealing with that besides a policy lynch at some point.
So.... It's a bunch of dissonance on the Newbie read? Which one has what read on Newbie? Because a portion of your top scumread seems like an associative...
You don't take issue with the quickvotes on Conc?
In post 203, Lowell wrote:Burning and RF are town. Mathilda's play is weirdly methodical. Someone kill conc.
Thanks for side-stepping me...
...Without ANY reference or response to my thoughts and questions previously. 196
I told you to not breed apathy.... And you only give an ambiguous response on Mathilda, and the throw BE and I in a bloc, while you plainly state that conc should just die.
Any reason?.... If anything, why not engage on me with my thoughts on your conc-wagon instead of just throwing out reads? This looks dismissive and I'm not seeing a good motivation here.
The votes staying.
In post 238, droog wrote:reads
town
burning earth
dominator
newbie
null
rf3
not mafia (where is jhe)
scum
loweell
mathilda
VOTE: mathilda
@mod requesting extension please
Explain this dom townread because they're null at best in my eyes.
I read through your posts and unless I missed something, the read seems partially gut.
In post 241, Burning_Earth wrote:Yeah all your other reads suck though.
In post 242, Burning_Earth wrote:I'm town, obviously.
Cool, BE.... Tell someone that their reads suck when they townread you - not give any reason as to why, or rationale behind the thought; and then just state that you're obviously town out of the pile of reads that "suck"....
Mathilda wrote:Why should I respond if I am satisfied with the response?
This all looks contrived by you to find distract people from the lynch wagon on your slot. This in itself makes me read you as scum. More so than anyone else I have voted for so far.
These first 2 sentences give me some bad vibes. Most of the votes on droog are about conc's entrance.
And so now when there's content from that slot - droog replacing in with pressure, you now say he's scum for giving reads and pushing other people?
What about droogs' posts exactly seem like a distraction?
Another thing - what about my 'response' satisfied you?(I'm assuming it's a post that I made?)
~TalyHydra of RadiantCowbells, JohnnyFarrar, and Taly.