I wouldn't be taking them seriously right now.
Town top, scum at the bottom. I've played with him a few times so know this.
Creature, what excitement were you expecting
In post 42, TheSoldier wrote:So is what we've seen so far normal for Kain, or is it just RVS silliness?
In post 40, Ranger wrote:About 50/50 I'd guess? I'd have to check.TheSoldier wrote:Ranger, is it common for you to not vote in your first post?
I'll take your word on it. What about Klingon's single post is scummier than zefiend's single post? Because I actually feel the opposite about them.
@Kop: Why did you answer for Ranger in 14?
@Nahdia: Which posts give you the feeling that Masq is trying hard to look town?
In post 78, GoodNightMsGreen wrote:
1. It's actually "Wisdom of the Crowds".
2. It's probably a bit late for that now.
In post 71, TheSoldier wrote:@GoodNight: Early thoughts on people other than Kain?
I'm in the process of trying to establish some. This head just got out of a really gnarly game, so give it a bit.
Thoughts I do have:
-Ranger I want to think is Town, the teasing really reminds me of something I do as both alignments in Newbie games but it's a lot more open than that and feels right.
-Masquerade is giving me some vaguely newbTownish vibes.
-I feel like I should have a read on Creature but I don't.
-You're asking the right questions and look pretty Town but I have this weird feeling something's wrong with your tone. I definitely need to go back and remind myself what you sounded like last time we played though.
-Kop feels a little underwhelming but we'll see where that goes.
~gm
In post 81, Creature wrote:In post 71, TheSoldier wrote:@Creature: Why do you think you're being voted? (This is a real question, less strange than it seems at first glance)
Wasn't I voted? Unless you mean lynched.
I didn't think I was being lynched, I was curious about Ranger's reads.
In post 87, Creature wrote:In post 86, Kop wrote:In post 81, Creature wrote:In post 71, TheSoldier wrote:@Creature: Why do you think you're being voted? (This is a real question, less strange than it seems at first glance)
Wasn't I voted? Unless you mean lynched.
I didn't think I was being lynched, I was curious about Ranger's reads.
Sorry if I'm butting in.
But the whole context of that quote you quoted doesn't mean lynched, the question is, why do you think you're being voted? If the question was aimed at being lynched, there are only a few people voting for you, and haven't designated you as lynch priority so it's far from meaning lynched.
I am being voted for being at the bottom of Ranger's readlist, this is why I asked him why he's scum reading me the most.
In post 92, ɀefiend wrote:VOTE: Kop
Posts read as fluff and pointless questions. And I'll echo this since it was ignored:
In post 71, TheSoldier wrote:@Kop: You've been passive so far. Why no attempts to engage?
In post 96, Willowmeadow wrote:acryon wrote:Any posts pinging you thusfar?
In post 85, Masquerade wrote:Hey Willow, can I call you Willow? Do you have any reads so far you'd like to share?
Yeah you can call me that.
I can't tell if Nahdia was serious in the start, but they're definitely someone who I won't forget to keep an eye on. Gut says there's something off about Creature but for now I can't put my finger on it.
I like what Ranger has been doing. Pretty original RVS strategy.
Don't know what zefiend is seeing as fluff in Kop. I'm not going to comment anything else on thisyet. I hope there's going to be more friction between them.
But in the end, KainTepes is the reason I'm afraid this day is going to end in a policy lynch. I hope he's replacing out before that, though.
In post 155, GoodNightMsGreen wrote:Or he just said he was because he forgot why he was going to say he voted her.
In post 157, GoodNightMsGreen wrote:He wasn't on my radar at the time.
In post 155, GoodNightMsGreen wrote:Or he just said he was because he forgot why he was going to say he voted her.
In post 186, Willowmeadow wrote:In post 171, Kop wrote:There shouldn't be a policy lynch. What is giving you a reason you think there is going to be a policy lynch? Do you not think we will actually find a good candidate to lynch?
I know it's going to be hard to get a 100% read on KT, but unless he does something that is scummy, then yeah we can progress on that, but for policy lynching him, no.
I said I'm afraid it will end into a policy lynch, but I completely agree that it should not. What's making me afraid? KainTepes' earlier behaviour, obviously. If there were 13 of me in this game, it would probably happen. I hope others don't get as easily annoyed as I sometimes do. Then again, I have no idea what happened to them lately but I hope they won't continue what they did earlier. Currently there's nothing to worry about.
Will look into acryon and GoodNightMsGreen's scene now.
In post 246, KainTepes wrote:I AGREE, CREATURE IS PROBABLY TOWN,,
MASQUERADE HAS BEEN SUSPICIOUS MORE OFTEN...
Mod edit: Alright, your last few posts have been pure capslock, giving you a warning now, please remember rule #14.
In post 461, pisskop wrote:why are you so focused on it?
this is clearly theory, so y u so vested in defending people who arent you?
In post 465, pisskop wrote:fair enough.
rangers real issue is that she is defending herself using ad hoc attacks.
In post 466, pisskop wrote:Im the moron ranger, but youll be the one who dies
In post 318, Klingoncelt wrote:Finished list:
Acryon - Lean Town
Willowmeadow - Lean Town
Creature - Null
GoodNightMsGreen - Null
Kop - Null
Pisskop - Null
Ranger - Null
Reubus Swagrid - Null
KainTepes - Lean Scum
Nahdia - Lean Scum
Masquerade - Scum
In post 793, Masquerade wrote:I don't feel comfortable talking about the setup. All I know is there are 3 mafia,maybe a SK as well,and we need to lynch them. We already have 2 down, 2 more scum to go.
In post 795, Nahdia wrote:what the heck is thisIn post 788, Kop wrote:I've read the last few pages, and Acryon can't have slipped up that easy, surely?
In post 792, Klingoncelt wrote:In post 791, Kop wrote:I wouldn't mind a Kingoncelt wagon.
VOTE: Klingoncelt
Twice in this game, he has popped in, put them at L-1 and left. Yes I am aware SS flipped the SK, but that doesn't alter anything, it doesn't change the possibilities of who could be what.
King, talk me through your thought process. You voted for Acryon, without a reason to put him to L-1. Now this is your last read list:
In post 318, Klingoncelt wrote:Finished list:
Acryon - Lean Town
Willowmeadow - Lean Town
Creature - Null
GoodNightMsGreen - Null
Kop - Null
Pisskop - Null
Ranger - Null
Reubus Swagrid - Null
KainTepes - Lean Scum
Nahdia - Lean Scum
Masquerade - Scum
I haven't seen you chase Masquerade or voted for him, since posting this. Considering he's in your scum pile.
But now your voting for Acryon, for no reason, or even interacted with him, and you have him leaning town. What's changed.
I'm sheeping Pisskop.
As you can see I'm V/LA right now, meaning I can't devote as much time to the game as I'd like.
So for now I sheep the player I trust the most.
That could change sometime Monday...
In post 799, Nahdia wrote:that's..... what? acryon is good therefore he can't be bad? you've lost me lmaoIn post 797, Kop wrote:In post 795, Nahdia wrote:what the heck is thisIn post 788, Kop wrote:I've read the last few pages, and Acryon can't have slipped up that easy, surely?
It's simple, I don't think such an experienced player like Acryon can slip up as easily as he appears too.
Does it not compute that this wagon has gained momentum quite quickly? and so easily?
So what are you suggesting with wagon speed. The wagon gained momentum too quickly so there must be scum on it? Who is the scum in this wagon? Why are you ignoring the possibility of a bus?
In post 900, acryon wrote:In post 899, pisskop wrote:I agree. Ranger has been largely abscent too
Which is where my thoughts on his opportunism come in. I believe he has chosen his absence and presence deliberately based on what kind of pull he feels he could have.
In post 1018, Willowmeadow wrote:KopknowsI'm town - could be scum.
Consider this a prodge. While we're at it, yeah, I'm VT. That won't change anything and you know it.
In post 1047, acryon wrote:
Ok, so you're the cop.
Your N1 investigation was on a likely investigative-immune SK, meaning he shows up as innocent.
Your N2 investigation you never told the town about, despite it clearing another player.
Your N3 investigation we also haven't heard about.
In post 1195, ChannelDelibird wrote:Hey Kop, I see you posting in other games
In post 1198, ChannelDelibird wrote:In post 1196, Kop wrote:In post 1195, ChannelDelibird wrote:Hey Kop, I see you posting in other games
2 posts, none of great substance.
I am here now. Wanna talk?
I'll be in and out this evening but absolutely. I think you're scum. Talk me out of it.
In post 1201, acryon wrote:Hm, not sure if scum or town are more likely to be this transparent about the reason. My gut tells me that scum would try to conjure up a legit reason, but they may also just drop it if they know they don't have something good. That being said, if they didn't have something real, I'm not sure they would do it in the first place without something set up.