Open 667: Day 3
-
-
Pepchoninga
-
-
Pepchoninga Mafia Scum
-
-
Pepchoninga Mafia Scum
-
-
Pepchoninga Mafia Scum
-
-
Pepchoninga Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1665
- Joined: November 30, 2016
-
-
Pepchoninga Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1665
- Joined: November 30, 2016
-
-
Pepchoninga Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1665
- Joined: November 30, 2016
Then why the fuck say you have a strategy?In post 26, Creature wrote:VOTE: SnarkySnowman
I have a strategy to win this game, but I won't reveal it yet. I don't want to waste my precious recourses making scum aware of them.-
-
Pepchoninga Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1665
- Joined: November 30, 2016
Why did you have to bring Alisae in this?In post 32, keyenpeydee wrote:Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm......... You sound Alisae. is this alisae alt?
-
-
Pepchoninga Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1665
- Joined: November 30, 2016
Do something about it, I wanna play that shit so hard >.<
-
-
Pepchoninga Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1665
- Joined: November 30, 2016
His name being said still triggers meIn post 36, keyenpeydee wrote:
I just said he sounded like Alisae. LOL.In post 34, Pepchoninga wrote:
Why did you have to bring Alisae in this?In post 32, keyenpeydee wrote:Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm......... You sound Alisae. is this alisae alt?
Don't worry. Professor McGonagall will send you your Hogwarts Letter soon.In post 35, Pepchoninga wrote:Do something about it, I wanna play that shit so hard >.<
IVE WAITED FOR YEARS!-
-
Pepchoninga Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1665
- Joined: November 30, 2016
I could see it being a bluff.In post 41, Celtic wrote:It is harmful. You just made yourself a NK target, so if you do have a strategy you better share by the end of day before ou die.-
-
Pepchoninga Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1665
- Joined: November 30, 2016
Generate discussionIn post 43, algebra wrote:I see it as a way to generate discussion, which is why I'm townreading I'm at the moment. If it was a bluff, what is he trying to accomplish?
Tho you can't get much discussion of such a bold statement. Well I guess he have, but still.-
-
Pepchoninga Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1665
- Joined: November 30, 2016
SAYS THE KING OF PRODSIn post 46, Gamma Emerald wrote:Hopefully he doesn't lurk as much as his main.
Idk, you are sticking with this nickname for the rest of your life.-
-
Pepchoninga Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1665
- Joined: November 30, 2016
Makes no sense for you to become a potential night kill with your first post. Why not reveal it now?In post 49, Creature wrote:
I'll reveal the strategy before day ends.In post 41, Celtic wrote:It is harmful. You just made yourself a NK target, so if you do have a strategy you better share by the end of day before ou die.-
-
Pepchoninga Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1665
- Joined: November 30, 2016
Sorry, Prod King, won't bother you with that again.In post 55, Gamma Emerald wrote:
THAT'S ONE GAME JACKASS.In post 48, Pepchoninga wrote:
SAYS THE KING OF PRODSIn post 46, Gamma Emerald wrote:Hopefully he doesn't lurk as much as his main.
Idk, you are sticking with this nickname for the rest of your life.
*insert sarcasm here*-
-
Pepchoninga Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1665
- Joined: November 30, 2016
Great, we got a game solver.In post 56, Gamma Emerald wrote:
VOTE: VijaradaIn post 50, Vijarada wrote:VOTE: gamma
game-breaking strategies are terrible. please don't do dumb shit ty
I didn't propose a strategy, Crrature did.
Creature - Vij scumteam gg-
-
Pepchoninga Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1665
- Joined: November 30, 2016
Why u always lyin'In post 60, Celtic wrote:Gamma how are you so good at this game?-
-
Pepchoninga Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1665
- Joined: November 30, 2016
Thats some good shit.In post 71, Gamma Emerald wrote:-
-
Pepchoninga Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1665
- Joined: November 30, 2016
We gonna have fun ^^In post 73, Indigo wrote:Oh man, Pep and Gamma in this game too...shoot.-
-
Pepchoninga Mafia Scum
-
-
Pepchoninga Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1665
- Joined: November 30, 2016
Wait...this all makes sense...I asked the little fucker to not join this game so I can play one game without him...In post 76, keyenpeydee wrote:
I told you she's AlisaeIn post 75, Pepchoninga wrote:Wait...Indigo do you know me?
AND HE MADE ANNOTHER ACCOUNT?
DAMN YOU BOTE.-
-
Pepchoninga Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1665
- Joined: November 30, 2016
-
-
Pepchoninga Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1665
- Joined: November 30, 2016
Were you an Admin at GDA? Answer this or I will asume you are Alisae!In post 79, Indigo wrote:Im not Alisae. Ask me some other question. Maybe move away from the Alisae thing. Just saying that the game is more important. I am glad people i know are here though. Need to continue with these healthy conversations.-
-
Pepchoninga Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1665
- Joined: November 30, 2016
Shit...In post 83, Vijarada wrote:
boy oh boy you look like you're faking being a "casual random townie ROFL"In post 68, Pepchoninga wrote:
Sorry, Prod King, won't bother you with that again.In post 55, Gamma Emerald wrote:
THAT'S ONE GAME JACKASS.In post 48, Pepchoninga wrote:
SAYS THE KING OF PRODSIn post 46, Gamma Emerald wrote:Hopefully he doesn't lurk as much as his main.
Idk, you are sticking with this nickname for the rest of your life.
*insert sarcasm here*
VOTE: pepchoniga-
-
Pepchoninga Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1665
- Joined: November 30, 2016
Key teach me where to find those godly HP Gifs *.*
-
-
Pepchoninga Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1665
- Joined: November 30, 2016
How did you get to this?In post 90, Creature wrote:Scum is probably between keyen, Snarky and Bork.-
-
Pepchoninga Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1665
- Joined: November 30, 2016
Ok, I will take this as a "Bye RVS vote"In post 93, Börk Börk wrote:Seeing four pages here already, I got my hopes up that there would be some proper discussion to pick apart and use to scumhunt. But alas, it's a whole lot of fluff and alt fishing.
VOTE: pepchoninga for contributing almost nothing useful despite having the highest postcount. Because that's not useful at all, and yet artificially inflating one's postcount can prove to be useful as a false argument against one's lynch at a later stage.
Your post is absolutely bad for these reasons: In those 4 pages, we have started a conversation. This conversation is full of fluff. And it was untill we got somethings real to discuss about. Creature seemed to want to give a good thing for us to prodice content but he basically ended the topic himself. There is nothing for us to do except keep posting until we have something real to talk about. And your vote is exactly that. Using the not producing content as an argument for a lynch in the first 4 pages is bad.-
-
Pepchoninga Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1665
- Joined: November 30, 2016
You voted me for around 10-15 posts one of wich was confirming my spot and the other were shit posts mostly not related to the game, so you are one to talk.In post 101, Börk Börk wrote:
After two posts of his, one of which was confirming his spot?In post 100, Creature wrote:Feeling better about a Snarky lynch.-
-
Pepchoninga Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1665
- Joined: November 30, 2016
That isn't good reasoning, since:In post 108, Celtic wrote:Keyen is town based on his calm and logical reaction to the votes on him.
1. He has no need to react differently, since it's early game.
2. Scum are much likelier to try and react calm to votes as to not slip something.-
-
Pepchoninga Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1665
- Joined: November 30, 2016
Well Celtics. It's not something that you should base your read on.In post 111, keyenpeydee wrote:@Pep, what is the bad reasoning? Mine or Celtic?-
-
Pepchoninga Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1665
- Joined: November 30, 2016
You are defending his action without trying ti understand him first.In post 116, Indigo wrote:I dont see a reason for Bork to come in swinging with a vote that, to me at least, is not RVS. I also dont aee a reason for him to be picked apart for it either. Healthy conversation boys, lets keep it healthy.
Now, having said the above, that commotion would be perfect muddy water for scum to hide in. Keep a keen eye.
And yes, scum could use this as a hiding place. Defending his early actions could be used to get to this hiding place.-
-
Pepchoninga Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1665
- Joined: November 30, 2016
It doesn't make it any less valid but it also doesn't make it any more believable. It's rushed and you really have no solid thing to go off from in that vote.In post 120, Börk Börk wrote:
Yes, I've played one game on this site and that's it.In post 107, keyenpeydee wrote:@Bork, are you to new to mafia?
Which doesn't make any of what I say any less valid.-
-
Pepchoninga Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1665
- Joined: November 30, 2016
Your reads seem strange. You don't really seem to be interested in being part of the conversation but rather just say how a certain of acting look town. Let me ask you, what is your definition of a towns behavior?In post 122, Celtic wrote:Bork's confidence reads town to me.
Also do you have padt experience on the game?-
-
Pepchoninga Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1665
- Joined: November 30, 2016
While your thinking is good, you need to understand that fluff doesn't mean scum. No, scum don't always try to make fluffy posts to distract town. They try to act like a town would, this includes scumhunt and all the other stuff, but they also manipulate town into an opinion. You cannot say someone is scum of the saying that they don't produce content in RVS. Content in RVS is hardly produced. The first players to say something strange or out of the ordinary is what creates the content, hence gets the game started. No, you don't have evidence. Evidence is you quoting a post and explaining what you feel is scummy about it.In post 123, Börk Börk wrote:
Instead of posting fluff and relying on someone else to produce content, you could have tried to do so yourself. That's why I voted you, and it's completely backed up by evidence.In post 105, Pepchoninga wrote:
Ok, I will take this as a "Bye RVS vote"In post 93, Börk Börk wrote:Seeing four pages here already, I got my hopes up that there would be some proper discussion to pick apart and use to scumhunt. But alas, it's a whole lot of fluff and alt fishing.
VOTE: pepchoninga for contributing almost nothing useful despite having the highest postcount. Because that's not useful at all, and yet artificially inflating one's postcount can prove to be useful as a false argument against one's lynch at a later stage.
Your post is absolutely bad for these reasons: In those 4 pages, we have started a conversation. This conversation is full of fluff. And it was untill we got somethings real to discuss about. Creature seemed to want to give a good thing for us to prodice content but he basically ended the topic himself. There is nothing for us to do except keep posting until we have something real to talk about. And your vote is exactly that. Using the not producing content as an argument for a lynch in the first 4 pages is bad.
It is beneficial to mafia to produce posts which lack content and distract town from keeping the game moving, as in the end town will have less time to dedicate to scumhunting. Therefore my case on you is also directly related to scummy behaviour, and not just policy.-
-
Pepchoninga Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1665
- Joined: November 30, 2016
I'm not defending myself. I'm saying why I belive your thinking is wrong. I don't have valid point since I don't have valid reads. I don't have valid reads, since the real game has just started.In post 125, Börk Börk wrote:
Oh, and where are your solid arguments and valid points? Oh wait. Nowhere. At least I'm making an effort, wen beyond simply defending myself.In post 121, Pepchoninga wrote:
It doesn't make it any less valid but it also doesn't make it any more believable. It's rushed and you really have no solid thing to go off from in that vote.In post 120, Börk Börk wrote:
Yes, I've played one game on this site and that's it.In post 107, keyenpeydee wrote:@Bork, are you to new to mafia?
Which doesn't make any of what I say any less valid.-
-
Pepchoninga Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1665
- Joined: November 30, 2016
This post made me laughIn post 129, Börk Börk wrote:
The alt talk is scummy because it make you look like you're moving the discussion forward, while not actually doing so, as alt fishing has no direct correlation to scumhunting. It's especially bad early on in the game, when we NEED some solid discussion. So it's scummy behaviour.In post 103, keyenpeydee wrote:
Says the one who's throwing scum reads based on shit posts. You clearly and obviously refused to do it because 'your basing your reads on non-game related talks (shit posts)' and that's what makes it so fake and unbelievable.In post 99, Börk Börk wrote:
Says the person who has contributed fuck-all to the discussion.In post 98, keyenpeydee wrote:
Your posts are unbelievable and fake.In post 97, Börk Börk wrote:
Give me a good reason to do so.In post 95, keyenpeydee wrote:@Bork, Can you quote things that looked 'useful' to you?
Asking someone to quote someone else's useful posts is both the laziest and least useful thing anyone has done so far.
Why?
We have four pages. If you're looking for content to make reads off then go find it yourself. I've explained my read, and I feel that there is no need to back it up with evidence, especially when the request is phrased in sich a way that puts the accused individual in a more positive light. This just makes me think that you two are scumbuddies.
And why isn't it useful? Because you can do your own scumhunting without piggybacking me.
You also refused to quote some 'helpful' posts because there's 4 pages and can't seem to see a helpful post to solidify your reads against me and you also try to make me appear scum by being a fucking lazy scumass person.
VOTE: Bork
Why do you think bringing the alt talk make me scum?
And the fact that your main defense here seems to be ad hominem attacks against me (i.e. 'fucking lazy scumass person') rather than my content just serves to solidify my point that you're not producing good content right now.
Also, for someone who claims to be 13, you sure use a lot of profanity. Just saying. Calm down a bit.-
-
Pepchoninga Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1665
- Joined: November 30, 2016
Scum do admittedly enjoy staying in RVS, but also me not screaming for an escape of RVS isn't scummy. I also did try to get a discussion out of the bold Creature comment, but he ultimately shut this topic 'till a later time.In post 132, Börk Börk wrote:
You make a fair point. However here I'm choosing to differentiate between 'being scum' and 'being scummy'. I'll say that you are correct about your fluff posting not necessarily meaning that you are scum. But regardless of whether you are scum or not, the outcome of delaying the transition out of RVS ultimately favours scum. Hence it is a scummy action.In post 126, Pepchoninga wrote:
While your thinking is good, you need to understand that fluff doesn't mean scum. No, scum don't always try to make fluffy posts to distract town. They try to act like a town would, this includes scumhunt and all the other stuff, but they also manipulate town into an opinion. You cannot say someone is scum of the saying that they don't produce content in RVS. Content in RVS is hardly produced. The first players to say something strange or out of the ordinary is what creates the content, hence gets the game started. No, you don't have evidence. Evidence is you quoting a post and explaining what you feel is scummy about it.In post 123, Börk Börk wrote:
Instead of posting fluff and relying on someone else to produce content, you could have tried to do so yourself. That's why I voted you, and it's completely backed up by evidence.In post 105, Pepchoninga wrote:
Ok, I will take this as a "Bye RVS vote"In post 93, Börk Börk wrote:Seeing four pages here already, I got my hopes up that there would be some proper discussion to pick apart and use to scumhunt. But alas, it's a whole lot of fluff and alt fishing.
VOTE: pepchoninga for contributing almost nothing useful despite having the highest postcount. Because that's not useful at all, and yet artificially inflating one's postcount can prove to be useful as a false argument against one's lynch at a later stage.
Your post is absolutely bad for these reasons: In those 4 pages, we have started a conversation. This conversation is full of fluff. And it was untill we got somethings real to discuss about. Creature seemed to want to give a good thing for us to prodice content but he basically ended the topic himself. There is nothing for us to do except keep posting until we have something real to talk about. And your vote is exactly that. Using the not producing content as an argument for a lynch in the first 4 pages is bad.
It is beneficial to mafia to produce posts which lack content and distract town from keeping the game moving, as in the end town will have less time to dedicate to scumhunting. Therefore my case on you is also directly related to scummy behaviour, and not just policy.
You seem to agree with what I'm saying, yet your vote is still on me because you think that I delayed us getting out of RVS?-
-
Pepchoninga Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1665
- Joined: November 30, 2016
Wow, a buddy attempt I see...you know this is usually pretty scummy, especially when it comes out of the waters like that.In post 139, Vijarada wrote:who should i be voting, bork? i think you should vote indigo with me.-
-
Pepchoninga Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1665
- Joined: November 30, 2016
I'm pretty sure what I read was you asking him who you should vote and then making a clear attempt for a buddy.In post 141, Vijarada wrote:yo pepchoniga, would you be interested in free cupcakes and finger foods at the Vijarada Friend Buffet?
really though, i was asking him who he wanted to lynch because of his full unvote, which is pressure not buddying.
And yes, I love cupcakes, especially when they are free-
-
Pepchoninga Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1665
- Joined: November 30, 2016
You should convince people with good points and solid cases and not by asking them to join your wagon.In post 144, Vijarada wrote:pepcho buddy i think you should vote indigo with me.
keyen my bro, vote indigo cause we'refriends
creature your plan sucks, but it would be redeemed if you voted indigo with me, man.
seriously i'm just pushing my preferred lynch. would you prefer it if i just told people what to do in a non-friendly way? BORK YOU SHIT! GET YOUR ASS INTO LINE AND VOTE WITH ME!!!!!
Also please. Just no theatricals xD-
-
Pepchoninga Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1665
- Joined: November 30, 2016
a) Just sounds totally anti-town however you look at it.In post 146, Celtic wrote:@Pep, I'm not participating in the conversation because
a) it doesn't concern me
b) I'm laying out the framework of the game that I will build upon throughout.
I do have lots of experience playing mafia.
I'm not going to answer your other question because that gives mafia the advantage of knowing what to fabricate for me to townread them.
b) I can roll with that, but that doesn't mean the conversation do not concern you.
And no, this is so bullshit. You say what looks town to you, yet you won't say what is your way of reading town. This makes no sense.-
-
Pepchoninga Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1665
- Joined: November 30, 2016
No.In post 154, Vijarada wrote:oh boy we should really lynch ^.-
-
Pepchoninga Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1665
- Joined: November 30, 2016
-
-
Pepchoninga Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1665
- Joined: November 30, 2016
-
-
Pepchoninga Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1665
- Joined: November 30, 2016
-
-
Pepchoninga Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1665
- Joined: November 30, 2016
Why does life exist? Am I omnipotent? Or omniscient...does the sun burn it's fuel and are gonna die in 1 bilion years? Good questions. Bad reasoning?In post 162, Vijarada wrote:pep why do you still have a random vote on keyen instead of a good vote elsewhere?
Same answer to your question. Why do I? I don't have any better reasoning.
*psst, I don't have any other solid readss*-
-
Pepchoninga Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1665
- Joined: November 30, 2016
Jesus dude, I love you.In post 163, keyenpeydee wrote:
how many fucks I give about what you think?In post 129, Börk Börk wrote: Also, for someone who claims to be 13, you sure use a lot of profanity. Just saying. Calm down a bit.
Spoiler:-
-
Pepchoninga Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1665
- Joined: November 30, 2016
This feel like scum trying to influence us and manipulate our actions by presenting facts in numbers.In post 168, Creature wrote:Also, we don't need to wait until Day 3 to start lynching scum.
If we lynch scum today, we have 19/35 chance of lynching the other scum opposed to 2/5 chance of lynching scum in LyLo.-
-
Pepchoninga Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1665
- Joined: November 30, 2016
Me? No...I'm just saying that when you make such a post saying we need to lynch scim from Day one, wich is common sence really, presented with those kind of facts, just feels like a scum trying to be town and in turn lead to a misslynch.In post 173, Creature wrote:You were planning to nolynch until Day 3?-
-
Pepchoninga Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1665
- Joined: November 30, 2016
People into taking actions. From then good scum can manipulate the situation into a day one misslynch.In post 175, Creature wrote:Then what I'm trying to influence?
I suspect you would be a good player, hence a good scum.-
-
Pepchoninga Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1665
- Joined: November 30, 2016
Hmmm, not to be rude, but I'm pretty sure that I saw your profile and then it said you are 15. You know I might be mistaken but still. 13 and 15 isn't really a big gap, so calling him an irritating kid might be going a bit too far.In post 178, Börk Börk wrote:I still want to lynch Keyen for being an irritating kid, but that's independent of any scumreads. Another fishy aspect of what he's doing is being wishy-washy with his vote on me. Makes a case that he evidently believes in and then shortly afterwards, when it's clear that nobody has followed his vote, he takes it away, instantly changes his opinion, and is keen to move along so that he can avoid all scrutiny for his voting.
Having thought about it, I don't really know whether I want to hop onto the Indigo wagon so soon. Considering how many posts he's made, I don't think it's even possible to have a solid case. While this doesn't invalidate Vijarada's point, I am a bit confused as to why he's pushing his case this much. However overall it's a town-like action, as it attracts people's attention and therefore scrutiny.
Furthermore the game is still in it's early tracks. Wanna tell ya something? You don't have a strong case on keyen either. Not defending him, but giving you something to think about. Overall I belive fast serious voting like that isn't good for us to get a healthy discussion. If we all go with mad votes head first, it is just gonna be easier for scum to take over the situation. Our biggest tool is words, not votes.
Vijarada seems Town enough for now, but his actions are fishy. Would like to see hisnoater reactions to solidify an opinion.-
-
Pepchoninga Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1665
- Joined: November 30, 2016
Should we lynch you then?In post 180, Creature wrote:I thought town were supposed to lynch mafia members, not irritating kids.-
-
Pepchoninga Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1665
- Joined: November 30, 2016
Fair enough.In post 184, Creature wrote:
Well, you can, but I wouldn't like to be lynched. Also, I am neither of them.In post 183, Pepchoninga wrote:
Should we lynch you then?In post 180, Creature wrote:I thought town were supposed to lynch mafia members, not irritating kids.
I like you signature btw.-
-
Pepchoninga Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1665
- Joined: November 30, 2016
So you are a fan of how I handled her case on me then?In post 186, Celtic wrote:I'm not a fan of how Creature and Keyen are attacking Bork's case. Rather than defending Keyen using logic, they are picking at his word choice.-
-
Pepchoninga Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1665
- Joined: November 30, 2016
Yet another pointless vote.
-
-
Pepchoninga Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1665
- Joined: November 30, 2016
Don't call somebody a noob! If you want to make fun of the post there are other ways. As the mod said, keep the insult to a minimum.In post 190, keyenpeydee wrote:Bork's case against me rendered me speechless because of her level of confbias and newbieness.-
-
Pepchoninga Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1665
- Joined: November 30, 2016
-
-
Pepchoninga Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1665
- Joined: November 30, 2016
Same thing. Point there mistakes, but don't use newbie as a reason for it. It's disrespectful imo and is really a poor explanation. It's just my opinion off course but I needed to point it out.In post 197, keyenpeydee wrote:Hey Pep, I'm not calling someone noob. I said newbie.-
-
Pepchoninga Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1665
- Joined: November 30, 2016
This is such a bad post tho...no offense. I interact with specific things and form reads. I see no reason to posts reads early game when I could wait and get more interaction with everybody and hence get better view of the overall situation.In post 201, Vijarada wrote:Pepchoniga has by far the most.posts. His early game reads fame to me. More recently, he's been making a ridiculous amount of posts interacting with specific things, but he rarely gives an opinion or read. Plus in my gut his posts read so awkward.
But still guys, let's lynch indigo. She's scum! Probably with pep.
Your post is completely out of the water and for me you are advocating a misslynch with no evidence to back it up ^^ this is scum action. Not accusing, just pointing it out.-
-
Pepchoninga Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1665
- Joined: November 30, 2016
This is normal we don't have much to go about in terms of solid evidence and actual arguments so y'all try to find something out of nowhere.In post 203, Börk Börk wrote:The fact that Keyen is discrediting my case by calling me a newbie, and the fact that this is hissoledefence, is just proof that he's caught scum who has no idea what to do.
Please lynch him. Even if he somehow turns out to be a bad town player instead, at least we'll have a significantly more enjoyable game.
-