Nahdia wrote:VOTE: Masquerade
Friggin' tryhard.
VOTE: Nahdia
acryon wrote:Any posts pinging you thusfar?
In post 85, Masquerade wrote:Hey Willow, can I call you Willow? Do you have any reads so far you'd like to share?
In post 104, Nahdia wrote:I was serious. What does that mean to you?In post 96, Willowmeadow wrote:I can't tell if Nahdia was serious in the start, but they're definitely someone who I won't forget to keep an eye on.
In post 129, Nahdia wrote:@Willow that's a really bold statement. Why can't I just be town who was wrong or scum who voted my partner? I like your posts in the sense that they feel genuine but I'm not quite understanding your logic. Elaborate, please.
In post 171, Kop wrote:There shouldn't be a policy lynch. What is giving you a reason you think there is going to be a policy lynch? Do you not think we will actually find a good candidate to lynch?
I know it's going to be hard to get a 100% read on KT, but unless he does something that is scummy, then yeah we can progress on that, but for policy lynching him, no.
In post 371, acryon wrote:In post 370, Willowmeadow wrote:Something about Acryon's posts-to-content ratio puts me off. They're not really saying much (or anything?) and I've seen that twice too many times come from scum.
Hmm, were there certain posts from me that felt empty?
In post 518, Something_Smart wrote:Willow, do you think there is a consensus regarding Nahdia? And why are you waiting to see who is the popular target before deciding whether to switch your vote?
In post 694, Masquerade wrote:If you don't know what's going on then how do you know there's something going on enough for you to say 'I don't know what's going on'?
In post 728, Masquerade wrote:So this opened right when I have to leave..
In post 773, Ranger wrote:Remember how I said one of {acryon, Willowmeadow} was scum? Well, with that Something_Smart flip, should be obvious thatbothare.
In post 1026, Klingoncelt wrote:To me, Willow looks scummier than Acryon.