learn 2 archetype, n00b
also
VOTE: flying cake punch
In post 45, KickAssAndGiggle wrote:Apparently, shitposting in RVS is a scum tell. Who knew?
(Well, apparently some people did!)
The epic logic: the man whodraws most attention to himselfon pagetwois likely to be scum? Genius!
In post 50, acryon wrote:In post 48, Antihero wrote:also mod got vc wrong lol
Why lol? Why didn't you just say what was off?
In post 52, Lowell wrote:
Haha wtf scum picked innocent child?!??! omg so terrible. I'm going to rethink all my "not scum, just noob" reads from here on out.
In post 63, Voidedmafia wrote:In post 61, KickAssAndGiggle wrote:In our last TWO games together I was town!
Do you understand the "Gambler's Fallacy"? You just committed it...
Now this is just grating.
Vote: Kickass L-1
In post 79, Voidedmafia wrote:In post 73, KickAssAndGiggle wrote:No, he was wise, and did not push me to L-1 on page 3.
Unlike yourself. Your play = horrible. Ridiculous. Scummy.
Do you expect someone to come up an hammer you out of the blue, then? Or are you trying to instill unreasonable fear into everyone?
In post 83, Titus wrote:Generally when people vote me in RVS out of fear, scum tend to be behind it.
In post 107, Voidedmafia wrote:Not talking to you, Anti.
In post 97, Titus wrote:Antihero, convince me your obvious town today. Discrediting posts from KAAG make it really hard for me to vote elsewhere.
In post 94, KickAssAndGiggle wrote:So, on a scale of 1 - 10 Ranger, how embarrassed will you be when:
A) I flip town,
B) Everyone sees your D1 reads are twaddle?
7? 8?
In post 134, Smudger wrote:In post 35, Smudger wrote:In post 28, acryon wrote:In post 26, KickAssAndGiggle wrote:I always though anti-hero was the wife of uncle-hero...
(Yes, I had to add hyphens to make the joke work and yes, the joke wasn't funny.)
As a dad, I can appreciate a joke like this. I like you.
um....BS... I call BS
In post 36, Smudger wrote:In post 29, KickAssAndGiggle wrote:Does that count as buddying?
Ohhh...a bit of RQS with my RVS...edgy!
and this, strengthens my current vote
ooohhh dear, I was in thread after a few glasses of wine.... please ignore these... man that's so embarrassing
still reading
In post 127, Voidedmafia wrote:(And I find sudden claims at L-1 without hammer intents to at least be sketchy, but I digress here.)
In post 127, Voidedmafia wrote:Ranger's voting KAAG, btw, not me. I don't know why, though.
In post 213, Voidedmafia wrote:Is it Lowell? Always Innocent? Varsoon Smudger? Me?
Flying Cake Punch wrote:
Is it karnage?
In post 220, Voidedmafia wrote:Awww. That was gonna be my next guess!
Though, I've got to ask, what makes Karnage more scum than, say, BROseiden? I'm assuming the lack of posts and/or the sketchy nature of what posts are there are contributing to this read.
In post 225, Karnage wrote:I think this happens to me in every other game I play in.
I get invested in one game and ignore my other games and eventually somebody decides that makes me scum
In post 228, Karnage wrote:but i'm currently reading through the thread.
In post 231, Karnage wrote:smudger, and AI are my top town reads.
In post 231, Karnage wrote:FCP - didnt get a feel either way
In post 231, Karnage wrote:Anti - i don't like the naked votes
In post 231, Karnage wrote:Titus - didn't like her desire to sheep antihero.
In post 231, Karnage wrote:lowell could be scum. I dont like how he brushes of a claim on p-3 nor his vote on FCP. I don't like his like of quickhammers either.
In post 250, Karnage wrote:you really need me to explain why that is scummy?
In post 255, Karnage wrote:In post 254, Antihero wrote:In post 250, Karnage wrote:you really need me to explain why that is scummy?
/nods
yeah, you do. it should be clear atp even for ppl who don't know us that we have a bit of history and she apparently respects my reads enough to be willing to sheep me.
how is that scummy?
well whatever relationship you have wasn't clear to me and I don't know you from Adam so I can't speak to how strong your reads are.
I think that sheeping somebody outside of some sort of investigation result is a way of not taking ownership of your reads. especially this early in the game when it's impossible to be that confident of who is and isn't town.
In post 252, BROseidon wrote:Oh yeah KAAG is pretty obviously town and that wagon on him was terrible.
In post 258, Smudger wrote:so you believe it is Karnage, why is this rather weak read, imo,
[my post] a secret read?
*PEdit - that said Karnage has now reacted to this.... see below
In post 278, AlwaysInnocent wrote:Yes, but I can't tell you what it is yet. I don't want Ranger to fix what gives her away.
In post 279, KickAssAndGiggle wrote:If you're going to say FCP is obv!town [...] could you also post a reason?
In post 265, Varsoon wrote:The speed of this whole Karnage thing feels like a mislynch.
In post 287, AlwaysInnocent wrote:It's not informationless.
In post 293, AlwaysInnocent wrote:It doesn't matter how well-liked anyone is: this does not make the wagon more likely to be correct. Risk-taking has no positive influence on correctness either. Etc. Etc.
In post 297, AlwaysInnocent wrote:Yeah, so let's try to improve it. I don't think going along with it is going to improve our chances. I think we should use our brains more. Quick lynches, however, reduce the time we have to use our brains (and to gather information).
In post 303, AlwaysInnocent wrote:I'm listening. I just don't understand your point.
In post 303, AlwaysInnocent wrote:If we have a quick lynch that is poorly substantiated, then in the best-case scenario scum exercise no meaningful influence and town will have to guess. So this will be no better than random. It is possible that scum gets lynched, but it is more probable that town gets lynched, simply because there are more townies than scum. In the worst-case scenario scum do exercise influence and town performs worse than random.
In post 303, AlwaysInnocent wrote:To win this game we must analyze. We are not playing apureguessing game, are we? I think we all play this game with the expectation that we can do better than chance.
In post 310, KickAssAndGiggle wrote:Too much discussing "THE game" and not enough "THIS game" guys.
In post 312, KickAssAndGiggle wrote:No, your debate is a sideshow. Doubt away.
Brownie points? With who? You don't half talk some nonsense...
In post 312, KickAssAndGiggle wrote:Brownie points? With who? You don't half talk some nonsense...
In post 309, AlwaysInnocent wrote:Sometimes people win the lottery. Doesn't mean you should be buying lottery tickets.In post 308, Not_Mafia wrote:Sometimes scum get quick lynched because they're scum