Open 638: Friends and Enemies! (And Enemies!) - GAME OVER!

Kop · Post Post #11 (isolation #0) » Tue May 10, 2016 7:49 am

VOTE: Randomidget

This is most certainly, Random.

Kop · Post Post #104 (isolation #1) » Thu May 12, 2016 8:35 am

VOTE: kasumeat

I like this vote simply because it appears he isn't reading the thread in great deal like town would.

Kop · Post Post #431 (isolation #2) » Thu May 19, 2016 4:01 am

In post 430, BTD6_maker wrote:Purely to confirm whether KTS's claim is worth listening to. Everyone actively does not want him to be lynched, despite no one wanting to confirm his claim or counterclaim. We should probably play as if KTS had never claimed, which means at least considering the three as potential scum.

Why are you rolefishing? It answers questions in regards to the claim, but you are actively saying I don't want the masons to claim, but would like them to back KTS claim up. Which is it?

Kop · Post Post #435 (isolation #3) » Thu May 19, 2016 7:18 am

In post 434, BTD6_maker wrote:
In post 433, Randomnamechange wrote:BTD6 you are being sooooo scummy right now.
Kop, any other comments on the game?
I'm not sure how that's scummy. I am not trying to force a rolefish. What I am saying is that if we establish that no one should counterclaim then anyone could have claimed without it meaning anything. KTS's claim means nothing now if Town are just going to accept it as is.

I would understand that if it was just a normal role being claimed, but masons, it's like your suggesting the only way this is going to go down is if the others come out. I'm not claiming anything, but I don't know why you are persisting to get the others out. If he is telling the truth, then it will come out eventually.

Kop · Post Post #467 (isolation #4) » Thu May 19, 2016 11:29 pm

So in 3 hours you have gone from wanting a no lynch, to putting a vote on a wagon already on it's way to forming?

The accusations on yourself, is drawn from the fact you keep talking about the other masons. Instead of laying it off and forgetting about it for now, you spent nearly a page and a half talking about it.

Kop · Post Post #550 (isolation #5) » Sun May 22, 2016 5:54 am

VOTE: BTD6_maker

Kop · Post Post #553 (isolation #6) » Sun May 22, 2016 6:07 am

In post 552, BTD6_maker wrote:
In post 550, Kop wrote:VOTE: BTD6_maker
Do you have any actual reasons for your vote?

Yeah, I don't think your town.

Kop · Post Post #556 (isolation #7) » Sun May 22, 2016 6:53 am

In post 555, BTD6_maker wrote:
In post 553, Kop wrote:
In post 552, BTD6_maker wrote:
In post 550, Kop wrote:VOTE: BTD6_maker
Do you have any actual reasons for your vote?
Yeah, I don't think your town.
Why do you scumread me?

The manner you handled the claim, and still persisted to push the case. It seemed that you wanted the other masons to come out and back it up, something town don't want, especially on day one.

Kop · Post Post #649 (isolation #8) » Tue May 24, 2016 9:22 am

I can see where ranger is coming from
Hammers get more attention, town aren't generally bothered about that attention because they can prove there towniness and gain trust, scum don't want attention because they are lying and whilst being under pressure due to the unwanted attention, caused by a hammer does lead to contradictions, slips etc.

Kop · Post Post #1044 (isolation #9) » Thu Jun 02, 2016 2:40 am

Good game, even though I never really participated. I never really got a good chance because everytime I came on, another phase had been and gone. I even said in the mason topic that KTS and O were brutal

Kuroi, I'd like to pre in to your new game, if that is possible.