He's just not worth keeping alive.
Mini 665: Day 1 - Abandoned
-
-
Rage Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 538
- Joined: April 1, 2008
-
-
Rage Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 538
- Joined: April 1, 2008
-
-
Rage Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 538
- Joined: April 1, 2008
-
-
Rage Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 538
- Joined: April 1, 2008
-
-
Rage Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 538
- Joined: April 1, 2008
You're not even addressing Y.C.'s case that you and thegeckoj seem to be teaming up on fisherofmen, and instead deflect that attention onto afatchic, with reasoning very close to what's against you. For this, you earn mygeorgi wrote:
hardly a bandwagon with just two votes for a decidedly suspicious suggestion (fisherofmen calling for a mass role reveal)...afatchic wrote:Y.C i also agree with you, however i was going to see if anyone else jumped on the bandwagon and just get them all together. kinda like just playing it like we don't care and let the scum hang themselves.
what is equally suspicious though is the way you, afatchic, seem to be cuddling-up to Y.C
FOS afatchickFoS, accompanied with my thumb.
Then, you upgrade your suspicion by referring to a post where afatchic stops someone for giving fisherofmen wiggle room, and might I add, before fisherofmen posts. This isn't a strong reason for your FoS, you've only said you think he's deflecting suspicion, but most of afatchic's recent posts contain support against fisherofmen.
In short, I don't think afatchic is buddying with Y.C. and I think georgi is scum because not only is he not addressing the suspicion on him, he is falsely deflecting onto one of his attackers. The reason why I'm not voting for georgi now is because I want to hear from fisherofmen.
On that note, I'm taking my random vote off of chazworthington, but I still want him to address this:
Rage wrote:
That's not what I said..chazworthington wrote:Rage wrote:Vote chazworthington
He's just not worth keeping alive.Unvote, Vote: Ragefor thinking I'm not worth as much as I cuold have saved on my car insurance by switching.UnvoteI'm a rageaholic! I just can't live without rageahol!-
-
Rage Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 538
- Joined: April 1, 2008
The first quote of mine was a random vote, but then you voted for me in return, misrepresenting my reasoning to vote for me. Or, rather, misinterpreting.chazworthington wrote:
What's to address? I assumed your comment was part of your persona, and made a joke vote in return.Rage wrote:On that note, I'm taking my random vote off of chazworthington, but I still want him to address this:
Rage wrote:
That's not what I said..chazworthington wrote:Rage wrote:Vote chazworthington
He's just not worth keeping alive.Unvote, Vote: Ragefor thinking I'm not worth as much as I cuold have saved on my car insurance by switching.Unvote
It's no big deal, really, but I just don't like obvious misrepresentation. Moving on..
Wonderful, way to influence the scum's (possible) night-kill decision. Based on the reactions you've received, the players against it are either scum or power-roles, or smart townies. Essentially, we are where we were before, but with players' opinions on mass-claim early in the game. What exactly were you trying to accomplish with this?fisherofmen wrote:Ok I'm back,
First: I was using the idea of a mass-claim to see how people would react, and to get the game out of the random stage.
Second: My scumhunting looks like newbie/scum moves when really they are pure genus as I just got a page of good reading out of one sentence.
Third:I don't think that mass-claims are a good idea at all until lylo.
Um if I missed anything let me know.
Also, where do you stand on the current suspicions, other than yourself?I'm a rageaholic! I just can't live without rageahol!-
-
Rage Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 538
- Joined: April 1, 2008
Quality > Quantitythegeckoj wrote:
i was just saying information is to the towns benefit. posting usually brings about information. since afatchic is posting the most he is contributing the most information at this point.Jenethron wrote:thegrekoj -- why do you think that afatchic is the most pro-town player?
I'm thinking that afatchic is much less scummier than georgi. Georgi has backed off two cases on afatchic now, and they were not proved wrong by just afatchic, they were proven wrong by a lot of the town (I assume a mix of pro and anti-town aligned players, but as of right now nothing is certain). Afatchic, on the other hand, is defending himself from these faulty accusations
Therefore, georgi earns my vote, but I'd prefer a mod's vote count before I place it... 1) because I want to know where everyone's else is and I think page 5 is a good place to have one, 2) I forget where my vote is.
*hint hint*I'm a rageaholic! I just can't live without rageahol!-
-
Rage Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 538
- Joined: April 1, 2008
-
-
Rage Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 538
- Joined: April 1, 2008
-
-
Rage Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 538
- Joined: April 1, 2008
Found it yet? I'd really like to know in order to improve my play as a power role. Honestly, I thought I was a little too quiet, and popping up irregularly, but I guess that comes with being a pro-town power role.afatchic wrote:
after one of your posts i thought you was either PR or scum, but wasn't sure. ill try to go back and find them when i get a chance.Rage wrote:Doctor, damnit!I'm a rageaholic! I just can't live without rageahol!
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.