I took a few years off, but used to be well know and to some widely disliked.
And snarky what's with this vote? I need a better explanation.
In post 30, chilledtea wrote:In post 24, drmyshottyizsik wrote:
I took a few years off, but used to be well know and to some widely disliked.
And snarky what's with this vote? I need a better explanation.
lol
VOTE: drmyshottyizsik
I think I got my first scum. This is easy.
In post 32, chilledtea wrote:In post 31, drmyshottyizsik wrote:In post 30, chilledtea wrote:In post 24, drmyshottyizsik wrote:
I took a few years off, but used to be well know and to some widely disliked.
And snarky what's with this vote? I need a better explanation.
lol
VOTE: drmyshottyizsik
I think I got my first scum. This is easy.
*Claps* You're great at this!
Thank you. Now just tell me who you'r scumpartners are and you might just live to see the end of this day.
In post 39, chilledtea wrote:
Don't be mad that you got caught so early. Just try better next time.
In post 46, Killthestory wrote:Let's be clear that that's still scummy as fuck.
In post 52, KainTepes wrote:In post 31, drmyshottyizsik wrote:In post 30, chilledtea wrote:In post 24, drmyshottyizsik wrote:
I took a few years off, but used to be well know and to some widely disliked.
And snarky what's with this vote? I need a better explanation.
lol
VOTE: drmyshottyizsik
I think I got my first scum. This is easy.
*Claps* You're great at this!
so... YOU ADMIT TO BEING SCUM?
VOTE: shottytea
In post 73, Lowell wrote:Nope. Jumping on wagons is awesome. Townread on snarky.
In post 77, duppin wrote:In post 75, drmyshottyizsik wrote:In post 73, Lowell wrote:Nope. Jumping on wagons is awesome. Townread on snarky.
Are you really trying to deflect that hard?
I think you and snark are scum buddies.
unvote
vote lowell
Um,
VOTE: shotty
In post 79, Killthestory wrote:In post 78, Almost50 wrote:Interesting musical chairs going on there. Could someone from each side please present a case on either drmyshottyizsik or Lowell?
In post 73, Lowell wrote:Nope. Jumping on wagons is awesome. Townread on snarky.
Need I say more?
In post 88, chilledtea wrote:In my opinion drmyshottyizsik is scum. He reacted way too seriously to my joke post.
In post 135, Rhaegar wrote:@DUPIN
Well, its good to know what you actually think : ). You should do that more often.
I'm defending shotty because I've played with him at least 5-6 times before, if not more. I've seen him lynched day 1 as town too many damn times to fall for that. And in all fairness, I've been guilty of getting him lynched day 1 a couple of those times. It's a lesson I've learned, and I have no interest in making the same mistake again. It's an easy wagon for scum to push, which is why I think there is scum on it.
Because of his playstyle he is a hard player to accurately read, which is why I reserve the right to do that at a later point. I concede that he could be scum, but I contend that his general behavior and attitude so far fits with both his town and scum play and therefor isn't useful in getting a read on him.
In post 137, pisskop wrote:nonsense. ill be reading you based on motivation andpersonality, not stale meta and reputation
In post 143, Killthestory wrote:Once again, I've been banned for my scum play before, so yes, I'd consider this more passive than my scum play. Also, looking at my past games, I'm not any more aggressive than any of them where I was confirmed to be town. This essentially nullifies your vote since if I'm playing normal as my other town games, wouldn't that mean that I wasn't playing as aggressively as my scumgame?
In post 152, Lowell wrote:In post 110, Killthestory wrote:no shit shotty's an easy mislynch, i could post a single time in this game and could probably lynch him.
Tell me more about this "mislynch"?
In post 158, Lowell wrote:No the point is he just threw out there that you're a "mislynch", implying he knows who is town and who isn't. Scumslip there is what I'm getting at.
In post 231, Killthestory wrote:In post 230, Autti wrote:In post 229, Killthestory wrote:Man you must be another VI Town. PLing is for plebians who can't scumread. I mean I've already found scum in Snarky, but everyone's too focused on stupid shit.
Actually Rhaegar started the wagon on Snarky.
Doesn't matter much right now, I'll give Rhae credit when the game ends, but for now I'm just trying to get scum lynched.
In post 240, duppin wrote:Chilledtea can you please read my posts?
Rhaegar is defending Shotty by pushing scum on the people voting on him. That is also how he is defending him.
In post 255, Killthestory wrote:No that's fucking stupid. This isn't a child forum lmfao
In post 266, Rhaegar wrote:
Shotty is a bad player. Bad players are easy targets for lynches regardless of their alignment and therefor get targeted by scum early on. I chose to examine the Shotty wagon to see if there was anyone suspicious on it. I did not call everyone who voted Shotty scum, simply that it would be good to see if any of them did anything scummy when they voted Shotty. That is how I ended up with my scum read on Snowman, which I have already thoroughly detailed.
[/u]
In post 273, drmyshottyizsik wrote:In post 266, Rhaegar wrote:
Shotty is a bad player. Bad players are easy targets for lynches regardless of their alignment and therefor get targeted by scum early on. I chose to examine the Shotty wagon to see if there was anyone suspicious on it. I did not call everyone who voted Shotty scum, simply that it would be good to see if any of them did anything scummy when they voted Shotty. That is how I ended up with my scum read on Snowman, which I have already thoroughly detailed.
[/u]
I'm not bad, I'm actually quite proven on selecting scum. However, I tend to be a tad disagreeable and a tad underwhelming with thoughts and analysis for a few days at a time. I preffer long case and sitting back to observe and poke. I think you get a much better idea of the story when you watch more than one person at a time. This usually means I like to observe the social behaviors of people and there interactions, but also see what happens when they aren't interacted with and that is key. I've found that scum, when unmentioned tend to bandwagon and insult people, where as town, while it seems counterintuitive, will tend to stay a bit quieter and either ask a question and wait or try and bring new ideas or information to the table. The is why I would really like killstory to answer my question. Do you have social issues or are you provocative, bandwagoning, and pot stirring scum?
In post 296, Killthestory wrote:id rather be called an asshole then a scum because only one of those is true. the other is lie that is meant to hurt my feelings.
In post 298, Killthestory wrote:do you think i give a fuck lmfao? spend your time doing something useful
In post 302, Killthestory wrote:No,* I just choose not to always type the word the. Also, I'm not getting pretentious, I either was,* or I wasn't.
In post 307, KainTepes wrote:I believe that KTS is scum,, but AUTTI, what makes you think KTS as scum would find it BENEFICIAL to antagonize people and draw attention to himself????
In post 316, Autti wrote:In post 313, KainTepes wrote:but AUTTI, wont KTS just find himself more easily LYNCHED because of that?? why do you think he thinks this is a good idea?
He has used self meta as a defense, and the fact that he hasn't scum-hunted other than snarky indicates he really isn't interested.
To be honest,he thinks being offensive is somehow acceptable and tolerable. Despite the fact he has been banned previously for it.
In post 319, pisskop wrote:Its like a who can beat their head into a rock the hardest contest
In post 321, pisskop wrote:I almsot asked to replace out of this fuckfest
In post 323, pisskop wrote:In post 322, drmyshottyizsik wrote:In post 321, pisskop wrote:I almsot asked to replace out of this fuckfest
Please do, you have added nothing but vulgarity and lurking.
I can see why nobody likes you and youre considered easy
In post 326, pisskop wrote:Lets get one thing clear.
If you werent so much of a CantGetRight we whouldnt have stalled.
Weve got another player acting like hes selling lemonade at the white house and a third who's putting in so much effort my eyes bleed when I look at this post.
In post 329, pisskop wrote:We already have kain, we dont need a second. Nor a second moderator
In post 346, Killthestory wrote:In post 326, pisskop wrote:
Weve got another player acting like hes selling lemonade at the white house and a third who's putting in so much effort my eyes bleed when I look at this post.
this is actually a hilarious description of me. im going to use this in the future
In post 370, Almost50 wrote:
In post 362, KainTepes wrote:CAN WE ALL VOTE CHILLEDTEA,,!!!!!
KT is trying to derail the SS wagon it seems. If SS flips red KT is confirmed scum in my book.
VOTE: SS <<< L-1
Time to claim, my friend.
In post 379, Rhaegar wrote:As to snarkysnowman, this is really all that needs to be said in support of a lynch.
http://forum.mafiascum.net/search.php?a ... 3&sr=posts
In post 381, Autti wrote:Claim won't really produce anything.
Not saying he should claim.
But in this setup everyone is either a cop or doc. Claiming doesn't provide us with much