Open 668 - Diffusion of Power [Game Over]


User avatar
KTthecreeper
KTthecreeper
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
KTthecreeper
Goon
Goon
Posts: 393
Joined: August 22, 2015
Location: somewhere under the rainbow

Post Post #8 (isolation #0) » Thu Jan 19, 2017 4:32 pm

Post by KTthecreeper »

In post 7, DiamondSentinel wrote:Also, I've done some analyzing of the 5 previous games listed. The ultimate difference between the town win and the scum wins is the trust the town had.

As such, I propose that, once a cop gains a result, they immediately reveal. In all 5 games, not a single kill was blocked, so there's no reason to beat around the bush with that. Therefore, we should just be completely open about what happens.
I agree

also the last time I did this a MG claimed he was a daycop with scum result on me and I got lynched so if that happens again I'll probably quit mafia

also RVS

I'll do a RVS vote next post
User avatar
KTthecreeper
KTthecreeper
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
KTthecreeper
Goon
Goon
Posts: 393
Joined: August 22, 2015
Location: somewhere under the rainbow

Post Post #9 (isolation #1) » Thu Jan 19, 2017 4:37 pm

Post by KTthecreeper »

VOTE: texcat I recognize the name so that means scum
User avatar
KTthecreeper
KTthecreeper
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
KTthecreeper
Goon
Goon
Posts: 393
Joined: August 22, 2015
Location: somewhere under the rainbow

Post Post #11 (isolation #2) » Thu Jan 19, 2017 4:42 pm

Post by KTthecreeper »

In post 10, DiamondSentinel wrote:
In post 8, KTthecreeper wrote:
In post 7, DiamondSentinel wrote:Also, I've done some analyzing of the 5 previous games listed. The ultimate difference between the town win and the scum wins is the trust the town had.

As such, I propose that, once a cop gains a result, they immediately reveal. In all 5 games, not a single kill was blocked, so there's no reason to beat around the bush with that. Therefore, we should just be completely open about what happens.
I agree

also the last time I did this a MG claimed he was a daycop with scum result on me and I got lynched so if that happens again I'll probably quit mafia

also RVS

I'll do a RVS vote next post
No daycops, so don't worry about that.
the problem was it was this setup and I said he obviously scum since he fakeclaimed a role that wasn't on the list

then they lynched me for "scummy reaction"

I stopped playing on this site for a while after that

but on to the topic

we need more than 3 people to post to have stuff to talk about ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
User avatar
KTthecreeper
KTthecreeper
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
KTthecreeper
Goon
Goon
Posts: 393
Joined: August 22, 2015
Location: somewhere under the rainbow

Post Post #21 (isolation #3) » Thu Jan 19, 2017 6:44 pm

Post by KTthecreeper »

In post 18, Subutai wrote:
In post 7, DiamondSentinel wrote:Also, I've done some analyzing of the 5 previous games listed. The ultimate difference between the town win and the scum wins is the trust the town had.

As such, I propose that, once a cop gains a result, they immediately reveal. In all 5 games, not a single kill was blocked, so there's no reason to beat around the bush with that. Therefore, we should just be completely open about what happens.
I think this is the optimal strategy here. Once a cop gets a result, he should out that result and should give us two confirmed townies (the cop + the person he copped).

I wonder if the best strategy here is to no lynch and play follow the cop. Does that work in this set up?
The problem is then we have scum fakeclaiming as cop with results
User avatar
KTthecreeper
KTthecreeper
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
KTthecreeper
Goon
Goon
Posts: 393
Joined: August 22, 2015
Location: somewhere under the rainbow

Post Post #46 (isolation #4) » Fri Jan 20, 2017 4:19 am

Post by KTthecreeper »

In post 44, Persivul wrote:Because, being
obvious
, scum can point it out just as easily as town.
I was about to point that out but I seem to have been beatan to the punch

Any faction could have done what I did all I did was say if you have a result go out and say it but scum can also fakeclaim so don't 100% automatically believe it

I still don't have any reads other then a slight town read on diamond but that'll change once he gets replaced

So I don't know anything or have any thoights other than that guy who said claim any result you have is wrong
User avatar
KTthecreeper
KTthecreeper
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
KTthecreeper
Goon
Goon
Posts: 393
Joined: August 22, 2015
Location: somewhere under the rainbow

Post Post #50 (isolation #5) » Fri Jan 20, 2017 4:28 am

Post by KTthecreeper »

In post 47, Persivul wrote:
In post 39, DiamondSentinel wrote:Yeah. I'm leaving the site. I told myself I would after I got done modding my game, and then I got caught up in a cross-replacement, which I shouldn't have agreed to.

Sorry about that.
You don't need to be sorry about that. I leave the site for a few months at times. The game's fun but it's really not great for mental health.

Posting in a game after you've requested replacement -
that
you should be sorry for.
I dont play mafia here very often since it takes alot out of you.

But Diamond have fun whereever you're going or whatever you're doing.
User avatar
KTthecreeper
KTthecreeper
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
KTthecreeper
Goon
Goon
Posts: 393
Joined: August 22, 2015
Location: somewhere under the rainbow

Post Post #51 (isolation #6) » Fri Jan 20, 2017 4:29 am

Post by KTthecreeper »

In post 48, Creature wrote:Oh right, at least KT doesn't stand for KainTepes.
In post 49, Persivul wrote:
In post 48, Creature wrote:Oh right, at least KT doesn't stand for KainTepes.
Snap, I was just about to say that.
I was in a game with KainTepes and that was one of the most confusing times of my life
User avatar
KTthecreeper
KTthecreeper
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
KTthecreeper
Goon
Goon
Posts: 393
Joined: August 22, 2015
Location: somewhere under the rainbow

Post Post #53 (isolation #7) » Fri Jan 20, 2017 5:01 am

Post by KTthecreeper »

In post 52, chilledtea wrote:I want to say something about the 3 votes on me, but really I can't say anything. I mean it is obv rvs wagon don't know what reaction I am supposed to give.
A reaction that is "OMG SCUM"
User avatar
KTthecreeper
KTthecreeper
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
KTthecreeper
Goon
Goon
Posts: 393
Joined: August 22, 2015
Location: somewhere under the rainbow

Post Post #56 (isolation #8) » Fri Jan 20, 2017 6:42 am

Post by KTthecreeper »

In post 54, chilledtea wrote:
In post 53, KTthecreeper wrote:
In post 52, chilledtea wrote:I want to say something about the 3 votes on me, but really I can't say anything. I mean it is obv rvs wagon don't know what reaction I am supposed to give.
A reaction that is "OMG SCUM"
Absolutely. At least 2 people on my wagon are scum, if not all three.
That seems like a stretch.

That would seem like an incredibly stupid thing for scum to do within 12 hours of day start

maybe one of the people bandwagoning so ill look too Netcha and Creature as poetical targets i'm not saying that trans is town but I think the people who jumped on the bandwagon are more likely scum .

its also really early so I need more proof before I can vote but these are my opinions as of now
User avatar
KTthecreeper
KTthecreeper
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
KTthecreeper
Goon
Goon
Posts: 393
Joined: August 22, 2015
Location: somewhere under the rainbow

Post Post #58 (isolation #9) » Fri Jan 20, 2017 6:52 am

Post by KTthecreeper »

In post 57, Creature wrote:Btw, town and scum are different things.
What is the point of pointing this out?
User avatar
KTthecreeper
KTthecreeper
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
KTthecreeper
Goon
Goon
Posts: 393
Joined: August 22, 2015
Location: somewhere under the rainbow

Post Post #61 (isolation #10) » Fri Jan 20, 2017 7:01 am

Post by KTthecreeper »

In post 59, Creature wrote:Because 54.
well its easier to quote the post you're referring too and give a bigger explanation. It was already pointed out that post 54 was a stretch but I do think as the game evolves the 3 people on that wagon are something to look into since it was quickly started and one of them could easily be scum.
User avatar
KTthecreeper
KTthecreeper
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
KTthecreeper
Goon
Goon
Posts: 393
Joined: August 22, 2015
Location: somewhere under the rainbow

Post Post #65 (isolation #11) » Fri Jan 20, 2017 7:04 am

Post by KTthecreeper »

In post 63, chilledtea wrote:I thought kt was joking with his "OMG SCUM" reaction post.
you asked what kind of reaction they were trying to get from you and I said they were trying to get you to say something that will get a lynch on you

which is why I believe theres atleast one scum on that wagon at this point
User avatar
KTthecreeper
KTthecreeper
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
KTthecreeper
Goon
Goon
Posts: 393
Joined: August 22, 2015
Location: somewhere under the rainbow

Post Post #67 (isolation #12) » Fri Jan 20, 2017 7:09 am

Post by KTthecreeper »

In post 66, Creature wrote:Calm down, not all three-players wagons must have one scum in it.
But if you look at it doesn't it make sense?

it started as an RVS vote that people flocked too for no other reason then to flock to it and the people who flocked too it have put little to no effort into the game so far so why isn't there a scum on that wagon? Right now this is all I have to go off of so I wanna push it and see where it leads us. For now VOTE: Trans he started the wagon and all of his post have been less than a sentence long and have been pointing out the obvious.
User avatar
KTthecreeper
KTthecreeper
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
KTthecreeper
Goon
Goon
Posts: 393
Joined: August 22, 2015
Location: somewhere under the rainbow

Post Post #69 (isolation #13) » Fri Jan 20, 2017 7:20 am

Post by KTthecreeper »

In post 68, Creature wrote:How a joke wagon points towards at least one scum being in it?
I've already made all my points. You can go reread my other post this page then you'll see my reasoning.

I'm also waiting for others to come on so more can happen so I'm trying to make something of the little we have.
User avatar
KTthecreeper
KTthecreeper
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
KTthecreeper
Goon
Goon
Posts: 393
Joined: August 22, 2015
Location: somewhere under the rainbow

Post Post #79 (isolation #14) » Fri Jan 20, 2017 9:39 am

Post by KTthecreeper »

In post 78, Transcend wrote:Fos KT

Happy with vote
Could you give a little reasoning behind your thoughts instead of giving us vague and confusing post
User avatar
KTthecreeper
KTthecreeper
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
KTthecreeper
Goon
Goon
Posts: 393
Joined: August 22, 2015
Location: somewhere under the rainbow

Post Post #82 (isolation #15) » Fri Jan 20, 2017 1:17 pm

Post by KTthecreeper »

In post 80, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:
In post 67, KTthecreeper wrote:
In post 66, Creature wrote:Calm down, not all three-players wagons must have one scum in it.
But if you look at it doesn't it make sense?

it started as an RVS vote that people flocked too for no other reason then to flock to it and the people who flocked too it have put little to no effort into the game so far so why isn't there a scum on that wagon? Right now this is all I have to go off of so I wanna push it and see where it leads us. For now VOTE: Trans he started the wagon and all of his post have been less than a sentence long and have been pointing out the obvious.
I don't see how this wagon points to Transcend for you and not necta or creature
If you look at his ISO you see hes done little to nothing in relevancy and his post are small vague and confusing.
User avatar
KTthecreeper
KTthecreeper
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
KTthecreeper
Goon
Goon
Posts: 393
Joined: August 22, 2015
Location: somewhere under the rainbow

Post Post #84 (isolation #16) » Fri Jan 20, 2017 4:10 pm

Post by KTthecreeper »

In post 83, texcat wrote:
In post 82, KTthecreeper wrote: If you look at his ISO you see hes done little to nothing in relevancy and his post are small vague and confusing.
I think you could say that of any ISO at this point.
But hes also posted 10 times

All of those times have given 0 good information
User avatar
KTthecreeper
KTthecreeper
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
KTthecreeper
Goon
Goon
Posts: 393
Joined: August 22, 2015
Location: somewhere under the rainbow

Post Post #129 (isolation #17) » Sat Jan 21, 2017 5:57 am

Post by KTthecreeper »

In post 14, Transcend wrote:1. I tr Diamond

2. I'm not lynching Kyouko today even if he scum slips

3. I'm flipping a coin. Heads means i tell the truth about my role, tails means i lie.

Doc.

4. VOTE: Creature
Solid first post sees us his first townread *I didn't know tr ment town read till later thought* said he won't lynch Kyouko I'm not sure why but lets roll with it and he said he's flipping a coin on what role hes gonan claim. Now that's a really strange thing to do D1 but I'll go back to that
In post 15, Transcend wrote:
In post 7, DiamondSentinel wrote:Also, I've done some analyzing of the 5 previous games listed. The ultimate difference between the town win and the scum wins is the trust the town had.

As such, I propose that, once a cop gains a result, they immediately reveal. In all 5 games, not a single kill was blocked, so there's no reason to beat around the bush with that. Therefore, we should just be completely open about what happens.

Ranger saved MURDERCAT in the previous DoP i played, hosted by davesaz.
tells us what doc did last game which is nice.
he refused the cop claim right away idea.
In post 22, Transcend wrote:tr sub

leantown kyouko
hes telling us his reads. but why would he A. read this early and B not use complete sentences/explain it
In post 27, Transcend wrote:VOTE: chilledtea
RVS vote
In post 32, Transcend wrote:are you talking about my snap reads?
talking to someone without quoting so its hard to understand what he's saying
In post 36, Transcend wrote:tr creature
another useless town read post. With all these I think its him trying to post and look active but is only giving us irrelevant fluff
In post 38, Transcend wrote:i already like it
another post he didn't quote so I don't have a context to put it in
In post 45, Transcend wrote:Tr texcat
another town read with no explanation
In post 78, Transcend wrote:Fos KT

Happy with vote
A scum read with no explanation and said he was happy I voted for him?
In post 85, Transcend wrote:VOTE: KT
Ok this is where I deiced I wasn't gonna say anything and you it sink into everyone else but you ignored it.


I pushed him most of the game this point and he only responded with vague scumreads and townreads on others
Then he naked votes me. He naked voted the person pushing him all game

IF you don't know what a naked vote is, it's a vote with 0 explanation which is this situation is a scumtell.

but let's go over the rest of the post shall we?
In post 95, Transcend wrote:Yeah

Okay

Kt is just annoying

Notsci is my hardest tr this game

VOTE: chilledtea
so he said Okay to something he called me just annoying which again is A. discrediting me and B. avoiding my points and concerns, another scum tell
In post 97, Transcend wrote:Anyone else think ct and pep is scum theatre lol
He's saying that ChilledTea and pep is scum 5 pages in

I have no words you can think of this yourself
In post 99, Transcend wrote:Why do you care if you look pro-town or not
I'll give him credit where its due this is actually a good point that I agree with.
In post 101, Transcend wrote:So if the 3 votes on you were questionable do you think there was scum there
he asked ChilledTea if he thinks his RVS wagon holds scum another decent post
In post 103, Transcend wrote:
In post 28, Necta wrote:Hello everybody, new player here. I hope we have a fun game.

VOTE: chilledtea
I prefer Icetea
This post is not alignment indicative and the only post in necta's iso. I refuse to believe this gives you a scum lean.
He called out Necta for scum leaning someone when they've only made 1 post.

I like it
In post 112, Transcend wrote:lack of participation is not a scumtell, especially from a newbie.

come on ct i don't want to confbias you because i respect you quite a bit, but you're not being reasonable here at all.
In post 119, Transcend wrote:tr necta
In post 121, Transcend wrote:
{notscience}

{Creature, Necta, Sub}

{texcat}

{ara, Persivul, ssbm}

{KT}

{Blawb, Pepch}

{chilled}
a reads list

- the actually reasons just his reads.

I like the idea of a reads list but you gotta give reasoning come on.
In post 120, Transcend wrote:p sure chilledtea lollynch was all town and scum resisted it due to not wanting to bus
hes pushing CT with vague confusing post

I have trouble understanding what this means
In post 122, Transcend wrote:oh yeah, i have an unannounced scumread on blawb

he's scummy
So you have a scum read on someone. Didn't tell anyone
and your reasoning is "he's scummy" I'm done.


In conclusion I think Trans is someone we should invest N1 whoever the N1 cop is and lynch if we have no one better

to put my read on him in MafiaScum terms Hand of Suspicion

I have to go to a swim meet fro the next 5-6 hours later guys
User avatar
KTthecreeper
KTthecreeper
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
KTthecreeper
Goon
Goon
Posts: 393
Joined: August 22, 2015
Location: somewhere under the rainbow

Post Post #142 (isolation #18) » Sat Jan 21, 2017 12:33 pm

Post by KTthecreeper »

I spend 30 minutes doing an ISO analysis giving my thoughts on a player and i get called a newb and scum


I'mhonestly done
User avatar
KTthecreeper
KTthecreeper
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
KTthecreeper
Goon
Goon
Posts: 393
Joined: August 22, 2015
Location: somewhere under the rainbow

Post Post #148 (isolation #19) » Sat Jan 21, 2017 3:29 pm

Post by KTthecreeper »

In post 143, texcat wrote:
In post 82, KTthecreeper wrote: If you look at his ISO you see hes done little to nothing in relevancy and his post are small vague and confusing.
First you say that his posts are mostly irrelevant, then you spend a wall analyzing them? Why bother analyzing posts that are irrelevant?
There's nothing else to do right now so I'm analyzing a scum read

Even if it isn't much its something.

I've just been trying to move the game along so far
User avatar
KTthecreeper
KTthecreeper
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
KTthecreeper
Goon
Goon
Posts: 393
Joined: August 22, 2015
Location: somewhere under the rainbow

Post Post #169 (isolation #20) » Sun Jan 22, 2017 4:15 am

Post by KTthecreeper »

In post 165, Persivul wrote:
In post 156, Transcend wrote:im not that good at reading rvs
If you recognize that, why were you making reads during rvs?
I'm in no means a newb I have no idea why I give you newb vibes...
User avatar
KTthecreeper
KTthecreeper
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
KTthecreeper
Goon
Goon
Posts: 393
Joined: August 22, 2015
Location: somewhere under the rainbow

Post Post #178 (isolation #21) » Sun Jan 22, 2017 8:43 am

Post by KTthecreeper »

In post 177, aronagrundy wrote:Yeah I still don't really like pep's content since I voted him (he doesn't really say anything original in any posts that are substantive), but I like the blawb wagon that's forming. I still think KT is town and probably an easy target for scum. I also don't feel like his townread on transcend is genuine, and he's only saying that because he's voting for kt. I would think it should be the other way around (tr transcend, therefore kt is scum). Post 140 also is basically justification for a terrible case I don't have a problem bringing him to L-2.

texcat is also going after kt, but her iso seems like her tunnel is genuine. Seems to have a natural progression from questioning kt to voting him.

VOTE: blawb
I never said trans is a townread I said N1 cop should invest him


Also I don't understnad the blawb wagon very much.

I understand he's said scummish stuff but I don't think its to the extend that he should be at L-2 *which he is* so I don't think people should vote him until we get more evidence.

Now people are gonna be calling me for protecting a scumbuddie but I'm not im just asking what the motivation is to vote him
User avatar
KTthecreeper
KTthecreeper
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
KTthecreeper
Goon
Goon
Posts: 393
Joined: August 22, 2015
Location: somewhere under the rainbow

Post Post #181 (isolation #22) » Sun Jan 22, 2017 9:01 am

Post by KTthecreeper »

In post 179, Blawb wrote:I'm not a huge fan of the reasoning (or lack of reasoning) for the votes on me, but there's nothing I can do to change that. Most people are judging others based on context of their posts instead of tone or reasoning behind them. I'll claim at L-1, but all I'll say is that I want you guys to take a deeper look at Persivul and Necta.

Creature, you made a comment about this being the scum!Blawb you know. If it makes any difference, this is a different person behind this account than the last guy. Brandon, for reference. If you go back to the scum thread of that game, you'll see an accurate description of my play. Just making sure I'm not being meta-voted.

Persivul and Necta, folks.

Oh, and before I was about to post this, I saw KT's post. Yeah, he's scum. Trying to look like he was against the wagon because he knows I'm scum and it'll make him look decent when I'm dead. Rookie move.
I haven't acknallaged your existance since that post.

And I was asking why people were lynching you since it seemed like alot over not much.

But thisis mafiascum mafia I can say something that may or may not be scum but I get lynched for it.

What ever
User avatar
KTthecreeper
KTthecreeper
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
KTthecreeper
Goon
Goon
Posts: 393
Joined: August 22, 2015
Location: somewhere under the rainbow

Post Post #198 (isolation #23) » Sun Jan 22, 2017 3:59 pm

Post by KTthecreeper »

In post 191, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:Feels like all my games are inactive, I think it's the weekend doing it

Creature, why were you on blawb? I didn't notice
aron, what did you like about the blawb wagon?
In post 11, KTthecreeper wrote:I stopped playing on this site for a while after that
When you stopped playing on this site did you continue playing elsewhere? If so, was it forum, chat, video, or face to face mafia?
I play on a different site

But its also rolemaddness games with teenagers which is much different than this

Return to “Completed Open Games”