Awkward.
VOTE: ConManMick
What are you doing?
smh....In post 17, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:Terrible reaction tests.
Considering Transcend luckily isn't in this game I wouldn't necessarily call it anti-town either. Though generating any mason discussion this early in the game doesn't seem like a good thing. So sure....that seems anti-town.
Your post was on the same page as the player list? I had to look at it to confirm my doubt Transcend was in the game. Why wouldn't scum just glance at the list as well.In post 34, Alisae wrote:Nah the reaction test was that the person I mentioned wasn't on the playerlist and scum are more likely to be aware of that then town are.
In post 47, mozamis wrote:catching up...
What reaction?In post 80, boring wrote:that reaction was interesting.
I thought my post 61 laid out what I was thinking pretty clearly.In post 186, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:How does that make him scum?In post 61, havingfitz wrote: LUV reading the Hawk and Grey game last night where Grey was "slick scum" seems awfully coincidental.
You keep saying this. Why?In post 192, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:why you thought that it made LUV scum
I was implying/explicitly stating that LUVs comments seemed awfully coincidental and that I wanted more information on the matter...hence my questions to LUV.In post 195, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:If you were not implying LUV was scum with the 'awfully coincidental' comment, what was you implying?In post 193, havingfitz wrote:You keep saying this. Why?In post 192, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:why you thought that it made LUV scum
Admittedly...you're almost as active as if you'd never found it. wtfIn post 98, SnarkySnowman wrote:Admittedly I couldn't find the thread.
Ali...what about Grey's play do you not like? Despite you voting, unvoting and re-voting him can't find your concerns.
Coming from me, and most others I would assume, that phrase would indicate some level of disbelief...or suspicion. So reason to suspect. It caused me to question the veracity of LUVs explanation to Grey. It was not scum indictment worthy...so he did not become a scum read for it.In post 208, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:What does 'awfully coincidental' mean in relation to alignment?
I don't think this is always the case. It isn't in this case. Just an event I wanted more info on.In post 211, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:suspicion = scum read
I'm not a this tyvm.
I did but apparently it's something we'll have to deal with in this game so it wasn't worth mentioning. But since you brought it up....VC 1.3 still has a slip-up.
But why would he have happened to have read that scum game versus reading anyone else's scum (or not) games amongst this game's playerlist? Especially when the entire exchange took place over the span of less than an hour. So it wasn't like LUV saw something. Read your game that night...then commented. It was all pretty bang bang and thus pretty coincidental.In post 300, -Grey- wrote:Not that coincidental considering it was one of two completed scum games, and the second one was nothing but catch up posts.
Ali has been accused of activities that could result in outing masons. I.e. mason hunting. Why do you think in part I'm voting him?In post 367, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:Now you're voting Ali for mason hunting? Bullshit, he wasn't accused of that earlier
More mason chat. Wtf? Why is the masons identities not best hidden from town? And therefore most likely hidden from scum too.In post 399, Alisae wrote:I was bring too much attention to it, so I figured it would be a better idea to out the theory instead of keeping the information hidden from town.
Why no votes gents?In post 459, tojam2 wrote:NV (3) - SnarkySnowman, boring, ConManMick
So you don't have an answer? You suspect no one enough to vote them?In post 474, SnarkySnowman wrote:Why the worry, you in a hurry?In post 473, havingfitz wrote:Why no votes gents?In post 459, tojam2 wrote:NV (3) - SnarkySnowman, boring, ConManMick
Here.In post 480, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Is there anyone here to talk to in real time?
Hate having to do multiple catch up posts one after another.
Are you saying you feel the same way about your moz vote as you would voting Hawk?In post 500, Antihuman wrote:lynching people just cause they're not very useful usually ends up as a ml. Part of the reason moz's a temp park on my side (I think).
The same thing applies to your moz vote apparently.In post 504, Antihuman wrote:You misunderstood
I'm saying Hawk's a mediocre lynch atm and you're stuck in confbias if you think this is the optimal lynch right now
In post 506, boring wrote:{Snarky}
In post 501, havingfitz wrote:Are you saying you feel the same way about your moz vote as you would voting Hawk?In post 500, Antihuman wrote:lynching people just cause they're not very useful usually ends up as a ml. Part of the reason moz's a temp park on my side (I think).
It doesn't seem like you are considering your moz vote the same way you are the current Hawk wagon.In post 502, Antihuman wrote:Similar
In post 154, Antihuman wrote:Mixed feelings about mozamis, LUV and FP, will need more time to sort them out.
I'm not too keen on elaborating at this stage cause it makes it easy for scum to tailor their play. But I'm keeping a spreadsheet so if you think you can call me out on empty reads, I can prove your wrong anytime
VOTE: mozamis
Very little substance in his posting, looks like coasting scum
Difference being you encouraging people to join you on moz while showing pessimism towards the Hawk wagon.In post 155, Antihuman wrote:I'd still prefer people switched onto mozamis for now.
Was there any suspicions towards BBT prior to him voting/pushing you? I don't recall from the ISO I did on you.In post 520, Hawk wrote:I'm literally at work trying to form a reads list and responded to all your call outs for early game shit. Lynch me if you want but when I flip green you'll be no closer to winning if you really are town. Which I don't think you are.In post 519, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:I like to push hard when I think I'm right.
The fact that Hawk mostly just responded talking about theory makes me feel even more confident that Hawk is scum.
Nothing definitive. That answer sucks I know. I liked your early posting. I think some of the posts the last day or so around the Hawk debate had me doubting you. I'm second guessing that read on you. If Hawk or Ali wasn't going to happen I don't think I'd vote you over one of the less involved players.In post 573, boring wrote:P-edit: Fitz, Can you explain why I'm in your highest suspect list? This is the first I've heard from you having anything at all to do with me, iirc. If you can't get Hawk or Alisae today, would you vote for me?
^ this.In post 642, -Grey- wrote:BBT is L-2.In post 641, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:Where is the mod? We need a VC!
I was already voting him when I "hammered".
I'm not a fan of so much whining and talk about giving up. If you're really giving up you should have hammered yourself or you should replace out. Regardless of your alignment. To come in guns blazing and so full of yourself only to be crushed by pressure is really pathetic.In post 653, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Please hammer me to prove so many people wrong.
The thing is....there's other players I'd rather see lynched. Replace out if you're such a quitter. Otherwise contribute to your wincon.In post 671, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Put your votes where your mouths are.
CMM...why aren't you participating in the game?In post 666, ConManMick wrote:Having played with BBT before I can see this reaction coming from him as town
You're not in a "shitty position." You're just being an immature ass. Are you 13?In post 689, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:I'm not being replaced. I'm not putting anyone else in this shitty position.
Objections to what...hammering BBT? Isn't he at like L-2 or 3? Aside from his whiny ass quitting attitude what's to object to?In post 715, ConManMick wrote:Righto. If anyone has any objections, speak now or forever hold your peace. I'll give it an hour so y'all can see.
I see no townslip.In post 777, Alisae wrote:Did Con townslip or was that fake?
Before the mod posted. NAI imo.